300 lines
15 KiB
Plaintext
300 lines
15 KiB
Plaintext
Numb: 1
|
||
Subj: Basic Telecom
|
||
From: THE VIDEOSMITH
|
||
Date: Thu May 09 1985
|
||
|
||
To all would-be students, and interested passer-by's,
|
||
|
||
This is Phreak Klass[room] 2600. A board dedicated to the teaching of the arts
|
||
of BelTel and System Hacking. My name is The Videosmith, and I am not the
|
||
greatest Phreak that ever lived... nor am I the best Hacker that has ever
|
||
lived; I'll let you know now that I am not the ultimate in the credit card
|
||
fraud industry. BUT: I know enough about all the catagories mentioned above
|
||
to be able to teach others what I know [trust me, I DO know something, I'm just
|
||
not the best- basically because there is no 'best'... there are
|
||
specialties...].
|
||
|
||
You are one of the following:
|
||
|
||
1) A 'loser' (define as you will) who has dragged himself off the streets and
|
||
would like to educate himself so that people don't [can't] pick on him who are
|
||
better phreaks. Now, I don't mind it if you are learning here just to get a
|
||
little knowledge, but you won't go far. There MUST be dedicatation.
|
||
|
||
2) You know SOMETHING, but not enough to call yourself a phreak, and would like
|
||
to learn more.
|
||
|
||
3) You know more than the average codew user, but would like to learn more
|
||
about phreaking and hacking [hacking especially].
|
||
|
||
4) You are NOT a phreak or hacker, but would like to be one.
|
||
|
||
5) You are a friend/observer of mine who wants to see what the hell I'm doing
|
||
teaching non-phreaks on a BBS called Phreak Klass 2600.
|
||
|
||
All of the above are welcomed, but as I stated in #1, you must have a certain
|
||
ammount of dedication to the Klass... I will know who will make it to High
|
||
Phreak and who will stop calling after a while by the 5th msg you post...
|
||
|
||
NO CODES/PASSWORDS NOR ANYTHING THAT IS *ACTUAL* INFORMATION IS TO BE POSTED ON
|
||
THIS BOARD. I will be teaching HOW to get this info, but you are the ones
|
||
who will actually be getting the info and using it.
|
||
|
||
---------------------------------------
|
||
Now, this board will begin with basic questions on how the board will be run,
|
||
and if some of you have questions on BASIC TELECOM [Meaning simple Bell info
|
||
and the like], feel free to ask/post them. 'Tis all for now...
|
||
|
||
Videosmith.
|
||
|
||
Numb: 4
|
||
Subj: Answers.
|
||
From: THE VIDEOSMITH
|
||
Date: Mon May 13 1985
|
||
|
||
Alright. I was gone overnight, and this is what happens. Here are some
|
||
answers, and RE-answers (after some clumsy or un-intelligable previous
|
||
answers)....
|
||
---------------------------------------
|
||
LATA Explained. Well, there have been 2 or more msgs explaining what LATA
|
||
STANDS for, but not what it is... LATA is a regionalized [section] of the
|
||
telephone network, which is defined by who owns that 'region' in terms of the
|
||
different companies after the Bell break-up. At this moment, I'm making an
|
||
intra-LATA call on the BOC intra- LATA network. Now, anytime you make a call
|
||
WITHIN your 'region' or LATA, you are making an intRA-LATA call, opposed to an
|
||
intER-LATA call... if I made a long distance call (OR a call out of my LATA),
|
||
I would be making an inter- LATA call: I am calling a LATA other than within
|
||
my own. LATA defines the region/ownership [billing] of the Bell network you
|
||
are on. That's all that I need to go into for a Basic board... it was not a
|
||
basic question: Because now you have the question of Intra- LATA signalling
|
||
(Blue Boxing, etc...).
|
||
---------------------------------------
|
||
ISC? The only thing that that MIGHT be corresponding to (although I am inform-
|
||
ed that it is an OLD term), is Inter or Intra-State Calling... this is now
|
||
referred to as LATA, if this is in ac- tuality what ISC stands for...
