134 lines
8.5 KiB
Plaintext
134 lines
8.5 KiB
Plaintext
SUBJECT: W. VA. NEWSLETTER FILE: UFO2186
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following is taken from:
|
|
|
|
The SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA UFO GROUP newsletter, VOL. XII, December 1989.
|
|
|
|
Danny Gordon - P.O. Box 834 - Wytheville, VA. 24382 - Phone 703-228-7890.
|
|
...............................................................................
|
|
|
|
HOLIDAY GREETINGS TO YOU ALL! AS 1989 COMES TO A VERY QUICK END, IT HAS BEEN A
|
|
YEAR OF COUNTLESS SURPRISES AND FLAPS INVOLVING UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECTS
|
|
AROUND THE WORLD. AND THE COMING YEAR WILL PROBABLY PROVIDE MORE OF THE SAME,
|
|
ALONG WITH SOME UNFORESEEN DEVELOPMENTS. THE BIGGEST RECENT DEVELOPMENT IN THE
|
|
UFO FIELD INVOLVES THE WORK OF TONY GONZALES IN REGARD TO THE B-2 BOMBER, "THE
|
|
AMERICAN MADE UFO."
|
|
|
|
AS AN END TO THE 1989 VERSION OF THE SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA UFO GROUP NEWSLETTER,
|
|
I AM PROVIDING SOME EXCERTS FROM GANZALES' MOST RECENT PAPER. IT INCLUDES SOME
|
|
MOST REVEALING COMMENTS FROM A CONVERSTAION HE HAD RECENTLY WITH WALT ANDRUS,
|
|
THE INTERNATIONAL DIRECTOR FOR THE MUTUAL UFO NETWORK.
|
|
|
|
|
|
THE B-2, THE REAL STORY
|
|
|
|
Tony Gonsalves, East Providence, RI.
|
|
|
|
I have ALWAYS believed we got the technology from RECOVERED UFOs THAT HAVE
|
|
CRASHED! More specifically, I have believed all along that the ROSWELL, NEW
|
|
MEXICO UFO was the primary source of the technology. This crash (and subse-
|
|
quent recovery by the military) is the one most famous and well known to the
|
|
most UFO investigators. It is one case where numerous key people have come for-
|
|
ward with their testimony that they themselves participated in the recovery
|
|
(and subsequent cover-up) of this particular UFO. These events occured in 1947.
|
|
Also, I have believed all along the way that there was a DIRECT LINK be-
|
|
tween the YB-49 Flying Wing of 1948-1952 and the Roswell UFO. Coming this dir-
|
|
ection in time, I have believed there exists a DIRECT LINK between the YB-49
|
|
and the B-2 Bomber (Hudson Valley version). In order, the sequence went:
|
|
Roswell UFO, YB-49, HUDSON VALLEY UFO/B-2.
|
|
My thoughts seemed to flow, at least according to what little information
|
|
I had to go on, in a way that seemed consistently logical. I felt that the
|
|
YB-49 was a `radical' departure in aircraft design that followed closely a
|
|
`radical' event (the Roswell recovery). Also, I couldn't help but notice, that
|
|
geographically, they BOTH occured pretty close to one another! Then, I found
|
|
it STRANGE that in 1952 the Air Force ordered ALL YB-49's destroyed because,
|
|
they claimed, the aircraft was unsafe. That seemed to be a VERY radical order!
|
|
My experience has taught me that the military just DOESN'T do things like that-
|
|
not normally. What they usually do is park the experimental planes behind some
|
|
hangar or put them in moth balls or even air museums-but NOT order them ALL
|
|
destroyed! Their thinking, usually, is that they may want to retrieve parts for
|
|
`other' experimental planes, or wan the planes for future study, or even to re-
|
|
activate the program at a later date. But NO, in the case of the YB-49, ALL THE
|
|
PLANES WERE ORDERED DESTROYED!
|
|
I got to thinking, "Why would they do this?" Then I came across an `uncanny'
|
|
coincidence-one too remarkable to dismiss! I noticed that the YB-49 had the
|
|
IDENTICAL WINGSPAN as the B-2 STEALTH BOMBER-AND BOTH WERE FLYING WINGS! It was
|
|
at this time, many months agao, that I created a possible scenario that had a
|
|
logical and smooth continuity (at least in my way of thinking). I figured that
|
|
the YB-49 was a `test plane' for the recovered Roswell UFO technology. This
|
|
seemed to be supported by the fact that during the life-span of the YB-49
|
|
(1948-1952) there were numerous west coast reports of `boomerang shaped' UFO's.
|
|
I felt certain we acquired the `gross' technology (as a friend recently put it)
|
|
back then, but lacked the `computer' technology to literally `fly' the sys-
|
|
tem. In other words, our computers, at that time, were far too big to ever con-
|
|
sider getting them aboard a plane. Surely, it seemed, the necessary computer
|
|
could possibly exceed the YB-49 (in size) by as much as ten-fold. So then it
|
|
seemed the Air Force probably HAD to fly their new found technology `by the
|
|
seat of their pants' with NO computers! Thus they found the YB-49 to be `UN-
|
|
SAFE'! The next logical conclusion I came to was that, in the 1970's, computer
|
|
technology had not only become very sophisticated, but also the computers be-
|
|
came compacted into small enough sizes to fit planes with NO difficulty at all.
