656 lines
28 KiB
Plaintext
656 lines
28 KiB
Plaintext
______________________________________________________________________________
|
||
| File Name : TOMIMOTR.ASC | Online Date : 04/30/95 |
|
||
| Contributed by : Stefan Hartman | Dir Category : ENERGY |
|
||
| From : KeelyNet BBS | DataLine : (214) 324-3501 |
|
||
| KeelyNet * PO BOX 870716 * Mesquite, Texas * USA * 75187 |
|
||
| A FREE Alternative Sciences BBS sponsored by Vanguard Sciences |
|
||
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|
||
The following file was sent to me on the InterNet by Stefan.
|
||
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
Return-Path: <shb.contrib.de!harti@contrib.de>
|
||
Received: from uropax.contrib.de by ix.ix.netcom.com (8.6.12/SMI-4.1/Netcom)
|
||
id OAA23352; Fri, 28 Apr 1995 14:40:35 -0700
|
||
Received: from shb.contrib.de by uropax.contrib.de with uucp
|
||
(Smail3.1.28.1 #3) id m0s4xLx-0007bbC; Fri, 28 Apr 95 23:13 MET DST
|
||
Received: by uropax.contrib.de from shb (policy router $Revision: 1.22 $)
|
||
id <799103612.1522>; Fri, 28 Apr 95 21:13 UTC
|
||
Received: by shb.contrib.de (CrossPoint v3.02 R/A2148);
|
||
28 Apr 1995 23:12:21 +0100
|
||
Date: 28 Apr 1995 22:58:00 +0100
|
||
From: harti@shb.contrib.de (Stefan Hartmann)
|
||
To: keelynet@ix.netcom.com
|
||
Message-ID: <5kjBHpHPldB@shb.contrib.de>
|
||
In-Reply-To: <199504281534.IAA17307@ix4.ix.netcom.com>
|
||
Subject: Re: Howdy!
|
||
X-Mailer: XP v3.02 R/A2148
|
||
MIME-Version: 1.0
|
||
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
|
||
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
|
||
|
||
PM_Square enhanced : The new free energy generation device !
|
||
============================================================
|
||
|
||
Latest news:
|
||
------------
|
||
|
||
1. MPEG movie now available at:
|
||
|
||
194.77.35.1 in pub/harti/energy/PM_Square/pm_sqlin.mpg about 485 KBytes.
|
||
Shows, how the Linear Mode works with multiple stator tracks !
|
||
Could be used to propel a train along a railway !
|
||
|
||
|
||
2. A new Enhanced Linear version shown down there !
|
||
|
||
=====================================================================
|
||
|
||
Hi,
|
||
|
||
do you remember the TOMI (also called TMI) device ?
|
||
|
||
Well, I have worked together with the inventor and another "magnet freak"
|
||
during the last weekend on the design and we found the solution how to power a
|
||
motor just via using Permanent Magnets !
|
||
|
||
I will call this design from now on:
|
||
|
||
|
||
PM_Square = (PM)^2
|
||
|
||
Permanent Magnet Powered Motor !
|
||
= = = =
|
||
|
||
|
||
Well, here it is how it is working:
|
||
|
||
|
||
I will first describe a Linear Motor design and later post a few MPEG
|
||
movies of the enhanced rotor version experiments...
|
||
|
||
I will publish all my results and findings, so you are ready to duplicate
|
||
it yourself and prove me right or wrong. This way the basic design goes to
|
||
the Public Domain and can't be bought out or will be suppressed...
|
||
I just claim the inventor rights on the Angle Steel add-on design !
|
||
|
||
Please copy this file to all people, which care about environment
|
||
pollution and want to have a so called "free energy" machine.
|
||
|
||
|
||
For the full understanding of this PM_Square design you should have read
|
||
the TOMI description !
|
||
|
||
Here the PM_Square design goes:
|
||
|
||
|
||
The most important enhancements over the TOMI design are introduced via
|
||
2 angle steel plates at the endings on each track-magnet (in the TOMI
|
||
description called: Runner-magnet)
|
||
I will call these "Runner-Magnets" from now on Stator Track-magnets,
|
||
because they don't "run" , but are just the Stator-Magnets, which build
|
||
the track !