|
||
---------------------------------------
|
||
As The Duke stated, TRW is a credit information bureau which hold credit
|
||
information on millions of people all over the country. TRW computers, which
|
||
hold this credit information, have become the target of many a hacker. With a
|
||
TRW account, you can receive credit information (card #'s included, obviously)
|
||
on any one who uses a bank or such an institution that uses TRW for credit
|
||
checking. TRW is not always the best way to get cards for CC Fraud, because
|
||
often the cards found on TRW are on TRW because they have had some bad credit
|
||
history. Now, The Duke has written a file on Carding. The first and only time
|
||
I got to look at it, it had several errors/problems with it... I assume he has
|
||
corrected his file, and if so- it will be on the board when you pass the course
|
||
on BASIC Tele... enough on TRW...
|
||
---------------------------------------
|
||
COSMOS is for the Advanced Telecomm- unications board.... but I'll give a
|
||
general run-down on what COSMOS is and what it is used for. COSMOS, a computer
|
||
built by Bell Laboratories [based in Massachusettes], is a computer which
|
||
handles Residential/Busniess customer telephone information (numbers, names,
|
||
address and such), and is used to put orders thru on such customers. It is
|
||
used to process the 'goings-on' which occur in the particular region that the
|
||
certain COSMOS serves (Disconnections, changes, Non-pubs, 3-way, Billing, and
|
||
such... that does not mean that you can always find Non-pub numbers on COSMOS,
|
||
but when a customer requests NON-pub, it goes thru a COSMOS 1st). COSMOS' OS
|
||
is called COSNIX. COSNIX is similar to UNIX (Also produced by Bell Labs), in
|
||
which both are -- EXTREMELY un-user friendly... although with a good set of
|
||
manuals (or GFiles) you can probably inch your way around COSMOS if you have
|
||
never been on a COSMOS system before... COSMOS, as I said, is a 'hacked'
|
||
computer, in which case it belongs on B3... so that's all on COSMOS for now...
|
||
--------------------------------------
|
||
At the present time, ALL extenders are safe, as long as you don't say YOUR name
|
||
and/or number on the telephone while youare making an illegal call... Taps
|
||
seem to be coming from no-where these days. Metro is safe, MCI is safe, Sprint
|
||
is safe... they're all safe. The most that can happen (if you are careful
|
||
about what you say on the connection) is that the LDX will call the # you
|
||
called and ask snooping questions, or worse: THEY'LL KILL THE CODE (Ahhh! My
|
||
lasty METRO!). The only extenders I wouldn't use right now are 950, because -
|
||
Yes, your # IS recorded by a CAMA office (DON'T ask, Centralized Automatic
|
||
Message Accounting... used for billing on calls), although the LDX's have not
|
||
yet found a way to get these numbers from the CAMA Toll Office and use them for
|
||
billing (But who knows when they WILL, stay away from 'em if possible), it's
|
||
always possible. I'll explain about the future of extender usage at a later
|
||
date. One last comment on Extenders... to be safe, don't use the main number
|
||
in a hunt-sequential rotary group (i.e., a group of numbers set up at the local
|
||
switching office so that when you call the main number (i.e. the first #), it
|
||
will place you in a non-busy num- ber slot in a group of numbers set up for
|
||
that certain extender company... that's why you almost never get a busy signal
|
||
when calling the first number in a rotary group). Use one of the #'s further
|
||
into the rotary group... let's say the main number for Metro is 351- 0100 (it
|
||
is in 215)... call 351-0101, 0102,0103,0104, etc, because if they WERE to use
|
||
ANI on any number, it would be the main/first number in the rotary group.
|
||
---------------------------------------
|
||
note: ANI- Automatic Number Ident.
|
||
---------------------------------------
|
||
Trunks are 'lines' which connect CO's, or "Central Offices"... every switch is
|
||
a "CO", therefore from every echange to every other exchange, you have a Trunk
|
||
or Tandem or Tandon (same and alike) connected every switch to each other.
|
||
This makes it possible for a person on a certain switch to speak to a person on
|
||
a different switch:
|
||
|
||
You ----- Your CO ---- Trunk -----
|
||
!
