parent
ac9932d133
commit
139cb0d41e
@ -8,6 +8,8 @@ stdenv.mkDerivation rec {
|
|||||||
sha256 = "1mbg18acrva5m7kxc9pzhaknsqm4r90nrp7ax9jkm9wjkrxwhqs1";
|
sha256 = "1mbg18acrva5m7kxc9pzhaknsqm4r90nrp7ax9jkm9wjkrxwhqs1";
|
||||||
};
|
};
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
patches = [ ./no-gets.patch ];
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
doCheck = true;
|
doCheck = true;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
meta = {
|
meta = {
|
||||||
|
22
pkgs/tools/system/acct/no-gets.patch
Normal file
22
pkgs/tools/system/acct/no-gets.patch
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
|
|||||||
|
hack until acct pulls a newer gnulib version
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
From 66712c23388e93e5c518ebc8515140fa0c807348 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
|
||||||
|
From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
|
||||||
|
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 13:30:41 -0600
|
||||||
|
Subject: [PATCH] stdio: don't assume gets any more
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Gnulib intentionally does not have a gets module, and now that C11
|
||||||
|
and glibc have dropped it, we should be more proactive about warning
|
||||||
|
any user on a platform that still has a declaration of this dangerous
|
||||||
|
interface.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
--- a/lib/stdio.in.h
|
||||||
|
+++ b/lib/stdio.in.h
|
||||||
|
@@ -125,7 +125,6 @@
|
||||||
|
so any use of gets warrants an unconditional warning. Assume it is
|
||||||
|
always declared, since it is required by C89. */
|
||||||
|
#undef gets
|
||||||
|
-_GL_WARN_ON_USE (gets, "gets is a security hole - use fgets instead");
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
#if @GNULIB_FOPEN@
|
||||||
|
# if @REPLACE_FOPEN@
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user