186 lines
11 KiB
Prolog
186 lines
11 KiB
Prolog
The following discussion of disk 'myths' was left by Mr. Frank Dooling of
|
||
Honolulu on the Hawaii Connection Bulletin Board. I thought they would be
|
||
interesting to reproduce here and have done so with the permission of Mr.
|
||
Dooling.
|
||
|
||
We may not necessarily agree with all the material here...but it is very
|
||
informative and could save us much time, money, and frustration. Enjoy.
|
||
|
||
Dave Hein
|
||
05/26/84
|
||
|
||
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
|
||
|
||
MSG(S) LEFT BY: FRANK DOOLING - Honolulu, Hi.
|
||
DATE POSTED: THU MAY 24 9:02:23 PM
|
||
|
||
DISK MYTHS
|
||
|
||
Is the price of blank diskettes a constant drain on your Apple budget? READ
|
||
ON! You'll be glad you did. Discussions of the subject of diskettes usually
|
||
result in the propagation of "disk myths", or statements about diskettes which
|
||
have three attributes: 1) They originate from diskettes manufactures or
|
||
dealers, not users; 2) They are all reasons why you should pay more for your
|
||
diskettes; and 3) They are untrue. Let us consider the most common of these
|
||
myths.
|
||
|
||
The ONE-SIDED MYTH -
|
||
|
||
You have probably been exposed to the controversy over using one or both
|
||
sides of your "single sided" diskettes. I have often heard the myth repeated
|
||
that the manufacturers put their label on whichever side of a diskette that
|
||
first passes their surface quality tests. By implication, the other side may
|
||
have failed such a test and therefore may be expected to be of inferior
|
||
quality. Sounds plausible, doesn't it? Cuts manufacturing costs, and why
|
||
certify both sides when only one is usable as the disk is sold? There is just
|
||
one problem with the theory - the box of diskettes doesn't know what type of
|
||
computer or drive it was headed for use on. Did you know that Apple disk
|
||
drives always write on the bottom side of the diskettes? In fact there is no
|
||
standard among computers. Some have single-sided drives which write on one
|
||
side, some use the other side. Manufacturers are therefore obliged to certify
|
||
both sides of diskettes with equal care.
|
||
|
||
|
||
THE TWO-SIDED MYTH
|
||
|
||
What keeps you from turning your diskette over and using the magnetic surface
|
||
on the other side? There is a small rectangular notch along one edge, centered
|
||
at 1 5/16 inches from the top edge of the 5 1/4 inch floppy diskettes. The
|
||
notch permits your disk drive to sense that it is okay to write on the disk.
|
||
If you cover this notch, the disk is write-protected. To make the other side
|
||
usable, just punch a similar hole along the opposite edge at the same distance
|
||
from the top. Turn the diskette over, insert it into the drive and use it in
|
||
the normal way. The shape of the notch is not important - circular or
|
||
rectangular are equally good - but it must be at the correct location, about
|
||
1/4 inch wide and not quite as deep. Use an ordinary hole punch for good
|
||
results. To get the location correct, just turn over another diskette and line
|
||
it up with the one to be punched. For mass production, make a mask 5 1/4 inch
|
||
long which can be quickly placed over the disk and show you where to punch.
|
||
Don't be too concerned if you get the hole slightly too large. Your chance of
|
||
damaging the diskette are small with ordinary care are less from making a too
|
||
large a hole than they are from using a crude instrument, causing the diskette
|
||
to be pinched inside its jacket.
|
||
|
||
The disk myth in this connection is that you risk losing data on the original
|
||
side of the disk if you write on the other side in a single-sided disk drive.
|
||
The reason cited is that magnetic particles will accumulate on the pressure pad
|
||
which presses against the side opposite the read/write head, and these can
|
||
destroy information on the side they come in contact with. The principal
|
||
argument against this theory is empirical - it doesn't happen, at least not
|
||
over a period as short as a few years in ordinary usage. {See caution below
|
||
under "The Cleaning Kit Myth" however.} The failure rate for diskettes used
|
||
one- sided and two-sided is statistically indistinguishable. The probability
|
||
of a micro-computer user using his diskettes two- sided is directly
|
||
proportional to his experience. Almost all users eventually try this. The
|
||
best proof of its effectiveness is that they stay with it. The most
|
||
experienced Apple owners, with the largest files, almost all use all their
|
||
diskettes two- sided, and smile knowingly at the novices who are reticent
|
||
because "if it were that simple, the manufacturers would tell you so"!
|
||
|
||
THE DOUBLE-DENSITY MYTH
|
||
|
||
This disk myth is insidious, because the manufacturers allow the consumers to
|
||
fool themselves and simply fail to provide them with the information needed to
|
||
correct the myth. Double-density diskettes cost more because they have a
|
||
thicker magnetic coating. So, they must be better, right? Why not keep your
|
||
really important files on double-density diskettes? Woe to you, naive and
|
||
trusting user. The purpose of the double-density diskette is to support disk
|
||
drives capable of generation of a stronger magnetic signal than Apple drives.
|
||
This is usually needed if more bits are to be written per inch, bit is quite
|
||
unnecessary for the information density at which the Apple disk drive operate.
|
||
More importantly, though, since the signal generated by Apple drives is not
|
||
strong enough for double-density diskettes, you may actually have a slightly
|
||
higher risk of losing those highly valuable files if you wrote them on a
|
||
double-density diskette.