|
||
Friend<-- Friends CO - Trunk -----
|
||
|
||
That's BASIC, as to apply to the level of this board. There is more involved
|
||
depending on the call you are making, but that's the basic diagram Blue Boxing
|
||
will be handled once you reach the fourth and last board, High Phreak. Until
|
||
then, Basic questions on Multi-Frequency signalling, please.
|
||
---------------------------------------
|
||
You need a base which to build upon...
|
||
---------------------------------------
|
||
PIN Registers. There must have been a msg which de-abbreviated P.I.N... (ha).
|
||
PIN's are used to detect AND record any and all Bell recognizable tones issuing
|
||
forth from the number on which those tones are being used. This includes DTMF
|
||
(Dual Tone Multo-Frequency), and MF (Multi-Frequency) tones... meaning
|
||
touch-tone and blue boxes (simplifica- tion). PIN Registors also pick up any
|
||
pulse dialing and translate the pulses into digits and records them... so
|
||
those of you with rotary fones, GOTCHA. PIN registors are not used like water
|
||
-- they are used only for highly sus pected (and could-be convicted) Phone
|
||
Phreaks... THERE ARE NO PIN REGISTORS ON ALLIANCE CONFERENCES... Nonononono.
|
||
Alliance records the number prior to any recording device - when you call some
|
||
one into an alliance, you just gave alliance that number - no record- ing
|
||
device needed (they can't do any- thing with the # anyway). Also, PIN's DO NOT
|
||
record the codes used after you dial an extender, so they're pretty use-less
|
||
there... they can detect MF tones (Boxing) on the line, and that's the
|
||
biggy... Ok?
|
||
|
||
AND THEY AREN'T JUST WAITING TO KNOCK IN YOUR WALLS WHEN YOU BOX, IT'S NOT THAT
|
||
DANGEROUS....
|
||
|
||
Although the my outlook on phreaking (as it is done now) is bleak, we still
|
||
have a WAYS to go before phreaking is dead, so stop all this talk about the end
|
||
of phreaking before you've learn- ed what phreaking is really about... and for
|
||
those who think phreaking is JUST a way to make free calls, you're going to
|
||
have a borING time on this BBS... plus I look down on you (HA! So there!).
|
||
No, all joking aside, the art of Phreaking was not designed for free calls for
|
||
the sake of no charge: but phree calls for the sake of know- ing HOW TO...
|
||
and knowing MUCHMUCHMUCH more than that. Free calls is minor compared to other
|
||
phreakly talents used by the 'upper circle' of phreaks. CCIS will take care of
|
||
blue boxing... Equal Access will EVENTUALLY (not for another 5 years) kill
|
||
extenders... and local "tracing" (1995, explained LATER), will kill most
|
||
everything else. But there will always be something... Bell doesn't evolve
|
||
technologically alone (we're HERE). Equal Access will allow the LDC customer
|
||
to dial "1" on his/her DTMF pad, and get the extender instead of AT&T...
|
||
simple. You get a choice of long dist companies... but instead of having to
|
||
dial them up, you tell Bell/AT&T to give "1" access to Sprint instead of the
|
||
usual AT&T.... Ok? Anything else?
|
||
|
||
Videosmith.
|
||
Numb: 10
|
||
Subj: [Continued...]
|
||
From: THE VIDEOSMITH
|
||
Date: Tue May 14 1985
|
||
|
||
If you're going to play 'I-have-all-the -answers', then make sure you have the
|
||
RIGHT ANSWERS. Don't make anything up for anyone's benefit, because it won't
|
||
benefit anyone. Sound good to you? Ok.
|
||
-----Sorry--A tad ticked off-----------
|
||
The reason for the previous statement is this: This and other area codes have
|
||
been plagued with idiots who feel that because they read something in some one
|
||
's message (who they deem 'knowledgable'), they should take it as the gosple,
|
||
and go spread it around... as what happened with 'tracing'... all kinds of
|
||
crap came out of that in this area code... It has been stamped out by myself,
|
||
and later I had the appreciated help of Modem Rider [215]. Assailant, besides
|
||
your mis-information, you basically re-stated what I stated about extender
|
||
usage... I don't need an on- line echo (leave resume, possibly later). All
|
||
has been said that needs to be said at this moment: Assailant, I have no grief
|
||
with you unless you dec- ide to handle this like a loser (which you don't seem
|
||
to have the traits of). You asked if you could take the test, AGAIN: I say
|
||
this- I'll give you the test if you want it that badly... but I'll tell you
|
||
now, it's not easy. You need EXPERIENCE to pass it... but I'll see how much
|
||
certain people know on this board. It'll take you a while be- fore I tests you
|
||
again if you fail to regain testing... I'm not interested in people who jump
|
||
the gun...
