textfiles/politics/SPUNK/sp000676.txt

133 lines
6.1 KiB
Plaintext

The information in this file was recently published in FREEDOM -
the fortnightly anarchist journal published by FREEDOM PRESS:
FREEDOM PRESS (IN ANGEL ALLEY) 84B WHITECHAPEL HIGH STREET,
LONDON E1 7QX GREAT BRITAIN
Do write for a sample copy or for a copy of our booklist of
publications. We will be putting more of this information out so
watch this spot...
ALGERIA SAME BOSS SAME STRUGGLE
Algeria no longer seems to be hitting the headlines with a
string of communiques listing the assasinations of militant
syndicalists, intellectuals and ordinnary and anonymous people
who made the mistake of letting be known their desire to live and
dress outside the boundaries of religious dogma.
A certain fatalism lies behind the bloody stories in most press
commentaries.
This brings us back to the basic stereotypical image, which has
always been presented, of an uncultured and ignorant people who
are incapable of adapting to the modern world. This devaluing and
criminal representation has fed racism and justified
colonialisation and 'French' exploitation.
After each report of a fresh assassination, it is not rare to
hear this sort of comment: they got what they deserved, these
Arabs. They wanted their independance! Look what they do with it.
Things were better as they were!
There is a certain triumphalism when they speak of the political
stalemate and the social and economic misery which affects the
vast majority of Algerians. This voyeurism hides a desire for
revenge and ignores the French State's responsibility for the
genesis of the current situation: 150 years of colonialism can't
be rubbed out in a day.
The Socialist Party calls for a memorial to those 32,000
Frenchmen who died during the Algerian war as though they have no
shame, no unease faced with the million Algerian deaths which are
France's responsibility.
A whole generation of youth was decapitated, all of which weighs
heavily when there is a need to reorganise an anaemic country
which the former colonist was trying to strangle economically.
Since then normal commercial relations have been resumed in the
interests, of course, of the respective middle classes. But there
is no doubt that French capital has always known how to use its
weight to influence the Algerian economy. For example, by
imposing renegotiated gas prices and capitalising on the urgent
financial needs of the Algerian state.
And then there is always the problem of an immigrant work force,
the object of blackmail fron one quarter or another. It's a
question of there being colossal sums at stake simply because of
salary transfer. Today France still intervenes to help determine
the level of IMF loans in order to influence the decision as to
when the funds should be released and in order to determine under
what conditions and with what levels of redundancies and which
economic policies will be financed by this money. Of course all
this is done discreetly and only in the company of reliable
people.
All the same we must ask ourselves what the aims of the State
and the French managerial class are in all of this. This group of
Frenchmen who govern us, have they any interest in ssing Algeria
get out of the social stagnation or have they more to gain by
seeing the whole population trying to survive under martial law
imposed by the military under the pretext of getting rid of the
fundamentalists? I don't want to expose too much Machaevellianism
but 27 million people are currently crushed and neutralised by
the implosion of their own society... all in accordance with the
workings of capitalism. Whilst people struggle among themselves
it's business as usual.
If the FIS and its most fundamentalist militants have managed to
carry out high profile operations it is because they have managed
to catalyse social discontent and denounce the incapacity of the
bureaucratic FLN.
But without financial support from Saudi Arabia and Iran could
they have laid on the food and health provision or the Islamic
education?
Today it is the same sources that are funding the network of
armed groups. Why? Who gains? Could this happen without at least
the neutrality of the American and French states? Is the issue
inseperable from the hightened efforts to normalise economic and
diplomatic relations with the Iranian and Iraqi states? Surely
not.
There is also, without a shadow of a doubt, a desire to 'manage'
the moderate faction of the FIS in order to constitute at the end
of the day a political compromise between the military and
religious groups in order to run Algeria and assure the
continuity of French influence in this part of the world.
And it is not just by chance that even here in France Pasqua is
making such strenuous efforts to canalise and favour the
emmergence of a French Islam with an Islamic University and
support to set up French Imams.
On the left nobody has anything further to say in so far as the
muslim religion allows for the control of a part of the youth in
the suburbs. Better that than riots.
In Vnissieux [a suburb of Lyon] the communist local authority is
congratulating itself on seeing young muslims joining Islamic
associations and returning to the police cars and other objects
stolen the previous night by other young people. Where will such
collaboration lead us?
For sure the Algerians are in a cul-de-sac and no one can tell
them how to get out. For sure, we are also in a political
impasse, and nobody can say how things will turn out. It's easy
to make such a statement. We must continue to realsie that it is
the same capitalist logic which leads to the same situations and
noone can convince us that they are different or in our interest
simply because the opposition is not being slaughtered on the
streets of Paris.
Let us be clear that the same rumblings are being heard here as
well as over there. Will we be able to state and define the
convergeance of interest which unite the exploited everywhere in
order to breach the arrogance of the police and the ministers of
all religions?
Bernard Le Monde Libertaire 30/3/94.