970 lines
43 KiB
Plaintext
970 lines
43 KiB
Plaintext
F I D O N E W S -- Vol.11 No.39 (26-Sep-1994)
|
||
+----------------------------+-----------------------------------------+
|
||
| A newsletter of the | ISSN 1198-4589 Published by: |
|
||
| FidoNet BBS community | "FidoNews" BBS |
|
||
| _ | +1-519-570-4176 |
|
||
| / \ | |
|
||
| /|oo \ | Small animal psychology and |
|
||
| (_| /_) | Spiritual guidance Department: |
|
||
| _`@/_ \ _ | Rev. Richard Visage 1:163/409 |
|
||
| | | \ \\ | |
|
||
| | (*) | \ )) | Editors: |
|
||
| |__U__| / \// | Donald Tees 1:221/192 |
|
||
| _//|| _\ / | Sylvia Maxwell 1:221/194 |
|
||
| (_/(_|(____/ | Tim |
|
||
| (jm) | Newspapers should have no friends. |
|
||
| | -- JOSEPH PULITZER |
|
||
+----------------------------+-----------------------------------------+
|
||
| Submission address: editors 1:1/23 |
|
||
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||
| MORE addresses: |
|
||
| |
|
||
| Don -- don@exlibris.tdkcs.waterloo.on.ca |
|
||
| Sylvia -- max@exlibris.tdkcs.waterloo.on.ca |
|
||
| Tim Pozar -- pozar@kumr.lns.com |
|
||
| David Deitch -- 1:133/411.411, deitch@gisatl.fidonet.org |
|
||
|
|
||
| submissions=> editor@exlibris.tdkcs.waterloo.on.ca |
|
||
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||
| For information, copyrights, article submissions, |
|
||
| obtaining copies of fidonews or the internet gateway faq |
|
||
| please refer to the end of this file. |
|
||
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||
========================================================================
|
||
Table of Contents
|
||
========================================================================
|
||
|
||
1. Articles...................................................... 2
|
||
ZCC selects new FidoNet International Coordinator........... 2
|
||
Dear Reverend Visage,....................................... 2
|
||
New Echo: DIVORCE........................................... 4
|
||
Mike Fuchs Compromises Echolist Entry Password Security..... 5
|
||
What Is StormNet?........................................... 8
|
||
Regarding the re-engineering of net 6:700................... 11
|
||
New government elected in Sweden 18. September 1994......... 12
|
||
Drear Madam Emilia.......................................... 13
|
||
Subject: File 1--New indecency rules proposed............... 13
|
||
If you are a Rottweiler lover.............................. 16
|
||
2. Fidonews Information.......................................... 17
|
||
FidoNews 11-39 Page: 2 26 Sep 1994
|
||
|
||
|
||
========================================================================
|
||
Articles
|
||
========================================================================
|
||
ZCC selects new FidoNet International Coordinator
|
||
FidoNet IC Elected to Office
|
||
From: The Zone Coordinator Council (ZCC)
|
||
Submitted by: Colin Wheat, Z3C (3:3/0)
|
||
|
||
The Zone Coordinator Council (ZCC) has, by a majority and unanimous
|
||
vote of 6:0, selected George Peace as the new FidoNet International
|
||
Coordinator, with effect from the 1st September 1994. George was the
|
||
immediate past Zone 1 Coordinator. POLICY4 wording requires that the
|
||
IC be selected from amongst the ZC ranks, however this solution has
|
||
been made possible by a POLICY interpretation supplied by the
|
||
outgoing IC.
|
||
|
||
The ZCC wishes to thank the outgoing IC, Matt Whelan, for his past
|
||
contributions to the FidoNet network. The responsibility and required
|
||
time commitment of the IC position are substancial and demanding,
|
||
thanks for the commendable contribution Matt.
|
||
|
||
There has been an unfortunate time delay between IC resignation and
|
||
this selection. However with George accepting the position, we're
|
||
looking forward to improving levels of Zonal cooperation and
|
||
performance both within the ZCC and throughout the Network.
|
||
|
||
Signed: Bob Satti (Z1C), Ron Dwight (Z2C), Colin Wheat (Z3C), Gamey
|
||
Garcia (Z4C), Henk Wolsink (Z5C), and Honlin Lue (Z6C).
|
||
|
||
Message text adapted by the Z3C, original text by Trev Roydhouse
|
||
(former Z3C).
|
||
|
||
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
Swamp Swine Magazine,
|
||
Railroads for Christ Division,
|
||
Shuckmagosh, Ohio
|
||
|
||
Dear Reverend Visage,
|
||
|
||
How fortuitous that you sojourned in Winnipeg which is several
|
||
hundred kilometres south of my birthplace. Had I known that you
|
||
were there, I would have sent my entire extended family to visit
|
||
you. They would have enjoyed the respite from sitting around the
|
||
curling rink, chewing moosehide. Although, in deference to their
|
||
advancing years, they no longer chew the hide while it is on the
|
||
moose.
|
||
|
||
Settling your various accounts has become a matter of some
|
||
sensitivity with the Snooze editors. They have begun to doubt the
|
||
monetary value of several hundred tons of autographed copies of
|
||
FidoNews 11-39 Page: 3 26 Sep 1994
|
||
|
||
the book: "My Short Life in Politics, by Mark Skaff." I fear that
|
||
we will have to supply them with several volumes, all signed in
|
||
jello, of Bill Clinton's "Conquering Unarmed Third World
|
||
Countries for Peace, Prosperity & Primary Votes."