|
||
|
||
Okay, so how are these 2 Angle Steel plates fitted to the Track-Magnets ?
|
||
|
||
Here is a simple ASCII drawing:
|
||
|
||
Top View
|
||
========
|
||
____ ____
|
||
| track magnets (stator) | <-----Angle Steel
|
||
|_____ _____ ___________ _____ ______ ______| at each ending !
|
||
| | | | | | | |
|
||
|N S|N S|N S|N S|N S|N S|N S|
|
||
|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|______|______|
|
||
|
||
|
||
------->| Roller Magnet dropped into the track
|
||
from above at 90 degrees at this place !
|
||
|
||
-----
|
||
| N |
|
||
| S |
|
||
-----
|
||
| N |
|
||
| S | Roller Magnet,
|
||
----- rolls this way -------->
|
||
| N | along out of the track !
|
||
| S |
|
||
-----
|
||
| N |
|
||
| S |
|
||
-----
|
||
|
||
------->| Roller Magnet dropped into the track
|
||
from above at 90 degrees at this place !
|
||
|
||
_____ _____ _____ _____ _____ ______ ______
|
||
| | | | | | | |
|
||
|S N|S N|S N|S N|S N|S N|S N|
|
||
|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|______|______|
|
||
| | <------Angle Steel
|
||
|____ track magnets (stator) _____| at each ending !
|
||
|
||
This is the Top View of the Linear Motor design !
|
||
All magnets used are circular magnets. So the Roller Magnet can roll
|
||
through the track ! The number of stator track magnets can vary, but
|
||
should not be too many , cause it weakens the flux inside the track.
|
||
Go for around 7 to 10 magnets first. (7 are shown over here !)
|
||
|
||
|
||
By using Angle Steel plates of ST37 or ST100 (thickness of about 1 to 2.5
|
||
mm), one can force the magnetic flux at the endings of the permanent
|
||
magnet Stator Track to be going the right way!
|
||
|
||
In this case it prevents to pull the Roller Magnet back into the track,
|
||
when it leaves the track at the right side !
|
||
You can also try to use a "V"-shaped placement of the Stator Track magnets
|
||
(not putting them in parallel as shown, but at an opening angle of maybe 5
|
||
to 10 degrees), which I can't draw over here with this simple ASCII-"art"!
|
||
|
||
This enables the Roller magnet to get out of the Stator Track at the
|
||
ending even better and the killing force at the end of the track is far
|
||
more weaker !
|
||
|
||
One has to drop the Roller Permanent Magnet for the best performance
|
||
(acceleration) into the track at around 90 degrees (also 45 degrees would
|
||
still work!) at around 1/5 to 1/4 length of the track.
|
||
This way, the Roller Magnet is just pulled into the track and don't have
|
||
to go via the slight repulsion gate at the entrance of the track at the
|
||
very left side !
|
||
|
||
With using the steel plates fitted to the end of the track magnets you can
|
||
also try to push the Roller Magnet into the track at the left side, but it
|
||
will almost kill the received acceleration force from the previous track !
|
||
But with using the Angle Steel plates, this killing effect is much less,
|
||
than without using the Angle Steel plates...
|
||
So the secret to a Real Working Linear PM_Square motor are just these
|
||
Angle Steel Magnetic Flux guidance plates !
|
||
|
||
The best design to get the Roller going through an unlimited number of
|
||
Magnet Stator tracks would be the following design:
|
||
|
||
Side View:
|
||
==========
|
||
|
||
Roller Magnet climbing the hills -----> going this direction -->
|
||
|
|
||
| wooden cardboard downhill track
|
||
| | (without any stator magnets !)
|
||
| |
|
||
| __ | __
|
||
| / \ | / \
|
||
\ | /--. \ \|/ /--. \
|
||
\ | / ; \ / ; \
|
||
\ \|/ / / \ / / \
|
||
\ / \ / \
|
||
\ o / ^ ^ \ / \
|
||
\ / | | \ / \ /
|
||
/ | | / /
|
||
/ | | / /
|
||
/ | | / /
|
||
<___ | | <___ <__
|
||
| |
|
||
^ | |
|
||
| | Angle Steel
|
||
Angle Steel |
|
||
Stator magnet track
|
||
______________________________________________________________________
|
||
|
||
This Linear Motion Permanent Magnet Motor design should really work.
