421 lines
22 KiB
Plaintext
421 lines
22 KiB
Plaintext
______________________________________________________________________________
|
||
| File Name : WACHSPRE.ASC | Online Date : 07/12/95 |
|
||
| Contributed by : Zero Profile Ltd.| Dir Category : GRAVITY |
|
||
| From : KeelyNet BBS | DataLine : (214) 324-3501 |
|
||
| A FREE Alternative Sciences BBS sponsored by Vanguard Sciences |
|
||
| KeelyNet * PO BOX 870716 * Mesquite, Texas * USA * 75187 |
|
||
| Voice/FAX : (214) 324-8741 InterNet - keelynet@ix.netcom.com |
|
||
| WWW Mirror - http://www.eskimo.com/~billb |
|
||
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|
||
This file deals with a magnetic method of directional control, and will be
|
||
updated when we get the diagrams, either as uploads or scanned in locally.
|
||
|
||
One of our contacts spoke with Mr. Wachspress about a year ago and he a free
|
||
flying SUPERCONDUCTING version actually uses the Earth's magnetic field to
|
||
provide free flight. Demonstrations are available for $5000. If the flying
|
||
device is allowed to ascend without restriction, it will move out of the
|
||
atmosphere. Note this patent uses electromagnets to demonstrate the
|
||
directional control techniques invented by Mr. Wachspress.
|
||
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
** TYPED IN ASCII FILE FORMAT FROM THE U.S. PATENT DOCUMENT
|
||
|
||
** Complements of: Zero Profile, Ltd. and
|
||
Magnetic Power, Inc. of Sebastopol, CA
|
||
|
||
United States Patent - Patent Number : 4,874,346
|
||
Wachspress - Date of Patent : Oct. 17, 1989
|
||
|
||
FREE FLYING MAGNETIC LEVITATOR
|
||
|
||
Inventor: Herb Wachspress
|
||
|
||
Appl. No. 141,566
|
||
Filed: Jan 6, 1988
|
||
|
||
(ref. Documents and other publications omitted)
|
||
|
||
ABSTRACT
|
||
|
||
A free flying magnetic levitator that is self stabilized and fully
|
||
maneuverable for magnetic structure establishing an odd number of poles for
|
||
interaction with another magnetic field having an even number of poles to
|
||
produce linear motion instead of rotation without a guideway.
|
||
|
||
Longitudinally wound coils produce the odd pole magnetic field for maximizing
|
||
coupling with an even pole field such as the magnetic field of the earth.
|
||
|
||
13 Claims, 6 Drawing Sheets
|
||
|
||
(Future - Drawings to be included in GIF format)
|
||
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
FREE FLYING MAGNETIC LEVITATOR
|
||
|
||
BACKGROUND OF INVENTION
|
||
|
||
It is known in the art of magnetics that magnets and magnetic materials can
|
||
exert forces of attraction and/or repulsion between each other and various
|
||
magneto-mechanical devices are known, including flying systems such as
|
||
levitating trains. These levitators require some form of linear guideway
|
||
to provide lateral stability and directional guidance.
|
||
|
||
Without such a guideway the interaction between opposing magnet systems would
|
||
terminate linear motion. The levitator would no longer have suspension and
|
||
thrust, and would rotate to a static rest.
|
||
|
||
A novel levitator is herein provided that requires no guideway, is free
|
||
flying, self stabilized and fully maneuverable.
|
||
|
||
With regard to movement of the levitator hereof in space, it is noted that the
|
||
earth's magnetic field has substantially parallel lines of force over any
|
||
limited distance and the present invention provides for establishing an
|
||
interacting TRIPOLE magnetic field by forming the turns of magnetic fields
|
||
thereof perpendicularly to the circumference of the winding.
|
||
|
||
With such winds, interaction with the earth's magnetic field, for example,
|
||
results from coupling primarily through the vector potential field of the
|
||
levitator windings and obeys Ampere's longitudinal force law to indeed produce
|
||
substantial thrust in the "weak" magnetic field of the earth.
|
||
|
||
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
|
||
|
||
The present invention provides a levitator or flight unit incorporating a
|
||
number of magnets having an odd number of poles that is controllably movable
|
||
in an external magnetic field and which is herein embodied as a toy having a
|
||
tethered flight unit controllably movable in a magnetic field.