|
|
This, I hypothesized, caused the Air Force to reactivate their `flying wing'-
|
|
but THIS time with the benefit of `refined' computer technology. It seemed that
|
|
OUR technology had `caught-up' with the UFO TECHNOLOGY! THUS THE HUDSON VALLEY
|
|
B-2/UFO WAS BORN-PROBABLY IN THE MID 1970'S!
|
|
I telephoned Mr. Andrus (Walt Andrus is the director of the Texas based
|
|
Mutual UFO Network aka MUFON.- BB) to bring him up to date on this project and
|
|
some of my tentative plans for the upcoming months. Things have been happening
|
|
so fast that I felt a phone call was the fastest way to get the information to
|
|
him.
|
|
I started to tell him about the `new evidence' that I had concerneing a
|
|
`direct link' between the Hudson Valley UFO and the B-2 Stealth Bomber. He in-
|
|
terrupted me to tell me that "he was CERTAIN THAT THE HUDSON VALLEY UFO WAS
|
|
NOT A B-2 BOMBER because the B-2 has JET ENGINES and it is NOT a UFO! I tried
|
|
desperately to get him to understand that I wasn't trying to say the Hudson
|
|
Valley UFO was `jet' powered-but that I was trying to say IT IS IN FACT, A B-2
|
|
OF A DIFFERENT KIND-WITH SOME OTHER KIND OF POWER! He countered with his CER-
|
|
TAINTY that it is NOT ANY KIND OF B-2 THAT EYEWITNESSES HAVE BEEN SEEING-THAT
|
|
I8T WAS IMPOSSIBLE! He then asked me what I thought the Hudson Valley UFO had
|
|
for power. I told him I DID NOT KNOW AND DID NOT CARE TO SPECULATE-that I would
|
|
leave that for other to determine-perhaps from his organization. I mentioned
|
|
that whatever powered the Roswell New Mexico UFO was probably the same as what-
|
|
ever THIS one has for power. AGAIN he voiced his REFUSAL TO TAKE SERIOUS WHAT
|
|
HE CALLED A `CRAZY' NOTION LIKE THAT!
|
|
I sighted the numerous eye-witnesses that are ALL claiming that they are
|
|
SEEING FIRST HAND what they are CERTAIN IS A B-2 - BUT NOT A JET POWERED B-2!
|
|
I sighted what my most recent caller - a woman - had reported seeing 6 weeks
|
|
ago. He then said something that put me in shock! Mr. Andrus said, "YOU'RE
|
|
HEARING ALL THIS B-2 NONSENSE FROM A WOMAN AND WHAT DO WOMEN KNOW ABOUT AIR-
|
|
PLANES?"
|
|
I then said, "Walt, there are THOUSANDS of people seeing this thing and
|
|
describing EXACTLY what a B-2 looks like. Surely you can't ignore all these
|
|
people-especially when NEARLY ALL eye-witnesses (since the introduction of
|
|
the B-2) are claiming they are CERTAIN they are seeing a B-2!" He asked me to
|
|
give hime examples as to where and by whom. I then sighted western Connecticut,
|
|
Hudson Valley, Wytheville, Virginia and Ohio. I sighted Mr. Dan Gordon the News
|
|
& Sports Director for station WYVE in Wytheville who was recently written up in
|
|
OMNI Magazine for his belief that he, and about 3,000 other people in his area
|
|
have seen what they believe to be a B-2 (not jet powered) flying around there
|
|
for the past few years. Mr. Andrus then made another statement I feel is down-
|
|
right despicable. He said, "THEY'RE A BUNCH OF HICKS AND FARMERS IN WYTHEVILLE,
|
|
WHAT COULD THEY POSSIBLY KNOW ABOUT WHAT AN AIRPLANE IS SUPPOSED TO LOOK LIKE!"
|
|
I sighted to Mr. Andrus that another organization, The J. Allen Hynek Cen-
|
|
ter for UFO Studies,(CUFOS - Chicago, IL.- BB) was starting, becuase of mount-
|
|
ing evidence, to lean toward my position and asked why HIS organization could-
|
|
not at least take an OPEN position on the matter. He said to me, "WHO IN THAT
|
|
ORGANIZATION KNOWS ANYTHING ABOUT UFOS?" My response to Mr. Andrus was that I
|
|
would not allow him to draw me into `organizational politics'.
|
|
I tried desperately to get Mr. Andrus to listen to reason and to at least
|
|
have an open mind to this matter because I had spoken directly to many of these
|
|
people and that THEY ARE NOT BLIND OR CRAZY!"
|
|
|
|
End of Gonsalves report.
|
|
|
|
THAT'S ALL FOLKS. THE 1989 EDITION OF THE SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA UFO GROUP NEWS-
|
|
LETTER IS HISTORY. I THANK YOU FOR YOUR HELP IN CONTINUING MY EFFORTS TO GET
|
|
TO THE TRUTH IN THE UFO MYSTERY AND LOOK FORWARD TO PROVIDING MORE INFORMATION
|
|
ON THE SUBJECT IN 1990. - DG
|
|
|
|
|
|
**********************************************
|
|
* THE U.F.O. BBS - http://www.ufobbs.com/ufo *
|
|
********************************************** |