|
||
|
||
The appearance of our comatose but still twitching RC was
|
||
indeed a pleasant surprise. The patterning sessions are
|
||
going remarkably well and he has begun to explain in short,
|
||
partial confessions, how it is possible for someone with
|
||
more than one working neuron to be able to foul up the
|
||
nodelist submission week after week. His ass/elbow
|
||
coordination powers have not yet advanced to the stage where
|
||
he is capable of distributing the snooze but I shall burn
|
||
prayer incense at the First Church of Appliantology & Dayglo
|
||
Black Velvet Paintings for his speedy recovery.
|
||
|
||
I also fear that the ZC, Bob Satti (cue the heavenly choir
|
||
of angels) has disappeared. He seems incapable of answering
|
||
the simplest of netmail queries as to why he has left our
|
||
region in the flippers of such a clearly incompetent
|
||
nodelist clerk. Perhaps Satti, (cue the large bolts of
|
||
lightning) recognizes in Rick a sort of kindred spirit since
|
||
he was singularly incapable of curtailing the hydrophobic
|
||
GMD weenies in his own net. I suggest you send a covey of
|
||
wide ankled Gimli princesses to attend to Satti's emergence
|
||
from narcosis.
|
||
|
||
Speaking of culturally magic moments. I ventured to the
|
||
Internationally Plowing match in Pembroke and witnessed the
|
||
crowning of an apparition which they named "Queen of The
|
||
Furrow." The possible duties of a queen of the furrow haunt
|
||
me in my sleep, as you can well imagine. I shall eliminate
|
||
the Glenfiditch IV drip in hopes that these visions abate.
|
||
|
||
The daycare centre of our region, Net250, continues to
|
||
supply a rich source of amusement. Apparently, in their rush
|
||
to Balkanize the net they had bought several largish bird
|
||
baths which they point upwards at the stars, hoping to
|
||
receive echomail from the lightning-lashed and painfully
|
||
close to solvent planetary beings. They remind me of those
|
||
cargo cultists who were so amused by Ms. Labamba when we last
|
||
visited Borneo. They speak of receiving mail in gigabytes which
|
||
would be something of a notable accomplishment if only some of
|
||
them could read. Barry Carter, having seen his ambitions to
|
||
become Steve Winter's altar boy dashed, has become the conscience
|
||
of their net, asking repeatedly why they keep appointing the
|
||
ghost of Richard Nixon's moral heritage to positions of authority
|
||
in their net.
|
||
|
||
I must go Visage, your secretary has a malevolent gleam in her
|
||
eyes and fistfuls of Tupperware catalog's in her hands. She is
|
||
armed and dangerous, Visage and her ill-humour has nothing at all
|
||
to do with the fact my bodyguard of trained Yaks are not yet
|
||
housebroken.
|
||
|
||
FidoNews 11-39 Page: 4 26 Sep 1994
|
||
|
||
Regards,
|
||
|
||
Doc Logger,
|
||
Trout University,
|
||
FlinFlon, Manitoba
|
||
|
||
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
New Echo: DIVORCE
|
||
by Ryan Shaw @ 1:152/67
|
||
The DIVORCE Echo
|
||
|
||
Greetings!
|
||
|
||
I would like to introduce a new echo available to all current
|
||
Fidonet nodes and nodes in "othernets" alike. Please take time
|
||
to read through the basic echo guidelines below:
|
||
|
||
To: All
|
||
Re: DIVORCE Echo Guidelines
|
||
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
Basic Disclaimer:
|
||
|
||
The opinions expressed in this echo are those of the writers
|
||
identified in the header of each message. No other responsibility
|
||
is expressed or implied for the content of the messages in this echo.
|
||
|
||
Rules to Follow:
|
||
|
||
[1] As is customary in echomail, private messages are not allowed.
|
||
|
||
[2] If you wish to post messages on this echo please try to keep
|
||
your comments and ideas on a rational level. This will help
|
||
to facilitate an open and free flowing dialogue.
|
||
|
||
[3] Attempt to quote only relevant text, in order to make your
|
||
messages more legible, and to lessen the burden on those
|
||
who pay to move each byte posted in this conference.
|
||
|
||
[4] Direct insults and/or personal attacks will not be tolerated.
|
||
|
||
[5] The moderator reserves the right to banish anyone and/or
|
||
any system from the distribution chain of this echo.
|
||
|
||
[6] The moderator is the moderator and what he/she says is the
|
||
last word. Any complaints about moderation will be taken
|
||
as netmail and filed. Any moderation complaints posted in
|
||
the echo are off-topic.
|
||
|
||
[7] PGP clear-signed messages =ARE= allowed and encourgaged.
|
||
PGP encrypted mail is =NOT= allowed.
|
||
|
||
This echo provides a place for people going through a divorce
|
||
or for people that are victims (usually the children) to air
|
||
their feelings and thoughts in a comfortable environment.
|
||
FidoNews 11-39 Page: 5 26 Sep 1994
|
||
|
||
|
||
Ryan Shaw, Moderator of DIVORCE
|
||
Fidonet 1:152/67
|
||
|
||
Please contact me via direct netmail if you are interested in the echo.
|
||
In your message, please include session-level and packet-level passwords
|
||
as well as your choice of mail compression.
|
||
|
||
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
Mike Fuchs Compromises Echolist Entry Password Security
|
||
MIKE FUCHS COMPROMISES ECHOLIST ENTRY PASSWORD SECURITY
|
||
By Alan Boritz - 1:2605/102@fidonet.org
|
||
|
||
Never thought you would see a headline like that in Fidonews?
|
||
I never expected it, either, until a few days ago, when Mike Fuchs
|
||
(the Echolist Scribe, 1:1/201 aka 1:266/71), removed my Elist
|
||
conference registration without asking.
