nixpkgs/pkgs/development/libraries/haskell/syb/0.3.3.nix

{ cabal }:

cabal.mkDerivation (self: {
  pname = "syb";
  version = "0.3.3";
  sha256 = "0jskxbnzariq2ahcymvjrp4bhl9cpflc1nh51whdl9axcrd5c901";
  meta = {
    homepage = "http://www.cs.uu.nl/wiki/GenericProgramming/SYB";
    description = "Scrap Your Boilerplate";
    license = self.stdenv.lib.licenses.bsd3;
    platforms = self.ghc.meta.platforms;
    maintainers = [ self.stdenv.lib.maintainers.andres ];
  };
})
Re-generated Haskell package descriptions with the latest version of cabal2nix. svn path=/nixpkgs/trunk/; revision=32327 2012-02-16 06:05:41 -08:00			`{ cabal }:`
Added Haskell Platform 2011.4.0.0. svn path=/nixpkgs/trunk/; revision=30951 2011-12-18 02:22:48 -08:00
			`cabal.mkDerivation (self: {`
			`pname = "syb";`
			`version = "0.3.3";`
			`sha256 = "0jskxbnzariq2ahcymvjrp4bhl9cpflc1nh51whdl9axcrd5c901";`
			`meta = {`
			`homepage = "http://www.cs.uu.nl/wiki/GenericProgramming/SYB";`
			`description = "Scrap Your Boilerplate";`
			`license = self.stdenv.lib.licenses.bsd3;`
			`platforms = self.ghc.meta.platforms;`
Removed myself as a maintainer from Haskell packages that I don't personally use. By now, it happened twice that a commit broke GHC and thus all Haskell packages we have in Nixpkgs. On such an occasion, I receive well in excess of 3000 notification e-mails from Hydra, and then I receive another 3000 e-mails after the bug has been fixed. Under these circumstances, subscribing to these notifications makes no sense for me. svn path=/nixpkgs/trunk/; revision=33392 2012-03-24 03:21:28 -07:00			`maintainers = [ self.stdenv.lib.maintainers.andres ];`
Added Haskell Platform 2011.4.0.0. svn path=/nixpkgs/trunk/; revision=30951 2011-12-18 02:22:48 -08:00			`};`
			`})`