656 lines
28 KiB
Plaintext
656 lines
28 KiB
Plaintext
![]() |
______________________________________________________________________________
|
|||
|
| File Name : TOMIMOTR.ASC | Online Date : 04/30/95 |
|
|||
|
| Contributed by : Stefan Hartman | Dir Category : ENERGY |
|
|||
|
| From : KeelyNet BBS | DataLine : (214) 324-3501 |
|
|||
|
| KeelyNet * PO BOX 870716 * Mesquite, Texas * USA * 75187 |
|
|||
|
| A FREE Alternative Sciences BBS sponsored by Vanguard Sciences |
|
|||
|
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|
|||
|
The following file was sent to me on the InterNet by Stefan.
|
|||
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|||
|
Return-Path: <shb.contrib.de!harti@contrib.de>
|
|||
|
Received: from uropax.contrib.de by ix.ix.netcom.com (8.6.12/SMI-4.1/Netcom)
|
|||
|
id OAA23352; Fri, 28 Apr 1995 14:40:35 -0700
|
|||
|
Received: from shb.contrib.de by uropax.contrib.de with uucp
|
|||
|
(Smail3.1.28.1 #3) id m0s4xLx-0007bbC; Fri, 28 Apr 95 23:13 MET DST
|
|||
|
Received: by uropax.contrib.de from shb (policy router $Revision: 1.22 $)
|
|||
|
id <799103612.1522>; Fri, 28 Apr 95 21:13 UTC
|
|||
|
Received: by shb.contrib.de (CrossPoint v3.02 R/A2148);
|
|||
|
28 Apr 1995 23:12:21 +0100
|
|||
|
Date: 28 Apr 1995 22:58:00 +0100
|
|||
|
From: harti@shb.contrib.de (Stefan Hartmann)
|
|||
|
To: keelynet@ix.netcom.com
|
|||
|
Message-ID: <5kjBHpHPldB@shb.contrib.de>
|
|||
|
In-Reply-To: <199504281534.IAA17307@ix4.ix.netcom.com>
|
|||
|
Subject: Re: Howdy!
|
|||
|
X-Mailer: XP v3.02 R/A2148
|
|||
|
MIME-Version: 1.0
|
|||
|
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
|
|||
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
PM_Square enhanced : The new free energy generation device !
|
|||
|
============================================================
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Latest news:
|
|||
|
------------
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
1. MPEG movie now available at:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
194.77.35.1 in pub/harti/energy/PM_Square/pm_sqlin.mpg about 485 KBytes.
|
|||
|
Shows, how the Linear Mode works with multiple stator tracks !
|
|||
|
Could be used to propel a train along a railway !
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
2. A new Enhanced Linear version shown down there !
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
=====================================================================
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Hi,
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
do you remember the TOMI (also called TMI) device ?
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Well, I have worked together with the inventor and another "magnet freak"
|
|||
|
during the last weekend on the design and we found the solution how to power a
|
|||
|
motor just via using Permanent Magnets !
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
I will call this design from now on:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
PM_Square = (PM)^2
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Permanent Magnet Powered Motor !
|
|||
|
= = = =
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Well, here it is how it is working:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
I will first describe a Linear Motor design and later post a few MPEG
|
|||
|
movies of the enhanced rotor version experiments...
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
I will publish all my results and findings, so you are ready to duplicate
|
|||
|
it yourself and prove me right or wrong. This way the basic design goes to
|
|||
|
the Public Domain and can't be bought out or will be suppressed...
|
|||
|
I just claim the inventor rights on the Angle Steel add-on design !
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Please copy this file to all people, which care about environment
|
|||
|
pollution and want to have a so called "free energy" machine.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
For the full understanding of this PM_Square design you should have read
|
|||
|
the TOMI description !
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Here the PM_Square design goes:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The most important enhancements over the TOMI design are introduced via
|
|||
|
2 angle steel plates at the endings on each track-magnet (in the TOMI
|
|||
|
description called: Runner-magnet)
|
|||
|
I will call these "Runner-Magnets" from now on Stator Track-magnets,
|
|||
|
because they don't "run" , but are just the Stator-Magnets, which build
|
|||
|
the track !
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Okay, so how are these 2 Angle Steel plates fitted to the Track-Magnets ?
