93 lines
3.7 KiB
Plaintext
93 lines
3.7 KiB
Plaintext
|
From: caasi%ucselx@sdsu.edu (Richard Caasi)
|
|||
|
Newsgroups: rec.humor.funny
|
|||
|
Subject: An AI Light Bulb
|
|||
|
Date: 4 Apr 90 10:30:10 GMT
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
How many AI people does it take to change a lightbulb?
|
|||
|
At least 55:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The problem space group (5):
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
One to define the goal state.
|
|||
|
One to define the operators.
|
|||
|
One to describe the universal problem solver.
|
|||
|
One to hack the production system.
|
|||
|
One to indicate about how it is a model of human lightbulb changing
|
|||
|
behaviour.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The logical formalism group (16):
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
One to figure out how to describe lightbulb changing in first order logic.
|
|||
|
One to figure out how to describe lightbulb changing in second order
|
|||
|
logic.
|
|||
|
One to show the adequacy of FOL.
|
|||
|
One to show the inadequacy of FOL.
|
|||
|
One to show that lightbulb logic is non-monotonic.
|
|||
|
One to show that it isn't non-monotonic.
|
|||
|
One to show how non-monotonic logic is incorporated in FOL.
|
|||
|
One to determine the bindings for the variables.
|
|||
|
One to show the completeness of the solution.
|
|||
|
One to show the consistency of the solution.
|
|||
|
One to show that the two just above are incoherent.
|
|||
|
One to hack a theorem prover for lightbulb resolution.
|
|||
|
One to suggest a parallel theory of lightbulb logic theorem proving.
|
|||
|
One to show that the parallel theory isn't complete. ...ad infinitum
|
|||
|
(or absurdum, as you will). ...
|
|||
|
One to indicate how it is a description of human lightbulb changing
|
|||
|
behaviour.
|
|||
|
One to call the electrician.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The robotics group (10):
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
One to build a vision system to recognize the dead bulb.
|
|||
|
One to build a vision system to locate a new bulb.
|
|||
|
One to figure out how to grasp the lightbulb without breaking it.
|
|||
|
One to figure out how to make a universal joint that will permit the
|
|||
|
hand to rotate 360+ degrees.
|
|||
|
One to figure out how to make the universal joint go the other way.
|
|||
|
One to figure out the arm solutions that will get the arm to the socket.
|
|||
|
One to organize the construction teams.
|
|||
|
One to hack the planning system.
|
|||
|
One to get Westinghouse to sponsor the research.
|
|||
|
One to indicate about how the robot mimics human motor behaviour in
|
|||
|
lightbulb changing.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The knowledge engineering group (6):
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
One to study electricians' changing lightbulbs.
|
|||
|
One to arrange for the purchase of the lisp machines.
|
|||
|
One to assure the customer that this is a hard problem and that great
|
|||
|
accomplishments in theory will come from his support of this effort.
|
|||
|
(The same one can arrange for the fleecing.)
|
|||
|
One to study related research.
|
|||
|
One to indicate about how it is a description of human lightbulb
|
|||
|
changing behaviour.
|
|||
|
One to call the lisp hackers.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The Lisp hackers (13):
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
One to bring up the chaos net.
|
|||
|
One to adjust the microcode to properly reflect the group's political
|
|||
|
beliefs.
|
|||
|
One to fix the compiler.
|
|||
|
One to make incompatible changes to the primitives.
|
|||
|
One to provide the Coke.
|
|||
|
One to rehack the Lisp editor/debugger.
|
|||
|
One to rehack the window package.
|
|||
|
Another to fix the compiler.
|
|||
|
One to convert code to the non-upward compatible Lisp dialect.
|
|||
|
Another to rehack the window package properly.
|
|||
|
One to flame on BUG-LISPM.
|
|||
|
Another to fix the microcode.
|
|||
|
One to write the fifteen lines of code required to change the lightbulb.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The Psychological group (5):
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
One to build an apparatus which will time lightbulb changing performance.
|
|||
|
One to gather and run subjects.
|
|||
|
One to mathematically model the behaviour.
|
|||
|
One to call the expert systems group.
|
|||
|
One to adjust the resulting system, so that it drops the right number
|
|||
|
of bulbs.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|