1587 lines
88 KiB
Plaintext
1587 lines
88 KiB
Plaintext
SUBJECT: UFOs TONITE DON ECKER INTERVIEWS DR. RICHARD BOYLAN
|
|
|
|
|
|
FILE: UFO2441
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is the transcript of Don Ecker's interview of Dr. Richard Boylan
|
|
form the show that was broadcast 7/18/93 on UFOs Tonite.
|
|
|
|
Thanks to...... Don Ecker...UFOs Tonite on Cable Radio Network
|
|
...... Dr. Richard Boylan
|
|
ÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ
|
|
Don Ecker : Tonight, we're going to be taking a look at something that we've
|
|
discussed a number of times before on "UFOs Tonite." We are going to be
|
|
talking about "alien encounters, alien abductions," is it real? Are people
|
|
genuinely taking a close look at it? Is there something here, or are
|
|
literally tens and tens of thousands of people all over the United States,
|
|
mistaken? Is it a new type of psychosis? What exactly is going on out
|
|
there? You've seen recently a movie "Fire in the Sky" the Travis Walton
|
|
story and we've had Travis on this broadcast. We've had Budd Hopkins on
|
|
this broadcast. We've had Evonne Smith (sp?) of Cerro. We've had Dr. Dave
|
|
Jacobs. All speaking about the idea of "encounters" or as many people call
|
|
them "abductions," but hold on not everyone considers the UFO encounter or
|
|
abduction to be necessarily something other than benign or good. Tonight's
|
|
guest I have on hand Dr. Richard J. Boylan PhD who is a psychologist. He
|
|
received his PhD in 1984 in psychology and I believe it was 1989 he became a
|
|
licensed psychologist. He started an interest in UFOs all the way back in
|
|
1947, when the subject about "anomalous objects" first hit the airwaves
|
|
nationwide and ultimately around the world. Today he is recognized as one of
|
|
the better well known names in this field of encounters, physical encounters,
|
|
people that have claimed to have had actual first hand experience with people
|
|
from somewhere else, and I would like to welcome Dr. Richard Boylan on the
|
|
air. Good evening Richard, it's a pleasure to have you here.
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : Good evening Don, I'm happy to be with you.
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Ok! You've just recently finished a book that's coming out in
|
|
the near future from "Wild Flower Press" called "Close Extraterrestrial
|
|
Encounters". Now you are in the... you are a licensed psychologist, you've
|
|
practiced with people with marital problems, people that have experienced
|
|
anything that might come to see a psychologist, but yet you suddenly kind of
|
|
jumped off track from the mainstream, what many people in the mental health
|
|
community considered to be some type of psychosis, and I guess the big
|
|
question would be, what caused that? What was it about this particular
|
|
subject that caught your fancy and caused you to believe that there might
|
|
in fact be something very real here?
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : Well Don, what started for me interest in extraterrestrial
|
|
>contact, as you said I've always been interested in UFO's since I was a
|
|
>small boy and followed the stories, but extraterrestrial contact I had kind
|
|
>of a guarded feeling for. I was not overly impressed by some of the
|
|
>contactee stories in the 1950's coming out of southern California and some
|
|
>other places. So I kept kind of a skeptical eye towards that side of the
|
|
>phenomenon, but around 1989 as I was counseling a wide variety of people, my
|
|
>private practice was psychology, psychotherapy. Three or four people that
|
|
>year started to come forward as we were working on other material. They came
|
|
>in for very garden variety types of problems, anxiety, depression,
|
|
>relationship problems that sort of thing, but as we got into earlier in
|
|
>their life, after we got counseling for some months. One and then another
|
|
>would kind of sheepishly come forward with this, "well you're not probably
|
|
>going to believe this, but you probably ought to know that when I was a kid
|
|
>these little beings were in my bedroom one night", you know. At first I was
|
|
>pretty startled by that stuff. I had dismissed it in the UFO literature for
|
|
>many years, but here it was people I had come to know and knew that they may
|
|
>have a little of life's problems, but they were perfectly sane and
|
|
>trustworthy people, talking about this phenomenon. At first I didn't know
|
|
>quite what to do about it. I remembered that Leo Sprinkle a Wyoming
|
|
>psychologist had been working with this material for some time.
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Leo from the University of Wyoming?
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : Right! So I looked over what he had said and then about that
|
|
>same year, Dr. Edith Fioria (sp?) a psychologist down in the south bay area
|
|
>of California... Saratoga, who's in private practice there came out with a
|
|
>book "Encounters" in which she talked about a number of people in her
|
|
>practice that were revealing stories of this kind and I looked at her
|
|
>approach. I mulled these things over and finally at the end of 1991 I
|
|
>decided, hey! you know I'm trained as a research scientist. Wouldn't this
|
|
>make one heck of a research project? So I... January of 92 I started
|
|
>putting announcements in a couple of the local publications saying that as
|
|
>epithetic psychologist if you've had an extraterrestrial encounter I would
|
|
>be happy to talk to you and try and be understanding, and boy! they came
|
|
>forward. (laughs)
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : How have your peers in the field reacted to what you are doing
|
|
now? Have you suffered, you know have you suffered criticism as a result of
|
|
this? Have they been saying that Richard Boylan has gone over the edge?
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : Uh, not really. Most of my fellow psychotherapist, they run
|
|
>about the same spectrum as the rest of humanity. A lot of them don't
|
|
>believe the evidence for this stuff exist and so they are skeptics. Some
|
|
>believe that this stuff is going on and so they're on-board, and there are
|
|
>some in the middle that are kind of unsure of themselves. I've had some
|
|
>people keep their distance from me because they fear that they don't want to
|
|
>be associated with somebody who's into to these weird topics, but by and
|
|
>large the relationships I've had among fellow therapist continue as before.
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Well up to this point Richard now since you have begun to take
|
|
a very in depth look at this phenomenon. How many folks have you dealt with
|
|
on a professional level?
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : Well, as part of this research project interviewing people
|
|
>specifically in some depth about their extraterrestrial contacts. I'm up
|
|
>to about ninety-eight folks now.
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Have you discovered any of these people that may have
|
|
manufactured these close encounters... In other words has there been
|
|
anybody in there that has been delusional or has actively attempted to
|
|
perpetuate a hoax that you've uncovered?
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : Yeah, there are several kinds of false stories that have
|
|
>emerged. There's a few delusionals maybe about two percent of the
|
|
>population and frankly are, you know, this is part of a mental illness in
|
|
>this story, and then there's some folks who for their own reasons, attention
|
|
>seeking, etc, have produced stories that I don't see the evidence for and
|
|
>there's some pretty clear indications that they are making this stuff up...
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Well, now people like, oh I'm sorry.
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : and then there's a third category of what appeared to me
|
|
>in my opinion to be plants from "military and intelligence," who were coming
|
|
>in trying to muddy-up what I'm doing by planting preposterous stories with
|
|
>me hoping I'll bite on them, and announce them, and sound so absolutely
|
|
>goofy that my research will not be taken seriously.
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Well, people like Hopkins have kept information back from the
|
|
main stream. Have neither written about it nor shown, what they consider to
|
|
be definitive evidence from some of the people they've worked with and what
|
|
I'm talking about primarily are people that have recalled symbols that
|
|
apparently are some type of writing or hieroglyphic type symbol that they've
|
|
seen allegedly while on board these objects. Now do you have anything
|
|
yourself that you hold back to verify people when they come in?
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : Well, I wouldn't say I hold it back, you know obviously I'm a
|
|
>professional. So people working with me are operating with an understanding
|
|
>that what they say is kept confidential, and only they can decide what to
|
|
>release and how much. As part of our getting into these experiences, and in
|
|
>some occasions people have done drawings of either the beings that they've
|
|
>dealt with, or symbols they've seen on the walls of spacecraft, or in
|
|
>screens or books that have been presented to them by extraterrestrials. I
|
|
>do certain comparisons, not... I don't have a checklist of alien symbols
|
|
>that, you know, if you don't recognize these you're bogus get out of here,
|
|
>but I have had some interesting things happen, for example. Two separate
|
|
>gentlemen who come from quite different geographical locations and very
|
|
>different stations in life, and wouldn't know each other at all. Both
|
|
>drew almost the same identical complex symbol that they had seen during an
|
|
>extraterrestrial encounter, and I almost dropped out of my chair when I saw
|
|
>it the second time, because first time you know, you figure well, yeah that
|
|
>was real, maybe he saw this, there's always a slight possibility that he
|
|
>didn't, but when the second guy came up with the same one, I figured Woh!,
|
|
>we've gotten something here.
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : OK! We're going to have to take a quick break, when we come
|
|
back we're going to rejoin my guest Dr. Richard Boylan a licensed
|
|
psychologist who is specializing in alleged abduction or encounter things.
|
|
We're going to be right back. {:^) Ok! We are back! My guest this evening
|
|
is Dr. Richard Boylan and if you'd like to call in with a question for Dr.
|
|
Boylan or myself and you're in the 818, 213, or 310 area codes you can call
|
|
us at 818-352-7152, if you're outside of those areas you can call us toll
|
|
free at 800-336-2225, that's 1-800-336-CABLE. Ok Richard, now about oh...
|
|
I guess it wasn't quite a year ago myself and Vicki Cooper the editor of UFO
|
|
magazine attended a symposium that was held in Berkeley, and you were a part
|
|
of that along with Leo Sprinkle, John Salter, Dick Haynes, I'm trying to
|
|
think of who else was...
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : Jim Harder was there.
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Yeah, Jim Harder was there that's right, and one thing that I
|
|
noticed during the course of this particular symposium was that the overall
|
|
view not only from the folks that were there giving the lectures, yourself
|
|
and these other folks that we just mentioned, but the overall audience felt
|
|
that this phenomenon at worst is benign, and at very best is beneficial for
|
|
humanity, and I noticed at the very end of the symposium, and I wanted to get
|
|
up and ask some very hard questions and unfortunately they were not taking
|
|
live questions. They were only taking questions on three by five cards and
|
|
then the moderator would pick them. Number one I wanted to find out. Did
|
|
these folks fear taking live questions, and number two is that accurate, that
|
|
not only they, but you feel that this is a very benign or even a beneficent
|
|
phenomenon?