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Here is a simple ASCII drawing:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Top View
|
|||
|
========
|
|||
|
____ ____
|
|||
|
| track magnets (stator) | <-----Angle Steel
|
|||
|
|_____ _____ ___________ _____ ______ ______| at each ending !
|
|||
|
| | | | | | | |
|
|||
|
|N S|N S|N S|N S|N S|N S|N S|
|
|||
|
|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|______|______|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
------->| Roller Magnet dropped into the track
|
|||
|
from above at 90 degrees at this place !
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
-----
|
|||
|
| N |
|
|||
|
| S |
|
|||
|
-----
|
|||
|
| N |
|
|||
|
| S | Roller Magnet,
|
|||
|
----- rolls this way -------->
|
|||
|
| N | along out of the track !
|
|||
|
| S |
|
|||
|
-----
|
|||
|
| N |
|
|||
|
| S |
|
|||
|
-----
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
------->| Roller Magnet dropped into the track
|
|||
|
from above at 90 degrees at this place !
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
_____ _____ _____ _____ _____ ______ ______
|
|||
|
| | | | | | | |
|
|||
|
|S N|S N|S N|S N|S N|S N|S N|
|
|||
|
|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|______|______|
|
|||
|
| | <------Angle Steel
|
|||
|
|____ track magnets (stator) _____| at each ending !
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
This is the Top View of the Linear Motor design !
|
|||
|
All magnets used are circular magnets. So the Roller Magnet can roll
|
|||
|
through the track ! The number of stator track magnets can vary, but
|
|||
|
should not be too many , cause it weakens the flux inside the track.
|
|||
|
Go for around 7 to 10 magnets first. (7 are shown over here !)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
By using Angle Steel plates of ST37 or ST100 (thickness of about 1 to 2.5
|
|||
|
mm), one can force the magnetic flux at the endings of the permanent
|
|||
|
magnet Stator Track to be going the right way!
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
In this case it prevents to pull the Roller Magnet back into the track,
|
|||
|
when it leaves the track at the right side !
|
|||
|
You can also try to use a "V"-shaped placement of the Stator Track magnets
|
|||
|
(not putting them in parallel as shown, but at an opening angle of maybe 5
|
|||
|
to 10 degrees), which I can't draw over here with this simple ASCII-"art"!
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
This enables the Roller magnet to get out of the Stator Track at the
|
|||
|
ending even better and the killing force at the end of the track is far
|
|||
|
more weaker !
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
One has to drop the Roller Permanent Magnet for the best performance
|
|||
|
(acceleration) into the track at around 90 degrees (also 45 degrees would
|
|||
|
still work!) at around 1/5 to 1/4 length of the track.
|
|||
|
This way, the Roller Magnet is just pulled into the track and don't have
|
|||
|
to go via the slight repulsion gate at the entrance of the track at the
|
|||
|
very left side !
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
With using the steel plates fitted to the end of the track magnets you can
|
|||
|
also try to push the Roller Magnet into the track at the left side, but it
|
|||
|
will almost kill the received acceleration force from the previous track !
|
|||
|
But with using the Angle Steel plates, this killing effect is much less,
|
|||
|
than without using the Angle Steel plates...
|
|||
|
So the secret to a Real Working Linear PM_Square motor are just these
|
|||
|
Angle Steel Magnetic Flux guidance plates !
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The best design to get the Roller going through an unlimited number of
|
|||
|
Magnet Stator tracks would be the following design:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Side View:
|
|||
|
==========
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Roller Magnet climbing the hills -----> going this direction -->
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
| wooden cardboard downhill track
|
|||
|
| | (without any stator magnets !)
|
|||
|
| |
|
|||
|
| __ | __
|
|||
|
| / \ | / \
|
|||
|
\ | /--. \ \|/ /--. \
|
|||
|
\ | / ; \ / ; \
|
|||
|
\ \|/ / / \ / / \
|
|||
|
\ / \ / \
|
|||
|
\ o / ^ ^ \ / \
|
|||
|
\ / | | \ / \ /
|
|||
|
/ | | / /
|
|||
|
/ | | / /
|
|||
|
/ | | / /
|
|||
|
<___ | | <___ <__
|
|||
|
| |
|
|||
|
^ | |
|
|||
|
| | Angle Steel
|
|||
|
Angle Steel |
|
|||
|
Stator magnet track
|
|||
|
______________________________________________________________________
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
This Linear Motion Permanent Magnet Motor design should really work.