|
||
|
||
The conference was ZEC, and it was no longer listed for zone-1
|
||
backbone distribution. Since it's former moderator, Dan Buda, had
|
||
allowed it's Echolist registration to lapse, ZEC was no longer
|
||
listed in the FIDONET.NA control file, and therefore unavailable to
|
||
many FidoNet systems that use it to control automatic conference
|
||
area requests. Moderators are required to register, and maintain
|
||
registration of backbone conferences, or they risk being removed
|
||
from distribution. In fact, you can't even get a conference
|
||
distributed through those channels if it ISN'T registered.
|
||
|
||
Just as SYSOP was to be removed from backbone distribution, the
|
||
last time it's registration dropped out of the Echolist, ZEC was in
|
||
the same boat.
|
||
|
||
I submitted an entry, a whole month after the Echolist
|
||
registration had lapsed, and registered ZEC, as you can see now in
|
||
the September, 1994, edition of the Echolist. As a result of my
|
||
registration, ZEC was restored to the FIDONET.NA control file, and
|
||
systems would no longer have difficulty requesting the conference.
|
||
Problem solved, right? Wrong. Eleven days after submitting my
|
||
Echolist entry, this came through the ECHOLIST conference:
|
||
|
||
The following reflects the current entry in The International
|
||
EchoList database on 11-Sep-94 8:38:53 pm
|
||
|
||
Tagname: ZEC Area Key: ZEC
|
||
Title: Zone 1 Echomail Coordinator Echo Conference
|
||
Description: A conference for Fidonet Sysops to discuss Echomail
|
||
related subjects with the Z1EC. No flaming allowed.
|
||
This is not a debate conference, it's a discussion and
|
||
Q & A conference. An Administrative conference. The
|
||
moderator reserves the right to ban individuals from
|
||
the conference due to disruptive behaviour.
|
||
Origin: 1:1/200
|
||
Distribution: Backbone
|
||
Gateways:
|
||
FidoNews 11-39 Page: 6 26 Sep 1994
|
||
|
||
# Nodes: 200 Volume: 100/Week Rule File:
|
||
Flags: <Mod Perm Req>
|
||
Moderators: Adrian Walker, 1:1/200@fidonet.org
|
||
Seen by:
|
||
Paths:
|
||
Date added: 31-Aug-94
|
||
Last changed: 11-Sep-94 Changed by: Mike Fuchs, 1:266/71
|
||
|
||
--- ELISTUPD/2 2.2.4
|
||
|
||
But, hey, didn't *I* just register a ZEC conference? Not
|
||
according to Mike Fuchs:
|
||
|
||
Tue 13 Sep 94 9:01p
|
||
By: Mike Fuchs, The Dog's Breakfast (1:266/71)
|
||
To: Alan Boritz
|
||
Re: Tag: ZEC was Updated.
|
||
St: Pvt Rcvd
|
||
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
CC: Adrian Walker
|
||
|
||
In a message of <Sep 13, 94>, Alan Boritz (1:2605/102@fidonet.org)
|
||
wrote:
|
||
|
||
AB>Hey, what's going on here, Mike? Are you taking it upon
|
||
AB>yourself to censor Echolist entries? Why did you remove my
|
||
AB>echolist entry?
|
||
|
||
The EchoList entry in question purports itself to be a Zone 1
|
||
Backbone conference, making it subject to acceptance or rejection of
|
||
the Zone 1 EchoMail Coordinator. The new Zone 1 EchoMail
|
||
coordinator (per the Zone 1 Nodelist) at 1:1/200 identified the
|
||
entry to be invalid and provided instructions for correcting it. If
|
||
you have a question regarding Backbone conference entries, please
|
||
contact the coordinator of that Backbone.
|
||
--
|
||
|
||
Did you know that the "zec" accepts or rejects "backbone"
|
||
entries? Apparently no one else knows that, either, except, perhaps
|
||
Mike Fuchs. Adrian Walker's recent description of the "zec's"
|
||
duties don't even mention the word "backbone" ONCE.
|
||
|
||
We're told in several supporting documents that the Echolist
|
||
Scribe is not an "official" part of the FidoNet echomail
|
||
distribution system. Mike Fuchs tells us, in the current moderator
|
||
update instructions (ELTECREF.TXT, in archive ELMOD933.LZH), that:
|
||
|
||
"2. ECHOMAIL DISTRIBUTION BACKBONES
|
||
|
||
A clarification is needed on the subject of EchoMail
|
||
backbones and backbone conferences. The EchoList is not
|
||
an official publication of any of the backbones, zones,
|
||
networks or FidoNet. It is an open, free directory of
|
||
information on ANY EchoMail conference, anywhere.
|
||
|
||
FidoNews 11-39 Page: 7 26 Sep 1994
|
||
|
||
"However, a couple of distribution backbones have
|
||
implemented a requirement (which I heartily endorse) that
|
||
any conference they carry must have a Moderator and
|
||
description publicly identified. The Zone 1 EchoMail
|
||
Coordinator (among others) has decided to use the EchoList
|
||
as a convenient repository for official information on
|
||
backbone conferences. So the only exception to the
|
||
EchoList's voluntary status is that dictated by the
|
||
distribution backbone you may choose to use. If you are
|
||
using one of these backbones you must list, at a minimum,
|
||
the Tag name, the Title, and the Moderators name and node
|
||
number.
|
||
|
||
"I have no direct involvement in the distribution or
|
||
administration of EchoMail itself. Any rules governing
|
||
your conference need to be obtained from your network
|
||
and/or distribution backbone."
|
||
|
||
Mr. Fuchs also tells us that the Echolist is strictly informal
|
||
(from the header of the current Echolist):
|
||
|
||
"The EchoList is an informal, international listing of
|
||
EchoMail Conferences as described and submitted by each
|
||
conference's moderator."