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan: Well, two questions there. First of all, I don't know why they
|
|
>did the index card question format. I had no reluctance to handle live
|
|
>questions. I've done that in a number of settings and I'd suspect that's
|
|
>true of most of the people you've mentioned. I think it was just a way of
|
|
>trying to manage a lot of folks in a big auditorium. As to the phenomenon
|
|
>itself. I think probably safest if I speak for myself, and not the other
|
|
>gentlemen you mentioned, but I would say this. For most people that I've
|
|
>dealt with it seems to go, that at first it's very scary uncertain shaking
|
|
>kind of an experience for a person. There's no precedent for it. Society
|
|
>says the stuff doesn't exist, if you try and say that it does you're crazy,
|
|
>and then as people walk into their experience and get a little help
|
|
>understanding what's going on and see what actually went on instead of the
|
|
>partial memories they often have when they come out of an encounter before
|
|
>they've been worked with professionally. When they get actually into the
|
|
>full experience and get a little perspective on it, but I generally find and
|
|
>there are some exceptions that, people feel that this is a overall been a
|
|
>positive stimulation in their lives, it's challenged them, it's caused them
|
|
>to rethink where they fit in the world, their understanding of the world,
|
|
>and depending on a persons personal makeup some people feel that they've had a
|
|
|
|
>a substantial consciousness-raising experience.
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Well, now I will never forget Leo Sprinkle standing before that
|
|
auditorium and he used an analogy, and he referred to the people that have
|
|
undergone this experience as sheep, and he referred to the intelligence
|
|
behind the UFO phenomenon itself as a shepherd, and he referred to the little
|
|
gray entities that many people report as the sheep dogs nipping at the heels,
|
|
and I was thoroughly outraged by that. Now I'm certainly no abduction
|
|
therapist nor have I specialized in that particular aspect of the overall
|
|
phenomenon, but I have spoken to many many people through out the years that
|
|
have undergone this, and I have yet to speak to anyone that would genuinely
|
|
accept this as a beneficent thing. The analogy that I always hear or
|
|
variations there of are. Friends don't come in the middle of the night
|
|
sneaking through your bedroom window, tying you up, abducting you, carrying
|
|
you off, doing things to you, then bringing you back unceremoniously and
|
|
dumping you off. How do you respond to that?
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : Well my research has been quite different. The numbers I've
|
|
>come up with are two-thirds the people say it's positive. About almost
|
|
>another third say it's mixed got some positive and some heroizing or down
|
|
>side aspects to it. Only a tiny fraction last time I did an analysis
|
|
>statistically about two percent said, no there's not a redeeming feature
|
|
>to it I wish it'd never happened.
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Well, what in your opinion have caused these people to accept
|
|
or the majority of the people that you have worked with to accept this
|
|
particular aspect of the overall UFO phenomenon in a positive light?
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : Well, I think I would say this without offending too many
|
|
>people. I think the kind of way a person tends to interpret and size up
|
|
>their experience, has not a little to do with, who gets to them, who works
|
|
>with them, and what kind of attitudes the person working with them has. If
|
|
>the person working with them already has a negative or terroristic mind-set
|
|
>about what extraterrestrial contacts are about, they're going to communicate
|
|
>that in very obvious or very suttle ways, that are going to be picked up on
|
|
>by the person they're dealing with. Very many experiences have not been
|
|
>dealt with by mental health professionals, but well meaning amateurs in the
|
|
>psychological sense who tried to be helpful, but really didn't have the
|
|
>professional understanding of how the human mind works under extraordinary
|
|
>circumstances, and may not have been as helpful as could have otherwise been
|
|
>the case.
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : OK, we're going to have to take another very quick break and when
|
|
we come back more on the overall UFO experience encounter. {:^) We are back
|
|
to my guest Dr. Richard Boylan. Ok Richard as a matter of fact speaking of
|
|
UFO magazine, you wrote a number of issues ago an article on a I believe you
|
|
referred to it as a tour through the southwest going around to some of these
|
|
areas that have achieved almost a legendary status in the UFO field, places
|
|
like "Area 51" down in Nevada where allegedly the U.S. Air Force or some
|
|
faction of the U.S. government has recovered alien technology. What caused
|
|
you to do that? I mean that's kind of a far cry from your normal from your
|
|
normal business of working with people that have undergone some type of
|
|
experience.
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : Yeah, well my general professional practice is a broad based
|
|
>psychological issues. Working with experiencers is only a small subdivision
|
|
>of that, but your point is well taken. Why would a clinical psychologist
|
|
>take a week and a half off from his practice, and go out in the desert of
|
|
>Nevada and New Mexico, and check out bases that are ultra-secret and are in
|
|
>some cases not supposed to exist? Well the reason I did that is, I did
|
|
>this grand tour as I call it between April 9 and 15th of 1992. At that
|
|
>point I'd been about three or four months into my research project, and
|
|
>they'd come up with a number of people who had come forward and were
|
|
>reporting extraterrestrial contact, and this was challenging to them about
|
|
>what they were remembering was true and it was challenging to me. I had to
|
|
>find that most of these people made sense and seemed sane and truthful, and
|
|
>yet the enormity of what was starting to pile up in all of these accounts
|
|
>really shook me, and I decided well now if I go out and see for myself some
|
|
>UFO activity, and some of this "cloak and dagger" stuff that's supposed to
|
|
>be going on that indicates that the government darn well knows this stuffs
|
|
>going on and is keeping it out of sight. Then I don't have to so much just
|
|
>operate on the word of people who say they've had extraterrestrial contact.
|
|
>I can see some of this stuff with my on two eyes, and I'll be in a much more
|
|
>solid place, and I'll be much more useful to people that come in after this
|
|
>because I'll be operating from information and not from just belief.
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Well, are you convinced at this point that there is in fact a
|
|
"covert" governmental operation of some type involved with this phenomenon?
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : I think the evidence for that is overwhelming from what I've
|
|
>seen and read, what others have researched, seen, and come up with.
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : And you know there are certain factions within the... Well I
|
|
don't want to say the "fringe" area of UFOlogy, but I guess perhaps that's
|
|
the best way to describe it. That think, even though there is no proof
|
|
whatsoever, that there are elements of the government that have formed some
|
|
type of treaty with these intelligences. Do you give any credence to that?
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : I don't have information that could prove that one way or
|
|
>the other. There are some accounts from people interviewed, who seem
|
|
>pretty believable that there are some underground facilities where
|
|
>extraterrestrials and governmental or human scientists have been jointly
|
|
>spotted, but you know I haven't been there myself, so that's still in the
|
|
>area of it looks like it's evidence, but we could certainly enjoy a little
|
|
>harder evidence, but I've seen UFOs myself, so that's not in the realm of
|
|
>speculation. I'm an eye witness there.
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : OK, we're going to have to take our half-hour break and when we
|
|
come back more with my guest Dr. Richard Boylan . This is Don Ecker, the
|
|
show is UFO's Tonite and you are listening to the Cable Radio Network. {:^)
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : And we are back, with my guest Dr. Richard Boylan. Ok Richard
|
|
you've been out to some of these areas and you told me just a few moments ago
|
|
that you had some sightings of some "strange craft" out there, but before we
|
|
go to that let me ask you a question. With your basic overall view that the
|
|
encounter phenomenon is not bad and very well maybe good, but yet you think
|
|
that there could perhaps be some of these intelligences working with factions
|
|
within the government. If in fact they are good, then number one why are
|
|
they not announcing themselves and why has our government not announced their
|
|
presence?
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : Well, the answer to that first question would be speculative.
|
|
>I don't know their reasons. I can have some educated surmises based on what
|
|
>I've heard from experiencers who have had dialog with the extraterrestrials,
|
|
>and as for the government I think it's pretty clear that there's a massive
|
|
>"cover-up" going up. I think you know asking the government why it's not
|
|
>coming clean with us is a very good question we should all be doing, and I
|
|
>think as that pressure builds the government is going to have to start to be
|
|
>more forthcoming with some answers back. As to the extraterrestrials it
|
|
>appears that there is some sensitivity on their part that we're not ready
|
|
>for a wide open manifestation or have not been anyway. The apparent game
|
|
>plan has been for the extraterrestrials to try and work with the leadership
|
|
>within our country, in the quiet bases with top government, and the
|
|
>governments booted it pretty much over to the military intelligence
|
|
>establishment to handle and to keep undercover, but with the idea that the
|
|
>population would be prepared gradually for the reality of extraterrestrial
|
|
>presence, well as you and I know the government has done just about zero on
|
|
>that score of preparing the people for the reality of UFOs and
|
|
>extraterrestrial presence among us.
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : But nevertheless, over the last twenty-five to thirty years if
|
|
nothing else Hollywood has prepared us for that.
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : Oh, Hollywood has done a much better job than the government.
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Starting for example with the original "Star Trek" series.
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : Yeah (laughs)
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Well, which was a very positive look at encounters off earth, I
|
|
mean with alien cultures. One of the most popular mythological heroes for
|
|
the want of a better term throughout the entire planet is "Mr. Spock" who is
|
|
a half human half alien from another planet, and you know he was universally
|
|
I think loved almost by practically everybody that watched the series.