|
||
It uses the gravitational force to go downhill into the next magnetic
|
||
Stator Track.
|
||
In this Side View only the front Stator magnet is shown with the Angle
|
||
Steel at each end with the "wrong" angle drawn, due to the bad
|
||
perspectivic drawing view !(I am not able to draw it better with using
|
||
this ASCII- "art" ! Normally in the Side View the Angle Steel Plates would
|
||
point into direction of your face and not downwards ! But I have drawn it
|
||
downwards to make it clear, where the placement of the Angle Steel is
|
||
located !)
|
||
|
||
Have a look again above to the Top View and it will getting clear to you,
|
||
how the Angle Steel has to be placed !
|
||
|
||
Enhanced Linear Motion version:
|
||
===============================
|
||
|
||
Side View:
|
||
----------
|
||
Roller Magnet climbing the hills -----> going this direction -->
|
||
|
|
||
| wooden cardboard downhill track
|
||
| | (without any stator magnets !)
|
||
| |
|
||
| |
|
||
| # # | # #
|
||
| / / | / /
|
||
| /\ /\ | /\ /\
|
||
\|/ / \ / \ | / \ / \
|
||
o/ \ / \ \|/ / \ / \
|
||
\ / \ / \ / \ / \ /
|
||
\/ \/ \/ \/ \/
|
||
/ / / / /
|
||
# # # # #
|
||
/|\
|
||
|_______ Angle Steel plates at each ending of the
|
||
Stator Magnets !
|
||
|
||
In this enhanced Linear version you use only the "phase" inside the stator
|
||
track, that really accelerates the roller magnet. The fields at the beginning
|
||
and ending of the Stator magnet track are not used !
|
||
The roller magnet can thus come into and out of the accelerating Stator Track
|
||
without any killing force. The roller will just be accelerated each time
|
||
it goes into the next hill !
|
||
|
||
Okay, so far for now.
|
||
|
||
Please try to duplicate this Linear Motion design of PM_Square and let me
|
||
know, if it will work for you.
|
||
|
||
If you have any question, please drop a note to my email account at:
|
||
|
||
harti@contrib.de or
|
||
|
||
harti@b-2.de.contrib.net
|
||
|
||
You can also have a look at my FTP site at:
|
||
|
||
ftp://ftp.b-2.de.contrib.net in pub/harti/energy/pm_square
|
||
(194.77.35.1) or into pub/incoming
|
||
|
||
There will be soon a few MPEG movies of my experiments with this
|
||
PM_Square device !
|
||
|
||
Theoretical explanation:
|
||
========================
|
||
|
||
I received this from an "anonymous" friend. Please read it and let me know
|
||
what you think about this theory for the explanation of the TOMI and
|
||
PM_Square effect !
|
||
|
||
I believe, that with using Permanent Magnets the Zero Point Energy can be
|
||
tapped ! (See Dr. Harraold Putthof's explanation of Zero Point Energy)
|
||
|
||
Irreversible Processes in Fields
|
||
================================
|
||
|
||
It is well known theory that the thermodynamic potentials go to
|
||
an extremum. This is regarded as equivalent to Planck's 2nd law
|
||
although the complete equivalence between both formulations of
|
||
the second law never have been proved generally, especially if we
|
||
apply the extremum principle of the thermodynamic potentials to
|
||
electromagnetic fields. In this article we investigate this
|
||
question.
|
||
|
||
I. Irreversible Processes in Vapour-Liquid Mixtures
|
||
|
||
We begin here with a well known and quite trivial example. We
|
||
regard two cylinder volumes connected by a tap in the middle.
