265 lines
11 KiB
Plaintext
265 lines
11 KiB
Plaintext
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
|
|
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
|
|
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
|
|
PO BOX 1031
|
|
Mesquite, TX 75150
|
|
|
|
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
|
|
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
|
|
files on KeelyNet except where noted!
|
|
|
|
October 6, 1991
|
|
|
|
GRAV7.ASC
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
This file is shared with KeelyNet courtesy of
|
|
Tom Brown, Director of Borderland Sciences.
|
|
|
|
The Journal of Borderland Sciences has been in
|
|
active publication since 1945.
|
|
It is an excellent quarterly magazine with subscribers worldwide.
|
|
If you might like to subscribe, please mention that you heard of
|
|
Borderland from either Vangard Sciences or KeelyNet.
|
|
Yearly subscriptions are $20.
|
|
|
|
Borderland Sciences
|
|
P.O. Box 429
|
|
Garberville, CA
|
|
95440-0429 USA
|
|
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
BSRF - July/August 1982
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Discovery of the Second Law of Gravitation
|
|
|
|
by Craig Gunnufson
|
|
|
|
Almost everyone has heard the story in which an apple fell on
|
|
Newton's head and this led to the discovery of the Universal Law of
|
|
Gravitation, which is:
|
|
|
|
"Any two bodies attract each other with a force proportional
|
|
to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to
|
|
the square of the distance between them (F-GMm/r'2 (for
|
|
'2=squared))"
|
|
|
|
I belive I have made a very fundamental discovery which could be
|
|
called the Second Universal Law of Gravitation. It came about as an
|
|
outgrowth of my Ether Displacement Theory. The Second Law of
|
|
Gravitation states :
|
|
|
|
"Matter absorbs and re-radiates energy from the medium (ether)
|
|
which is responsible for the phenomenon known as gravitation.
|
|
The rate of energy being radiated is proportional to the
|
|
square of the mass."
|
|
|
|
(Note that radiation indicates PUSH....Vangard)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dE/dt = kM'2 = power,
|
|
|
|
k = 7.2 X 10'-34 (to the -34th) erg/gm'2 sec
|
|
|
|
Therefore, an intrinsic property of matter is that it absorbs energy
|
|
from the ether.
|
|
|
|
The rate of acceleration of a falling object, which acquires kinetic
|
|
energy is a measure of energy flow via conduction through the ether.
|
|
|
|
For example, under Newton's law of gravitation, if one of the masses
|
|
in question is doubled, it would follow that force and therefore the
|
|
rate of acceleration would double.
|
|
|
|
Since the kinetic energy is proportional to the second power of the
|
|
velocity, we would also expect the energy flow via conduction to be
|
|
proportional to the second power of the mass times the constant.
|
|
|
|
The solar energy output is not less than 3.89 X 10'33 (to the
|
|
33rd)erg/sec. If we assume that fusion and gravitational mechanisms
|
|
are the only methods of energy production, then the ether must
|
|
supply 2.8 X 10'33 erg/sec since the neutrino measurements account
|
|
for only 27% of the Sun's energy.
|
|
|
|
From laboratory work it is known that nuclear fusion reactions give
|
|
off neutrinos. It has been generally accepted that the Sun's energy
|
|
is the result of fusion but, over the last 10 years, counts of
|
|
neutrinos emitted by the sun have been less than expected.
|
|
|
|
In "SCIENCE", January 1976, J.N. Bahcall and R. Davis, Jr. reported
|
|
finding only 1.5 Solar Neutrino Units (SNU). Under the standard
|
|
solar model, 5.5 SNU were expected. If these figures are correct,
|
|
then only 27% of the Sun's energy may be produced by fusion.
|
|
|
|
The "K" was calculated to be 7.2 X 10'-34 erg/gm'2 sec. It is
|
|
recognized that this value of "K" is a first approximation since it
|
|
is likely that celestial bodies contain other energy processes and
|
|
the neutrinos measured may be general background levels. Based on
|
|
this value the predicted minimum energy output of other celestial
|
|
bodies were then calculated :
|
|
|
|
Celestial Body Mass (M) gms Predicted Output
|
|
Earth 5.97 X 10'27 2.60 X 10'22
|
|
Jupiter 1.88 X 10'30 2.50 X 10'27
|
|
Saturn 5.60 X 10'29 2.30 X 10'26
|
|
Neptune 1.00 X 10'29 7.20 X 10'24
|
|
Uranus 8.60 X 10'28 5.30 X 10'24
|
|
Alpha Centauri "A" 2.15 X 10'33 3.33 X 10'33
|
|
Alpha Centauri "B" 1.75 X 10'33 2.20 X 10'33
|
|
Alpha Centauri "C" 2.39 X 10'32 4.10 X 10'31
|
|
(where ' preceding a number indicates to the tenth power)
|
|
|
|
There is much disagreement among geophysicists as to the Earth's
|
|
total rate of energy dissipation. Values of heat quantities
|
|
measured are on the order of magnitude of 10'20 erg/sec (Sclater,
|
|
"Review Geophys. Space Physics", Vol. 18. p. 269-300).
