300 lines
15 KiB
Plaintext
300 lines
15 KiB
Plaintext
|
Numb: 1
|
|||
|
Subj: Basic Telecom
|
|||
|
From: THE VIDEOSMITH
|
|||
|
Date: Thu May 09 1985
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
To all would-be students, and interested passer-by's,
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
This is Phreak Klass[room] 2600. A board dedicated to the teaching of the arts
|
|||
|
of BelTel and System Hacking. My name is The Videosmith, and I am not the
|
|||
|
greatest Phreak that ever lived... nor am I the best Hacker that has ever
|
|||
|
lived; I'll let you know now that I am not the ultimate in the credit card
|
|||
|
fraud industry. BUT: I know enough about all the catagories mentioned above
|
|||
|
to be able to teach others what I know [trust me, I DO know something, I'm just
|
|||
|
not the best- basically because there is no 'best'... there are
|
|||
|
specialties...].
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
You are one of the following:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
1) A 'loser' (define as you will) who has dragged himself off the streets and
|
|||
|
would like to educate himself so that people don't [can't] pick on him who are
|
|||
|
better phreaks. Now, I don't mind it if you are learning here just to get a
|
|||
|
little knowledge, but you won't go far. There MUST be dedicatation.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
2) You know SOMETHING, but not enough to call yourself a phreak, and would like
|
|||
|
to learn more.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
3) You know more than the average codew user, but would like to learn more
|
|||
|
about phreaking and hacking [hacking especially].
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
4) You are NOT a phreak or hacker, but would like to be one.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
5) You are a friend/observer of mine who wants to see what the hell I'm doing
|
|||
|
teaching non-phreaks on a BBS called Phreak Klass 2600.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
All of the above are welcomed, but as I stated in #1, you must have a certain
|
|||
|
ammount of dedication to the Klass... I will know who will make it to High
|
|||
|
Phreak and who will stop calling after a while by the 5th msg you post...
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
NO CODES/PASSWORDS NOR ANYTHING THAT IS *ACTUAL* INFORMATION IS TO BE POSTED ON
|
|||
|
THIS BOARD. I will be teaching HOW to get this info, but you are the ones
|
|||
|
who will actually be getting the info and using it.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
---------------------------------------
|
|||
|
Now, this board will begin with basic questions on how the board will be run,
|
|||
|
and if some of you have questions on BASIC TELECOM [Meaning simple Bell info
|
|||
|
and the like], feel free to ask/post them. 'Tis all for now...
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Videosmith.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Numb: 4
|
|||
|
Subj: Answers.
|
|||
|
From: THE VIDEOSMITH
|
|||
|
Date: Mon May 13 1985
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Alright. I was gone overnight, and this is what happens. Here are some
|
|||
|
answers, and RE-answers (after some clumsy or un-intelligable previous
|
|||
|
answers)....
|
|||
|
---------------------------------------
|
|||
|
LATA Explained. Well, there have been 2 or more msgs explaining what LATA
|
|||
|
STANDS for, but not what it is... LATA is a regionalized [section] of the
|
|||
|
telephone network, which is defined by who owns that 'region' in terms of the
|
|||
|
different companies after the Bell break-up. At this moment, I'm making an
|
|||
|
intra-LATA call on the BOC intra- LATA network. Now, anytime you make a call
|
|||
|
WITHIN your 'region' or LATA, you are making an intRA-LATA call, opposed to an
|
|||
|
intER-LATA call... if I made a long distance call (OR a call out of my LATA),
|
|||
|
I would be making an inter- LATA call: I am calling a LATA other than within
|
|||
|
my own. LATA defines the region/ownership [billing] of the Bell network you
|
|||
|
are on. That's all that I need to go into for a Basic board... it was not a
|
|||
|
basic question: Because now you have the question of Intra- LATA signalling
|
|||
|
(Blue Boxing, etc...).
|
|||
|
---------------------------------------
|
|||
|
ISC? The only thing that that MIGHT be corresponding to (although I am inform-
|
|||
|
ed that it is an OLD term), is Inter or Intra-State Calling... this is now
|
|||
|
referred to as LATA, if this is in ac- tuality what ISC stands for...
