textfiles/programming/CRYPTOGRAPHY/4212582_.par

### Hellman-Merkle: 4,218,582 

              Public key cryptographic apparatus and method
 
US PAT NO:     4,218,582
DATE ISSUED:   Aug. 19, 1980
TITLE:         Public key cryptographic apparatus and method
INVENTOR:      Martin E. Hellman, Stanford, CA
               Ralph C. Merkle, Palo Alto, CA
ASSIGNEE:      The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University
                 , Stanford, CA (U.S. corp.) 
APPL-NO:       05/839,939
DATE FILED:    Oct. 6, 1977
INT-CL:        [2] H04L 9/04
US-CL-ISSUED:  178/22; 364/900
US-CL-CURRENT: 380/30; 364/918.7, 919, 919.4, 926.1, 926.5, 929, 932.8, 933,
                 933.1, 937, 937.1, 937.2, 946, 946.2, 946.8, 947, 947.2,
                 949.71, 951.1, 951.4, 959.1, DIG.2; 380/49
SEARCH-FLD:    178/22
REF-CITED: 
 
                             OTHER PUBLICATIONS
"New Directions in Cryptography," Diffie et al., IEEE Transactions on
  Information Theory, vol. II22, No. 6, Nov. 1976, pp. 644-654.
"A User Authentication Scheme not Requiring Secrecy in the Computer," Evans,
  Jr., et al., Communications of the ACM, Aug. 1974, vol. 17, No. 8, pp.
  437-442.
"A High Security Log-In Procedure," Purdy, Communications of the ACM, Aug.
  1974, vol. 17, No. 8, pp. 442-445.
Diffie et al., "Multi-User Cryptographic Techniques," AFIPS Conference
  Proceedings, vol. 45, pp. 109-112, Jun. 8, 1976.
ART-UNIT:      222
PRIM-EXMR:     Howard A. Birmiel
 
ABSTRACT: 
A cryptographic system transmits a computationally secure cryptogram that is
generated from a publicly known transformation of the message sent by the
transmitter; the cryptogram is again transformed by the authorized receiver
using a secret reciprocal transformation to reproduce the message sent. The
authorized receiver's transformation is known only by the authorized receiver
and is used to generate the transmitter's transformation that is made
publicly known. The publicly known transformation uses operations that are
easily performed but extremely difficult to invert. It is infeasible for an
unauthorized receiver to invert the publicly known transformation or
duplicate the authorized receiver's secret transformation to obtain the
message sent.
               17 Claims, 13 Drawing Figures
EXMPL-CLAIM:   1
NO-PP-DRAWING: 7
 
GOVT-INT: 
 
 The Government has rights in this invention pursuant to Grant No. ENG-10173
of the National Science Foundation and IPA No. 0005.
 
SUMMARY: 
 
                         BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
 
 1. Field of Invention
 
 The invention relates to cryptographic systems.
 
 2. Description of Prior Art
 
 Cryptographic systems are widely used to ensure the privacy and authenticity
of messages communicated over insecure channels. A privacy system prevents
the extraction of information by unauthorized parties from messages
transmitted over an insecure channel, thus assuring the sender of a message
that it is being read only by the intended receiver. An authentication system
prevents the unauthorized injection of messages into an insecure channel,
assuring the receiver of the message of the legitimacy of its sender.
 
 Currently, most message authentication consists of appending an
authenticator pattern, known only to the transmitter and intended receiver,
to each message and encrypting the combination. This protects against an
eavesdropper being able to forge new, properly authenticated messages unless
he has also stolen the cipher key being used. However, there is little
protection against the threat of dispute; that is, the transmitter may
transmit a properly authenticated message, later deny this action, and
falsely blame the receiver for taking unauthorized action. Or, conversely,
the receiver may take unauthorized action, forge a message to itself, and
falsely blame the transmitter for these actions. The threat of dispute arises
out of the absence of a suitable receipt mechanism that could prove a
particular message was sent to a receiver by a particular transmitter.
 
 One of the principal difficulties with existing cryptographic systems is the
need for the sender and receiver to exchange a cipher key over a secure
channel to which the unauthorized party does not have access. The exchange of
a cipher key frequently is done by sending the key in advance over a secure
channel such as private courier or registered mail; such secure channels are
usually slow and expensive.
 
