174 lines
9.5 KiB
Plaintext
174 lines
9.5 KiB
Plaintext
SATAN & THE LITTLE GREEN MEN!! - The Connection Exposed!
|
|
|
|
By
|
|
|
|
Val Dobson
|
|
|
|
Old Nick and the inhabitants of UFOs have a lot in common - although
|
|
there is no objective proof for the existence of either, both can
|
|
claim millions of fervent believers. These believers credit their
|
|
chosen belief-object with amazing powers, and a desire to rule the
|
|
world by covert means.
|
|
|
|
There is little cross-over between the two belief systems. Practically
|
|
all Christians ignore the UFO phenomenon - they're not in the Bible
|
|
and they are obviously demonic manifestations, anyway; UFO nuts are
|
|
interested only in "hard"-science explanations - what does religion
|
|
have to do with technology-advanced space beings? There is no mutual
|
|
interest, and the two camps refuse to even acknowledge one anothers
|
|
existence.
|
|
|
|
Yet there is much common ground. Take for instance the US cattle
|
|
mutilations mystery, where cattle in the American Southwest are found
|
|
mysteriously dead, with holes drilled in the bodies and blood and
|
|
organs apparently missing. Significantly, there may be no human tracks
|
|
about.
|
|
|
|
The Satan-watching fundamentalists declare that these incidents are
|
|
the work of Satanist groups performing ghastly rituals upon the
|
|
hapless animals - helicopters and giant extending ladders make sure
|
|
there are no footprints to be found.
|
|
|
|
UFO enthusiasts insist the mutilations are the work of aliens
|
|
performing horrific vivisection experiments upon the hapless animals -
|
|
levitating force-beams make sure there are no footprints to be found.
|
|
|
|
As to why Satanists/aliens should want to do these things, both sides
|
|
offer identical conclusions: "Who knows the mind of a Satanist/alien?"
|
|
And both sides choose to ignore unexciting explanations involving
|
|
poachers, parasites, wild animals, and human error.
|
|
|
|
Then again, take many UFO abduction stories. Usually, somebody
|
|
contacts some well known UFO investigator and explains that one night,
|
|
they saw strange lights in the sky, felt unexplained terror and have
|
|
been suffering from nightmares and strange symptoms ever since. The
|
|
investigator talks to them, puts them through numerous hypnotic
|
|
regression sessions, analyses their dreams. From all this he deduces
|
|
that the person has actually been abducted into an alien spacecraft,
|
|
subjected to painful physical examination and probes (usually
|
|
concentrating on the sexual organs) and had their conscious memory of
|
|
the occasion wiped before being returned to Earth.
|
|
|
|
Compare this scenario to the numerous "I was a victim of evil
|
|
Satanists" stories. Someone contacts a Christian occult investigator,
|
|
explains that they once played with a Ouija board/tarot deck/sat on a
|
|
bus next to a witch, felt unexplained terror, since when they have
|
|
been suffering nightmares and strange symptoms. The investigator puts
|
|
the person through numerous regressions sessions, administers much
|
|
counselling and healing, and analyses their dreams. From all this, he
|
|
deduces that the person was forced to take part in horrible Satanic
|
|
rituals, where bizarre-looking people chanting in a strange tongue did
|
|
unpleasant things to their victims body (usually concentrating on the
|
|
sexual organs), afterwards administering drugs/hypnosis to wipe
|
|
conscious memories of the occasion.
|
|
|
|
Seen in this light, the story of American Kathie Davies' encounters
|
|
with aliens makes interesting reading for anybody aquainted with
|
|
"Devil worshippers-ate-my-baby" stories.
|
|
|
|
In 1983 "Kathie" (a pseudonym) contacted UFO investigator Bud Hopkins,
|
|
telling him that a UFO landed in her garden, leaving visible traces on
|
|
the ground. She also told him that she believed that this had not been
|
|
the first time she had had contact with aliens. Over the next four
|
|
years, hypnotic regression and dream analysis enabled Hopkins to
|
|
extract from Davies an incredible story. According to this story,
|
|
Kathie had experienced various types of alien contact from an early
|
|
age.
|
|
|
|
At age two or three, her mother had protected her from a "threat from
|
|
the sky" by hiding her in a closet; at age six, she wandered away from
|
|
home and met a little grey-skinned alien (disguised as a small boy)
|
|
who cut her leg; at age sixteen, she went on a car ride with three
|
|
young men who acted strangely. Two years later, she was on another car
|
|
ride when she was abducted by little grey-skinned aliens, who
|
|
subjected her to a painful gynaecological probe; her two companions in
|
|
the car were kept unaware of her disappearance. Four months later,
|
|
she was abducted again by the same aliens and again intimately probed.
