354 lines
20 KiB
Plaintext
354 lines
20 KiB
Plaintext
|
||
*******************************************************************************
|
||
From: Diane Vera Msg Num: 73 of 80
|
||
To: Balanone Date: 29 Feb 92 22:32:30
|
||
Subj: "Nazi sympathies"
|
||
Attr: Rec'd Read: N
|
||
Conf: Magickal Chat Echo (93Net)
|
||
*******************************************************************************
|
||
|
||
Here, at last, is my long-procrastinated reply to your February 3
|
||
string of messages to me in BASE OF SET titled "Non-Fascist Temple
|
||
of Set". I've decided to try to move this discussion to OASIS,
|
||
since I gather that most BASE OF SET readers are long since tired of
|
||
it, and so that Tim can comment without being perceived as "hounding
|
||
Setians". OASIS, in case you're unfamiliar with it, is an occult
|
||
"anything goes" echo, distributed mainly to OTO boards and thus
|
||
inhabited mainly by Thelemites, with a large minority of Satanists.
|
||
.
|
||
Thanks for spelling out Aquino's disagreements with all the main
|
||
tenets of Nazi ideology. I hope you'll suggest to Aquino that he
|
||
give a similarly straightforward reply next time someone tries to
|
||
question him in depth about the common perception of "Nazi
|
||
sympathies" on his part. (Had he done so in MAGICKNET two years
|
||
ago, I don't think Tim would have written "The Nazi Trapezoid",
|
||
although Tim might still have had a few questions. Right, Tim?)
|
||
.
|
||
B > In Dr. Aquino's 11/14/90 response, as quoted in part
|
||
2 of your 1/25 post to me, Dr. Aquino says, "I have always
|
||
deplored its [Naziism's] premises, policies, and activities
|
||
which resulted in savagery and misery to a great many
|
||
people." He deplores its premises (ideology) and its
|
||
policies (practices) which result in savagery and misery.
|
||
.
|
||
But, unlike your message to me, Aquino's "response" to "The Nazi
|
||
Trapezoid" doesn't specify *what* these "premises" are which he
|
||
deplores. Aquino does, after all, agree with (or at least encourage
|
||
open-mindedness toward) *some* ideas that are associated with
|
||
Nazism. For example, on March 15, 1990 in MAGICKNET, Aquino wrote
|
||
to Mel. White in a message titled "Taboo Genetics":
|
||
.
|
||
MA > Dear Ms. White,
|
||
Yes, it's interesting when one comes across a living example
|
||
of the Nazi genetic breeding experiments - bearing in mind
|
||
that this program barely got off the ground before the outcome
|
||
of WW2 brought an end to it.
|
||
Humanity breeds vegetables and virtually every other
|
||
animal except itself to improve strength, substance,
|
||
appearance, etc. Prior to WW2 the entire subject of human
|
||
genetic engineering by selective breeding was not a taboo as
|
||
it is today. It was not just Nazi Germany which was
|
||
interested in it. But the Nazis' experiments in it transformed
|
||
it into a postwar taboo, equated today with racism, genocide,
|
||
etc. Perhaps in another century this taboo will have
|
||
exhausted itself, but for now even a hint of interest in it is
|
||
certain to provoke howls of indignation from the masses.
|
||
I have a friend who was [un]fortunate enough to be born
|
||
in Nazi Germany as a result of a marriage adhering to the
|
||
country's multi-generational racial laws. Consequently she has
|
||
a birth certificate, complete with gold eagle & swastika,
|
||
which is positively dazzling - certainly nothing like the
|
||
rubber-stamp certificates issued today. She has been heard to
|
||
remark rather bitterly that all the golden certificate got her
|
||
was increased persecution in the years following the war. Such
|
||
is the mandala of history.
|
||
.
|
||
Aquino suggests here that human "genetic engineering by selective
|
||
breeding" doesn't necessarily have to mean racism. And indeed it
|
||
doesn't, at least in theory. But I don't see how, in practice,
|
||
human eugenics could ever be disentangled from racism and other
|
||
forms of oppression. I'm wondering how, "in another century",
|
||
Aquino thinks it might be implemented.