|
|||
|
---------------------------------------
|
|||
|
As The Duke stated, TRW is a credit information bureau which hold credit
|
|||
|
information on millions of people all over the country. TRW computers, which
|
|||
|
hold this credit information, have become the target of many a hacker. With a
|
|||
|
TRW account, you can receive credit information (card #'s included, obviously)
|
|||
|
on any one who uses a bank or such an institution that uses TRW for credit
|
|||
|
checking. TRW is not always the best way to get cards for CC Fraud, because
|
|||
|
often the cards found on TRW are on TRW because they have had some bad credit
|
|||
|
history. Now, The Duke has written a file on Carding. The first and only time
|
|||
|
I got to look at it, it had several errors/problems with it... I assume he has
|
|||
|
corrected his file, and if so- it will be on the board when you pass the course
|
|||
|
on BASIC Tele... enough on TRW...
|
|||
|
---------------------------------------
|
|||
|
COSMOS is for the Advanced Telecomm- unications board.... but I'll give a
|
|||
|
general run-down on what COSMOS is and what it is used for. COSMOS, a computer
|
|||
|
built by Bell Laboratories [based in Massachusettes], is a computer which
|
|||
|
handles Residential/Busniess customer telephone information (numbers, names,
|
|||
|
address and such), and is used to put orders thru on such customers. It is
|
|||
|
used to process the 'goings-on' which occur in the particular region that the
|
|||
|
certain COSMOS serves (Disconnections, changes, Non-pubs, 3-way, Billing, and
|
|||
|
such... that does not mean that you can always find Non-pub numbers on COSMOS,
|
|||
|
but when a customer requests NON-pub, it goes thru a COSMOS 1st). COSMOS' OS
|
|||
|
is called COSNIX. COSNIX is similar to UNIX (Also produced by Bell Labs), in
|
|||
|
which both are -- EXTREMELY un-user friendly... although with a good set of
|
|||
|
manuals (or GFiles) you can probably inch your way around COSMOS if you have
|
|||
|
never been on a COSMOS system before... COSMOS, as I said, is a 'hacked'
|
|||
|
computer, in which case it belongs on B3... so that's all on COSMOS for now...
|
|||
|
--------------------------------------
|
|||
|
At the present time, ALL extenders are safe, as long as you don't say YOUR name
|
|||
|
and/or number on the telephone while youare making an illegal call... Taps
|
|||
|
seem to be coming from no-where these days. Metro is safe, MCI is safe, Sprint
|
|||
|
is safe... they're all safe. The most that can happen (if you are careful
|
|||
|
about what you say on the connection) is that the LDX will call the # you
|
|||
|
called and ask snooping questions, or worse: THEY'LL KILL THE CODE (Ahhh! My
|
|||
|
lasty METRO!). The only extenders I wouldn't use right now are 950, because -
|
|||
|
Yes, your # IS recorded by a CAMA office (DON'T ask, Centralized Automatic
|
|||
|
Message Accounting... used for billing on calls), although the LDX's have not
|
|||
|
yet found a way to get these numbers from the CAMA Toll Office and use them for
|
|||
|
billing (But who knows when they WILL, stay away from 'em if possible), it's
|
|||
|
always possible. I'll explain about the future of extender usage at a later
|
|||
|
date. One last comment on Extenders... to be safe, don't use the main number
|
|||
|
in a hunt-sequential rotary group (i.e., a group of numbers set up at the local
|
|||
|
switching office so that when you call the main number (i.e. the first #), it
|
|||
|
will place you in a non-busy num- ber slot in a group of numbers set up for
|
|||
|
that certain extender company... that's why you almost never get a busy signal
|
|||
|
when calling the first number in a rotary group). Use one of the #'s further
|
|||
|
into the rotary group... let's say the main number for Metro is 351- 0100 (it
|
|||
|
is in 215)... call 351-0101, 0102,0103,0104, etc, because if they WERE to use
|
|||
|
ANI on any number, it would be the main/first number in the rotary group.
|
|||
|
---------------------------------------
|
|||
|
note: ANI- Automatic Number Ident.
|
|||
|
---------------------------------------
|
|||
|
Trunks are 'lines' which connect CO's, or "Central Offices"... every switch is
|
|||
|
a "CO", therefore from every echange to every other exchange, you have a Trunk
|
|||
|
or Tandem or Tandon (same and alike) connected every switch to each other.
|
|||
|
This makes it possible for a person on a certain switch to speak to a person on
|
|||
|
a different switch:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
You ----- Your CO ---- Trunk -----
|
|||
|
!
|
|||
|
Friend<-- Friends CO - Trunk -----
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
That's BASIC, as to apply to the level of this board. There is more involved
|
|||
|
depending on the call you are making, but that's the basic diagram Blue Boxing
|
|||
|
will be handled once you reach the fourth and last board, High Phreak. Until
|
|||
|
then, Basic questions on Multi-Frequency signalling, please.