|
||
|
||
Videosmith.
|
||
PS - No jokes...
|
||
|
||
Numb: 11
|
||
Subj: Course is here.
|
||
From: THE VIDEOSMITH
|
||
Date: Sat May 18 1985
|
||
|
||
One correction in Red's last message-- Do not answer any questions if you can
|
||
not answer them completely and you KNOW you're correct in your answer.
|
||
---------------------------------------
|
||
The Course: Phreak Klassroom 2600 ...
|
||
---------------------------------Basic-
|
||
|
||
I will now begin the course in Basic
|
||
Tele. We will start out with the basics
|
||
of Basic Tele (sounds good, eh?).
|
||
I entered the phreaking world when we
|
||
were hacking TELTEC, and such 'incred-
|
||
ible' extenders. Legion of Doom, a
|
||
group completely devoted to phreaking &
|
||
hacking, hadn't yet begun (I mention
|
||
this because most of the newer phreaks
|
||
have stepped intoan era where LOD! is
|
||
one of the most dominating groups in
|
||
the country). There wasn't much 'Blue
|
||
Boxing' going on... not too many people
|
||
really KNEW about the Bell Network. The
|
||
big thing was exnteders, and every once
|
||
in a while an 'overseas extender'
|
||
(Which in many cases was actually a PBX
|
||
when the majority of the populous did
|
||
not know much about BelTel and it's
|
||
workings...). Travel Net became very
|
||
popular among the 1-800 extenders, some
|
||
people with rotary fone service could
|
||
use it because it could be voice activ-
|
||
ated. And one of the biggest rumors
|
||
going around was "tracing", and exactly
|
||
how fast it would ta
|
||
[S]can/[Q]uit/[1-16, Last=11] :
|
||
|
||
Numb: 12
|
||
Subj: [cont]
|
||
From: THE VIDEOSMITH
|
||
Date: Sat May 18 1985
|
||
|
||
It may still be now, I'm not sure. I
|
||
suppose I was quite impressionable at
|
||
that time... anyway, it did begin with
|
||
'just' extenders.
|
||
|
||
Extenders:
|
||
----------
|
||
|
||
Basics. Extenders "rent" Out-Wats
|
||
lines (trunks you can out-pulse on...
|
||
unlike an In-Wats, like many 800's).
|
||
They really own their own switching
|
||
equiptment. In otherwords, you use
|
||
your local switch (Central Office)
|
||
to call their switch, and then you
|
||
are routed to what ever number you
|
||
entered after your code. This can make
|
||
for a completely lousy connection, but
|
||
it seems that some extender companies
|
||
have found ways to cut down on line
|
||
noise and make clear'er' connections.
|
||
All extenders use "hunt-sequentially
|
||
rotary groups" (various different
|
||
variations on that name... let's use
|
||
that for practicality). These are
|
||
groups of numbers which have a "lead"
|
||
number. When you dial the "lead" or
|
||
first number of the rotary group (By
|
||
the way, it's called a rotary group
|
||
because in the old X-Bar (Crossbar) &
|
||
SxS (Step-by-Step) equiptment, there
|
||
would actually be a circular device
|
||
which would turn to let you connect w/
|
||
an UN-busy line on the group), you are
|
||
connected with the first open (non-
|
||
busy) line in the group. This insures
|
||
that you don't get a busy signal (most
|
||
of the time), and that you don't have
|
||
to go around and dial 12 numbers before
|
||
you can use the LDX. [cont]
|
||
|
||
[S]can/[Q]uit/[1-16, Last=12] :
|
||
|
||
Numb: 13
|
||
Subj: [cont]
|
||
|