|
||
Both the volumes can be set by moving a piston up and down into
|
||
or out of the volume. With this experimental setup we proceed
|
||
the following isothermic irreversible cycle, comp fig.1a):We take a fluid
|
||
(for example water) being at the dew line of the
|
||
phase diagram. We expand both the pistons isothermically from
|
||
point 1 to point 2. So liquid condenses and is collected in the
|
||
lower cylinder. Now the tap is closed and both the volumes are
|
||
recompressed at equal pressures until the starting volume is
|
||
reached again. Now we regard the question whether Planck's law is
|
||
fulfilled. This question can be answered by writing the 2nd law
|
||
for free energy which states that the free energy F tends to be a
|
||
minimum. Therefore, if we leave the minimum in doing the cycle
|
||
Fstart-Fend = - circle integral P dV > 0
|
||
|
||
must hold because the cycle is isothermal (dT=0) with no matter
|
||
exchange (dn=0). The orientation of the integral shows that
|
||
Planck's second law holds, comp. fig.1b).
|
||
|
||
II. Irreversible Processes in Fields
|
||
|
||
a) General
|
||
According Landau and Lifshitz (1) the free energy of a system
|
||
including electric fields and linear dielectrics is defined by
|
||
F'(V,T,D) = F(V,T) + 1/(8*Pi*eps) Int D^2 dV
|
||
|
||
The Legendre transform of this potential is
|
||
|
||
F''(V,T,E) = F(V,T) - eps/(8*Pi) Int E^2 dV
|
||
|
||
Both these definitions are not useful for thermodynamics
|
||
because they are non-homologous functions regarding the molar
|
||
ratios. Therefore, the following definitions are used and
|
||
specified for constant dielectrics
|
||
|
||
f'(V,T,P) = f (V,T) + 1/(8*Pi) Int E dP = f + 1/(8*Pi*Xi) P^2
|
||
f''(V,T,E) = f(V,T) - 1/(8*Pi) Int P dE = f - Xi/(8*Pi) E^2
|
||
Regarding the 2nd derivative of the electric variable of both
|
||
these potentials we see that for a constant homogene dielectrics
|
||
f'(V,T,P) approaches a minimum and f''(V,T,E) approaches a
|
||
maximum in the equilibrium state, if Xi > 0. Similar
|
||
considerations hold for magnetic fields as well.
|
||
b) Mixing Processes
|
||
Now, similar like in section I, we investigate an isothermic and
|
||
isochoric cycle if an intense field is applied to a non ideal -
|
||
non linear binary dielectric liquid (2).
|
||
We start at the phase separation line at low field and apply a
|
||
stronger field. Then demixing of the solution occurs. We close
|
||
the tap and discharge the field. In the endpoint of the cycle at
|
||
lower field we reopen the tap and return to equilibrium. Because
|
||
we leave the equilibrium in performing the cycle the unequality
|
||
|
||
df'' = - circle integral P dE < 0
|
||
|
||
holds according the last lines of section II a). Regarding the
|
||
orientation of this integral we realize that it is a negative
|
||
hysteresis relative to the usual ferroelectric hysteresis. Therefore, our
|
||
consideration predicts a violation of Planck's
|
||
second law for electrically induced irreversibilities. The
|
||
irreversibility goes the other way round according to the Gibbs
|
||
formalism contrary to Planck's 2nd law.
|
||
c) Permanent Magnet Motors
|
||
In Landau/Lifshitz (1) there exists a proof which shows that if
|
||
we introduce a para- or ferromagnetic body into a fixed magnetic
|
||
field (j=constant) the following relation holds:
|
||
|
||
df' = - M dH
|
||
|
||
Because df' approaches a maximum we interprete this equation that
|
||
a self accelerating perpetual motion is possible in a magnetic
|
||
field as an irreversibility.
|
||
|
||
Therefore, in order to find an example we first rule out the conditions under
|
||
which a perpetuum mobile is impossible. This is always the case if the
|
||
magnetic field can be described as a potential field. According Jackson(3) a
|
||
magnetic field of a closed loop or the field of a hard permanent ferromagnet
|
||
can formally be decribed by a potential. This means that rot B vanishes. This
|
||
has as a consequence that a perpetuum mobile acceleration of a magnetic charge
|
||
is impossible.Therefore, the question arises whether there exists the
|
||
possibility to break this zero rot B - field.
