doc/reviewing-contributions: nix-review instead of nox-review
It is faster, handles more edge cases and allows to test/review the built packages interactively.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -351,26 +351,26 @@ Additional information.
|
||||
</section>
|
||||
|
||||
<section xml:id="submitting-changes-tested-compilation">
|
||||
<title>Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using <command>nox-review</command></title>
|
||||
<title>Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using <command>nix-review</command></title>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
If you are updating a package's version, you can use nox to make sure all
|
||||
packages that depend on the updated package still compile correctly. This
|
||||
can be done using the nox utility. The <command>nox-review</command>
|
||||
utility can look for and build all dependencies either based on uncommited
|
||||
changes with the <literal>wip</literal> option or specifying a github pull
|
||||
request number.
|
||||
If you are updating a package's version, you can use nix-review to make sure all
|
||||
packages that depend on the updated package still compile correctly.
|
||||
The <command>nix-review</command> utility can look for and build all dependencies
|
||||
either based on uncommited changes with the <literal>wip</literal> option or
|
||||
specifying a github pull request number.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
review uncommitted changes:
|
||||
<screen>nix-shell -p nox --run "nox-review wip"</screen>
|
||||
review changes from pull request number 12345:
|
||||
<screen>nix-shell -p nix-review --run "nix-review pr 12345"</screen>
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
review changes from pull request number 12345:
|
||||
<screen>nix-shell -p nox --run "nox-review pr 12345"</screen>
|
||||
review uncommitted changes:
|
||||
<screen>nix-shell -p nix-review --run "nix-review wip"</screen>
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
</section>
|
||||
|
||||
<section xml:id="submitting-changes-tested-execution">
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user