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : Yeah well, Hollywood feeds us back mass culture and mass
|
|
>consciousness, and you know there's been a lot of opinion poles that have
|
|
>asked people whether they believe in UFOs and the majority of the United
|
|
>States citizens think that UFOs are real. The government's lagging way
|
|
>behind the people once again in being on top of this phenomenon. What
|
|
>appears to be going on now with this escalation in extraterrestrial
|
|
>contacts, is it appears that the extraterrestrials have borrowed a page from
|
|
>Ross Perot's campaign, and have decided to take their campaign directly to
|
|
>the people and go around the government directly to the people, and so
|
|
>there's been apparently an escalation of extraterrestrial contacts based on
|
|
>some of the work the "Roper pole" (sp?) and other researchers calculations
|
|
>and my own work. I would estimate that there's probably three thousand
|
|
>extraterrestrial contacts going on a day in the United States. Obviously at
|
|
>that volume we're not talking about a phenomena that's staying very well
|
|
>hidden. Just a couple of weeks ago there was a Sunday magazine supplement
|
|
>in many of the major papers in the United States with alien abductions as
|
|
>their front page cover story, with a Harvard psychiatrist John Mack and
|
|
>others featured dealing with this straight up as a bonafide scientifically
|
|
>valid phenomenon, so you know the popular consciousness is there, it's the
|
|
>government that's got lockjaw.
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : All right let's go to the phone lines. We have David from Venice
|
|
on Continental Cable. Good evening David.
|
|
|
|
-!- David : Hello
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Are you there?
|
|
|
|
-!- David : Yeah, how ya doing?
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Fine, did you have a question for my quest?
|
|
|
|
-!- David : Yeah, I got a couple of questions, but the first question I got
|
|
-!- is of all the people that you've investigated or talked to about
|
|
-!- abductions has any of them ever been on any kind of drugs like, you know
|
|
-!- rock cocaine or mushrooms or anything like that?
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Are you talking about the people themselves that have undergone
|
|
these experiences?
|
|
|
|
-!- David : Yes sir, I want to know whether or not if they've been on any
|
|
-!- kind of drugs or...
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Richard
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : Well David, let me be clear about your question, are you
|
|
>talking about taking drugs at the time that they also feel they had an
|
|
>extraterrestrial experience?
|
|
|
|
-!- David : Yes sir
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : Oh, I've not detected any such set of circumstances. I
|
|
>carefully check with people you know, you had anything to drink that night
|
|
>or you know, any drug use and make sure that's negatives, so that we're not
|
|
>dealing with hallucinations. It would be real convenient if that's all this
|
|
>was, but doesn't seem to be that's what's going on.
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Yeah, and besides Richard is it not true that most people that
|
|
end up having conscious recollections of this actually have experiences that
|
|
go back almost to their very early childhood?
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : Well, for some people yes and some people no. I would say the
|
|
>majority of people I've researched have had multiple contacts going back a
|
|
>ways in their life in some cases back to very early childhood.
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Does that answer your question David?
|
|
|
|
-!- David : Yeah, and I have another question Don. Ok, what about like the
|
|
-!- government you know, during I know during the Vietnam war they did "agent
|
|
-!- orange". What about the government doing any kind of flying over areas
|
|
-!- where people thought maybe they had some kind of experience, anything
|
|
-!- like that ?
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Well, there's no way of telling, although this is not local just
|
|
to the United States or to any geographical area. This literally has been
|
|
reported worldwide, and with the numbers of people that have undergone this.
|
|
I would find it pretty hard to believe that it was some type of chemically
|
|
induced phenomena that would be as universal as it is. Would you agree with
|
|
that Richard ?
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : Yeah, we're talking about people very widely scattered, and
|
|
>other researchers are coming up with the same findings I am. People from
|
|
>all parts of the region, all walks of life, all ages. If the government
|
|
>were out there spraying some "mind bending" chemical, you know you'd be
|
|
>hearing choppers all night long whipping around, because there's a lot of
|
|
>this activity of encounters being reported.
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : All right, well thank you for your call David and keep listening.
|
|
Ok Richard, with this particular phenomenon I've got to get back to something
|
|
that I had asked you earlier. Friends do not come in the middle of the night
|
|
unannounced at two or three or four o-clock in the morning. Many people have
|
|
been absolutely traumatized by this, and I have spoken to more people that
|
|
feel a sense of fear or urgency, than they do a feeling of happiness
|
|
undergoing this. Most people are not asked their permission, the reports
|
|
that are coming out state that in many cases these individuals are at home in
|
|
bed asleep, suddenly they're confronted with this presence, now according to
|
|
the published reports they're taken in many many cases against their will,
|
|
they have some type of procedure performed on them. Now this has come out
|
|
not only consciously, but of course under hypnosis. There have been reports
|
|
of women alleging that they've had within the first trimester a fetus
|
|
removed. Men have reported having involuntary extraction of sperm from them
|
|
and then they're unceremoniously dumped back in their house. Now I, perhaps
|
|
I'm missing something, but I see nothing good in this especially when you
|
|
consider that the human race is in fact a sentient intelligent race even
|
|
though you may turn on the news every night and that may give lie to what I
|
|
just said, but you know how can you take a look at this and state that you
|
|
feel that this is in fact beneficent for the people involved?
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : Well, the scenario you describe is not a typical scenario that
|
|
>I've come up with as the research that I've come into. I think that's sort
|
|
>of the stereotype that's broadcast by...
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : You mean you're telling me, that the majority of people that you
|
|
have worked with have a different type of experience than that ?
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : Well, there are elements that are similar in some cases and
|
|
>elements that are different, but that stereotype I think is overdrawn and I
|
|
>don't find validation for that as the average standard experience.
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Ok, now in that case, what have you been finding out, what have
|
|
you been uncovering that suggests to you that this is for the furtherment I
|
|
guess of humanity and if in fact that's what you are suggesting, why would
|
|
these intelligences be concerned about that ?
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : Well, good question. I guess if I were going to make a overall
|
|
>characterization about extraterrestrial contacts, and that's a dangerous
|
|
>thing to do. I would say that the contacts are in "involuntary consciousness
|
|
>raising exercise". I'm not suggesting that people perceive the
|
|
>extraterrestrials when they first visit them as friends, that connection for
|
|
>a number of people develops later. At first it's obviously baffling, scary,
|
|
>without precedent.
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Well, let me interrupt for just a second. When you say perceive
|
|
them as friends and that comes later, friends in what way and in which
|
|
manner?
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : Well, recognizing fellow intelligent life, recognizing someone
|
|
>who has their interest and a personal concern for them at heart, who exudes
|
|
>a great deal of caring and warmth in many cases, and keeps track of them
|
|
>from time to time and on a repeat visit there's a sense of an old familiar
|
|
>person that many of the experiencers say they're glad to see it come back.
|
|
>I realize this doesn't fit the stereotype that's some of the authors have
|
|
>put out there, but you know some of the literature. I think it David Jacobs
|
|
>book for example, which tends to depict things in the more awful kind of
|
|
>sense, but I've heard and talked with you know John Mack, John Carpenter,
|
|
>Leo Sprinkle, Jim Harder and others and I get a sense that what I'm talking
|
|
>about is not that uncommon in their findings too, once you get past the
|
|
>rhetoric and get down to the reality of what actually is happening to
|
|
>people.
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker: My guest this evening is Dr. Richard Boylan and we're talking
|
|
about UFO experiences or abductions. Well if in fact then this is a
|
|
beneficent experience, what is the ultimate aim of what these individuals are
|
|
doing and how are they doing it?
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : Well, a number of experiencers have gotten messages and I've
|
|
>kind of put them together and there's a convergence there that suggest
|
|
>there's a kind of overall unifying theme to what the extraterrestrials are
|
|
>getting across to people they've contacted. There's a great concern for
|
|
>this planet and it's ecology and the destruction of that by humans in
|
|
>negative involvement with the ecology of the earth, there's a concern for
|
|
>interpersonal violence among humans, how we are treating each other, there's
|
|
>a concern for our excessive preoccupation with materialism and the
|
|
>extraterrestrials message is in many cases would be that we develop our
|
|
>mental and spiritual sides more and not be so concerned about only
|
|
>technological progress. These are some of the concerns, obviously many of
|
|
>the extraterrestrials are looking forward to a time when there can more open
|
|
>contact, when they can be sure that they land somewhere's somebody's not
|
|
>going to get their 357 magnum out and blow them away, when there can be a
|
|
>respectful dialog between people without the need to be as roundabout and
|
|
>surreptitious as they feel they need to be now.
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Ok Richard, let me take another quick break, as a matter of fact
|
|
we've run past it here and then we have some more phone calls so standby.{:^)
|
|
And we are back with my guest Dr. Richard Boylan and let's go to the lines
|
|
Richard. I've got Vince calling from Tucson, Arizona on satellite, is that
|
|
correct ? Hello Vince.
|
|
|
|
-!- Vince : Yeah, go ahead.
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Yeah, my guest this evening is Dr. Richard Boylan, did you have a
|
|
question for him ?
|
|
|
|
-!- Vince : Yes I did, you got cut out there I didn't hear the first part.
|
|
-!- Yeah, I do have a question. Being a psychologist with the abduction
|
|
-!- scenario could it be analogist to people who've been kidnapped and held
|
|
-!- hostage and that after a period of time they you know possibly get swayed
|
|
-!- over to the kidnapper's point of view and now all of the sudden they
|
|
-!- agree with what the kidnapper's do and... ?
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : That's an excellent point, that's called the "Stockholm
|
|
syndrome". How do you answer a question like that Richard? What Vince is
|
|
asking is over a period of time over a period of years people have been taken
|
|
again and again with not so much as a bye or leave, and as happens here on
|
|
planet earth sometimes when this type of situation occurs the individuals
|
|
begin to identify with their abductors and before you know it they are
|
|
siding with them against the rest of society.
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : Well, the Stockholm syndrome is based on a protracted
|
|
>kidnapping and terrorizing situation that goes... well the original
|
|
>Stockholm hostage taking I believe lasted several days, certainly a long
|
|
>period of a hours with a terrorizing and life threatening circumstances
|
|
>involved that tend to overtake a person's mind and make them more pliable to
|
|
>seeing their best interest aligned with that of their hostage taker.
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Yes, but yet many many people that have undergone this experience
|
|
have stated emphatically and for the record that they had absolutely no say
|
|
so over anything, they were basically turned off, their perception was
|
|
manipulated. Now how do we know that the, for example the people that you
|
|
have dealt with that claim that this is a good thing, a happy thing that
|
|
their perception in fact is not being manipulated?
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : Well, the typical duration of an extraterrestrial contact when
|
|
>it involves leaving where the person is found and that isn't always the
|
|
>case, there are a lot of contacts where the extraterrestrials come and visit
|
|
>a person, let's say in their bedroom for example, and there's no taking away
|
|
>to a craft, that's one of the elements of the stereotype that just isn't
|
|
>right in many cases, but even where there is a removal to craft, the average
|
|
>duration is about an hour and there's no life threatening kinds of "gun to
|
|
>the head" kind of stuff, so it's too short and it lacks the life threatening
|
|
>aspects for the Stockholm syndrome.
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : But yet, if these intelligences and for the want of a better term
|
|
aliens, I refrain from calling them extraterrestrial because I don't for a
|
|
fact know for a fact that is in fact what they are, but they can manipulate
|
|
individuals and from many many reports over the years would seem to bare this
|
|
out, so the question I guess once again is, how do we know that what
|
|
perceptions these folks are relaying are in fact accurate?
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : Well, I don't know about manipulations, I've not heard that
|
|
>reported on the folks I've dealt with. I know Dr. Jacobs would like to have
|
|
>that be the case, but I think that's his interpretation of the data and I
|
|
>don't read the data the same way. The people I've researched with are very
|
|
>capable of speaking both when they find their interests and that of the
|
|
>extraterrestrials aligned, when they find their interests separate and when
|
|
>they take exception to something that has happened to them during an
|
|
>encounter, so we're not dealing with mindless robots here or people that
|
|
>have been taken over and brainwashed by extraterrestrials and are now just
|
|
>happy playing spokespersons for the extraterrestrial line.
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker: But do we know this?
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : Yes
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : How?
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : Well, I've talked with such folks after one or more encounters
|
|
>and they are able to quite well differentiate how they feel about different
|
|
>aspects of the experience, some positive, some negative, some sort of in
|
|
>between. They're not just happy campers and propaganda victims for the
|
|
>extraterrestrials.
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Ok Vince, did that pretty much answer your question?
|
|
|
|
-!- Vince : Yeah, a little bit, I do have kind of a follow up question.
|
|
-!- Wouldn't you consider the abduction scenario over, you know if somebody
|
|
-!- been abducted since they were five years old and all the way through
|
|
-!- their life until they are age forty. Isn't that kind of a long term
|
|
-!- thing, these people are always under the threat of being abducted, as
|
|
-!- much as if you'd been abducted once and held captive all the time and you
|
|
-!- know are they, you know the Stockholm scenario as you call it, doesn't
|
|
-!- that apply if some of these people have been tagged and now they are able
|
|
-!- to be abducted at anytime and against their will ?
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : Well, you know it's a funny thing that with the people I've
|
|
>worked with and the other people that... October conference all the
|
|
>researchers you had mentioned, they don't like to use the term abduction, if
|
|
>that sounds like somebody put a gun to your head and walked you off.
|
|
>Contact is a much more unloaded term for that experience. The majority of
|
|
>the experiencers of close extraterrestrial encounters that I've worked with
|
|
>have come to a point of view where they don't mind future contacts and in
|
|
>many cases look forward to them. The word abduction would not fit to
|
|
>describe that, that set of mind or those kinds of contact experiences. If
|
|
>we're going to be technical about the Stockholm syndrome it doesn't come on
|
|
>just because of brief exposures without terrorism just because there's a
|
|
>number of them spaced apart by months or years. It's a kind of durational
|
|
>brainwashing experience that this phenomenon just lacks the elements of.
|
|
>It's a nice theory, but it doesn't fit the circumstances of these relatively
|
|
>brief extraterrestrial encounters.
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Ok Vince, we are going to have to move along. I thank you for
|
|
your call and keep listening. Richard we're going to have to take the half
|
|
hour break and when we come back we have some more telephone calls. {:^)
|
|
And, let's go back to the phone lines, we've got Bill in Sherman Oaks. Good
|
|
evening Bill.
|
|
|
|
-!- Bill : Hi Don, how are you?
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : I'm fine thank you. What cable system are you calling in on?
|
|
|
|
-!- Bill : I believe I have United, yeah that's how the bill comes in United
|
|
-!- cable.
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Ok, did you have a question for my guest?
|
|
|
|
-!- Bill : Well, yeah Don, I just wanted to say I hope this doesn't come
|
|
-!- across as propaganda, but Richard thank God there's still a handful of
|
|
-!- you out there, I was beginning to give up here. Richard I wanted to ask
|
|
-!- you just a little about your credentials. How long have you been doing
|
|
-!- research in the extraterrestrial field?
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : Well, the research kind of came and found me about 89 and I've
|
|
>made it more of a formal project since then. I've followed the UFO
|
|
>phenomenon since 47, but the extraterrestrial contacts stuff, in terms of
|
|
>really getting into it and it hitting me in the face where I couldn't avoid
|
|
>it was 1989.
|
|
|
|
-!- Bill : And these are by patients and clients that you were seeing at
|
|
-!- this...?
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : Yes, for other reasons back then, of course more recently is
|
|
>I've done my formal research project with "Out Reach", I've had people come
|
|
>in explicitly because they feel they've had extraterrestrial encounters.
|
|
|
|
-!- Bill : When did you notice and I'm going to call it negative for a lack
|
|
-!- of a better word, that this abduction element came into effect ? It
|
|
-!- appears to me within the last five years and what do you feel is the
|
|
-!- culprit behind it, do you have any thoughts on that?
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : Let me be absolutely clear Bill, are you talking about
|
|
>abduction as a kind of negative overall characterization of the ET contact
|
|
>phenomenon?
|
|
|
|
-!- Bill : Yes
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : Yes? Ok, gotcha. Yes, because if you remember "Giant Rock"
|
|
>in the fifties and the contactees back then they were talking about the
|
|
>"Space Brothers" and they bring tidings of either great joy or great cosmic
|
|
>importance or earth importance and the negative...
|
|
|
|
-!- Bill : I just visited that area last week, I'm familiar with it...
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : I've yet to visit that, I guess I should do it on historical
|
|
>grounds, but anyway...
|
|
|
|
-!- Bill : Interesting experience...
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : Your right, and then there's the "Billy Meyer" kind of stuff in
|
|
>the sixties and now it's, now that you mention it, it is more recent that a
|
|
>kind of massive negative stereotypical overall image making has emerged. We
|
|
>didn't even really get that so much with the "Hills", Barney and his wife...
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Well now, Richard lest we think that we are saying that they are
|
|
coming down just arbitrarily performing nasty nasty things, I don't believe
|
|
that that is it as much as, you know many people have attributed this to what
|
|
human beings do with wildlife, tagging animals and then occasionally tracking
|
|
them down shooting them with a dart, you know checking their vital signs and
|
|
what have you, and they say well if in fact this phenomenon is occurring that
|
|
it's not much different than that, but yet the point I'm trying to make is
|
|
that we are dealing today human beings are a sentient thinking spiritual
|
|
creature and whatever is occurring and I disagree with it simply from the
|
|
fact that apparently whatever is happening is happening in many cases against
|
|
the experiencers will. I could not began to tell you how many people through
|
|
the course that I've dealt with at UFO magazine and so forth, have stated
|
|
that whatever it is I don't know, but I wish it would stop.
|
|
|
|
-!- Bill : Well, Don I've had some contacts myself and there were periods
|
|
-!- within those contacts where I had a lot of uncertainties about it just
|
|
-!- because of the experiences that had to go on with my everyday life
|
|
-!- patterns and it was a very difficult thing to comprehend, but the overall
|
|
-!- experience itself was not negative in the sense that someone came in to
|
|
-!- my bedroom in the middle of the morning and started poking needles in me
|
|
-!- or anything similar to the late movie "Fire in the Sky", I mean that was
|
|
-!- such misinterpreted hogwash that...
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Well, it was something that was Hollywood-ized without a doubt...
|
|
|
|
|
|
-!- Bill : Yeah, but this is the effect and for the individual that's never
|
|
-!- interpreted this phenomenon in any fashion or manner sees this, this is
|
|
-!- the interpretation that they get, and I believe that just adds to the
|
|
-!- fuel of this party line until it's infiltrated to a degree until where it
|
|
-!- gets out of hand. Wouldn't you agree with that Richard to some degree?
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : Ok Bill, my frank opinion is that the negative stereotyping is
|
|
>part of the organized cover up of the extraterrestrial presence and UFO
|
|
>presence phenomenon.
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Richard, I would have to say that Budd Hopkins or David Jacobs
|
|
would disagree with that.
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : Of course they have, we've disagreed before. I think that they
|
|
>are not interpreting the phenomenon correctly.
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker: How do you base that ?
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan: Neither of them are psychologist, they'll be the first to admit
|
|
>that.
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Yep, that is correct, your absolutely correct.
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : And it makes a lot of difference whether a person who has this
|
|
>kind of unprecedented, spooky, mysterious kind of experience is dealt with
|
|
>by somebody who knows how to handle emotional reactions and has enough
|
|
>information about the phenomenon to intelligently deal with the person, or
|
|
>whether they get you know debriefed by people that lack those skills and...
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Well, Hopkins in fact has worked...
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Ecker : that can be quite... can cause kind of a permanent-izing of the
|
|
>trauma, if the person is not dealt with right.
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Hopkins has worked with mental health professionals...
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : But he is not one.
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : No he is not, but I to say that that particular individual, and I
|
|
certainly do not agree with all his conclusions, but he has done more in a
|
|
positive light to bring this phenomenon to the public mind than practically
|
|
anyone else in the entire field.
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : Well, I will agree and give credit to Budd for putting the word
|
|
>out there about the reality of extraterrestrial contacts in the time when it
|
|
>was extremely lonely and unpopular...
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : And he was dealing with people when no one else would, Richard...
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : I give him every bit of that, however you know there are now a
|
|
>lot of psychotherapist willing to get into the field, getting into the
|
|
>field. I've trained probably thirty of them myself just in the last half
|
|
>year and their are a lots more out there coming forward now that this thing
|
|
>is getting declassified and legitimated as a real phenomenon...
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : But I will say this Hopkins...
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : ...and it's not like the old days.
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Hopkins, to my knowledge has never taken a fee from anybody that
|
|
he's worked with in the abduction field.
|
|
|
|
-!- Bill : But that doesn't necessarily make him right, Don...
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : Yeah, he doesn't have a licence, it would be unlawful for him
|
|
>to do so.
|
|
|
|
-!- Bill : And I'm not trying to take anything away from him, and if I may
|
|
-!- just say one more thing and I'll leave the line free for somebody else
|
|
-!- here. It just seems to me that if I were a "power monger" in charge of a
|
|
-!- dominant oil company on this planet and there was a civilization that
|
|
-!- came here and could show me a better way to do it, I sure would want to
|
|
-!- do something about that, and I'm not going to take up anymore time here,
|
|
-!- it's a great show, Thank You very much.
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Thank you for calling, Bill. Ok, we are going to go to John in
|
|
Glendale on Sammons cable. Good evening John.
|
|
|
|
-!- John : Hi Don, Dr. Boylan.
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : Good evening.
|
|
|
|
-!- John : This is a terrific show tonight.
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Well, thank you.
|
|
|
|
-!- John : I have one comment and then I do have a question. I'm calling to
|
|
-!- lend my support to Dr. Boylan's point of view. I do feel that this is
|
|
-!- not a black and white phenomenon nor is it necessarily as literal as it
|
|
-!- appears on the surface, and it's in the past few years it's come to be my
|
|
-!- notion that humanity is in the process of having it's consciousness
|
|
-!- transformed and that doesn't mean that it's going to be necessarily fun
|
|
-!- or easy, but perhaps will be beneficial in the long run.
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : OK...
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : I'd have to agree with you John, that this extraterrestrial
|
|
>contact as an aggregate human experience is definitely transforming our
|
|
>consciousness.
|
|
|
|
-!- John : Yes, I would agree with that, and so perhaps at our stage right
|
|
-!- now we don't quite understand all of the meaning about it.
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : What was your question, John?
|
|
|
|
-!- John : So my question is, I'd like to ask Dr. Boylan if he feels that
|
|
-!- this encounter phenomenon is a "literal physical" experience or something
|
|
-!- more akin to an "altered state" type of experience?
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : Well, I could be cute and say all of the above, but let me be a
|
|
>little more clear than that. It is as far as I can tell in a number of
|
|
>cases, a "physical real" experience where people are actually taken
|
|
>somewhere else, not that there aren't plenty of just "bedroom dialogs", but
|
|
>in those cases where people are removed to craft, taken somewhere else and
|
|
>in some cases procedures done where they have indications of laser surgery
|
|
>burn marks, or scoops taken out of skin, or other signs that indicate actual
|
|
>physical procedure and then returned, and I've yet to have anybody dumped in
|
|
>bed by the way, I've always seen accounts of kind of gentle and unobtrusive
|
|
>and placing back where they were found in ways that make it hard to tell
|
|
>that anything happened, but there do seem to be some mental contacts that
|
|
>are highly real, that seem to be like "ultra-vivid dreams", these usually
|
|
>seem to be follow-up encounters after, usually the first encounters are
|
|
>three dimensional real. Sometimes when person sort of got the basic message
|
|
>and the reality of the extraterrestrial dialog with them, it seems that some
|
|
>of these follow-up visits occur as mental transfers of data and information,
|
|
>and perceptions, along with highly visual mental pictures so that the person
|
|
>is almost not sure whether they've actually gone somewhere and seen the
|
|
>stuff or it's been highly vividly presented inside their mind. So I think
|
|
>that long-winded answer John, is that I think there's some of both to these
|
|
>encounters, it kind of depends on which particular encounter is going on at
|
|
>the moment.
|
|
|
|
-!- John : Uh huh, it's interesting that you should mention "vivid dreams"
|
|
-!- because I've never had a sighting or an encounter that I can remember,
|
|
-!- however a few years ago I did have an extremely vivid dream, in which the
|
|
-!- message seemed to come to me that this was the only way in which I would
|
|
-!- be able to perceive this phenomenon which would be in an "altered state"
|
|
-!- kind of condition, which is I guess why I asked that question.
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : Well, ok John, let me back at this another way to, to be
|
|
>complete about it. There are a number of encounters that are disguised as
|
|
>"vivid dreams", in other words the "screen memory" or the "mental self
|
|
>explanation" that is imposed on the person's mind, when the
|
|
>extraterrestrials don't feel the time is right for that person to totally
|
|
>remember the encounter is that, "gee this was only a dream but boy was it a
|
|
>vivid one". So I can't say from just the little bit that we've talked
|
|
>whether what you've recalled was a "vivid dream, an extraterrestrial
|
|
>encounter disguised as a vivid dream, or one of those totally mental-ized
|
|
>along with visuals kind of encounters where there was no physical presence
|
|
>in the room, but a highly charged mental exchange". It would take some
|
|
>working with a professional, perhaps some hypnotic regression to tease out
|
|
>which one of the three it actually was.
|
|
|
|
-!- John : Uh huh.
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Ok John, we are going to have to move along, the lines are lit
|
|
up, but thank you for your call and please keep listening.
|
|
|
|
-!- John : Thank You !
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Ok, we are going to go to Tino in Garden Grove on Paragon. Good
|
|
evening.
|
|
|
|
-!- Tino : Hey Don, how are you doing?
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Well, I'm fine.
|
|
|
|
-!- Tino : It's good to talk to you again.
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Is this the Tino I think it is?
|
|
|
|
-!- Tino : That's right. I haven't talked to you in awhile, it's good to
|
|
-!- hear your voice again.
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Well thank you, it's good to talk to you too. My guest this
|
|
evening is Dr. Richard Boylan, did you have a question for him?
|
|
|
|
-!- Tino : Yeah, I've got two questions or three questions under one theme.
|
|
-!- I'm talking about the "alien entities" themselves, let's talk those for
|
|
-!- awhile. What has been your experience as to the "types of entities"
|
|
-!- there are, and what about their "powers and abilities". I understand at
|
|
-!- "Bentwaters" for instance they were able to do certain things that
|
|
-!- weren't always recorded by "Unsolved Mysteries" and other things, and
|
|
-!- then also the final, is there any as to their origin?
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : Good questions Tino, let me try these on. Now I don't claim to
|
|
>have you know all the data, I don't know of any researcher that could.
|
|
|
|
-!- Tino : Well, maybe both of you could answer.
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : In my research to date, I've come up with a minimum of seven
|
|
>different races and possibly more you know. Again some of the stereotyper's
|
|
>would have the extraterrestrials being three and a half foot tall grey
|
|
>skinned folks, blah blah blah, but then you've got a lot of racial
|
|
>differences. Even if you concede a sort of a "grey general type" for one of
|
|
>the races, you've got three and half foot to four foot tall types, you've
|
|
>got five to six foot types, you've got seven to eight foot types, you've got
|
|
>three, four, or five finger types, pads on the ends of fingers or suction
|
|
>cups, you've got webbed or non-webbed fingers, you've got large almond
|
|
>shaped eyes slanted upward, outwards or horizontally in some cases large
|
|
>ovoid eyes without the almond slant, you've got extraterrestrials with slit
|
|
>pupils, you've got just other different body types, the so called praying
|
|
>mantis type, the reptoid type. So just running those categories out, you're
|
|
>probably talking seven to ten races just there. These are the ones that I
|
|
>keep getting recurrently. There's a few exotic and single case reports that
|
|
>I tend to be a little cautious about until I get a lot more corroborative,
|
|
>other people sighting the same ones, but those ones keep popping back up.
|
|
>Now as to your question about their "powers and abilities", obviously
|
|
>telepathy, they seem to be able go through walls, although their favorite
|
|
>mode of entry and exit is pane glass. They appear to be able to travel
|
|
>great distances with ease. They appear to be able to see the probable
|
|
>future and describe it in some detail and show it to people and people have
|
|
>subsequently seen that come true, and on and on. As to their origin, it's
|
|
>very interesting among the experiencers I've worked with, I don't know if
|
|
>the people haven't bothered to ask that question or it hasn't been
|
|
>volunteered. I try and take just what I've heard from reliable witnesses.
|
|
>In one case an experiencer said that he was told the race came from, I think
|
|
>about eight light years away, and that's just one race and one account.
|
|
>Obviously there's all these different races, we have every reason to believe
|
|
>that they come from a number of different star systems of obviously
|
|
>different distances from us. So that's what I got so far on that Tino and I
|
|
>hope that is of some help.
|
|
|
|
-!- Tino : Yes, very interesting, thank you. Don how would you answer any of
|
|
-!- those ?
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Well, I take a different take on it than what Richard does. I
|
|
number one, can not say and I'm used to dealing in fact as you know. I could
|
|
not go to court and state under oath that, I know that these intelligences,
|
|
if in fact that's what they are, are extraterrestrial. That is the most
|
|
likely hypothesis and that would seem to be born out by the facts, number
|
|
one. Number two, even though I am not willing to say that whatever is
|
|
happening under this set of circumstances is necessarily evil. I am not
|
|
willing to throw my arms open and embrace it as a positive thing, until much
|
|
more information is known. I'm not saying it's bad, I'm not saying it's
|
|
good, but I'm holding off on my final conclusions on that. I have talked to
|
|
many more people that have been traumatized by these circumstances, than I
|
|
have talked to people that have embraced this overall. I have been and have
|
|
interfaced with a number of people, for example with the "Close Encounter
|
|
Research Organization" that is headed up by Evonne Smith, whom many people
|
|
will have remembered having been on this program in the past, and she also is
|
|
keeping the options open on what is ultimately happening. I have heard from
|
|
a number of, for example females that have undergone this experience, that
|
|
have alleged that, they had undergone and became pregnant and at some point
|
|
in the process the fetus was removed. Now I don't know if this is true are
|
|
not, but this is... I mean this has been born out by more than just one or
|
|
two witnesses. So what I'm saying is, I think that we have to have a lot
|
|
more information and hopefully at some point, we have to have whomever's
|
|
in charge from the governmental side, to finally come forward and to be honest
|
|
and open to release what is known about this phenomenon to the American
|
|
public, and that's basically my angle on it.
|
|
|
|
-!- Tino : All right, listen let's have lunch in August.