|
||
|
||
In addition, Mr. Fuchs tells us that the Echolist will allow
|
||
multiple entries for conferences with the same tag name:'
|
||
|
||
"In addition to the Tag name, the EchoList implements a
|
||
derived Key field for each conference. You can ignore the
|
||
existence of this internal Key in all but the most unusual
|
||
situations. It is used to provide a unique, DOS file name
|
||
compatible abbreviation of the Tag, and to allow multiple
|
||
conferences with the same Tag (perhaps in different
|
||
networks) to maintain independent EchoList entries."
|
||
|
||
So where did this recent requirement for "acceptance or
|
||
rejection" by the "zec" come from? From Mr. Fuchs' imagination,
|
||
apparently. Perhaps a more accurate description of Mr. Fuchs'
|
||
off-the-cuff excuse could be, "'cause I felt like it." Since the
|
||
Echolist allows multiple entries with the same tag name, there was
|
||
no technical reason why Adrian Walker could not register his own
|
||
entry, rather than plagiarize MY entry. It's especially
|
||
significant, since no one bothered to ASK me, before I could offer
|
||
the password to the next moderator of the conference.
|
||
|
||
It's really disappointing that what we've come to regard as a
|
||
great collective reference work, and an example to other networks of
|
||
a clever working tool, is nothing but the play-toy of a spoiled
|
||
brat. There's no need to file policy complaints, or
|
||
beg/plead/threaten people to remove or change a conference's
|
||
moderator or backbone distribution standard, just find out Mr.
|
||
Fuchs' price to compromise a password and snip out an Elist entry.
|
||
|
||
Was Mike Fuchs dishonest in his intent? It sure looks that
|
||
FidoNews 11-39 Page: 8 26 Sep 1994
|
||
|
||
way. Do we need ANOTHER conference registry, beyond manipulation by
|
||
control-freaks? Absolutely. Will YOUR Echolist entry be snipped
|
||
out if you anger the "backbone boys?" Only the Shadow knows...
|
||
|
||
-#-
|
||
|
||
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
******* **** *
|
||
* * * *
|
||
******* ***** **** **** ***** * * * **** *****
|
||
* * * * **** * * * * * * ** *
|
||
******* * **** * * * * * * **** **** *
|
||
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
What Is StormNet?
|
||
|
||
StormNet is an alternative network for use with FidoNet
|
||
compatible software. We pass messages back and forth both in netmail
|
||
and in echomail conferences. In StormNet, each node is welcomed and
|
||
assisted in many ways by other StormNet members. We have active
|
||
echomail areas and a growing file echo selection. Our echomail
|
||
traffic is growing every day, and are now pulling more mail ever than
|
||
before. StormNet has a friendlier atmosphere than can be found in
|
||
many other networks.
|
||
|
||
StormNet has been in existence for over two years, and in that
|
||
time, has grown significantly. Our membership has changed from an
|
||
inexperienced group of local nodes to a more mature group of people
|
||
from all over the United States, Canada, Europe, and Asia.
|
||
Currently, we have over 250 nodes in StormNet, and are expanding
|
||
every week!
|
||
|
||
* Why is StormNet here?
|
||
|
||
StormNet was started for a few reasons. When we created it, we
|
||
wanted to serve teens, adults, and others worldwide with a quality
|
||
alternative network that is relatively cheap to pull in. Most of our
|
||
high speed transfers take less than a minute. Although we prefer it,
|
||
you don't have to poll every day, we are flexible and will allow you
|
||
to poll whenever you like. We want to serve you with the finest
|
||
quality echomail and files for you and your users. We are
|
||
considerably smaller than FidoNet, and therefore do not have the
|
||
overflow of mail/files often seen in its conferences. The average
|
||
cost per month for one who pulls StormNet and polls daily is around
|
||
$6.00-7.00 within the US.
|
||
|
||
* What are the rules like?
|
||
|
||
StormNet? Rules? You've got to be kidding me. Well, it's not
|
||
like we don't have any rules; all of the rules in our policy
|
||
statement basically stem from one basic principle - "Be nice and use
|
||
common sense." The policy's specifics were written to outline some
|
||
problems which may potentially arise when people aren't nice and
|
||
FidoNews 11-39 Page: 9 26 Sep 1994
|
||
|
||
don't use common sense.
|
||
|
||
The SNAC (StormNet Advisory Council) helps to ensure the smooth
|
||
running of StormNet affairs. StormNet does not discriminate because
|
||
of age, sex, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, beliefs,
|
||
taste in food, opinion on world politics, or favorite color. We
|
||
welcome anyone who is interested in joining a fun network to try out
|
||
StormNet. We also don't allow "bashing", spindling or other forms of
|
||
mutilation of groups in our newsletters, or any of our echos
|
||
(excluding WAR_ZONE), and other parts of our network.
|
||
|
||
* What are the echos like?
|
||
|
||
We have a variety of conferences to suit most needs. If you are
|
||
a user of StormNet, or a node, you can request an echo if you feel it
|
||
would be active. We have echos on many subjects, A to Z (as we say
|
||
SN_A to SN_Z). We have a talented staff of moderators and
|
||
co-moderators, and combined with the efforts of our international
|
||
echomail coordinator, keep the network running smoothly.
|
||
|
||
* Internet... Yes, Internet!
|
||
|
||
StormNet is now registered in the domain listings as
|
||
"storm.net". All StormNet nodes can use our UUCP host to send
|
||
messages anywhere on Internet at no additional cost to you.
|
||
|
||
* Vanity Internet addresses
|
||
|
||
The StormNet International Internet Coordinator has just recently
|
||
allowed a "vanity" name that you can apply for once you join
|
||
StormNet. This can be just about anything, and saves typing. For
|
||
example, "John.Doe@johnsbbs.storm.net" is alot easier to remember
|
||
than "John.Doe@f104.n192.usa.storm.net."