|
||
|
||
The question can be answered positively. Using by Mu metal shieldings a non
|
||
zero rot B field can be generated from a potential field by shielding off the
|
||
unwanted parts of the field . We illustrate this idea by the following axial
|
||
motor construction proposal which is derived by us from the linear Harris TMI
|
||
set up (4), comp. fig.3)+b), which works and which has been confirmed and
|
||
discussed by different persons(4,5). We do not claim that our proposal is a
|
||
perpetuum mobile.
|
||
|
||
We use a cylindrical tube of Mu metal as housing for the motor. In the
|
||
housing tube we have a tube of lower diameter made from conducting material
|
||
having the same axis as the housing tube. A current flows in the inner tube
|
||
along the length equally distributed across the thicknell of the wall.The
|
||
common axis of both these cylinders consist of a wire carrying a current
|
||
flowing in the opposite direction relative to the current tube. If we look at
|
||
the configuration of the field we have a circular non vanishing rot B field in
|
||
one direction near the wall and a circular B field in the opposite direction
|
||
near the central wire.
|
||
|
||
Now we use the wire as an axis of a rotor which carries at least two
|
||
symmetrically balanced permanent magnets rods whose north poles point radially
|
||
and the south poles axially. The north poles are standing under the influence
|
||
of the B field near the wall, the south pole feels the opposite field near by
|
||
the wire. So a permanent torque is exerted on the rotor which begins to spin
|
||
around the central wire as the axis. We see that our motor works only with
|
||
permanent fields and needs no brushes.
|
||
|
||
Therefore, the question arises: Is it not possible to use permanent magnets +
|
||
Mu metal shields to replace the current wires by permanent magnets generating
|
||
circular non vanishing rot B fields of opposite orientation to get the rotor
|
||
spinning, comp.
|
||
|
||
fig.5a). Similar constructions are already patented and can be found in the
|
||
literature (6), comp. fig. 5b).
|
||
|
||
Furthermore, we emphasize that until today there exist no generally accepted
|
||
magnetic force law between differential current loops. Only for closed current
|
||
loop the situation is clear, because all the different differential form
|
||
coincide in one. Different forms have been proposed by Biot Savart (7),
|
||
Ampere (7) (includes actio and reactio and conservation of angular momentum),
|
||
Whittaker (8) (includes only action=reaction), Aspden (7) (includes only
|
||
conservation of angular momentum) , and Marinov (9). Marinov claims that he
|
||
would have proved experimentally his form as the correct one. Therefore, there
|
||
seems to be an interesting field where important questions can be solved.
|
||
|
||
Bibliography:
|
||
|
||
1) Landau L.D., Lifshitz E.M.
|
||
Electrodynamics of Continous Media
|
||
Pergamon, Oxford, 1984
|
||
|
||
2) Wirtz D., Fuller G.G. Phys.Rev.Lett.71, 2236, (1993)
|
||
Debye P., Kleboth K. J.Chem.Phys.42, 3155, (1965)
|
||
|
||
3) Jackson,J.D.
|
||
Classical Electrodynamics 2nd edition
|
||
John Wiley, New York, 1975
|
||
|
||
4) Decker, J. BBS Keelynet PO-Box Mesquite Texas USA 75187
|
||
Modem ..214 324 3501 Filename: TOMIBILD.ASC
|
||
|
||
harti@shb.contrib.de TMI device, free energy device ?
|
||
24.2.95 in ALT.SCI.PHYSICS.NEW-THEORIES
|
||
|
||
5) anff@qvwp.demon.co.uk TMI device, free energy device?
|
||
26.2.95 in ALT.SCI.PHYSICS.NEW-THEORIES
|
||
|
||
harti@shb.contrib.de TMI + MRA updates, free energy
|
||
25.2.95 in ALT.SCI.PHYSICS.NEW-THEORIES
|
||
|
||
harti@shb.contrib.de TOMI enhanced ! Free emergy device !
|
||
31.3.95 in CL.ENERGY.ALTERNATIVEN
|
||
|
||
prebys@puhep1.princeton.edu TMI device, free energy device ?