|
|||
|
It uses the gravitational force to go downhill into the next magnetic
|
|||
|
Stator Track.
|
|||
|
In this Side View only the front Stator magnet is shown with the Angle
|
|||
|
Steel at each end with the "wrong" angle drawn, due to the bad
|
|||
|
perspectivic drawing view !(I am not able to draw it better with using
|
|||
|
this ASCII- "art" ! Normally in the Side View the Angle Steel Plates would
|
|||
|
point into direction of your face and not downwards ! But I have drawn it
|
|||
|
downwards to make it clear, where the placement of the Angle Steel is
|
|||
|
located !)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Have a look again above to the Top View and it will getting clear to you,
|
|||
|
how the Angle Steel has to be placed !
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Enhanced Linear Motion version:
|
|||
|
===============================
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Side View:
|
|||
|
----------
|
|||
|
Roller Magnet climbing the hills -----> going this direction -->
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
| wooden cardboard downhill track
|
|||
|
| | (without any stator magnets !)
|
|||
|
| |
|
|||
|
| |
|
|||
|
| # # | # #
|
|||
|
| / / | / /
|
|||
|
| /\ /\ | /\ /\
|
|||
|
\|/ / \ / \ | / \ / \
|
|||
|
o/ \ / \ \|/ / \ / \
|
|||
|
\ / \ / \ / \ / \ /
|
|||
|
\/ \/ \/ \/ \/
|
|||
|
/ / / / /
|
|||
|
# # # # #
|
|||
|
/|\
|
|||
|
|_______ Angle Steel plates at each ending of the
|
|||
|
Stator Magnets !
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
In this enhanced Linear version you use only the "phase" inside the stator
|
|||
|
track, that really accelerates the roller magnet. The fields at the beginning
|
|||
|
and ending of the Stator magnet track are not used !
|
|||
|
The roller magnet can thus come into and out of the accelerating Stator Track
|
|||
|
without any killing force. The roller will just be accelerated each time
|
|||
|
it goes into the next hill !
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Okay, so far for now.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Please try to duplicate this Linear Motion design of PM_Square and let me
|
|||
|
know, if it will work for you.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
If you have any question, please drop a note to my email account at:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
harti@contrib.de or
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
harti@b-2.de.contrib.net
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
You can also have a look at my FTP site at:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
ftp://ftp.b-2.de.contrib.net in pub/harti/energy/pm_square
|
|||
|
(194.77.35.1) or into pub/incoming
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
There will be soon a few MPEG movies of my experiments with this
|
|||
|
PM_Square device !
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Theoretical explanation:
|
|||
|
========================
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
I received this from an "anonymous" friend. Please read it and let me know
|
|||
|
what you think about this theory for the explanation of the TOMI and
|
|||
|
PM_Square effect !
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
I believe, that with using Permanent Magnets the Zero Point Energy can be
|
|||
|
tapped ! (See Dr. Harraold Putthof's explanation of Zero Point Energy)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Irreversible Processes in Fields
|
|||
|
================================
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
It is well known theory that the thermodynamic potentials go to
|
|||
|
an extremum. This is regarded as equivalent to Planck's 2nd law
|
|||
|
although the complete equivalence between both formulations of
|
|||
|
the second law never have been proved generally, especially if we
|
|||
|
apply the extremum principle of the thermodynamic potentials to
|
|||
|
electromagnetic fields. In this article we investigate this
|
|||
|
question.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
I. Irreversible Processes in Vapour-Liquid Mixtures
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
We begin here with a well known and quite trivial example. We
|
|||
|
regard two cylinder volumes connected by a tap in the middle.
|
|||
|
Both the volumes can be set by moving a piston up and down into
|
|||
|
or out of the volume. With this experimental setup we proceed
|
|||
|
the following isothermic irreversible cycle, comp fig.1a):We take a fluid
|
|||
|
(for example water) being at the dew line of the
|
|||
|
phase diagram. We expand both the pistons isothermically from
|
|||
|
point 1 to point 2. So liquid condenses and is collected in the
|
|||
|
lower cylinder. Now the tap is closed and both the volumes are
|
|||
|
recompressed at equal pressures until the starting volume is
|
|||
|
reached again. Now we regard the question whether Planck's law is
|
|||
|
fulfilled. This question can be answered by writing the 2nd law
|
|||
|
for free energy which states that the free energy F tends to be a
|
|||
|
minimum. Therefore, if we leave the minimum in doing the cycle
|
|||
|
Fstart-Fend = - circle integral P dV > 0
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
must hold because the cycle is isothermal (dT=0) with no matter
|
|||
|
exchange (dn=0). The orientation of the integral shows that
|
|||
|
Planck's second law holds, comp. fig.1b).