|
||
|
||
The term field generator is herein employed to define a principal magnetic
|
||
field source that the levitator interacts with.
|
||
|
||
It is known that a magnet having three poles may be formed by physically
|
||
connecting a pair of dipole magnets together with like poles contacting each
|
||
other. This structure may then have, for example, north poles at each end and
|
||
a south pole at the center. It has been commented by at least one researcher
|
||
that such structure has no useful purpose.
|
||
|
||
It is possible, however, to combine tripole magnets, for example, in such a
|
||
way that a net force is exerted thereon by an external magnetic field to the
|
||
end of moving the combination by magnetic forces and in fact to support and
|
||
move the combination in the space by such forces.
|
||
|
||
A simple combination of tripole electromagnetics is herein controllably
|
||
energized to not only levitate the combination in a magnetic field, but also
|
||
to controllably move the combination in the field.
|
||
|
||
Considering magnetic forces and interactions as an aid to understanding the
|
||
present invention, it is first noted that magneto-mechanical interactions are
|
||
the direct result of polar relationships. Conventional magneto-mechanical
|
||
machines have an even number of active poles and can be explained by
|
||
elementary dipole-dipole interactions. It is known that opposite poles
|
||
attract and like poles repel.
|
||
|
||
Two unrestrained dipoles may exhibit some repulsion temporarily, but will not
|
||
remain in stable opposition, as they inevitably rotate and attract each other.
|
||
|
||
A single isolated magnetic pole has been hypothesized as an elementary
|
||
particle but no single pole magnets have been adequately confirmed.
|
||
|
||
A hypothetical isolated magnetic pole would be attracted toward another
|
||
OPPOSITE monopole and repelled from a like monopole along a straight
|
||
trajectory.
|
||
|
||
A monopole would be attracted to one pole of the dipole and repelled by the
|
||
other pole and would follow a curvilenear trajectory. A first dipole
|
||
magnet can be made to move across the field lines of a second if the field of
|
||
the first magnet is tapered, although a tapered dipole will also rotate as it
|
||
cuts across the field and will come to rest when in line with the other
|
||
field's force lines.
|
||
|
||
A three pole magnet, as employed in the present invention, exhibits many of
|
||
the characteristics of a monopole. If the flux in both halves of a tripole
|
||
are equal, the opposite rotational moments thereof in a magnetic field will
|
||
balance each other.
|
||
|
||
However, in order to have linear motion between a tripole and a dipole, the
|
||
inner pole and outer poles of the tripole must have different effective
|
||
strengths and they should couple to the dipole field with different
|
||
efficiencies. In essence, there should be weaker and stronger poles, i.e., a
|
||
pole differential.
|
||
|
||
Winding an electromagnetic tripole along two opposite horn or cone sections
|
||
with their throats meeting in the middle creates a greater magnetic flux
|
||
density in the middle pole because there are more turns per ampere of current
|
||
flow in the middle pole compared to the outer poles. Also, the inner and
|
||
outer poles operate at different characteristic impedance (mostly reluctance
|
||
and inductive reactance) causing a differential of coupling efficiencies to
|
||
the external dipole field. Without these acting on the tripole they would
|
||
balance each other and there would be no motion.
|
||
|
||
Another major factor determining the overall magnetomechanical performance of
|
||
the dipole-tripole interactions and all even pole-even pole, odd pole-odd pole
|
||
interactions is the overall impedance matching of opposing systems. In most
|
||
magnetomechanical systems the gap between moving elements is very small the
|
||
loss of efficiency by poor impedance matching is insignificant so there has
|
||
been little investigation of the problem.
|
||
|
||
However, a free flying magnetic levitator generator system, with the flux in
|
||
the medium between them, where the gap between moving elements can be very
|
||
large, impedance matching becomes important. A closer impedance match is a
|
||
function of the size, shape and materials of the opposing systems. In the
|
||
case of an electromagnet tripole interacting with a permanent magnet dipole,
|
||
it is proposed that a coating of the winding wire of the tripole with
|
||
materials having a magnetic permeability larger than the wire but smaller than
|
||
the permanent magnet dipole would improve coupling efficiency and that such
|
||
permeability should be close to the permeability of the medium between both
|
||
systems.