|
|
|
|
However, Williams and Von Herzen pointed out in 1974 that much more
|
|
heat could be lost due to hydrothermal circulation of sea water.
|
|
|
|
Page 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Some estimates place this heat loss at 100 times greater than
|
|
continental heat loss. Therefore, at the present time, the total
|
|
energy released by the earth is highly speculative. My calculation
|
|
of 2.6 X 10'22 erg/sec is within the range of possibilities.
|
|
|
|
From the data received by the probes sent to Jupiter there is an
|
|
outer layer of atmosphere that is quite cold, but under this colder
|
|
layer is a much hotter layer, around 440 degrees Celsius.
|
|
(Encyclopedia Americana, Vol. 16, p. 254, 1979).
|
|
|
|
Because the outer layer acts as insulation, we would expect only
|
|
some portion of the energy radiated by the inner layer to escape the
|
|
planet. Using the Stefan-Boltzmann law it is possible to calculate
|
|
the upper limit of the rate of energy lost through radiation.
|
|
|
|
E = kT'4 = (5.7 X 10'-5) (713 degrees K)'4 = 1.47 X 10'7 erg/cm'2sec
|
|
|
|
Esubt = E(area) = (1.47 X 10'7) (6.48 X 10'20) = 9.5 X 10'27 erg/sec
|
|
|
|
Since some portion of this amount is able to escape through the
|
|
outer layer, then my figure of 2.5 X 10'27 erg/sec is within
|
|
probable range.
|
|
|
|
Newton himself recognized that bodies were attracted to each other,
|
|
but the actual mechanism remained a mystery to him. In the 19th
|
|
Century, Lesage theorized that a medium of hyperfine particles could
|
|
account for the inverse square law discovered by Newton.
|
|
|
|
Lesage's theory also showed that
|
|
GRAVITY IS A PUSH, NOT A PULL OR ATTRACTION.
|
|
|
|
Since then, there have been others who have come up with similar
|
|
theories independently.
|
|
|
|
(Walter Wright of Fairfield, California is the leading
|
|
exponent of the Push Gravity theory as first noted by his
|
|
then 6 year old son, Walter has since fleshed the idea out
|
|
into a complete and logical system which we of Vangard
|
|
Sciences/KeelyNet fully support.....Jerry Decker/Ron Barker)
|
|
|
|
However, Lesagian theory has had its critics. In recent times two
|
|
of the most notable are Richard Feynman and Willy Ley. In his
|
|
essay, "The Case for a Lesagian Theory of Gravitation", that
|
|
appeared in the Association for Pushing Gravity Research, 1979
|
|
Mutual Aid addition, John Kizer presented some of the arguments made
|
|
by these critics.
|
|
|
|
One of them is : "The friction generated by the impacts of these
|
|
ultra-mundane particles upon masses such as the
|
|
earth would, of necessity, make the earth white-
|
|
hot within a short period of time."
|
|
|
|
In this statement the critics are right QUALITATIVELY but not
|
|
QUANTITATIVELY. My calculations show that the earth DOES NOT HAVE
|
|
SUFFICIENT MASS to become white hot, BUT THE SUN DOES.
|
|
|
|
It can be seen that with this new law of gravitation we can
|
|
calculate the rate of energy radiation of celestial bodies. These
|
|
rates confirm the idea that space, or the ether, has usable energy.
|
|
|
|
Page 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is much research presently going on for the purpose of tapping
|
|
this energy. This confirmation further legitimizes this important
|
|
research.
|
|
|
|
Copyright 1981 by Craig Gunnufson, all rights reserved.
|
|
|
|
Mr. Gunnufson welcomes comment.
|
|
His address is 26176 Madison St.,
|
|
Murrieta, California 92362 USA
|
|
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
|
|
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
|
|
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
|
|
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
|
|
|
|
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
|
|
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
|
|
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
If we can be of service, you may contact
|
|
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 4
|
|
|
|
|