 Diffie, et al, in "Multiuser Cryptographic Techniques," AFIPS-Conference
Proceedings, Vol. 45, pp. 109-112, June 8, 1976, propose the concept of a
public key cryptosystem that would eliminate the need for a secure channel by
making the sender's keying information public. It is also proposed how such a
public key cryptosystem could allow an authentication system which generates
an unforgeable message dependent digital signature. Diffie presents the idea
of using a pair of keys E and D, for enciphering and deciphering a message,
such that E is public information while D is kept secret by the intended
receiver. Further, although D is determined by E, it is infeasible to compute
D from E. Diffie suggests the plausibility of designing such a public key
cryptosystem that would allow a user to encipher a message and send it to the
intended receiver, but only the intended receiver could decipher it. While
suggesting the plausibility of designing such systems, Diffie presents
neither proof that public key cryptosystems exist, nor a demonstration
system.
 
 Diffie suggests three plausibility arguments for the existence of a public
key cryptosystem: a matrix approach, a machine language approach and a logic
mapping approach. While the matrix approach can be designed with matrices
that require a demonstrably infeasible cryptanalytic time (i.e., computing D
from E) using known methods, the matrix approach exhibits a lack of practical
utility because of the enormous dimensions of the required matrices. The
machine language approach and logic mapping approach are also suggested, but
there is no way shown to design them in such a manner that they would require
demonstrably infeasible cryptanalytic time.
 
 Diffie also introduces a procedure using the proposed public key
cryptosystems, that could allow the receiver to easily verify the
authenticity of a message, but which prevents him from generating apparently
authenticated messages. Diffie describes a protocol to be followed to obtain
authentication with the proposed public key cryptosystem. However, the
authentication procedure relies on the existence of a public key cryptosystem
which Diffie did not provide.
 
                    SUMMARY AND OBJECTS OF THE INVENTION
 
 Accordingly, it is an object of the invention to allow authorized parties to
a conversation (conversers) to converse privately even though an unauthorized
party (eavesdropper) intercepts all of their communications.
 
 Another object of this invention is to allow a converser on an insecure
channel to authenticate another converser's identity.
 
 Another object of this invention is to provide a receipt to a receiver on an
insecure channel to prove that a particular message was sent to the receiver
by a particular transmitter. The object being to allow the receiver to easily
verify the authenticity of a message, but to prevent the receiver from
generating apparently authenticated messages.
 
 An illustrated embodiment of the present invention describes a method and
apparatus for communicating securely over an insecure channel, by
communicating a computationally secure cryptogram that is a publicly known
transformation of the message sent by the transmitter. The illustrated
embodiment differs from prior approaches to a public key cryptosystem, as
described in "Multiuser Cryptographic Techniques," in that it is both
practical to implement and is demonstrably infeasible to invert using known
methods.
 
 In the present invention, a receiver generates a secret deciphering key and
a public enciphering key, such that the secret deciphering key is difficult
to generate from the public enciphering key. The transmitter enciphers a
message to be communicated by transforming the message with the public
enciphering key, wherein the transformation used to encipher the message is
easy to effect but difficult to invert without the secret deciphering key.
The enciphered message is then communicated from the transmitter to the
receiver. The receiver deciphers the enciphered message by inverting the
enciphering transformation with the secret deciphering key.
 
 Another illustrated embodiment of the present invention describes a method
and apparatus for allowing a transmitter to authenticate an authorized
receiver's identity. The authorized receiver generates a secret deciphering
key and a public enciphering key, such that the secret deciphering key is
difficult to generate from the public enciphering key. The transmitter
enciphers a message to be communicated by transforming the message with the
public enciphering key, wherein the transformation used to encipher the
message is easy to effect but difficult to invert without the secret
deciphering key. The enciphered message is then transmitted from the
transmitter to the receiver. The receiver deciphers the enciphered message by
inverting the enciphering transformation with the secret deciphering key. The
receiver's identity is authenticated to the transmitter by the receiver's
ability to decipher the enciphered message.
 
 Another illustrated embodiment of the present invention describes a method
and apparatus for providing a receipt for a communicated message. A
transmitter generates a secret key and a public key, such that the secret key
is difficult to generate from the public key. The transmitter then generates
a receipt by transforming a representation of the communicated message with
the secret key, wherein the transformation used to generate the receipt is
difficult to effect without the secret key and easy to invert with the public
key. The receipt is then communicated from the transmitter to the receiver.
The receiver inverts the transformation with the public key to obtain the
representation of the communicated message from the receipt and validates the
receipt by comparing the similarity of the representation of the communicated
message with the communicated message.
 