|
||
|
||
* Support
|
||
|
||
StormNet has support sites for different types of software. We
|
||
currently have technical support nodes/echos for BinkleyTerm, EzyCom,
|
||
Maximus, Proboard, RemoteAccess, Storm Watch Software, and T.A.G..
|
||
|
||
New technical support nodes for other software are permitted and
|
||
encouraged. When you apply for technical support, you will get a
|
||
flag in the nodelist designating you as a support site. You also get
|
||
your name added to the list of technical support nodes at the bottom
|
||
of the nodelist. And finally, you have the option to add file and
|
||
message echos software you support.
|
||
|
||
* What we're looking for
|
||
|
||
StormNet is looking for nodes who want to pull in high quality
|
||
echomail at a relatively cheap price. Ones who think they would like
|
||
StormNet to be on their BBSes or computers.
|
||
|
||
We also are looking for new zones to create all the time.
|
||
StormNet is not just limited to North America, other continents and
|
||
FidoNews 11-39 Page: 10 26 Sep 1994
|
||
|
||
countries are already members, but we would like more. We'd like to
|
||
expand StormNet worldwide, and we think that everyone would benefit
|
||
from this and it would strengthen relations and understanding between
|
||
other nations. It already has. With European and Asian nodes,
|
||
StormNet has a very unique atmosphere where you will regularly chat
|
||
with people not in the same country, or continent as you. We are
|
||
willing to work with you to install a new zone in/on your
|
||
country/continent.
|
||
|
||
* Why should I consider StormNet?
|
||
|
||
We respect each and every StormNet member and his/her rights.
|
||
We offer our services to all. We have a great network setup. We
|
||
want all to join and have a good time in the network that we have
|
||
created. We're proud of our network. We offer a unique and quaint
|
||
atmosphere not found on any other network. We guarantee it.
|
||
|
||
If you have any questions, comments, or problems, feel free to
|
||
contact any of the nodes listed below. We'd be glad to help you.
|
||
|
||
Alan Jurison StormNet Int'l EchoMail Coordinator
|
||
|
||
You may F'req or download "STORMNET" (or STORMNET.ARJ) from these
|
||
nodes:
|
||
|
||
BBS : Ham-Net BBS
|
||
Position : StormNet Int'l HQ / IEC / Int'l ZoneGate / Mid Atlantic RC
|
||
SysOp : Alan Jurison
|
||
Location : Manlius, New York, USA
|
||
Data Phone : 1-315-682-1824
|
||
Voice Phone: 1-315-682-9411 (14:00-23:00 *EST/EDT*)
|
||
FidoNet : (1:260/375)
|
||
StormNet : (181:181/1)
|
||
InterNet : Alan.Jurison@iec.storm.net
|
||
Speed(s) : 14,400 v32b -- 21,600 HST/Terbo - 28,800 VFC/V34
|
||
|
||
BBS : *A*R*T*H*U*R* BBS
|
||
Position : StormNet Nodelist Coordinator / Detroit Area NC
|
||
SysOp : Victor Capton
|
||
Location : Troy, Michigan, USA
|
||
Data Phone : 1-810-740-8764
|
||
FidoNet : (1:120/120)
|
||
StormNet : (181:181/2)
|
||
InterNet : Victor.Capton@inc.storm.net
|
||
Speed(s) : 14,400 v32b -- 21,600 HST/Terbo - 28,800 VFC/V34
|
||
|
||
BBS : ASA CompuHelp
|
||
Positions : StormNet United States ZC / Ohio Valley RC
|
||
SysOp : Jeff Binkley
|
||
Location : Gahana, Ohio, USA
|
||
Data Phone : 1-614-476-3723
|
||
FidoNet : (1:226/600)
|
||
StormNet : (181:181/0)
|
||
InterNet : Jeff.Binkley@zc.usa.storm.net
|
||
Speed(s) : 14,400 v32b -- 14,400 HST
|
||
FidoNews 11-39 Page: 11 26 Sep 1994
|
||
|
||
|
||
BBS : New Era BBS
|
||
Positions : StormNet Canada ZC
|
||
SysOp : Mauro Incrocci
|
||
Location : Kelowna, British Coloumbia, Canada
|
||
Data Phone : 1-604-762-6239
|
||
FidoNet : (1:353/210)
|
||
StormNet : (182:182/0)
|
||
InterNet : Mauro.Incrocci@zc.can.storm.net
|
||
Speed(s) : 14,400 v32b -- 28,800 VFC
|
||
|
||
BBS : The Rising Sun BBS
|
||
Positions : StormNet Europe ZC / North Central RC
|
||
SysOp : Jens Fendler
|
||
Location : Destedt, Germany
|
||
Data Phone : +49-5306-7824
|
||
FidoNet : (2:241/510)
|
||
StormNet : (183:183/0)
|
||
InterNet : Jens Fendler@zc.eur.storm.net
|
||
Speed(s) : 14,400.v32b -- 28,800 VFC
|
||
|
||
BBS : Data Matrix
|
||
Positions : StormNet Asia ZC / Malaysia RC
|
||
SysOp : Azuan Yazdani
|
||
Location : Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
|
||
Data Phone : +60-3-2735826
|
||
FidoNet : (6:609/79)
|
||
StormNet : (184:184/0)
|
||
InterNet : Azuan Yazdani@zc.asia.storm.net
|
||
Speed(s) : 14,400.v32b
|
||
|
||
Thank you for your time! We hope to see you soon!
