This reverts commit 4e6bf03504c9e09f067cc6dee6b5aeec43a1405c, reversing
changes made to afd997aab6e9b7a322198092c7828d6c560ac06f.
Instead we propagate those frameworks from the compiler again
There are no new releases of sqldeveloper v17/v18 and I don't think that
we should keep obviously unmaintained software that interacts with
database systems.
I removed `sqldeveloper_18` and `pkgs.sqldeveloper` now points to
version 19.4. Unfortunately I had to drop darwin support as JavaFX is
required for 19.4 which is part of the `oraclejdk` which isn't packaged
for darwin yet.
For further information please refer to the release notes:
https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/developer-tools/sql-developer/downloads/sqldev-relnotes-194-5908846.html
According to https://repology.org/repository/nix_unstable/problems, we have a
lot of packages that have http links that redirect to https as their homepage.
This commit updates all these packages to use the https links as their
homepage.
The following script was used to make these updates:
```
curl https://repology.org/api/v1/repository/nix_unstable/problems \
| jq '.[] | .problem' -r \
| rg 'Homepage link "(.+)" is a permanent redirect to "(.+)" and should be updated' --replace 's@$1@$2@' \
| sort | uniq > script.sed
find -name '*.nix' | xargs -P4 -- sed -f script.sed -i
```
Idea shamelessly stolen from 4e60b0efae56cc8e1a8a606a5a89462c38aba305.
I realized that I don't really know anymore where I'm listed as maintainer and what
I'm actually (co)-maintaining which means that I can't proactively take
care of packages I officially maintain.
As I don't have the time, energy and motivation to take care of stuff I
was interested in 1 or 2 years ago (or packaged for someone else in the
past), I decided that I make this explicit by removing myself from several
packages and adding myself in some other stuff I'm now interested in.
I've seen it several times now that people remove themselves from a
package without removing the package if it's unmaintained after that
which is why I figured that it's fine in my case as the affected pkgs
are rather low-prio and were pretty easy to maintain.