 Additional objects and features of the present invention will appear from
the description that follows wherein the preferred embodiments have been set
forth in detail in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
 
DRAWING DESC: 
 
                      BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
 
 FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a public key cryptosystem that transmits a
computationally secure cryptogram over an insecure communication channel.
 
 FIG. 2 is a block diagram of an enciphering device for enciphering a message
into ciphertext in the public key cryptosystem of FIG. 1.
 
 FIG. 3 is a block diagram of a multiplier for performing modular
multiplications in the deciphering device of FIG. 7, the exponentiator of
FIG. 10, and the public key generator of FIG. 11.
 
 FIG. 4 is a detailed schematic diagram of an adder for performing additions
in the enciphering device of FIG. 2, the multiplier of FIG. 3, and the public
key generator of FIG. 11.
 
 FIG. 5 is a detailed schematic diagram of a comparator for performing
magnitude comparisons in the enciphering device of FIG. 2, the multiplier of
FIG. 3, the deciphering device of FIG. 7, the divider of FIG. 8, and the
alternative deciphering device of FIG. 9.
 
 FIG. 6 is a detailed schematic diagram of a subtractor for performing
subtraction in the multiplier of FIG. 3, the deciphering device of FIG. 7,
and the dividier of FIG. 8.
 
 FIG. 7 is a block diagram of a deciphering device for deciphering a
ciphertext into message in the public key cryptosystem of FIG. 1.
 
 FIG. 8 is a block diagram of a divider for performing division in the
invertor of FIG. 7 and the alternative deciphering device of FIG. 9.
 
 FIG. 9 is a block diagram of an alternative deciphering device for
deciphering a ciphertext into message in the public key cryptosystem of FIG.
1.
 
 FIG. 10 is an exponentiator for raising various numbers to various powers in
modulo arithmetic in the alternative deciphering device of FIG. 9 and the
public key generator of FIG. 11.
 
 FIG. 11 is a public key generator for generating the public enciphering key
in the public key cryptosystem of FIG. 1.
 
 FIG. 12 is a flow chart for the algorithm of the logarithmic converter of
FIG. 11 when p-1 is a power of 2.
 
 FIG. 13 is a flow chart for the algorithm for computing the coefficients
{b.sub.j } of the expansion ##EQU1## where 0.ltoreq.b.sub.j .ltoreq.p.sub.i
-1, of the logarithmic convertor of FIG. 11, when p-1 is not a power of 2.
 
DETDESC: 
    
                   DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
 
 Referring to FIG. 1, a public key cryptosystem is shown in which all
transmissions take place over an insecure communication channel 19, for
example a telephone line. Communication is effected on the insecure channel
19 between transmitter 11 and receiver 12 using transmitter-receiver units 31
and 32, which may be modems such as Bell 201 modems. Transmitter 11 possesses
an unenciphered or plaintext message X to be communicated to receiver 12.
Transmitter 11 and receiver 12 include an enciphering device 15 and
deciphering device 16 respectively, for enciphering and deciphering
information under the action of an enciphering key E on line E and a
reciprocal deciphering key D on line D. The enciphering and deciphering
devices 15 and 16 implement inverse transformations when loaded with the
corresponding keys E and D. For example, the keys may be a sequence of random
letters or digits. The enciphering device 15 enciphers the plaintext message
X into an enciphered message or ciphertext S that is transmitted by
transmitter 11 through the insecure channel 19; the ciphertext S is received
by receiver 12 and deciphered by deciphering device 16 to obtain the
plaintext message X. An unauthorized party or eavesdropper 13 is assumed to
have key generator 23 and deciphering device 18 and to have access to the
insecure channel 19, so if he knew the deciphering key D he could decipher
the ciphertext S to obtain the plaintext message X.
 