|
|
|
|
Hopkins interpretation of this was that Kathie had been artificially
|
|
inseminated at the first abduction and had had her unborn child
|
|
removed at the second abduction. He writes about this: "I guessed what
|
|
had happened, and shortly after I brought Kathie out of the trance she
|
|
conformed this. They had taken her baby. " (my italics). The next
|
|
year, when she was pregnant with her son Bobbie (she was married by
|
|
this time and Bobbies father was entirely human), she was abducted a
|
|
third time and had her nostrils probed. A year later, pregnant with
|
|
her second son, she received a series of peculiar phone calls
|
|
consisting of a guttural voice moaning something indecipherable; her
|
|
second child was subsequently born with a speech defect that made him
|
|
sound strangely like the unknown caller. In June 1983, the UFO landing
|
|
that caused her to contact Hopkins occurred; she was abducted a fourth
|
|
time and had her ear probed.
|
|
|
|
Hopkins believes that something was implanted in Kathie during both
|
|
this and the earlier nostril probing. Three months later she went into
|
|
a local shop for some shopping, to realise with horror that the
|
|
"shopkeeper" was an alien and his "shop" a spaceship. She hurried
|
|
home, to be later abducted for the fifth time. In the spaceship she
|
|
was medically examined, had a small cut made in her neck, and was
|
|
shown the artificially created child that had been taken from her in
|
|
1978. A month after this, she dreamed that the aliens came to her
|
|
bedroom and removed ova from her while she was sleeping, also
|
|
kidnapping her younger son. The child was abducted again in 1986,
|
|
after which Kathy had a final, momentous dream: she is taken into the
|
|
spaceship, shown two babies, told there are seven more and informed
|
|
that they are all hers. Later that year her elder son starts seeing
|
|
lights in the sky, has mysterious nosebleeds and dreams of red
|
|
tarantulas.
|
|
|
|
Such is the Kathie Davies story. Regular ORCRO readers will notice a
|
|
familiar pattern. There are all the kidnappings (unnoticed by anyone
|
|
else), the forced insertion of various instruments into the various
|
|
orifices, the encounters with strange and threatening people who were
|
|
not what they appeared to be. Then there is the artificial
|
|
insemination which results in a pregnancy which even Kathie herself
|
|
notices at the time, followed by forced abortion of a foetus that is
|
|
used for unknown purposes. There is also the investigators treatment
|
|
of the case; Hopkins accepts the most outlandish and unsubstantiated
|
|
claims as facts, does not bother with independent corroboration for
|
|
any part of Kathies evidence, "interprets" her dreams and memories to
|
|
fit his preconceived beliefs and persuades her to accept his
|
|
interpretation as real, factual occurrences; she then goes on to
|
|
produce more "proof" for him in the form of dreams and strange
|
|
happenings.
|
|
|
|
Largely for his work with Kathie Davies, Bud Hopkins is today honoured
|
|
and recognised as one of the worlds top UFO investigators. His books
|
|
are bestsellers, he is a consultant speaker at seminars and
|
|
conferences; he is the man to go to if you have ever been kidnapped by
|
|
aliens (especially the small grey-skinned type). "Kathie Davies" of
|
|
course also has a small niche in the UFOLOGIC hall of fame, as the
|
|
first human woman (there were others afterwards) known to have been
|
|
used by aliens for breeding purposes; she is justifiably a legend.
|
|
|
|
It is most tempting to wonder what might have happened if Kathie had
|
|
contacted not Bud Hopkins but (say) Larry Jones or Maureen Davies, or
|
|
any other of the "cult-cops" or self-styled "anti-satanists" who are
|
|
fervent believers in Satan and satanic abuse. In response to their
|
|
careful, sensitive questioning and expert therapeutic counselling,
|
|
would she still have produced a story of being kidnapped, probed and
|
|
inseminated by little grey-skinned aliens? Or would she (O foolish
|
|
thought!) have remembered that she in fact spent years being drugged,
|
|
abused and raped by baby-eating Satanists? O foolish, foolish
|
|
thought.....
|
|
|
|
|
|
BIBLIOGRAPHY
|
|
|
|
Intruders.
|
|
Bud Hopkins, Random House, 1987.
|
|
(The Kathie Davies Case).
|
|
|
|
Abduction.
|
|
Jenny Handles, Robert Hale, 1988.
|
|
(An Open Minded Look at UFO abduction phenomenon).
|
|
|
|
Perspectives.
|
|
John Spencer Macdonald, 1989.
|
|
(A sceptical look at UFO abduction phenomenon).
|
|
|
|
Visions, Apparitions, Alien Visitors.
|
|
Hillary Evans, Aquarian Press, 1984.
|
|
(An attempt to explain the subjects of the title in psychological
|
|
terms)
|