|
||
|
||
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
Regarding the re-engineering of net 6:700
|
||
By:
|
||
Nils Hammar, 2:205/601@fidonet
|
||
nils@bod.fdata.se
|
||
4341@msg.abc.se
|
||
|
||
Regarding the "Re-engineering of Net 700", I can say that it seems like
|
||
the RC have appointed a NC that isn't supported by the nodes in
|
||
the net in question. This isn't a good situation, and from what
|
||
I can tell, the RC is a servant, not a master when assigning a
|
||
new NC. If the RC is assigning a NC that isn't accepted by the
|
||
majority in the network, then the RC has failed and should
|
||
either resign as RC or make a new assignment in cooperation with
|
||
the nodes in the net in question.
|
||
|
||
However, there has to be an easier way to solve this than via
|
||
FidoNews, which only annoys the readers.
|
||
|
||
Since this article from "Chris Leung (6:700/703 aka 6:700/0)"
|
||
seems to be written by the recently appointed NC, I think that
|
||
FidoNews 11-39 Page: 12 26 Sep 1994
|
||
|
||
it is he that has the most problem, and tries to gain power, but
|
||
since I can't review all nodes in that net and check their
|
||
opinion, I am unable to tell who is right and who is wrong.
|
||
|
||
What I think is the most important thing with the nodelist isn't
|
||
if all nodes are geographically correct, but that the entries
|
||
reflects the right phone number connected to right sysop and
|
||
node address, so that I wouldn't wake up Aunt Clara several
|
||
times at ZMH for that zone during a week or two...
|
||
|
||
THE NODELIST IS OUR MAP TO THE REALITY - TRY TO KEEP IT UP TO DATE!
|
||
(Don't try to change the reality to reflect the nodelist - it
|
||
doesn't work...)
|
||
|
||
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
New government elected in Sweden 18. September 1994
|
||
By:
|
||
Nils Hammar, 2:205/601@fidonet
|
||
nils@bod.fdata.se
|
||
4341@msg.abc.se
|
||
|
||
What about this subject in Fidonews then? What has the election
|
||
of a new government in Sweden to do with our hobby? (I hope that
|
||
most of us has this as a hobby)
|
||
|
||
Continue to read, and you will probably get some visions at least!
|
||
|
||
The special thing with this election was that this was the first
|
||
time that internet was used to spread information about the
|
||
result of the election during the counting of votes! There was
|
||
two methods used, one where all newspapers in Sweden got the
|
||
results via email (except one newspaper that got it via fax), and
|
||
the other method was that the results could be picked up by
|
||
anybody who had a computer running Mosaic connected to the
|
||
internet. This service wasn't restricted to sites in Sweden, and
|
||
the information is still possible to access (as far as I know).
|
||
|
||
I was checking the results myself during the election with a
|
||
workstation running Mosaic, and it was really interesting to see
|
||
how the numbers changed depending on which part of the country I
|
||
was examining. It was even possible to see the raw data, and
|
||
check exactly how many votes that was given in each district and
|
||
sub-district. The results was also presented graphically, both
|
||
in a bar-diagram and in a pie-diagram.
|
||
|
||
Information about the election was available both in Swedish and
|
||
in English at the WWW-server.
|
||
|
||
At the peak the WWW-server received one call per second, which
|
||
isn't bad at all! Anybody that want to check some more about
|
||
this can start Mosaic on their workstation or PC and open the
|
||
URL "http://www.swip.net/val94". Here is also some information
|
||
about the swedish governmental system.
|
||
|
||
FidoNews 11-39 Page: 13 26 Sep 1994
|
||
|
||
This is written with the reservation that this WWW-server still
|
||
runs this information.
|
||
|
||
I am only waiting for the next country to use this kind of
|
||
service in their elections!
|
||
I think that Denmark isn't going to be the next country, since
|
||
they had their election this Wednesday. (21. September 1994.)
|
||
|
||
Anybody that knows something about any other country using a
|
||
similar method could as well write an article here in FidoNews!
|
||
|
||
|
||
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
Drear Madam Emilia
|
||
|
||
140 cat
|
||
cat
|
||
120 cat
|
||
cat
|
||
100 cat
|
||
dog cat
|
||
80 dog cat
|
||
dog cat bear
|
||
60 dog cat bear
|
||
dog cat bear
|
||
40 dog cat bear
|
||
dog cat bear
|
||
20 dog cat bear
|
||
dog cat bear armadillo
|
||
|
||
Q: What are the most popular animals in FidoNet
|
||
according to frequency of use in BBS names ?
|
||
[in decimal numbers]
|
||
|
||
|
||
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
reprinted from:
|
||
Computer underground Digest Wed Sep 8, 1994 Volume 6 : Issue 79
|
||
ISSN 1004-042X
|
||
|
||
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 1994 11:52:49 -0400 (EDT)
|
||
From: Mike Godwin <mnemonic@EFF.ORG>
|
||
Subject: File 1--New indecency rules proposed
|
||
for all online services (fwd)
|
||
|
||
(MODERATORS' NOTE: In CuD 6.76 we ran a post on the Exon Amendment to
|
||
S 1822. S.AMDT.2404, sponsored by Senator J. James Exon (D. Neb.),
|
||
raised concerns that proposed federal restrictions on "indecency"
|
||
could adversely affect computer communications by placing the onus of
|
||
liability on the carrier. Contrary to some reports, the EFF does not
|
||
approve of the amendment. For those wishing further information, the
|
||
full Bill is: S. 1822 (Sponsored by Sen. Ernest F. Hollings, D., S.