|
|||
|
---------------------------------------
|
|||
|
You need a base which to build upon...
|
|||
|
---------------------------------------
|
|||
|
PIN Registers. There must have been a msg which de-abbreviated P.I.N... (ha).
|
|||
|
PIN's are used to detect AND record any and all Bell recognizable tones issuing
|
|||
|
forth from the number on which those tones are being used. This includes DTMF
|
|||
|
(Dual Tone Multo-Frequency), and MF (Multi-Frequency) tones... meaning
|
|||
|
touch-tone and blue boxes (simplifica- tion). PIN Registors also pick up any
|
|||
|
pulse dialing and translate the pulses into digits and records them... so
|
|||
|
those of you with rotary fones, GOTCHA. PIN registors are not used like water
|
|||
|
-- they are used only for highly sus pected (and could-be convicted) Phone
|
|||
|
Phreaks... THERE ARE NO PIN REGISTORS ON ALLIANCE CONFERENCES... Nonononono.
|
|||
|
Alliance records the number prior to any recording device - when you call some
|
|||
|
one into an alliance, you just gave alliance that number - no record- ing
|
|||
|
device needed (they can't do any- thing with the # anyway). Also, PIN's DO NOT
|
|||
|
record the codes used after you dial an extender, so they're pretty use-less
|
|||
|
there... they can detect MF tones (Boxing) on the line, and that's the
|
|||
|
biggy... Ok?
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
AND THEY AREN'T JUST WAITING TO KNOCK IN YOUR WALLS WHEN YOU BOX, IT'S NOT THAT
|
|||
|
DANGEROUS....
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Although the my outlook on phreaking (as it is done now) is bleak, we still
|
|||
|
have a WAYS to go before phreaking is dead, so stop all this talk about the end
|
|||
|
of phreaking before you've learn- ed what phreaking is really about... and for
|
|||
|
those who think phreaking is JUST a way to make free calls, you're going to
|
|||
|
have a borING time on this BBS... plus I look down on you (HA! So there!).
|
|||
|
No, all joking aside, the art of Phreaking was not designed for free calls for
|
|||
|
the sake of no charge: but phree calls for the sake of know- ing HOW TO...
|
|||
|
and knowing MUCHMUCHMUCH more than that. Free calls is minor compared to other
|
|||
|
phreakly talents used by the 'upper circle' of phreaks. CCIS will take care of
|
|||
|
blue boxing... Equal Access will EVENTUALLY (not for another 5 years) kill
|
|||
|
extenders... and local "tracing" (1995, explained LATER), will kill most
|
|||
|
everything else. But there will always be something... Bell doesn't evolve
|
|||
|
technologically alone (we're HERE). Equal Access will allow the LDC customer
|
|||
|
to dial "1" on his/her DTMF pad, and get the extender instead of AT&T...
|
|||
|
simple. You get a choice of long dist companies... but instead of having to
|
|||
|
dial them up, you tell Bell/AT&T to give "1" access to Sprint instead of the
|
|||
|
usual AT&T.... Ok? Anything else?
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Videosmith.
|
|||
|
Numb: 10
|
|||
|
Subj: [Continued...]
|
|||
|
From: THE VIDEOSMITH
|
|||
|
Date: Tue May 14 1985
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
If you're going to play 'I-have-all-the -answers', then make sure you have the
|
|||
|
RIGHT ANSWERS. Don't make anything up for anyone's benefit, because it won't
|
|||
|
benefit anyone. Sound good to you? Ok.
|
|||
|
-----Sorry--A tad ticked off-----------
|
|||
|
The reason for the previous statement is this: This and other area codes have
|
|||
|
been plagued with idiots who feel that because they read something in some one
|
|||
|
's message (who they deem 'knowledgable'), they should take it as the gosple,
|
|||
|
and go spread it around... as what happened with 'tracing'... all kinds of
|
|||
|
crap came out of that in this area code... It has been stamped out by myself,
|
|||
|
and later I had the appreciated help of Modem Rider [215]. Assailant, besides
|
|||
|
your mis-information, you basically re-stated what I stated about extender
|
|||
|
usage... I don't need an on- line echo (leave resume, possibly later). All
|
|||
|
has been said that needs to be said at this moment: Assailant, I have no grief
|
|||
|
with you unless you dec- ide to handle this like a loser (which you don't seem
|
|||
|
to have the traits of). You asked if you could take the test, AGAIN: I say
|
|||
|
this- I'll give you the test if you want it that badly... but I'll tell you
|
|||
|
now, it's not easy. You need EXPERIENCE to pass it... but I'll see how much
|
|||
|
certain people know on this board. It'll take you a while be- fore I tests you
|
|||
|
again if you fail to regain testing... I'm not interested in people who jump
|
|||
|
the gun...
