103 lines
5.2 KiB
Plaintext
103 lines
5.2 KiB
Plaintext
SUBJECT: THE PHOENIX PROJECT FROM A GENIE FORUM FILE: UFO2511
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART 14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filename: Phoeni14.Thd
|
|
Type : Message Thread
|
|
Author : Jack Mathias
|
|
Date : 11/28/92
|
|
Desc : Rebuttal to Ed Stewart
|
|
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Re: Phoenix project From Ed Stewart To Joseph Harris 11-26-92 07:17
|
|
|
|
-=> Quoting Joseph Harris to Jack Mathias <=-
|
|
|
|
JH> (and I STILL want to hear the reasoning behind letting this report
|
|
JH> sit on a shelf for three years.)
|
|
|
|
ES> Believe me you don't want to hear it! ...but promised to provide me
|
|
ES> with material later after they contacted their alleged "inside
|
|
ES> experts within the Phoenix Group".
|
|
|
|
ES> Sure enough two days later Jack Mathias downloaded a file directly
|
|
ES> to me and suggested I could do with it what I wish with only one
|
|
ES> consideration. Remove all references to the Phoenix Project if I
|
|
ES> chose to make it public because of the "difficulties" they were
|
|
ES> experiencing with Paranet.
|
|
|
|
Ed...
|
|
|
|
The way I remember it is that the file I downloaded to you was
|
|
information on 1989FC and had nothing to do with the question
|
|
referenced by Joseph. However the way I recall our meeting the question
|
|
in point was answered. The reason that it took a couple of years for
|
|
the report to be transmitted was because the Phoenix Project *had*
|
|
never intended on submitting it. The only reason it was released was
|
|
because I, myself, pestered the team in my belief that this information
|
|
should be released -- that we should allow those interested in UFOs,
|
|
etc, to perhaps gain more knowledge and insight. Which, as it now
|
|
appears, turned out being bad judgement on my part.
|
|
|
|
ES> After I analyzed the file contents I privately secured the
|
|
ES> assistance and technical expertise of individuals in the Space
|
|
ES> Program that I have access to through GENIE and found out that
|
|
ES> their "reason for three year delay story" has more holes and
|
|
ES> misinformation than what we have already been exposed to and is
|
|
ES> simply utter nonsense.
|
|
|
|
Your initial response to the file I gave you was -- as stated -- from
|
|
information taken from GENIE and concerned 1989FC. I believe it was the
|
|
idea that 1989FC never existed and that the probe currently on station
|
|
mapping Venus was never diverted to track its course. It had nothing to
|
|
do with any of the published reports. If the asteroid doesn't or didn't
|
|
exist then the newspapers printed falsehood at the time. Making the
|
|
article in last weeks [I believe] Newsweek also a falsehood since it
|
|
referred to this.
|
|
|
|
ES> Once misinformation becomes public, someone somewhere will always
|
|
ES> chose to believe it.
|
|
|
|
Believe it or not I go along with that thought. It is also true that
|
|
once individuals or groups decide that a piece is filled with lies and
|
|
loop-holes that have not been explained to *their* satisfaction and
|
|
state such, this information is also retained by those reading it thus
|
|
doing nothing but deepening the mystery, etc., and casting suspicious
|
|
eyes at the group submitting the information.
|
|
|
|
ES> But rest assure, if they ever answer your query (which I seriously
|
|
ES> doubt they will ever do) and publicize the material they gave me as
|
|
ES> the reason, I am prepared and WILL respond publicly to the
|
|
ES> misinformation that is in the file contents. BTW, I am still
|
|
ES> waiting for their answer on the F-4s on my query to them from over
|
|
ES> two months ago.
|
|
|
|
I have now received the files that Joseph has been nice enough to put
|
|
into this echo for me and I must say that I found them interesting.
|
|
However it is still my contention -- and that of the team -- that
|
|
nothing has been disproved. I will say -- and I have mentioned this to
|
|
Steve and Joseph on several occasions -- I am a bit disappointed that
|
|
the *Team* chose not to respond to the files and they were made public.
|
|
|
|
I, myself, am considering responding, in sorts, to Joesph in regards to
|
|
his messages and also to the file released by Michael Corbin in which
|
|
he addressed Don Kircher's 10/23/92 report because I still feel that
|
|
something should be said. I do not believe for one instant that the
|
|
book is closed. After all, unless one experiences something it will
|
|
always remain hard for others who haven't, to believe.
|
|
|
|
Sincerely, Jack Mathias
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**********************************************
|
|
* THE U.F.O. BBS - http://www.ufobbs.com/ufo *
|
|
********************************************** |