 The example system makes use of the difficulty of the so-called "knapsack
problem." Definitions of the knapsack problem exist in the literature, for
example, Ellis Horowitz and Sartaj Sahni, "Computing Partitions with
Applications to the Knapsack Problem", JACM, Vol. 21, No. 2, April 1974, pp.
277-292; and O. H. Ibarra and C. E. Kim, "Fast Approximation Algorithms for
the Knapsack and Sum of Subset Problems", JACM, Vol. 22, No. 4, October 1975,
pp. 464-468. The definition used here is adapted from R. M. Karp,
"Reducibility Among Combinatorial Problems" in Complexity of Computer
Computations, by R. E. Miller and J. W. Thatcher, eds., Plenum Press, New
York (1972), pp. 85-104. Simply stated, given a one-dimensional knapsack of
length S and a vector a composed of n rods of lengths a.sub.1, a.sub.2, . . .
a.sub.n, the knapsack problem is to find a subset of the rods which exactly
fills the knapsack, if such a subset exists. Equivalently, find a binary
n-vector x of 0's and 1's such that S=a*x, if such an x exists, (* applied to
vectors denotes dot product, applied to scalars denotes normal
multiplication).
 
 A supposed solution, x, is easily checked in at most n additions; but, to
the best of current knowledge, finding a solution requires a number of
operations which grows exponentially in n. Exhaustive trial and error search
over all 2.sup.n possible x's is computationally infeasible if n is larger
than one or two hundred. Thus, it is computationally infeasible to invert the
transformation; such transformations are characterized by the class of
mathematical functions known as one-way cipher functions. A task is
considered computationally infeasible if its cost as measured by either the
amount of memory used or the computing time is finite but impossibly large,
for example, on the order of approximately 10.sup.30 operations with existing
computational methods and equipment.
 
 Theory suggests the difficulty of the knapsack problem because it is an
NP-complete problem, and is therefore one of the most difficult computational
problems of a cryptographic nature. (See for example, A. V. Aho, J. E.
Hopcraft and J. D. Ullman, The Design and Analysis of Computer Algorithms,
Reading, Ma.; Addison-Wesley, 1974, pp. 363-404.) Its degree of difficulty,
however, is dependent on the choice of a. If a=(1, 2, 4, . . . 2.sup.(n-1)),
then solving for x is equivalent to finding the binary representation of S.
Somewhat less trivially, if for all i, ##EQU2## then x is also easily found:
x.sub.n =1 if and only if S.gtoreq.a.sub.n, and, for i=n-1, n-2, . . . 1,
x.sub.i =1 if and only if ##EQU3## If the components of x are allowed to take
on integer values between 0 and l then condition (1) can be replaced by
##EQU4## and x.sub.i can be recovered as the integer part of ##EQU5##
Equation (2) for evaluating x.sub.i when x.sub.i is binary valued is
equivalent to this rule for l=1.
 
 A trap door knapsack is one in which careful choice of a allows the designer
to easily solve for any x, but which prevents anyone else from finding the
solution. Two methods will be described for constructing trap door knapsacks,
but first a description of their use in a public key cryptosystem as shown in
FIG. 1 is provided. Receiver 12 generates a trap door knapsack vector a, and
either places it in a public file or transmits it to transmitter 11 over the
insecure channel 19. Transmitter 11 represents the plaintext message X as a
vector x of n 0's and 1's, computes S=a*x, and transmits S to receiver 12
over the insecure channel 19. Receiver 12 can solve S for x, but it is
infeasible for eavesdropper 13 to solve S for x.
 
 In one method for generating trap door knapsacks, the key generator 22, uses
random numbers generated by key source 26 to select two large integers, m and
w, such that w is invertible modulo m, (i.e., so that m and w have no common
factors except 1). For example, the key source 26 may contain a random number
generator that is implemented from noisy amplifiers (e.g., Fairchild .mu. 709
operational amplifiers) with a polarity detector. The key generator 22 is
provided a knapsack vector, a' which satisfies (1) and therefore allows
solution of S'=a'*x, and transforms the easily solved knapsack vector a' into
a trap door knapsack vector a via the relation
 
 a.sub.i =w*a'.sub.i mod m                                  (3)
The vector a serves as the public enciphering key E on line E, and is either
placed in a public file or transmitted over the insecure channel 19 to
transmitter 11. The enciphering key E is thereby made available to both the
transmitter 11 and the eavesdropper 13. The transmitter 11 uses the
enciphering key E, equal to a, to generate the ciphertext S from the
plaintext message X, represented by vector x, by letting S=a*x. However,
because the a.sub.i may be psuedo-randomly distributed, the eavesdropper 13

(This text is incomplete)