|
||
|
||
The use of coating to improve the performance of a system is common practice
|
||
in other technologies, although the correlations to magnetic levitators have
|
||
been evidenced only by rudimentary demonstration. The electromagnet tripole
|
||
is not limited to employing slowly varying direct electrical currents, but can
|
||
employ all types of modulated alternating currents, hence the levitator
|
||
becomes a cross between a motor and antenna.
|
||
|
||
The permanent magnet dipole has certain characteristic electromagnetic
|
||
resonances and a dynamic antenna motor tripole serving as a levitator will
|
||
interact dynamically with the dipole as well as statistically; however, such
|
||
theory and application is still only rudimentarily developed. However, the
|
||
static odd pole even pole interactions of novel value are more clearly
|
||
demonstrated and explained above.
|
||
|
||
Free flying magnetic levitators can be configured from two tripoles disposed
|
||
perpendicularly to each other, as well as other combinations of tripoles, five
|
||
pole magnets and other odd pole combinations. A simple magnetic levitator is
|
||
a full embellishment of Coulombs law for magnetomechanical systems:
|
||
|
||
F sub FL = KC sub (PHI) F (PHI) L = U sub m to R squared
|
||
|
||
Where F= force between the levitator and the field generator,
|
||
C=coupling efficiency,
|
||
(PHI)F=magnetic flux of the field generator,
|
||
(PHI)L=magnetic flux of the levitator,
|
||
U sub m=permeability of the medium,
|
||
r=distance between the levitator and the field generator,
|
||
K=universal magnetic constant (for compatability of units).
|
||
|
||
This law is applicable to all permanent and electromagnets operating as motors
|
||
or generators.
|
||
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
BRIEF DESCCRIPTION OF FIGURES
|
||
(omitted)
|
||
|
||
DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
|
||
|
||
(Brief excerpts of the following eight pages of description are referenced by
|
||
column and line number CC:LL)
|
||
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
8:38
|
||
|
||
It will be seen that the flight unit may be controlled, not only to hover in
|
||
an exterior magnetic field or the field of an exterior field generator also to
|
||
make all of the motions possible with conventional flying devices such as an
|
||
airplane.
|
||
|
||
One operating the present invention may thus move the flight unit about in the
|
||
surrounding magnetic field. It will of corse, be appreciated that the
|
||
controls of the control unit may be set up in a variety of ways, possibly for
|
||
example, by providing separate joy sticks for (each axis)
|
||
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
10:51
|
||
|
||
If the current in a wire loop is considered to be in 3D space, the magnetic
|
||
field around the wire is the vector curl of the current and exists some
|
||
further dimension that might be considered to as in 4D space.
|
||
|
||
If the magnetic field around the wire is considered to be in 4D space the
|
||
vector potential field around the magnetic field is the vector curl of the
|
||
magnetic field and exists some further dimension that might be considered as
|
||
in 5D space.
|
||
|
||
Many more fields are nested in fields of higher dimensionality but only two
|
||
are known to demonstrate macroscopic forces of interaction, magnetic fields
|
||
via many common linear and rotational motors and vector potential fields.
|
||
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
12:5
|
||
|
||
It will be appreciated that levitation for any substantial distance in the
|
||
earth's magnetic field is best accomplished without physical connection of the
|
||
levitator to the ground or power supply. This can be accomplished by
|
||
providing the levitator itself with a self contained power supply. Such a
|
||
power supply may energize the windings of the levitator magnets with
|
||
electrical energy stored in the windings.
|
||
|
||
Considering this matter..it is noted that force, F, applied to a current
|
||
carrying conductor in a magnetic field, B, is proportional to Bli, wherein l
|
||
is the length of the conductor and i is current flowing through the conductor.
|
||
|
||
Interactions with the relatively weak earth's magnetic field produces
|
||
levitation and motion of the levitator hereof may best be accomplished by
|
||
causing a very large current to flow through the windings of the electromagnet
|
||
thereof.
|
||
|
||
Reference is made in this respect to FIG. 16 illustrating a curve of critical
|
||
current versus magnetic field strength. Commonly motors are operated in the
|
||
range wherein the current is relatively low and the field strength is
|
||
relatively high. Inasmuch as the field strength of the earth's magnetic field
|
||
is known to be quite low, the present invention operates upon an entirely
|
||
different portion of the curve, as indicated, for example, at C thereon
|
||
wherein a very large current is employed.