|
||
25.2.95 in SCI.ENERGY
|
||
|
||
6) Johnson, H.R. Permanent magnet motor U.S.Patent No. 4.151.431
|
||
Apr.24,1979
|
||
|
||
7) Aspden, Harold Physics without Einstein Southampton 1969
|
||
Aspden, Harold Modern Aether Physics Southampton 1975
|
||
|
||
8) Whittaker, Edmund Sir
|
||
A history of the theories of Aether and Electricity Vol I
|
||
The classical theories
|
||
Humanities Press New York 1975
|
||
|
||
9) International Glasnost Journal of Fundamental Physics Vol.3, No.11,
|
||
Marinov, Stefan; p.18
|
||
_________________________________________________________________
|
||
Figures:
|
||
|
||
|| || ||
|
||
| || | |======| | || |
|
||
|======| | | |======|
|
||
| | | | | |
|
||
--- --- --- --- --- ---
|
||
| | | | | |
|
||
| |---| |--|-| |--|-|
|
||
| | | | | |
|
||
--- --- --- --- --- ---
|
||
| | | | |//////|
|
||
|======| |//////| |======|
|
||
| || | |======| | || |
|
||
|| || ||
|
||
|
||
1 2 3
|
||
|
||
|
||
fig. 1a): Isothermal cycle of a simple fluid with irreversibility
|
||
1 starting a the dew line 1-2 expansion, condensation of liquid 2
|
||
separating volumes by closing the tap 2-3 recompression 3 opening
|
||
the tap, work has to be added to proceed the cycle
|
||
|
||
P ^ 3 ._
|
||
r | | |_
|
||
e | | |_
|
||
s | | |_ 3
|
||
s | 1 ._ |_
|
||
u | |_ |<
|
||
r | |__ |_
|
||
e | |_>_ |__
|
||
| |___.|
|
||
| 2
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
----------------------------------------->
|
||
Volume
|
||
fig. 1b): Isothermal cycle of a simple fluid with irreversibility
|
||
Pressure-volume diagram: 1 starting a the dew line 1-2 expansion,
|
||
condensation of liquid 2 separating volumes by closing the tap
|
||
2-3 recompression 3 opening the tap, work has to be added to
|
||
proceed the cycle
|
||
|
||
^
|
||
P |
|
||
o |
|
||
l |
|
||
a |
|
||
r | 2
|
||
i | -------.
|
||
s | __| ____|
|
||
a | 1 _>_| _<_|
|
||
t | .__| __|
|
||
i | | __|
|
||
o | .__|
|
||
n | 3
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
----------------------------------------->
|
||
electric field
|
||
|
||
fig.2: isothermal cycle with electrically induced irreversibility
|
||
1 starting at the phase separation line with low field
|
||
1-2 applying a field 2 closing the tap 2-3 dicharging of the high
|
||
field 3 opening of the tap and returning to starting point 1A negative
|
||
hysteresis is predicted according the Gibbs formalism.
|
||
|
||
_ _ _ _ _
|
||
Top view S |_|_|_|_|_| N <--------moveable ROLLER magnet
|
||
|
||
direction S |<--track-->| N
|
||
of ROLLER ____________|____________
|
||
| | ___| | |___ |
|
||
| | |___| (start) |___| |
|
||
| | |___| |___| | RUNNERS
|
||
| | |___| incline |___| <--------roll of magnets,positioned at
|
||
| | |___| |___| | the same angle as the slope of
|
||
| | |___| |___| | the incline
|
||
\|/ | |___| |___| |
|
||
| |___|____________|___| |
|
||
| N | | S |
|
||
| | decline | |<-------no magnets here, but not as much
|
||
| S | | N | space between the rolls as shown
|
||
| ___|____________|___ |
|
||
| |___| |___| |
|
||
| |___| |___| |
|
||
| |___| incline |___| |
|
||
| |___| |___| |
|
||
| |___| |___| |
|
||
| |___| |___| |
|
||
| |___|____________|___| |
|
||
| | | |
|
||
| N | decline | S |
|
||
| | | |
|
||
| |____________| |
|
||
| (finish) |<-------ROLLER winds up here
|
||
|________________________|
|
||
|
||
fig.3a) the TMI device, top view
|
||
the two magnets along the incline are stationary, the magnet in
|
||
the middle begins to roll standing under the influence of the
|
||
stationary magnets. It is drawn over the fulcrum. There it rolls
|
||
down under the influence of gravitation until it reaches the
|
||
bottom of the second hill.