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
II. Irreversible Processes in Fields
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
a) General
|
|||
|
According Landau and Lifshitz (1) the free energy of a system
|
|||
|
including electric fields and linear dielectrics is defined by
|
|||
|
F'(V,T,D) = F(V,T) + 1/(8*Pi*eps) Int D^2 dV
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The Legendre transform of this potential is
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
F''(V,T,E) = F(V,T) - eps/(8*Pi) Int E^2 dV
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Both these definitions are not useful for thermodynamics
|
|||
|
because they are non-homologous functions regarding the molar
|
|||
|
ratios. Therefore, the following definitions are used and
|
|||
|
specified for constant dielectrics
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
f'(V,T,P) = f (V,T) + 1/(8*Pi) Int E dP = f + 1/(8*Pi*Xi) P^2
|
|||
|
f''(V,T,E) = f(V,T) - 1/(8*Pi) Int P dE = f - Xi/(8*Pi) E^2
|
|||
|
Regarding the 2nd derivative of the electric variable of both
|
|||
|
these potentials we see that for a constant homogene dielectrics
|
|||
|
f'(V,T,P) approaches a minimum and f''(V,T,E) approaches a
|
|||
|
maximum in the equilibrium state, if Xi > 0. Similar
|
|||
|
considerations hold for magnetic fields as well.
|
|||
|
b) Mixing Processes
|
|||
|
Now, similar like in section I, we investigate an isothermic and
|
|||
|
isochoric cycle if an intense field is applied to a non ideal -
|
|||
|
non linear binary dielectric liquid (2).
|
|||
|
We start at the phase separation line at low field and apply a
|
|||
|
stronger field. Then demixing of the solution occurs. We close
|
|||
|
the tap and discharge the field. In the endpoint of the cycle at
|
|||
|
lower field we reopen the tap and return to equilibrium. Because
|
|||
|
we leave the equilibrium in performing the cycle the unequality
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
df'' = - circle integral P dE < 0
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
holds according the last lines of section II a). Regarding the
|
|||
|
orientation of this integral we realize that it is a negative
|
|||
|
hysteresis relative to the usual ferroelectric hysteresis. Therefore, our
|
|||
|
consideration predicts a violation of Planck's
|
|||
|
second law for electrically induced irreversibilities. The
|
|||
|
irreversibility goes the other way round according to the Gibbs
|
|||
|
formalism contrary to Planck's 2nd law.
|
|||
|
c) Permanent Magnet Motors
|
|||
|
In Landau/Lifshitz (1) there exists a proof which shows that if
|
|||
|
we introduce a para- or ferromagnetic body into a fixed magnetic
|
|||
|
field (j=constant) the following relation holds:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
df' = - M dH
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Because df' approaches a maximum we interprete this equation that
|
|||
|
a self accelerating perpetual motion is possible in a magnetic
|
|||
|
field as an irreversibility.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Therefore, in order to find an example we first rule out the conditions under
|
|||
|
which a perpetuum mobile is impossible. This is always the case if the
|
|||
|
magnetic field can be described as a potential field. According Jackson(3) a
|
|||
|
magnetic field of a closed loop or the field of a hard permanent ferromagnet
|
|||
|
can formally be decribed by a potential. This means that rot B vanishes. This
|
|||
|
has as a consequence that a perpetuum mobile acceleration of a magnetic charge
|
|||
|
is impossible.Therefore, the question arises whether there exists the
|
|||
|
possibility to break this zero rot B - field.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The question can be answered positively. Using by Mu metal shieldings a non
|
|||
|
zero rot B field can be generated from a potential field by shielding off the
|
|||
|
unwanted parts of the field . We illustrate this idea by the following axial
|
|||
|
motor construction proposal which is derived by us from the linear Harris TMI
|
|||
|
set up (4), comp. fig.3)+b), which works and which has been confirmed and