|
||
Car.). Official Title: A BILL TO FOSTER THE FURTHER DEVELOPMENT OF THE
|
||
FidoNews 11-39 Page: 14 26 Sep 1994
|
||
|
||
NATION'S TELECOMMUNICATIONS INFRASTRUCTURE AND PROTECTION OF THE
|
||
PUBLIC INTEREST, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. At last report, the Bill
|
||
(with the amendment) has been referred to the Senate Committee on
|
||
Commerce (on 26 July). We're not aware of subsequent action taken
|
||
since. The following fowarded post clarifies the amendment)).
|
||
|
||
From farber@eff.org Thu Sep 1 10:47:31 1994
|
||
Posted-Date--Thu, 1 Sep 1994 09:29:09 -0400
|
||
|
||
Date--Thu, 25 Aug 1994 14:32:40 -0600
|
||
From--djw@eff.org (Daniel J. Weitzner)
|
||
|
||
I. Overview
|
||
|
||
During the final hours before the Senate telecommunications
|
||
bill (S.1822) was marked-up by the Senate Commerce Committee, a
|
||
provision was added which would expand the current FCC regulation on
|
||
obscene and indecent audiotext (900 number) services to virtually all
|
||
electronic information services, including commercial online service
|
||
providers, the Internet, and BBS operators. This proposal, introduced
|
||
by Senator Exon, would require all information service providers and
|
||
all other electronic communication service providers, to take steps to
|
||
assure that minors do not have access to obscene or indecent material
|
||
through the services offered by the service provider.
|
||
|
||
Placing the onus, and criminal liability, on the carrier, as
|
||
opposed to the originator of the content, threatens to limit the free
|
||
flow of all kinds of information in the online world. If carriers are
|
||
operating under the threat of criminal liability for all of the
|
||
content on their services, they will be forced to pre-screen all
|
||
messages and limit both the privacy and free expression of the users
|
||
of these services. Senator Exon's amendment raises fundamental
|
||
questions about the locus on liability for harm done from content in
|
||
new digital communications media. These questions must be discussed
|
||
in a way that assures the free flow of information and holds content
|
||
originators responsible for their actions.
|
||
|
||
II. Summary of Exon Amendment
|
||
|
||
The Exon amendment which is now part of S.1822, expands section
|
||
of the Communications Act to cover anyone who "makes, transmits, or
|
||
otherwise makes available" obscene or indecent communication. It
|
||
makes no distinction between those entities which transmit the
|
||
communications from those which create, process, or use the
|
||
communication. This section of the Communications Act was originally
|
||
intended to criminalize harassment accomplished over interstate
|
||
telephone lines, and to require telephone companies that offer
|
||
indecent 900 number services to prevent minors from having access to
|
||
such services. The 900 number portions are known as the Helms
|
||
Amendments, having been championed by Senator Jesse Helms. These
|
||
sections have been the subject of extension constitutional litigation.
|
||
|
||
If enacted into law, these amendments would require that anyone
|
||
who "makes, transmits, or otherwise makes available" indecent
|
||
communication take prescribed steps to assure that minors are
|
||
FidoNews 11-39 Page: 15 26 Sep 1994
|
||
|
||
prevented from having access to these communications. In the case of
|
||
900 numbers, acceptable procedures include written verification of a
|
||
subscriber's age, payment by credit card, or use of a scrambling
|
||
device given to the subscriber after having verified his or her age.
|
||
Failure to do so would result in up to a $100,000 fine or up to two
|
||
years imprisonment.
|
||
|
||
III. Carrier Liability and Threats to the Free Flow of Information
|
||
|
||
These provisions raise serious First Amendment concerns. (Note
|
||
that we use the term 'carrier' here to refer to a wide range of
|
||
information and communication service providers. This does not
|
||
suggest that these entities are, or should be, common carriers in the
|
||
traditional sense of the term.)
|
||
|
||
Overbroad carrier liability forces carriers to stifle the free
|
||
flow of information on their systems and to act as private censors
|
||
|
||
If carriers are responsible for the content of all information
|
||
and communication on their systems, then they will be forced to
|
||
attempt to screen all content before it is allowed to enter the
|
||
system. In many cases, this would be simply impossible. But even
|
||
where it is possible, such pre-screening can severely limit the
|
||
diversity and free flow of information in the online world. To be
|
||
sure, some system operators will want to offer services that
|
||
pre-screen content. However, if all systems were forced to do so, the
|
||
usefulness of digital media as communication and information
|
||
dissemination systems would be drastically limited. Where possible,
|
||
we must avoid legal structures which force those who merely carry
|
||
messages to screen their content.
|
||
|
||
Carriers are often legally prohibited from screening messages
|
||
|
||
In fact, under the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of
|
||
1986, electronic communication service providers are generally
|
||
prohibited from examining the contents of messages or information
|
||
carrier from one subscriber to another.
|
||
|
||
Extension of the 900 number rules to all electronic information
|
||
services may be unconstitutional
|
||
|
||
The regulation of indecent 900 number programming was only
|
||
accomplished after nearly a decade of constitutional litigation, with
|
||
rules being overturned by the Supreme Court. The regulations were
|
||
finally found constitutional only after being substantially narrowed
|
||
to meet First Amendment scrutiny. Since the access methods offered by
|
||
online service providers are significantly different than simple
|
||
telephone access to 900 services, we doubt that the same
|
||
constitutional justifications would support the newly expanded rules.
|
||
This issue requires considerable study and analysis.
|
||
|
||
Content creators, or those who represent the content as their
|
||
own, should be responsible for liability arising out of the content
|
||
|
||
In sum, it should be content originators, not carriers, who are
|
||
FidoNews 11-39 Page: 16 26 Sep 1994
|
||
|
||
responsible for their content. Any other approach will stifle the
|
||
free flow of information in the new digital media.
|
||
|
||
IV. Next Steps
|
||
|
||
Having only just received the language offered by Senator Exon,
|
||
EFF still needs to do further analysis, and consult with others in the
|
||
online community. We also hope to speak with Senator Exon's staff to
|
||
understand their intent. Another important hearing will be held on
|
||
S.1822 in mid-September by the Senate Judiciary Committee. By that
|
||
time, we hope to have this issue resolved. While we agree that these
|
||
carrier liability problems are in need of Congressional consideration,
|
||
we do not believe that the time is ripe to act. Before any action is
|
||
taken, hearings must be held and careful evaluation of all the issues,
|
||
not just indecency, must be undertaken.
|
||
|
||
Daniel J. Weitzner, Deputy Policy Director, Electronic Frontier Foundation,
|
||
1001 G St. NW Suite 950 East, Washington, DC 20001 +1 202-347-5400(v)
|
||
|
||
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
If you are a Rottweiler lover
|
||
|
||
If you are a Rottweiler lover, trainer, owner, handler, breeder,
|
||
rescuer, or just interested in learning more about them, there is an
|
||
echo for you. It is called ROTTIES. Currently it is privately
|
||
distributed until we can increase the number of systems carrying it,
|
||
and increase the message traffic, to levels that would merit its
|
||
inclusion on the FidoNet Backbone.
|
||
|
||
If you are a sysop contact one of the following people for a feed to
|
||
the echo. You will have to make your own arrangements with the system
|
||
operator as to whether you will be polling them for mail or they will
|
||
be polling you for mail.
|
||
|
||
If you are not a sysop and are interested, ask your sysop to contact
|
||
one of the following and pick it up for you.
|
||
|
||
Jacob Eagle Eyes, 1:3603/263
|
||
Sandeleh Francis, 1:205/31
|
||
Michael Stroh, 1:363/603
|
||
Kathleen Weaver, 1:124/4220
|
||
|
||
Are there any others willing to provide a feed? Let me know and I'll
|
||
add you to the list.
|
||
|
||
[It may also be available on some Regional distribution channels. Ask
|
||
your REC to carry it if it isn't already available!]
|
||
|
||
FidoNews 11-39 Page: 17 26 Sep 1994
|
||
|
||
|
||
========================================================================
|
||
Fidonews Information
|
||
========================================================================
|
||
|
||
------- FIDONEWS MASTHEAD AND CONTACT INFORMATION ----------------
|
||
|
||
Editors: Sylvia Maxwell, Donald Tees
|
||
Editors Emeritii: Thom Henderson, Dale Lovell,
|
||
Vince Perriello, Tim Pozar
|
||
Tom Jennings
|
||
"FidoNews" BBS
|
||
FidoNet 1:1/23
|
||
BBS +1-519-570-4176, 300/1200/2400/14400/V.32bis/HST(DS)
|
||
|
||
more addresses:
|
||
Rev. Richard Visage -- 1:163/409
|
||
Don -- 1:221/192, don@exlibris.tdkcs.waterloo.on.ca
|
||
sylvia -- 1:221/194, max@exlibris.tdkcs.waterloo.on.ca
|
||
Tim -- pozar@kumr.lns.com
|
||
|
||
(Postal Service mailing address)
|
||
FidoNews
|
||
128 Church St.
|
||
Kitchener, Ontario
|
||
Canada
|
||
N2H 2S4
|
||
|
||
max & Don voice: (519) 570-3137
|
||
|
||
Fidonews is published weekly by and for the members of the FIDONET
|
||
INTERNATIONAL AMATEUR ELECTRONIC MAIL system. It is a compilation
|
||
of individual articles contributed by their authors or their
|
||
authorized agents. The contribution of articles to this compilation
|
||
does not diminish the rights of the authors. Opinions expressed in
|
||
these articles are those of the authors and not necessarily those of
|
||
FidoNews.
|
||
|
||
Authors retain copyright on individual works; otherwise FidoNews is
|
||
Copyright 1994 Sylvia Maxwell. All rights reserved. Duplication
|
||
and/or distribution permitted for noncommercial purposes only. For use
|
||
in other circumstances, please contact the original authors, or the eds.
|
||
|
||
OBTAINING COPIES: The most recent issue of FidoNews in electronic
|
||
form may be obtained from the FidoNews BBS via manual download or
|
||
Wazoo FileRequest, or from various sites in the FidoNet and Internet.
|
||
PRINTED COPIES may be obtained by sending SASE to the above paper-mail
|
||
address, or trade for copy of your 'zine.
|
||
|
||
INTERNET USERS: FidoNews is available via FTP from ftp.fidonet.org,
|
||
in directory ~ftp/pub/fidonet/fidonews.
|
||
|
||
Anyone interested in getting a copy of the INTERNET GATEWAY FAQ may
|
||
freq GISFAQ.ZIP from 1:133/411.0, or send an internet message to
|
||
fidofaq@gisatl.fidonet.org. No message or text or subject is
|
||
FidoNews 11-39 Page: 18 26 Sep 1994
|
||
|
||
necessary. The address is a keyword that will trigger the automated
|
||
response. People wishing to send inquiries directly to David Deitch
|
||
should now mail to fidonet@gisatl.fidonet.org rather than the
|
||
previously listed address.
|
||
|
||
SUBMISSIONS: You are encouraged to submit articles for publication in
|
||
FidoNews. Article submission requirements are contained in the file
|
||
ARTSPEC.DOC, available from the FidoNews BBS, or Wazoo filerequestable
|
||
from 1:1/23 as file "ARTSPEC.DOC". Please read it.
|
||
|
||
"Fido", "FidoNet" and the dog-with-diskette are U.S. registered
|
||
trademarks of Tom Jennings, and are used with permission.
|
||
|
||
"the pulse of the cursor is the heartbeat of fidonet"...
|
||
-- END
|
||
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|