|
||
|
||
Side view ! (enhanced version !)
|
||
===========
|
||
|
||
ROLLER starts here
|
||
\|/
|
||
| ----------------> direction of moveable magnetic ROLLER
|
||
| /\ /\
|
||
| / \ / \
|
||
| / \ / \
|
||
/ \ / \
|
||
/-------------- / -------------- <--------Magnetic ROLLER ends up
|
||
/ / here
|
||
|
||
fig.3b) the TMI device, side view comp. textthe two magnets along the incline
|
||
are stationary, the magnet in the middle begins to roll standing under the
|
||
influence of the stationary magnets. It is drawn over the fulcrum. There it
|
||
rolls down under the influence of gravitation until it reaches the bottom of
|
||
the second hill.
|
||
___________________________
|
||
/ \
|
||
/ \
|
||
Mu metal / \
|
||
housing / \
|
||
/ \
|
||
/ \
|
||
/ _______________ \
|
||
/ / -------> \ \
|
||
| current / B-fields \ |
|
||
| tube / | \ |
|
||
| / | \ |
|
||
| | /---------|----------\ | |
|
||
| | / _______ <-- ________ \ | |
|
||
| | ||S N| /-\ |N S|| | |
|
||
| | ||_______| \-/ |________|| | |
|
||
| | \ axis wire / | |
|
||
| | \--------------------/ | |
|
||
| \ rotor / |
|
||
| \ \ / |
|
||
| \ \----> / |
|
||
\ \ ___________________/ /
|
||
\ /
|
||
\ /
|
||
\ /
|
||
\ /
|
||
\ /
|
||
\ /
|
||
\_____________________________/
|
||
|
||
fig.4 magnetic motor with no brushes; top view
|
||
the magnet charges on the rotor are spinning around the axis wire
|
||
in the stationary double circular and opposite rot B fields of
|
||
the wire and the current tube.
|
||
|
||
fig.5a) our magnetic motor proposal using only permanent magnetsthe
|
||
central wire is replaced by an inner ring consisting of
|
||
permanent magnets and Mu metal shields generating an non
|
||
vanishing B-field; the current tube is replaced by an outer ring
|
||
of permanent magnets and Mu metal shields. the rotor is the same
|
||
as in fig. 4. The field configuration seen by the rotor is in
|
||
effect the same as in fig.4., only both the opposite non
|
||
vanishing rot B fields of the stator are generated by permanent
|
||
magnets. Unwanted parts of the field are shielded by Mu metal. It
|
||
is clear that the configuration can be multiplied to enforce the
|
||
power by taking more circles. Magnets similar as used by Johnson
|
||
are recommended for the stator fields, comp fig.5b). Using
|
||
electromagnets instead of permanent magnets would enhance power.
|
||
|
||
fig.5b) the Johnson motor, US Patent Nr. 4,151,431 permanent magnets as
|
||
stator, rotor with non vanishing rot B -field , see original patent disclaimer
|
||
regarding employer Anti-Copyright - can be copied by everybody for nothing
|
||
|
||
Berlin, Germany, on the 4th of April 1995.
|
||
Best regards, Stefan Hartmann.
|
||
|
||
--
|
||
Hartmann Multimedia Service
|
||
Dipl. Ing. Stefan Hartmann
|
||
Keplerstr. 11 B, 10589 Berlin, Germany
|
||
Tel: ++ 49 30 344 23 66 FAX: ++ 49 30 344 92 79
|
||
email: harti@contrib.de harti@b-2.de.contrib.net
|
||
Web access: http://www.b-2.de.contrib.net/harti/harti.html
|
||
--
|
||
Hartmann Multimedia Service
|
||
Dipl. Ing. Stefan Hartmann
|
||
Keplerstr. 11 B, 10589 Berlin, Germany
|
||
Tel: ++ 49 30 344 23 66 FAX: ++ 49 30 344 92 79
|
||
email: harti@contrib.de harti@b-2.de.contrib.net
|
||
Web access: http://www.b-2.de.contrib.net/harti/harti.html
|
||
## CrossPoint v3.02 ##
|
||
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |