82 lines
4.8 KiB
Plaintext
82 lines
4.8 KiB
Plaintext
SUBJECT: SCIENCE VS. SPIRIT: LET'S CALL A TRUCE FILE: UFO2036
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following article is reprinted from California UFO Magazine, Vol. 2
|
|
Issue 3.
|
|
-------------------------
|
|
|
|
SCIENCE VS. SPIRIT:
|
|
LET'S CALL A TRUCE
|
|
|
|
by Jim Speiser
|
|
|
|
Let's get one thing straight: I don't believe in channeling, crystal
|
|
power, pyramid power, Space Brothers, or Semjase. I don't have an Akashic
|
|
Record (or cassette, for that matter). I put no stock in Shirley MacLaine.
|
|
As a so-called secular humanist, I don't even believe in God. My belief in
|
|
the possibility that UFOs represent an extraordinary potential leap in our
|
|
knowledge is based on a plethora of highly compelling evidence, and on the
|
|
lack of cohesive logical arguments to the contrary.
|
|
This belief basis places me squarely in the empirical "nuts-and-
|
|
bolts" camp of Ufology. I am, of course, aware that there are others whose
|
|
belief is more spiritually oriented, who seem to have mystically achieved
|
|
certainty of various aspects of the phenomenon, where I have achieved mere-
|
|
ly excited interest.
|
|
Since the very early days of contactees and credible professionals
|
|
tackling the UFO issue, it seems these two camps have been at odds with
|
|
one another, but never more so than now, in an era that sports both Bill
|
|
Moore and Billy Meier. Those of us in the empirical camp have in the past
|
|
regarded "spiritual" Ufology as something of a nuisance, and have strug-
|
|
gled to separate ourselves from it in the eyes of the public, the media,
|
|
and the academic community. Our attempts at gaining recognition within the
|
|
scientific establishment have been thwarted by our inability to fully a-
|
|
chieve this perceptual schism. It's been rather like trying to get a date
|
|
while your little brother who picks his nose is hanging around.
|
|
Recently, however, it appears that some of our attempts at dicho-
|
|
tomizing have taken on a more vitriolic tone, as characterized by cor-
|
|
respondence that has appeared in CALIFORNIA UFO. One writer representing a
|
|
major organization claimed that the magazine would never sell as long as
|
|
it included "unfounded 'contactee' garbage." An ad appearing in the back
|
|
of the same issue was printed without the group's name, for fear of "guilt
|
|
by association."
|
|
It seems to me that such entities as this magazine and the National
|
|
UFO Conference are appropriate forums for many different points of view,
|
|
and have stated so from the outset. Whether we like it or not, contactees,
|
|
channelers, etc. are part and parcel of the larger sociological phenomenon
|
|
we lump under "UFOs." Certainly, there are elements of fraud and huckster-
|
|
ism in both camps, and it is our responsibility to make every attempt to
|
|
weed these out and point them out as such. But there are many on the
|
|
"spiritual side" who are sincere, honest individuals merely guided in
|
|
their search for the truth by _internal_, rather than _external_, evidence
|
|
-- and regardless of whether their professions of faith are products of
|
|
self-delusion or wishful thinking, they are entitled to fair treatment in
|
|
any publication that assays to cover the gamut of thinking and theorizing
|
|
in the areas of UFOs and extraterrestrials.
|
|
This attempt at total burial of our spiritual side puts me in mind
|
|
of one of the more reprehensible activities in modern society, known as
|
|
"fag-bashing," wherein a certain element of Cro-Magnon knuckledraggers
|
|
feels compelled to beat the daylights out of homosexuals, in order to
|
|
reinforce (mainly to themselves) their own masculinity.
|
|
I should think scientific Ufology would have matured to the point
|
|
where we can be comfortable enough with our own ufological "machismo" that
|
|
we can at least tolerate the existence of those whose epistemology is more
|
|
mystically derived than our own. While still decrying their credulity, we
|
|
can at least acknowledge their rights to freedom of speech. Continuing to
|
|
bash them, in order to reinforce (mainly to ourselves) our own legitimacy,
|
|
is to engage in the same sort of witch-hunting we accuse our skeptical
|
|
detractors of committing.
|
|
Further, much as we left-brainers are loath to admit, there is a
|
|
strong possibility that some of the answers to the UFO question lie in the
|
|
metaphysical realm. The problem arises when such theorizing is represented
|
|
to the public as legitimate, evidence-based Ufology. It then becomes more
|
|
be plenty of room in
|
|
that sucker for all of us.
|
|
--------------------------
|
|
To subscribe to California UFO, write them at:
|
|
1800 S. Robertson Blvd.
|
|
Los Angeles, CA 90035
|
|
|
|
**********************************************
|
|
* THE U.F.O. BBS - http://www.ufobbs.com/ufo *
|
|
********************************************** |