|
||
|
||
The current carrying capacity of electrical conductors is known to be related
|
||
to the resistance thereof, and in order to achieve truly high current density,
|
||
the present invention employs conductors having extremely small or
|
||
substantially zero resistance, i.e., superconductors.
|
||
|
||
One known superconductor of use here is niobium-titanium that may comprise an
|
||
alloy containing 48% titanium and a superconductor so comprised preferably
|
||
includes copper cladding of full annealed copper. Superconducting properties
|
||
of alloys are generally considered to be attainable only at very reduced
|
||
temperatures although recent research indicates that some types of conductors
|
||
may exhibit superconducting properties at higher temperatures.
|
||
|
||
There is schematically illustrated in FIG. 17 a levitator incorporating a
|
||
tripole magnet or tripole magnet and cryostat. The cryostat includes an outer
|
||
insulated envelope providing heat insulating for the interior thereof and an
|
||
interior shell mounting the tripole magnet. A vacuum connection is provided
|
||
to evacuate the interior of the envelope and shell, and a fill and vent line
|
||
extends to the rear exterior of the envelope with a valve therein. A switch
|
||
is electrically connected between the terminals of the tripole and terminals
|
||
exterior to the envelope.
|
||
|
||
In accordance with conventional practice the cryostat is first evacuated and
|
||
then charged with liquid helium through the valve. The tripole is then
|
||
charged by an external power supply through the switch which is connected
|
||
accross the windings to prevent shorting of the power supply during charging.
|
||
After disconnection of the power supply the valve is opened to vent the liquid
|
||
helium so as to bring the temperature therein to a very low temperature by
|
||
boiling of the liquid helium.
|
||
|
||
Actuation of the switch then causes a circulating current to flow through the
|
||
windings of the tripole against substantially zero resistance so that this
|
||
current then persists to produce the above noted magnetic field about the
|
||
tripole which couples with the earth's magnetic field to cause forces of
|
||
interaction which move or levitate the levitator. It will, of course, be
|
||
appreciated that this levitator may, and preferably does, include a pair of
|
||
orthogonal disposed tripoles, however, only a single tripole is illustrated in
|
||
FIG. 17 for ease of illustration and description.
|
||
|
||
The levitator of FIG. 17 may, for example, comprise a small space vehicle with
|
||
the outer shell being formed of aluminum sheet having dimension of ten inches
|
||
in length by two and half inches in diameter with the motor comprising a pair
|
||
of tripole windings of niobium-titanium wire having a one inch diameter and
|
||
two inch length.
|
||
|
||
With the structure weighing one ounce and the motor weighing three ounces, a
|
||
refrigerant in the form of two ounces of liquid helium may be provided therein
|
||
to provide a total weight at lift off of 6 ounces.
|
||
|
||
Such a unit may have a total thrust at lift off of 9 ounces with an altitude
|
||
at burnout of three miles and a velocity of twenty five hundreds of miles per
|
||
hour at such burnout. Steering of such a unit may be accomplished by
|
||
controlled passage of some current through an orthogonal winding of aluminum
|
||
wire, for example, which exhibits some resistance at the temperature of
|
||
operation of the unit so as to provide desired lateral forces of interaction
|
||
with the earth's magnetic field.
|
||
|
||
The tripole magnet field hereof with longitudinally wound toroidial windings
|
||
as shown, for example, in FIG. 13, may also be formed by placing the
|
||
conductors upon a deformable form that may be similar to the structure of FIG.
|
||
10 wherein the ends of the winds are capable of being rotated. A winding may
|
||
thus be formed as elongated turns in a cylindrical shape, as shown at A of
|
||
FIG. 18. End discs or rings are then controllably rotated in opposite
|
||
directions to twist the winding into a pair of frusto-conical shapes having
|
||
contiguous small ends, as shown at B of FIG. 18.
|
||
|
||
Appropriate electrical connections are made to the windings as noted above and
|
||
the tripole electromagnet may thus be readily controlled as to taper of the
|
||
windings for establishing a desired differential field strengths between the
|
||
center and ends thereof.