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Sounds like a winner.
|
|
|
|
-!- Tino : Thanks, great show...
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Thanks for calling... Ok Tino, bye bye. All right we have a
|
|
couple of lines open. My guest this evening is Dr. Richard Boylan. And
|
|
let's go back to John in Ventura on Century. Good evening John.
|
|
|
|
-!- John : Good evening Don. I have a question for the Doctor. The question
|
|
-!- is, along with the other contacts that are being made, is it not possible
|
|
-!- that our own federal government and it's secretive agencies, using
|
|
-!- different types of chemicals, like they used on people during the Vietnam
|
|
-!- era to... it's called metapederfrane (sp?) it's a spray that has an
|
|
-!- amnesia effect, but it leaves you totally helpless, and I was wondering
|
|
-!- if maybe that type of thing is also being used for some reason?
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : Well, let me come at that question a little bit sideways. I
|
|
>have had some tiny minority of accounts, a small fraction of the accounts
|
|
>that I've dealt with where, people report "joint military-alien" abductions,
|
|
>and I'm going to use that term, because these are almost always totally
|
|
>negative and terrorizing kinds of experiences, and without going into all of
|
|
>the details, I get into a little bit more of that in my book coming out. It
|
|
>appears that these are psychological warfare operations designed to enhance
|
|
>the image of extraterrestrial contact, as a horrible experience that people
|
|
>should fear and certainly not look forward to and try and run away from and
|
|
>simply not want to meddle with. So, there does seem to be in those cases
|
|
>some use of "mind-altering" chemicals, certainly rough handling procedures
|
|
>and a totally disagreeable experience, in some cases sexual abuse or rape,
|
|
>and the person when they get all done is definitely a propaganda agent for
|
|
>the fact that you wouldn't want come within a hundred miles of an
|
|
>extraterrestrial, after they come out of those experiences.
|
|
|
|
-!- John : ~!@#$%^&*()_+
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Could you speak up John?
|
|
|
|
-!- John : Sure, I was just wondering the reason, being in intelligence at
|
|
-!- one time, I've heard of this and I was just wondering you know... our own
|
|
-!- government's experimenting on us, along with the maybe factual contacts
|
|
-!- that have happened, trying to dis information ?
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : Well, it certainly muddies-up the picture to have that going
|
|
>along side by side genuine extraterrestrial contacts...
|
|
|
|
-!- John : Yes...
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : It's people who've undergone one experience are thrown in with
|
|
>people who've undergone a different experience and it does make a confusing
|
|
>picture. I would say this, and you're probably more back grounded in the
|
|
>intelligence community than I from the outside would be, but I'm not so
|
|
>quick to say that our government's doing this. There seems to be some of
|
|
>the folks behind these particular iniquitous procedures that I don't think
|
|
>are taking their orders from the President. They seem to be pretty much
|
|
>autonomous and on their agenda.
|
|
|
|
-!- John : Yeah, I know they're not probably coming from the President. I
|
|
-!- probably know where they're coming from, but thank you doctor, I
|
|
-!- appreciate it.
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : All right, thank you John.
|
|
|
|
-!- John : Uh huh.
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : And when we come back I'm going to get Bert from Burbank on,
|
|
Bert don't hang up this time. {:^) We are back to the phones and now after
|
|
waiting patiently we have Bert in Burbank.
|
|
|
|
-!- Bert : Hello there!
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : How ya doing Bert ?
|
|
|
|
-!- Bert : I'm fine, I hope you guys are doing well, it's a very interesting
|
|
-!- show. I'd like to kind of purpose something that I've thought of for
|
|
-!- quite some time and then ask a question based around it, apropos to
|
|
-!- what's been talked about, and it's something that I call the "Elsie and
|
|
-!- Elmer syndrome" and what you do, you know you got to think about things.
|
|
-!- You go down to a farm and you go over and you get poor old elmer the bull
|
|
-!- all hot and bothered... the vets will... in a constant state of arousal,
|
|
-!- and say, uh uh ! well, sorry... really there ain't no cow around, but we
|
|
-!- got what we wanted anyway. Guy comes with a three foot syringe, pumping
|
|
-!- bull juice into a cow to impregnate her and keep her that way for the
|
|
-!- rest of her life, and the doctor, the vet is coming over and examining
|
|
-!- the cow twice a month, giving her shots, doing all kinds of strange
|
|
-!- things to her. Farmer John, he gets to milk her every morning, touching
|
|
-!- all parts of her anatomy and so he can sell the milk for you know
|
|
-!- whatever he needs. So now the question is this, are we "Elsie and
|
|
-!- Elmers" friend ?
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Well, that's a heavy duty question.
|
|
|
|
-!- Bert : (laughs) It's like, isn't this what's going on? So how do we
|
|
-!- determine if we are Elsie and Elmers friend or if the aliens are our
|
|
-!- friends, because there certainly seems to be some parallels between cows
|
|
-!- down on the farm and what the aliens are doing, at least the greys?
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Richard, are you there?
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : Oh Yeah.
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Ok, how do you respond to that?
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : Well, let me start off with the... where my research has been.
|
|
>I have found a minority, a very substantial minority of cases involving
|
|
>what people might call reproductive procedures. Again the stereotype is
|
|
>that !@#$%^&* greys are zapping people in their bedrooms and hijacking them
|
|
>onto saucers and milking them of their reproductive products. I do not find
|
|
>that in the vast majority of the encounters I hear reported. There are some
|
|
>reproductive material borrowing, and even smaller percentage of cases I've
|
|
>heard and researched some fertilization with apparently hybridized
|
|
>reproductive material and extraction of a hybrid fetus, about a trimester
|
|
>into pregnancy, but those are minority experiences. The idea that we are
|
|
>being accosted by some sex hungry race or some race that can't handle it's
|
|
>own reproductive process and has to borrow us... is over blown.
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Are you saying that Jacobs and Hopkins conclusions in that area,
|
|
in your opinion are not accurate?
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : I think they are distorted. I think unless they're running
|
|
>across a some wholly different sample than I've run across and some of the
|
|
>researchers I've talked to, I think they're representing a gross distortion
|
|
>and a false stereotype of the experience.
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : But yet, that seems to be what their... that seems to be what
|
|
their subjects are telling them. How do you explain that?
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : Well, I don't know that that's what their subjects are telling
|
|
>them, that's what they are walking out and telling us their subjects have
|
|
>told them.
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Well, how do we know that your conclusions are accurate?
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : Well, you just have to use the same kind of criteria. I've
|
|
>been trained in research and I've trained in human psychology and I think
|
|
>I am therefore in a good equipped place to do my research. I make no
|
|
>apologies for the research I do. I present it to anybody who wants to look
|
|
>at the methodology, the numbers, the analyses...
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : But yet, we're dealing with something that in the history of
|
|
humankind has never been brought forward, except in the last what fifteen
|
|
twenty years.
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : True, but we have developed a method of scientific inquiry that
|
|
>works rather well. I've been trained in anthropology and psychology and I
|
|
>think these two disciplines are exquisitely helpful in understanding this
|
|
>phenomenon. I don't think social history or art are nearly as useful in
|
|
>equipping a person to have a comprehensive understanding of this phenomenon.
|
|
|
|
-!- Bert : Dr. Boylan, I've got to tell you something that there is a great
|
|
-!- deal of what you say that I agree with, and I would as a matter of fact,
|
|
-!- and I'm sure some of the other listeners would like to look at some of
|
|
-!- the information that you have. You said something brought out with Tino
|
|
-!- I believe, who was asking the question about running across different
|
|
-!- varieties and there certainly are many many different varieties that have
|
|
-!- been reported of alien beings. There's also a great variety of things
|
|
-!- that have been... information that has been passed on to the, as we call
|
|
-!- them, contactees", which sometimes as a very negative effect, if not
|
|
-!- necessarily accurately so, but the point being, that we have so many
|
|
-!- different ones even if we just say the seven that you're basically
|
|
-!- familiar with, that each one of them can have their own agenda, and just
|
|
-!- like here in the United States we have people who don't want dolphins
|
|
-!- bottled up in a pin, and then we have others who legitimately want people
|
|
-!- to swim with the dolphins because they can help some people overcome
|
|
-!- certain problems. So give us an idea and you've kind of talked in
|
|
-!- generalities. I'd really like to hear a couple of specific... general
|
|
-!- cases and what kind of information has been passed to the contactees, and
|
|
-!- for example maybe even where these beings were supposed to have come
|
|
-!- from.
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : Well, none of the experiencers I've worked with is learned in
|
|
>astronomy to know even if the extraterrestrial showed them a star chart that
|
|
>they'd know what they were looking at, so...
|
|
|
|
-!- Bert : Did they have a name for their planet or the system they came
|
|
-!- from, was that ever passed ?
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : I've never heard that reported. Generally in a number of cases
|
|
>they are shown the home planet as a visual, but no name ascribed to it...
|
|
|
|
-!- Bert : Uh huh.
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : In terms of the messages that the extraterrestrials have passed
|
|
>on, I've tried to summarize that... speak to one case in particular, an
|
|
>individual who has had a number of contacts from childhood into early
|
|
>adulthood and then nothing for a long time and then just in the last few
|
|
>years has had a contact or two and I'd say the last three or four years.
|
|
>This individual very early in his life... this is a young man who was raised
|
|
>on a ranch in California and Nevada, over the years was shown events which
|
|
>at that point were forty plus years into the future, that are now starting
|
|
>to unfold.
|
|
|
|
-!- Bert : Uh huh.
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : He was shown the increasing manifestation of the
|
|
>extraterrestrials, that people... that this whole phenomenon is going to
|
|
>come out of the closet. It's own memories were going to wake up when he was
|
|
>the age that he was about two and half years ago. That it would be the
|
|
>right time to come forward and recover the rest of his memory. He was shown
|
|
>all of this as a child, and then when he came in and started working with me
|
|
>and got the rest of his memories recovered, it all fit into place and he was
|
|
>quite taken back by the fact that the timing was just as they had said back
|
|
>then. The general message content had to do with, besides taking care of
|
|
>each other better and taking care of the planet better, getting ready for a
|
|
>more open extraterrestrial presence among us, but that a proper preparation
|
|
>is needed to take place first, peoples minds had to be conditioned for this,
|
|
>there is a certain gradualism to this, and that's parenthetically why I
|
|
>think we are seeing a gradual escalation in these contacts and more and more
|
|
>people being woken up to their memories and experiences that in some cases
|
|
>happened twenty, thirty, forty years ago, that the light bulb is coming on
|
|
>now, they're coming forward to talk to researchers, psychologists, whatever,
|
|
>about their experiences. We're seeing kind of a mass consciousness
|
|
>awakening in the popular press. The one thing I've seen that most grabs it
|
|
>for me is a New Yorker cartoon. The "New Yorker" not being a radical
|
|
>magazine, it shows this guy being hauled out by a number of
|
|
>extraterrestrials from the bedroom, while his wife looks on rather blandly
|
|
>and says "do you want me to videotape Murphy Brown for you, when you get
|
|
>back?"
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Yeah, as a matter of fact we have that hanging up on our bulletin
|
|
board. Bert, we've got to roll along. Thanks for your call.
|
|
|
|
-!- Bert : You bet! Doctor Boylan is there a paper or anything that you
|
|
-!- have, possibly a book that we could get a hold of?
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Yeah, as a matter of fact I'm going to be talking about that
|
|
later...
|
|
|
|
-!- Bert : Great! Thanks a lot...
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : It's called... Bert, "Close Extraterrestrials Encounters". It's
|
|
coming out this fall, "Wild Flower Press"...
|
|
|
|
-!- Bert : Terrific !
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : We'll be getting more information from Richard in a minute.
|
|
|
|
-!- Bert : All right ! Thanks a lot guys.
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Ok, let's move along, we've have had Margaret in Ventura on
|
|
Century waiting. Good evening Margaret. Are you there?
|
|
|
|
-!- Margaret : Yes
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Yes, Good evening, do you have a question for my guest?
|
|
|
|
-!- Margaret : Yes I do. Yes I am. I've had...
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : We're waiting.
|
|
|
|
-!- Margaret : Yeah, my question is... I've been... Oh, I'm listening to the
|
|
-!- TV and I can't concentrate. (laughs)
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Ok well, did you have a question?
|
|
|
|
-!- Margaret : Yes I do.
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Ok.
|
|
|
|
-!- Margaret : Ok, this is what's happened. When I was about three years
|
|
-!- old, I feel that now that I'm about almost forty two, what had happened
|
|
-!- to me at three years old quite possibly was an alien encounter. I was in
|
|
-!- my back yard, I was all alone and this being came to me an told me like
|
|
-!- what this man had just said before, told me things that would happen in
|
|
-!- the future, and this being told me that he was from the future and he
|
|
-!- said that he was representing the human race in the future, that these
|
|
-!- beings are what we are going to be in the future, and of course it scared
|
|
-!- me and I was only three years old and really didn't understand like I do
|
|
-!- now, and what I've been experiencing now is kind of like... I can only
|
|
-!- describe it as being electrically shocked, not... it doesn't hurt, but
|
|
-!- it's like I'm aware of their presence in my room and it's like I'm being
|
|
-!- scanned from head to toe and by the time it goes from head to toe, by the
|
|
-!- time it gets to my top of my head around the crown area, I hear this loud
|
|
-!- popping like an electrical kind of a statically, and it wakes me up right
|
|
-!- away you know, and I have seen three squiggly type beings. Not that they
|
|
-!- took shape, it's that they look like energy, light energy beings and
|
|
-!- there were like three of them, always three. The center one's always
|
|
-!- tallest and the two off to the side are the shortest. Now has anybody in
|
|
-!- your dealings ever experienced anything like that?
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : Elements of that sound very familiar...
|
|
|
|
-!- Margaret : Very familiar.
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : The kind of electrical tingle, the kind of popping sound, the
|
|
>kind of waking up at the end of it... Mostly people recall the
|
|
>extraterrestrials as solid shapes or dark shadows in the corner, but there
|
|
>are some minority of reports where the beings have a luminescence quality or
|
|
>appear to be almost made out of light energy rather than total solid form.
|
|
>I'm not quite clear what that represents. The physics of this is probably
|
|
>beyond me and it's clearly got me and maybe beyond human physics, but there
|
|
>have been a number of reports of that kind. So there are bits and pieces of
|
|
>everything you've said I've heard in other reports, for what that's worth
|
|
>Margaret.
|
|
|
|
-!- Margaret : Uh huh. Well, my other experiences that... The people that are
|
|
-!- having these negative experiences, is because they're attracting negative
|
|
-!- beings and that's what they are attracting...
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Now why would you say that Margaret ? What makes you think that
|
|
they would be attracting...
|
|
|
|
-!- Margaret : Why would I say that?...
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Negative beings, yes.
|
|
|
|
-!- Margaret : There are negative beings in the universe and they have told
|
|
-!- me that is what we are to be on guard for. Never to fall down in
|
|
-!- drunkenness because our auras open up and allow them to take over, and the
|
|
-!- other reason that they told us that they were taking fetuses is part of
|
|
-!- their food chain.
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Who said that?
|
|
|
|
-!- Margaret : This is what they told me.
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : You mean the entity that you had an experience with?
|
|
|
|
-!- Margaret : They said... The one that came to me and said he was from our
|
|
-!- future, that these beings are taking... the negative ones are taking...
|
|
-!- They're cannibals out in outer space, they're cannibals and their from...
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Well, I would have to see a lot more. I would not take anything
|
|
like that at face value.
|
|
|
|
-!- Margaret : Hey, I didn't make this up, this is just something that's come
|
|
-!- to me, Ok...
|
|
|
|
Don Allen : Oh No, I'm not suggesting you did. What I am suggesting is, like
|
|
anything else...
|
|
|
|
-!- Margaret : But they're also trying to cross breed... they're trying to
|
|
-!- cross breed...
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : It's like anything else in this field...
|
|
|
|
-!- Margaret : This is the other thing they were trying to tell us, that
|
|
-!- they're trying to cross breed with human forms to become more human like
|
|
-!- so that they can take over the earth. Now that's really frightening.
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Well, in that case I think I'll go home and oil my shotgun.
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : Well, I haven't heard any accounts of that kind.
|
|
|
|
-!- Margaret : Well, but what the main message is, is to always be your most
|
|
-!- positive and the negative ones can't get you, they can't harm you.
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Well, my recommendation would be to treat everything with a grain
|
|
of salt until we have a lot more information. Margaret, thank you for your
|
|
call. Please keep listening.
|
|
|
|
-!- Margaret : Hey, your welcome.
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Ok, let's go to Miles in Woodland Hills on CVI. Good evening
|
|
Miles.
|
|
|
|
-!- Miles : Hi Don, how are you doing tonight?
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : I'm fine, thank you.
|
|
|
|
-!- Miles : Good to talk to you once again. I've got two questions tonight.
|
|
-!- The first one, I would like to ask Dr. Boylan. The real trouble I have
|
|
-!- with the... actually correlating aliens with the abductions is that the
|
|
-!- high degree of technology that it must take for them to get here, say
|
|
-!- coming from the Pleiades or some other point out in space, then having
|
|
-!- the real low tech medical techniques of, taking skin samples and scooping
|
|
-!- skin out and the two don't seem to add up to me and I'd like you to
|
|
-!- comment on that, what you feel about... cause it seems that most of the
|
|
-!- abductees comment about you know getting sperm and ovary samples taken
|
|
-!- from them, and seems to me that they should be... we're on the verge of
|
|
-!- doing that type of cell engineering right now ourselves, if they're that
|
|
-!- advanced they shouldn't need all that.
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : Well, I think we really have to be real cautious Miles, about
|
|
>anthropomorphism, you know, taking the human point of view about what the
|
|
>extraterrestrials are up to. It's always very very difficult and
|
|
>anthropologists always warn us that we're really prone to that. What seems
|
|
>to be, in my view and there's some evidence for that in the accounts some
|
|
>experiencers tell from dialog mentally with the extraterrestrials, is that
|
|
>this sampling isn't so much to figure out how our DNAs put together, you
|
|
>know, one sample should be enough to do that, but it's more individual
|
|
>monitoring of the experiencers personal individuals health, you know, how
|
|
>much heavy metals has this guy picked up, or you know, how's his physical
|
|
>health doing? Is there something that needs correction or adjustment here.
|
|
>These are moors (sp) readouts, information gathering about the specific
|
|
>individual as to what he or she is doing health wise, rather than trying to
|
|
>figure out homo sapiens as a species on a DNA basis.
|
|
|
|
-!- Miles : I see. Also Don, I've got a question for you to.
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Yeah.
|
|
|
|
-!- Miles : I know about seven police officers back in Pennsylvania that had
|
|
-!- a series of UFO sightings and also encounters back in Fredricksburg and
|
|
-!- Meedville in and around 1975. I was wondering while you were a
|
|
-!- police officer back there, did you have any sightings like that?
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Nope, I sure didn't.
|
|
|
|
-!- Miles : Oh Ok.
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Thank you Miles, let's go to Greg in Van Nuys. Good evening Greg
|
|
|
|
-!- Greg : Hi Don. Richard how long do you believe that this is going on?
|
|
-!- How long have these beings being visiting us and how long have they been
|
|
-!- abducting people?