|
|||
|
discussed by different persons(4,5). We do not claim that our proposal is a
|
|||
|
perpetuum mobile.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
We use a cylindrical tube of Mu metal as housing for the motor. In the
|
|||
|
housing tube we have a tube of lower diameter made from conducting material
|
|||
|
having the same axis as the housing tube. A current flows in the inner tube
|
|||
|
along the length equally distributed across the thicknell of the wall.The
|
|||
|
common axis of both these cylinders consist of a wire carrying a current
|
|||
|
flowing in the opposite direction relative to the current tube. If we look at
|
|||
|
the configuration of the field we have a circular non vanishing rot B field in
|
|||
|
one direction near the wall and a circular B field in the opposite direction
|
|||
|
near the central wire.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Now we use the wire as an axis of a rotor which carries at least two
|
|||
|
symmetrically balanced permanent magnets rods whose north poles point radially
|
|||
|
and the south poles axially. The north poles are standing under the influence
|
|||
|
of the B field near the wall, the south pole feels the opposite field near by
|
|||
|
the wire. So a permanent torque is exerted on the rotor which begins to spin
|
|||
|
around the central wire as the axis. We see that our motor works only with
|
|||
|
permanent fields and needs no brushes.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Therefore, the question arises: Is it not possible to use permanent magnets +
|
|||
|
Mu metal shields to replace the current wires by permanent magnets generating
|
|||
|
circular non vanishing rot B fields of opposite orientation to get the rotor
|
|||
|
spinning, comp.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
fig.5a). Similar constructions are already patented and can be found in the
|
|||
|
literature (6), comp. fig. 5b).
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Furthermore, we emphasize that until today there exist no generally accepted
|
|||
|
magnetic force law between differential current loops. Only for closed current
|
|||
|
loop the situation is clear, because all the different differential form
|
|||
|
coincide in one. Different forms have been proposed by Biot Savart (7),
|
|||
|
Ampere (7) (includes actio and reactio and conservation of angular momentum),
|
|||
|
Whittaker (8) (includes only action=reaction), Aspden (7) (includes only
|
|||
|
conservation of angular momentum) , and Marinov (9). Marinov claims that he
|
|||
|
would have proved experimentally his form as the correct one. Therefore, there
|
|||
|
seems to be an interesting field where important questions can be solved.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Bibliography:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
1) Landau L.D., Lifshitz E.M.
|
|||
|
Electrodynamics of Continous Media
|
|||
|
Pergamon, Oxford, 1984
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
2) Wirtz D., Fuller G.G. Phys.Rev.Lett.71, 2236, (1993)
|
|||
|
Debye P., Kleboth K. J.Chem.Phys.42, 3155, (1965)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
3) Jackson,J.D.
|
|||
|
Classical Electrodynamics 2nd edition
|
|||
|
John Wiley, New York, 1975
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
4) Decker, J. BBS Keelynet PO-Box Mesquite Texas USA 75187
|
|||
|
Modem ..214 324 3501 Filename: TOMIBILD.ASC
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
harti@shb.contrib.de TMI device, free energy device ?
|
|||
|
24.2.95 in ALT.SCI.PHYSICS.NEW-THEORIES
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
5) anff@qvwp.demon.co.uk TMI device, free energy device?
|
|||
|
26.2.95 in ALT.SCI.PHYSICS.NEW-THEORIES
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
harti@shb.contrib.de TMI + MRA updates, free energy
|
|||
|
25.2.95 in ALT.SCI.PHYSICS.NEW-THEORIES
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
harti@shb.contrib.de TOMI enhanced ! Free emergy device !
|
|||
|
31.3.95 in CL.ENERGY.ALTERNATIVEN
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
prebys@puhep1.princeton.edu TMI device, free energy device ?
