From 9e05276949045b8620a0ebd7de3aa75bb6af21cc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrew Childs <lorne@cons.org.nz>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 17:25:00 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] bash: provide a working binutils

Why does bash need binutils at all? What's wrong with stdenv?

This avoids a broken ld wrapper, since binutils is binutils wrapped
for linux, even though it's only required on darwin.
---
 pkgs/top-level/all-packages.nix | 10 ++++++++--
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/pkgs/top-level/all-packages.nix b/pkgs/top-level/all-packages.nix
index 07aba73d0fc..99169c48802 100644
--- a/pkgs/top-level/all-packages.nix
+++ b/pkgs/top-level/all-packages.nix
@@ -9988,15 +9988,21 @@ in
 
   any-nix-shell = callPackage ../shells/any-nix-shell { };
 
-  bash = lowPrio (callPackage ../shells/bash/4.4.nix { });
-  bash_5 = lowPrio (callPackage ../shells/bash/5.1.nix { });
+  bash = lowPrio (callPackage ../shells/bash/4.4.nix {
+    binutils = stdenv.cc.bintools;
+  });
+  bash_5 = lowPrio (callPackage ../shells/bash/5.1.nix {
+    binutils = stdenv.cc.bintools;
+  });
   bashInteractive_5 = lowPrio (callPackage ../shells/bash/5.1.nix {
+    binutils = stdenv.cc.bintools;
     interactive = true;
     withDocs = true;
   });
 
   # WARNING: this attribute is used by nix-shell so it shouldn't be removed/renamed
   bashInteractive = callPackage ../shells/bash/4.4.nix {
+    binutils = stdenv.cc.bintools;
     interactive = true;
     withDocs = true;
   };