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : Well, I don't know the answer to that, how long it's been going
|
|
>on. Definitively I think there are some indicators that tell us things.
|
|
>Just in my own research sample, I have a grandmother age individual who has
|
|
>this... the family tradition passed down from her grandmother of something
|
|
>that sounds like an extraterrestrial contact experience. Now that would put
|
|
>it what three to six generations back, but there are other indications of
|
|
>extraterrestrial contact in anthropological evidence, besides things like
|
|
>the Nazca (sp?) lines and what Zechariah Stichins has come up with from
|
|
>this Sumerian literature. I went back to Chaco Canyon (sp?) several weeks
|
|
>ago on some follow up research and the ancient Anasazi the ancestors
|
|
>of the Pueblo indians here, centuries ago had straight lines from Chaco
|
|
>Canyon out to the out layer communities hundreds of miles away in all
|
|
>directions that went over hills and valleys without any respecting of the
|
|
>terrain. These sixteen foot wide straight as an arrow paths make no sense
|
|
>in terms of foot paths or trade routes. In fact many of them could only be
|
|
>spotted from the air, were finally mapped and it looks like we have our only
|
|
>Nazca lines here in the United States. There are a number of indicators
|
|
>that primitive civilizations have come into contact with beings and have
|
|
>honored those contacts by creating symbols and designs that only can be seen
|
|
>from the air when humans didn't know how to go up in the air, you know,
|
|
>there's some such evidence that suggests that extraterrestrials may well
|
|
>have been visiting us for millennia, and some of the experiencers say that
|
|
>they've been told by the extraterrestrials that they have been visiting us
|
|
>for a very long time.
|
|
|
|
-!- Greg : I see, Ok, thank you very much.
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Alright Greg, thank you.
|
|
|
|
-!- Greg : Ok Don, Bye Bye.
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Good night. Richard...
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : Uh huh.
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : If in fact these are extraterrestrial visitors and in my book I
|
|
can not definitively say that, because I don't know and I don't know of
|
|
anyone that has proof that is forthcoming and definitively say they are ET,
|
|
but we'll work on that assumption. If they are coming here and if it is in
|
|
fact for our benefit. The first part of my question is what have they done
|
|
for the people that you have worked with, that convinced you that it is of a
|
|
beneficent nature? What have they done that have improved these people?
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : Well, it's the experiencers attitudes themselves that convinced
|
|
>me. I've really tried to come at this as a scientist without assuming
|
|
>either positive or negative, but just letting the data walk at me and making
|
|
>of it what it seems to have to say, and working with people with no
|
|
>particular assumptions, but just having them spill out what's bottled up in
|
|
>them, and take a look at it and remember all of the contacts, and this is
|
|
>where it really helps to have a professional involved with these people,
|
|
>because you know, you can have people really get in touch with their
|
|
>feelings. The appropriate use of clinical hypnosis to recover total
|
|
>memories, and what people often have when they've not been worked with
|
|
>professionally is, they only remember the scary parts of their encounter,
|
|
>but they don't remember the rest of it, the kind of, if you'll pardon the
|
|
>expression, the human dialog, the emotional content, the caring, the
|
|
>concern...
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Well, the people... we're running close on time now...
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : Yeah.
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : What I want to find out. The people that you have worked with,
|
|
what did they tell you that these intelligences did to them, and what was it
|
|
that convinced you that this is beneficent?
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : Well, it's the experiencers themselves, they come out of these
|
|
>experiences feeling awe, deeply touched, their minds have been expanded,
|
|
>their consciousness...
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : All right let me approach it from a different angle...
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : Yeah...
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Let me approach it from a different angle. What is happening
|
|
during the course of this abduction experience ? I know you don't like that
|
|
word, but the for the hour and a half or two hours that these people are with
|
|
these intelligences, what is happening ?
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : Well, there's a lot of dialog, there's in some cases, there's
|
|
>if they're removed to a craft, there's some what we'd consider to be
|
|
>scientific or medical kinds of examination procedures, there's some
|
|
>instruction going on, they're being shown things. They're being engaged in
|
|
>a highly personalized way in some cases by beings that are doing education.
|
|
>Other cases with kind of a loving gaze and an engaging kind of mental
|
|
>connection. There's a lot of variety.
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Well, I don't mean to be rude, but I find it highly unlikely that
|
|
a sentient being would travel light years to come to earth and gaze with
|
|
love on somebody. That does not compute.
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : Well, I tried to use a little shorthand for at least the higher
|
|
>races visiting as that there, but like Zen monks, you know, they have a
|
|
>respect for all, to use your own words "sentient" life forms. They see a
|
|
>kinship and that all life has to be reverenced. That's often the message
|
|
>they give us to, that we should not be dismissive of animals and other life
|
|
>forms, and because they understand the kinship and the sacredness and
|
|
>reverence of all life forms, they recognize us as a bright fairly
|
|
>intelligent life forms, you know, a cut above the animal kingdom and more
|
|
>bracketed in with them than with other layers of life forms, and so they see
|
|
>a kinship there that makes them want to bring us forward and finish the rest
|
|
>of our mental and spiritual evolution, so that they can share the gift of
|
|
>fully expanded consciousness and evolution more fully with us, help us kind
|
|
>of fast forward if you will.
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Well, you know what would convince me?
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : What?
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : That they were simply coming here to assist humankind, which and
|
|
I've got to tell you, I don't by that. I think whatever they're doing,
|
|
they're coming under their own agenda, but if I were to be convinced, I would
|
|
be convinced if they would come out and say, ok this is how we can assist you
|
|
in healing the ozone depletion or we will work with you in coming up with a
|
|
cure for cancer, or aids, or we're going to show you how to make the
|
|
transition from a fossil fuel based economy to something that is clean and
|
|
efficient non polluting, or we're going to show you how to achieve the same
|
|
type
|
|
of nutritional balance by growing this crop or that crop, and you will no
|
|
longer have the need to butcher and kill animals for food sources. That
|
|
would be something I would think that would be of a beneficent nature for
|
|
humankind, but you know, as far as we are a spiritual being, I don't need
|
|
anyone to come down from the sky to teach me how to be more spiritual. I
|
|
already know what I personally believe and I think everybody else is
|
|
somewhere in there also. So what I'm saying Richard, I think whatever is
|
|
happening has been happening a long time and it's happening under a
|
|
particular agenda that we do not understand or even necessarily perceive.
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : Well, I would be the first to agree that we don't completely
|
|
>understand their agenda, that would require their perspective and their
|
|
>mental capacity to do. I personally consider that the human race has some
|
|
>room left to grow, and I would not consider it preposterous if they come
|
|
>with the agenda of wanting to nudge us in that direction. Some of the
|
|
>examples you've given of beneficents are in the technological realm. I
|
|
>think that they're...
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : No, it was all in the realm of improving the human condition.
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : Yeah, but things like cancer cures or better grain hybrids to
|
|
>get better crop yields are what one might call technological. I don't think
|
|
>that that's the burden of their basic message, their top priority. I think
|
|
>there is some nudging of through mental influence on us to move forward in
|
|
>those directions. When you look at the technological advance in the last
|
|
>fifty years in the United States, last forty-five years compared to the rest
|
|
>of human history, there are more than a few commentators who believe that
|
|
>there's some external influence on these quantum leaps forward of
|
|
>technology, and it's not all just bright humans sitting down coming up with
|
|
>bright ideas. I wouldn't preclude that there's been an extraterrestrial
|
|
>influence on the technological leap forward either.
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Ok, your book is going to be coming out this fall.
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : Yeah.
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : When exactly, do you have a date on it?
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : Well, let's say August 31st for lack of a more precise date.
|
|
>That's probably close enough. That's when Wild Flower press expects to have
|
|
>it out.
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : And the title on it is "Close Extraterrestrial Encounters".
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : Yeah, and subtitled "First hand personal accounts and research
|
|
>findings". There's nine experiences of contact in there and telling their
|
|
>individual stories, and then I do the rest of the book talking about what
|
|
>I've found in kind of an overall way, about the extraterrestrials what
|
|
>they're up to, why they're here, what contacts feel like, how to get past
|
|
>the scary part of it to the more settled in part of it, etc. It should be
|
|
>I think the bible on extraterrestrial contact, if I may say so immodestly.
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Alright, and is this going to be available in various book
|
|
stores.
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : Yeah, this should be out there in general book store
|
|
>distributorship.
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Ok, now one of the last things we're down to about the last
|
|
minute or so, and I just received this today and I'm not going to go into any
|
|
detail, but somebody had sent to me, that two of your former patients or
|
|
people that you have worked with have initiated a suit. Is there any truth
|
|
in that?
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : Well, the suit has been filed, it is based on false and
|
|
>slanderous allegations. You know obviously my attorneys have suggested that
|
|
>I not get into the particulars of this because of the pending litigation...
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Ok, that's one of the reasons I didn't mention it until now. I
|
|
didn't know whether you would be able to speak about it or not, but
|
|
unfortunately this is the type of thing I guess that someone in your position
|
|
has to always be cognizant of and ready for, I would imagine. Does it have
|
|
to do with anything having to do with ET?
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : Oh, very much. That's exactly, you know, what it's about, and
|
|
>without again trying to follow my attorneys advice not to get into the
|
|
>particulars. I think probably the best anecdote is one of my fellow UFO
|
|
>researchers said to me, "well Richard you must be getting to close to the
|
|
>truth because they're starting to do the smear stuff on you".
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Do you think that these two individuals have any, for the want of
|
|
a better, you know, any governmental or any ties that would suggest that?
|
|
|
|
>Dr. Boylan : We're looking into the evidence for that, but I can't really
|
|
>comment on it at this point in time.
|
|
|
|
Don Ecker : Ok, well Richard that's the end of it. Can you hold on for just
|
|
a moment and I'll speak to you right after the show. I want to thank you for
|
|
coming on the air tonight.
|
|
|
|
The End
|
|
**********************************************
|
|
* THE U.F.O. BBS - http://www.ufobbs.com/ufo *
|
|
********************************************** |