|
||
|
||
THE HUB RING MYTH
|
||
(this part we do not agree with....)
|
||
|
||
Some diskettes come with HUB-RINGS, and this too is supposed to be worth
|
||
paying for. Hub rings are circular bands on the inner edge of your diskette
|
||
which provide extra strength to that edge. Their main function is to keep the
|
||
inner edge from getting crunched if the diskette is off-center when the lid and
|
||
pressure pad are lowered after the diskette is inserted in the drive. With
|
||
just a minimum of care however, the lid can be close slowly and lifted and
|
||
closed again if it meets resistance, so as not to damage the diskette. Another
|
||
recomended practice is to boot your disk ("PR#6")) and start it spinning before
|
||
lowering the door lid. This not only aids in self-centering, but also prevents
|
||
the read/write head from pressing against the disk surface as it retracts for
|
||
recalibration (the clacketty noise you hear). In other words,; ordinary good
|
||
disk-handling practice (which even children can be expected to follow) will
|
||
allow the diskette a chance to self-center and prevent damage. The problem
|
||
caused by hub rings is that, if the diskette has any tendency to bind in its
|
||
jacket, preventing it from gaining full rotation speed, it is easier for it to
|
||
slip with hub rings than without. If you ever try a disk-speed test and
|
||
occasionally see some measures go off scale, this is usually from binding up
|
||
and may be excerbated by hub rings.
|
||
|
||
|
||
THE NAME BRAND MYTH
|
||
|
||
Occasionally a brand of diskette in its entirety or a particular batch of
|
||
diskette from some well known manufacturer, will be flawed and produce much
|
||
user grief. However, there is a lot of incentive for manufacturers who want to
|
||
stay in business to prevent this from happening and most are succesfull. Once
|
||
the diskettes pass the certification tests, if they are properly shipped and
|
||
handled, they are all essentially equally good, regardless of name brand or
|
||
claims to the contrary. Almost all diskette failure is due to handling
|
||
problems (see below). Failure rates of factory-shiped diskettes are about 12
|
||
per 1000, on average, with little variation between brands and no correlation
|
||
with price. The myth here is that paying more for a name brand buys a tangible
|
||
benifit. In fact, many generic brand diskettes are available, often made by
|
||
the same manufacturer but without the name-brand label, for much less cost than
|
||
the identical diskette with the label pasted on it. Is the label really worth
|
||
that much extra cost to you? There is also the question of whether a
|
||
manufacturer will stand behind its guarantee. Apple Avocation Alliance
|
||
recently reported that Verbatim refused to honor its diskette guarantee and
|
||
criticized the Apple organization for selling Verbatim's product "too cheaply".
|
||
|
||
THE CLEANING KIT MYTH
|
||
|
||
"Buy a cleaning kit for your disk drive. Clean it once a week." Before I
|
||
knew any better I bought just such a head cleaning kit. At the time I wondered
|
||
at the "Important notice to the purchaser" in small print on the box, which I
|
||
quote in part: "Neither seller nor manufacturer shall be liable for any
|
||
injury, loss or damage arising out of the use of the product. Before using,
|
||
user shall determine the suitability of the product for his intended use, and
|
||
user assumes all risk and liability whatsoever in connection therwith". I
|
||
assumed, as most people must, that this was just legal mumbo-jumbo to protect
|
||
the manufacturer from frivolous lawsuits by incompetent users. After all, the
|
||
product was being widely sold for the purpose of cleaning disk drive heads, and
|
||
that was surely a desirable end. Wrong again! I began to have one diskette
|
||
failure after another and it was several months before I realized the
|
||
correlation with the use of the head cleaner. The sad truth is that the
|
||
cleaning fluid used with the kit is strong solvent. he recommended method if
|
||
application, results in the pressure pad getting soaked with solvent. If you
|
||
then use a diskette in the drive, the magnetic surface on the other side of the
|
||
diskette is scoured by the solvent and actually dissolved in the process! The
|
||
damage can be so extensive that it may no longer be possible to initialize the
|
||
damages surface. Of course if I had not been using my diskettes two-sided, I
|
||
might not have discovered the problem. But now I know that, in truth, head
|
||
cleaning usually needs to be done at only intervals of one to four years, not
|
||
weeks, and is usually done with isopropyl alcohol applied directly to the head,
|
||
without damage to either pressure pad or diskettes.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
PROPER CARE AND HANDLING
|
||
|
||
Most diskette failure is caused by improper care and handling, rather than
|
||
anything under the control of the manufacturer. Of course, diskettes must be
|
||
kept away from magnetic fields, such as emitted by some TV's and certain other
|
||
electronic devices. They must be kept clean and dry. And the importance of
|
||
never writing on a diskettes label with an object which can apply pressure to
|
||
the magnetic surface below can not be over-emphasized.
|
||
|
||
Perhaps the most single most common cause of diskette failure not cuased by
|
||
disk drives is binding in the cardboard jackets. This is why you are advised
|
||
to store diskettes vertically and avoid the temptation to stack them
|
||
horizontally. Anything which applies pressure to the jackets (including
|
||
crowded storage of diskettes, horizontally or vertically) can cause binding,
|
||
which prevents the diskette from spinning at full speed continously while in
|
||
use, which causes intermittent failures.
|
||
|
||
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
|
||
So, for what it's worth...Caveat Emptor.
|
||
|