|
|||
|
25.2.95 in SCI.ENERGY
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
6) Johnson, H.R. Permanent magnet motor U.S.Patent No. 4.151.431
|
|||
|
Apr.24,1979
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
7) Aspden, Harold Physics without Einstein Southampton 1969
|
|||
|
Aspden, Harold Modern Aether Physics Southampton 1975
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
8) Whittaker, Edmund Sir
|
|||
|
A history of the theories of Aether and Electricity Vol I
|
|||
|
The classical theories
|
|||
|
Humanities Press New York 1975
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
9) International Glasnost Journal of Fundamental Physics Vol.3, No.11,
|
|||
|
Marinov, Stefan; p.18
|
|||
|
_________________________________________________________________
|
|||
|
Figures:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|| || ||
|
|||
|
| || | |======| | || |
|
|||
|
|======| | | |======|
|
|||
|
| | | | | |
|
|||
|
--- --- --- --- --- ---
|
|||
|
| | | | | |
|
|||
|
| |---| |--|-| |--|-|
|
|||
|
| | | | | |
|
|||
|
--- --- --- --- --- ---
|
|||
|
| | | | |//////|
|
|||
|
|======| |//////| |======|
|
|||
|
| || | |======| | || |
|
|||
|
|| || ||
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
1 2 3
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
fig. 1a): Isothermal cycle of a simple fluid with irreversibility
|
|||
|
1 starting a the dew line 1-2 expansion, condensation of liquid 2
|
|||
|
separating volumes by closing the tap 2-3 recompression 3 opening
|
|||
|
the tap, work has to be added to proceed the cycle
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
P ^ 3 ._
|
|||
|
r | | |_
|
|||
|
e | | |_
|
|||
|
s | | |_ 3
|
|||
|
s | 1 ._ |_
|
|||
|
u | |_ |<
|
|||
|
r | |__ |_
|
|||
|
e | |_>_ |__
|
|||
|
| |___.|
|
|||
|
| 2
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
----------------------------------------->
|
|||
|
Volume
|
|||
|
fig. 1b): Isothermal cycle of a simple fluid with irreversibility
|
|||
|
Pressure-volume diagram: 1 starting a the dew line 1-2 expansion,
|
|||
|
condensation of liquid 2 separating volumes by closing the tap
|
|||
|
2-3 recompression 3 opening the tap, work has to be added to
|
|||
|
proceed the cycle
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
^
|
|||
|
P |
|
|||
|
o |
|
|||
|
l |
|
|||
|
a |
|
|||
|
r | 2
|
|||
|
i | -------.
|
|||
|
s | __| ____|
|
|||
|
a | 1 _>_| _<_|
|
|||
|
t | .__| __|
|
|||
|
i | | __|
|
|||
|
o | .__|
|
|||
|
n | 3
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
----------------------------------------->
|
|||
|
electric field
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
fig.2: isothermal cycle with electrically induced irreversibility
|
|||
|
1 starting at the phase separation line with low field
|
|||
|
1-2 applying a field 2 closing the tap 2-3 dicharging of the high
|
|||
|
field 3 opening of the tap and returning to starting point 1A negative
|
|||
|
hysteresis is predicted according the Gibbs formalism.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
_ _ _ _ _
|
|||
|
Top view S |_|_|_|_|_| N <--------moveable ROLLER magnet
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
direction S |<--track-->| N
|
|||
|
of ROLLER ____________|____________
|
|||
|
| | ___| | |___ |
|
|||
|
| | |___| (start) |___| |
|
|||
|
| | |___| |___| | RUNNERS
|
|||
|
| | |___| incline |___| <--------roll of magnets,positioned at
|
|||
|
| | |___| |___| | the same angle as the slope of
|
|||
|
| | |___| |___| | the incline
|
|||
|
\|/ | |___| |___| |
|
|||
|
| |___|____________|___| |
|
|||
|
| N | | S |
|
|||
|
| | decline | |<-------no magnets here, but not as much
|
|||
|
| S | | N | space between the rolls as shown
|
|||
|
| ___|____________|___ |
|
|||
|
| |___| |___| |
|
|||
|
| |___| |___| |
|
|||
|
| |___| incline |___| |
|
|||
|
| |___| |___| |
|
|||
|
| |___| |___| |
|
|||
|
| |___| |___| |
|
|||
|
| |___|____________|___| |
|
|||
|
| | | |
|
|||
|
| N | decline | S |
|
|||
|
| | | |
|
|||
|
| |____________| |
|
|||
|
| (finish) |<-------ROLLER winds up here
|
|||
|
|________________________|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
fig.3a) the TMI device, top view
|
|||
|
the two magnets along the incline are stationary, the magnet in
|
|||
|
the middle begins to roll standing under the influence of the
|
|||
|
stationary magnets. It is drawn over the fulcrum. There it rolls
|
|||
|
down under the influence of gravitation until it reaches the
|
|||
|
bottom of the second hill.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Side view ! (enhanced version !)