|
||
|
||
It will be appreciated that there has been described above a free flying
|
||
magnetic levitator having extended capabilities not only for producing usable
|
||
forces of interaction with generated electrical fields but also with the
|
||
earth's magnetic field. It is further noted that the present invention
|
||
particularly as described in the above noted example of a levitator in
|
||
accordance herewith may be scaled up to larger sizes with increased
|
||
efficiencies and the capablilties of lifting substantial payloads.
|
||
|
||
It is also noted that the toroidal windings of FIGS. 13 and 14 may be employed
|
||
in each of the configurations described and illustrated for the winding of
|
||
FIG. 2, for example. Thus the present invention does provide a material
|
||
advancement in the field of space vehicles whether such space be considered as
|
||
the space above a desktop or as the space about the earth, and beyond.
|
||
|
||
14:08 to 16:30 (Summary of Patent Claims) has been omitted
|
||
|
||
portions of the above U.S. Patent document have been omitted to simplify the
|
||
transcription to machine readable form. For the complete document contact
|
||
the U.S. Patent Office. The Los Angeles Library will provide direct fax
|
||
transmission of U.S. patent documents for a nominal fee.
|
||
|
||
--------- end of patent document ------ transcribed 4/15/93
|
||
|
||
GIF files of the FIGS from this document will be provided as:
|
||
Wachspr1.GIF through Wachspr6.GIF
|
||
As soon as they have been scanned in and uploaded (by Zero Profile).
|
||
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
Vanguard Notes
|
||
|
||
The magnetic fields are produced by an interesting geometry which is key to
|
||
the entire patent claim showing how a magnetic monopole can be constructed and
|
||
used in a practical application.
|
||
|
||
To get a better idea of how it works, you draw a 'cross' on a piece of paper,
|
||
then imagine a line drawn vertically through the center, you will have 6
|
||
radial lines.
|
||
|
||
Tapered coils are wound on each of these six arms and energized so that the
|
||
same pole is located at the center. That is, South pole only on the inside
|
||
and North pole ONLY on the outside (or vice versa). Thus, you have an
|
||
'artificial monopole' as a direct result of the geometry.
|
||
|
||
By controlling the current flow through one or more of these conical coils,
|
||
the device can be caused to move in the desired direction.
|
||
|
||
\ (Z) | / (Y) (Z)
|
||
\ | / | /
|
||
(Y) \ | / | /
|
||
\ | / | /
|
||
\ | / | /
|
||
| 6 radial arms |/_________(X)
|
||
/ | \
|
||
/ | \
|
||
(X) / | \
|
||
/ | \
|
||
/ | \
|
||
|
||
|
||
| | this end is on the outside
|
||
________________|_|__________
|
||
wire \_________|_|_________/ (another wonderful ASCII detail)
|
||
\________|_|________/ this one 'intended' to show how a coil
|
||
\_______|_|_______/ is wrapped on each of the 6 radial arms
|
||
\______|_|______/ note : the tapered end faces INWARD
|
||
Tapered \_____|_|_____/
|
||
Coil \____|_|____/
|
||
\___|_|__/________ wire
|
||
| |
|
||
| | this end goes to center
|
||
|
||
The interactions between the magnetic fields can be so adjusted as to cause
|
||
the device to tilt. If it is 'floating' as a result of a repelling field
|
||
(which would be located on the bottom for now...<g>), it works like a boat on
|
||
water. When constructed of superconducting materials, it will float in the
|
||
air as it repels against the earth's very weak magnetic field.
|
||
|
||
For demonstration purposes according to the patent diagram, a coil is provided
|
||
on the bottom to provide a repelling field. The device initially sits on this
|
||
platform when no power is applied to the floater. When the floater is powered
|
||
up and since it is of LIKE polarity in a monopolar configuration, it is
|
||
repelled from the bottom plate freely floats in the air.
|
||
|
||
Though this is NOT true gravity control, it offers a unique means of
|
||
'steering' such a device when we get to that inevitable stage. Additionally,
|
||
the idea of creating such an intense monopolar repulsion that a device could
|
||
actually work against the earth's natural magnetic field is amazing in itself.
|
||
|
||
The effects of such high density magnetic fields on living organisms might not
|
||
make this a 'desired' means of flight, though it does not rule out use of it
|
||
for payload delivery systems for space, upper atmosphere beacons or
|
||
transmitters, eye-in-the-sky surveillance systems, etc...........>>> Jerry
|
||
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |