From http://www.lighttpd.net/:
Important changes
-----------------
This release contains a lot of bug fixes, many detected by scan.coverity.com
(and more to come). The main reason for the release is a fix for an SQL
injection (and path traversal) bug triggered by specially crafted (and
invalid) Host: headers.
Security fixes
--------------
http://download.lighttpd.net/lighttpd/security/lighttpd_sa_2014_01.txt (no CVE yet)
NOTE: We (nixpkgs) currently don't build the mod_mysql_vhost module mentioned
above.
You can now say:
systemd.services.foo.baseUnit = "${pkgs.foo}/.../foo.service";
This will cause NixOS' generated foo.service file to include
foo.service from the foo package. You can then apply local
customization in the usual way:
systemd.services.foo.serviceConfig.MemoryLimit = "512M";
Note however that overriding options in the original unit may not
work. For instance, you cannot override ExecStart.
It's also possible to customize instances of template units:
systemd.services."getty@tty4" =
{ baseUnit = "/etc/systemd/system/getty@.service";
serviceConfig.MemoryLimit = "512M";
};
This replaces the unit options linkTarget (which didn't allow
customisation) and extraConfig (which did allow customisation, but in
a non-standard way).
This reverts commit c5ab2bfd258501cbe5f440089039aff8e7595e3c.
As mentioned in the previous commit, this is now no longer needed.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
On MinGW, we're passing these programs to the configure script, but this
obviously won't work for non-autoconf-based projects.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
Both branches have quite a lot in common, so it's time for a merge and
do the cleanups with respect to both implementations and also generalize
both implementations as much as possible.
This also closes#1876.
Conflicts:
pkgs/development/interpreters/lua-5/5.2.nix
pkgs/development/libraries/SDL/default.nix
pkgs/development/libraries/glew/default.nix
pkgs/top-level/all-packages.nix
This version just got released two days ago, while we were working for
cross-builds on 5.0.2. From the release notes it shouldn't introduce any
incompatibilities.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
GCC doesn't support attributes on enumerators, which could pose a
problem but fortunately not in this case. Here a
__attribute__((weak_import)) is used, which doesn't make much sense for
enumerators anyway (noone will die because the corresponding enumerator
won't be referenced either in older OS X versions).
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