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Videosmith.
|
|||
|
PS - No jokes...
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Numb: 11
|
|||
|
Subj: Course is here.
|
|||
|
From: THE VIDEOSMITH
|
|||
|
Date: Sat May 18 1985
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
One correction in Red's last message-- Do not answer any questions if you can
|
|||
|
not answer them completely and you KNOW you're correct in your answer.
|
|||
|
---------------------------------------
|
|||
|
The Course: Phreak Klassroom 2600 ...
|
|||
|
---------------------------------Basic-
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
I will now begin the course in Basic
|
|||
|
Tele. We will start out with the basics
|
|||
|
of Basic Tele (sounds good, eh?).
|
|||
|
I entered the phreaking world when we
|
|||
|
were hacking TELTEC, and such 'incred-
|
|||
|
ible' extenders. Legion of Doom, a
|
|||
|
group completely devoted to phreaking &
|
|||
|
hacking, hadn't yet begun (I mention
|
|||
|
this because most of the newer phreaks
|
|||
|
have stepped intoan era where LOD! is
|
|||
|
one of the most dominating groups in
|
|||
|
the country). There wasn't much 'Blue
|
|||
|
Boxing' going on... not too many people
|
|||
|
really KNEW about the Bell Network. The
|
|||
|
big thing was exnteders, and every once
|
|||
|
in a while an 'overseas extender'
|
|||
|
(Which in many cases was actually a PBX
|
|||
|
when the majority of the populous did
|
|||
|
not know much about BelTel and it's
|
|||
|
workings...). Travel Net became very
|
|||
|
popular among the 1-800 extenders, some
|
|||
|
people with rotary fone service could
|
|||
|
use it because it could be voice activ-
|
|||
|
ated. And one of the biggest rumors
|
|||
|
going around was "tracing", and exactly
|
|||
|
how fast it would ta
|
|||
|
[S]can/[Q]uit/[1-16, Last=11] :
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Numb: 12
|
|||
|
Subj: [cont]
|
|||
|
From: THE VIDEOSMITH
|
|||
|
Date: Sat May 18 1985
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
It may still be now, I'm not sure. I
|
|||
|
suppose I was quite impressionable at
|
|||
|
that time... anyway, it did begin with
|
|||
|
'just' extenders.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Extenders:
|
|||
|
----------
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Basics. Extenders "rent" Out-Wats
|
|||
|
lines (trunks you can out-pulse on...
|
|||
|
unlike an In-Wats, like many 800's).
|
|||
|
They really own their own switching
|
|||
|
equiptment. In otherwords, you use
|
|||
|
your local switch (Central Office)
|
|||
|
to call their switch, and then you
|
|||
|
are routed to what ever number you
|
|||
|
entered after your code. This can make
|
|||
|
for a completely lousy connection, but
|
|||
|
it seems that some extender companies
|
|||
|
have found ways to cut down on line
|
|||
|
noise and make clear'er' connections.
|
|||
|
All extenders use "hunt-sequentially
|
|||
|
rotary groups" (various different
|
|||
|
variations on that name... let's use
|
|||
|
that for practicality). These are
|
|||
|
groups of numbers which have a "lead"
|
|||
|
number. When you dial the "lead" or
|
|||
|
first number of the rotary group (By
|
|||
|
the way, it's called a rotary group
|
|||
|
because in the old X-Bar (Crossbar) &
|
|||
|
SxS (Step-by-Step) equiptment, there
|
|||
|
would actually be a circular device
|
|||
|
which would turn to let you connect w/
|
|||
|
an UN-busy line on the group), you are
|
|||
|
connected with the first open (non-
|
|||
|
busy) line in the group. This insures
|
|||
|
that you don't get a busy signal (most
|
|||
|
of the time), and that you don't have
|
|||
|
to go around and dial 12 numbers before
|
|||
|
you can use the LDX. [cont]
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
[S]can/[Q]uit/[1-16, Last=12] :
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Numb: 13
|
|||
|
Subj: [cont]
|
|||
|
|