|
|||
|
===========
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
ROLLER starts here
|
|||
|
\|/
|
|||
|
| ----------------> direction of moveable magnetic ROLLER
|
|||
|
| /\ /\
|
|||
|
| / \ / \
|
|||
|
| / \ / \
|
|||
|
/ \ / \
|
|||
|
/-------------- / -------------- <--------Magnetic ROLLER ends up
|
|||
|
/ / here
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
fig.3b) the TMI device, side view comp. textthe two magnets along the incline
|
|||
|
are stationary, the magnet in the middle begins to roll standing under the
|
|||
|
influence of the stationary magnets. It is drawn over the fulcrum. There it
|
|||
|
rolls down under the influence of gravitation until it reaches the bottom of
|
|||
|
the second hill.
|
|||
|
___________________________
|
|||
|
/ \
|
|||
|
/ \
|
|||
|
Mu metal / \
|
|||
|
housing / \
|
|||
|
/ \
|
|||
|
/ \
|
|||
|
/ _______________ \
|
|||
|
/ / -------> \ \
|
|||
|
| current / B-fields \ |
|
|||
|
| tube / | \ |
|
|||
|
| / | \ |
|
|||
|
| | /---------|----------\ | |
|
|||
|
| | / _______ <-- ________ \ | |
|
|||
|
| | ||S N| /-\ |N S|| | |
|
|||
|
| | ||_______| \-/ |________|| | |
|
|||
|
| | \ axis wire / | |
|
|||
|
| | \--------------------/ | |
|
|||
|
| \ rotor / |
|
|||
|
| \ \ / |
|
|||
|
| \ \----> / |
|
|||
|
\ \ ___________________/ /
|
|||
|
\ /
|
|||
|
\ /
|
|||
|
\ /
|
|||
|
\ /
|
|||
|
\ /
|
|||
|
\ /
|
|||
|
\_____________________________/
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
fig.4 magnetic motor with no brushes; top view
|
|||
|
the magnet charges on the rotor are spinning around the axis wire
|
|||
|
in the stationary double circular and opposite rot B fields of
|
|||
|
the wire and the current tube.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
fig.5a) our magnetic motor proposal using only permanent magnetsthe
|
|||
|
central wire is replaced by an inner ring consisting of
|
|||
|
permanent magnets and Mu metal shields generating an non
|
|||
|
vanishing B-field; the current tube is replaced by an outer ring
|
|||
|
of permanent magnets and Mu metal shields. the rotor is the same
|
|||
|
as in fig. 4. The field configuration seen by the rotor is in
|
|||
|
effect the same as in fig.4., only both the opposite non
|
|||
|
vanishing rot B fields of the stator are generated by permanent
|
|||
|
magnets. Unwanted parts of the field are shielded by Mu metal. It
|
|||
|
is clear that the configuration can be multiplied to enforce the
|
|||
|
power by taking more circles. Magnets similar as used by Johnson
|
|||
|
are recommended for the stator fields, comp fig.5b). Using
|
|||
|
electromagnets instead of permanent magnets would enhance power.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
fig.5b) the Johnson motor, US Patent Nr. 4,151,431 permanent magnets as
|
|||
|
stator, rotor with non vanishing rot B -field , see original patent disclaimer
|
|||
|
regarding employer Anti-Copyright - can be copied by everybody for nothing
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Berlin, Germany, on the 4th of April 1995.
|
|||
|
Best regards, Stefan Hartmann.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
--
|
|||
|
Hartmann Multimedia Service
|
|||
|
Dipl. Ing. Stefan Hartmann
|
|||
|
Keplerstr. 11 B, 10589 Berlin, Germany
|
|||
|
Tel: ++ 49 30 344 23 66 FAX: ++ 49 30 344 92 79
|
|||
|
email: harti@contrib.de harti@b-2.de.contrib.net
|
|||
|
Web access: http://www.b-2.de.contrib.net/harti/harti.html
|
|||
|
--
|
|||
|
Hartmann Multimedia Service
|
|||
|
Dipl. Ing. Stefan Hartmann
|
|||
|
Keplerstr. 11 B, 10589 Berlin, Germany
|
|||
|
Tel: ++ 49 30 344 23 66 FAX: ++ 49 30 344 92 79
|
|||
|
email: harti@contrib.de harti@b-2.de.contrib.net
|
|||
|
Web access: http://www.b-2.de.contrib.net/harti/harti.html
|
|||
|
## CrossPoint v3.02 ##
|
|||
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|