|
||
.
|
||
I don't necessarily expect you to provide an answer to this
|
||
question, since you're not Aquino. I'm just trying to give you an
|
||
idea of why, in the absense of any clear statement by Aquino stating
|
||
what he does *not* agree with about Nazi ideology, Tim got the
|
||
very strong impression that Aquino is a "Nazi sympathizer". Simply
|
||
disapproving of Nazi atrocities (as Aquino has done) does not
|
||
constitute a statement of fundamental disagreement with Nazism. As
|
||
Tim Maroney wrote in MAGICKNET on February 26, 1990, in a message to
|
||
Brad Hicks, "Re: Oh, Yeh?":
|
||
.
|
||
TM > One more thing -- it may not be clear why I regard
|
||
Aquino's latest statement about Nazism to still be unclear on
|
||
the subject. To transplant the argument, I personally am
|
||
aware that socialists have done any number of mean, evil, and
|
||
nasty things, and I condemn those -- this is an exact parallel
|
||
to Aquino's stated feelings about Nazism. However, you would
|
||
be incorrect to draw from that the conclusion that I consider
|
||
socialism an abomination or am not sympathetic to it. In
|
||
fact, the opposite is true; I consider the socialist
|
||
atrocities to be aberrations and the fundamental theory to
|
||
remain sound. Anyone dealing honestly with any political
|
||
movement that has attained any degree of public success must
|
||
admit that many manifestations of the movement have been
|
||
undesirable. But this in itself does not mean that one does
|
||
not remain in essential sympathy with the goals of the
|
||
movement.
|
||
.
|
||
If only Aquino had posted something like your message, which does
|
||
constitute a clear statement of disagreement with Nazi ideology, not
|
||
just Nazi atrocities (though I see a couple minor problems with your
|
||
statement which I'll discuss later). For the benefit of other
|
||
readers, I will quote in full the relevant parts of your message:
|
||
.
|
||
B > My dictionary defines Naziism as, "the body of
|
||
political and economic doctrines held and put into effect
|
||
by the National Socialist German Workers' party in the
|
||
Third German Reich including the totalitarian principle of
|
||
government, state control of all industry, predominance of
|
||
groups assumed to be racially superior, and supremacy of
|
||
the fuhrer."
|
||
.
|
||
B > I'm not Dr. Aquino, but I've been reading his works
|
||
for well over a decade now, and I've heard some of his
|
||
discussions on these and related topics, and I believe I
|
||
can accurately state the following:
|
||
1) Dr. Aquino disagrees with the Nazi ideology of
|
||
the totalitarian principle of government. While he
|
||
recognizes that there are problems in every form of
|
||
democracy used to date, democracy in general results in
|
||
better governments and better organizations than does
|
||
totalitarianism.
|
||
In evidence of this, I point to the organization of
|
||
the Temple of Set (his design), where a) there are multiple
|
||
checks and balances designed to ensure that no single
|
||
person wields totalitarian power, b) all members of the
|
||
Priesthood have an equal vote concerning the bylaws of the
|
||
organization, and c) a democratic vote of the Council of
|
||
Nine is powerful enough to remove any officer from power
|
||
and to expel any member from the organization, including
|
||
the High Priest.
|
||
2) Dr. Aquino disagrees with the Nazi ideology of
|
||
the state control of all industry. While Dr. Aquino is
|
||
certainly no captain of industry (he prefers to earn his
|
||
livelihood within academia), I've never heard him express
|
||
any dissatisfaction with capitalism or the free market
|
||
system, other than the generally recognized fact that
|
||
people can be financially hurt in a non-socialist state.
|
||
Instead of arguing for a socialist state, which
|
||
would be the case if he supported this Nazi ideology, Dr.
|
||
Aquino instead argues that Black Magicians should be able
|
||
to successfully make their own way in a capitalist society.
|
||
3) Dr. Aquino disagrees with the Nazi ideology of
|
||
the predominance of groups assumed to be racially superior.
|
||
I have always seen Dr. Aquino treat people of various races
|
||
as comparative equals, judging people not by race, but by
|
||
personal qualities under the control of the individual
|
||
(their education, their application of their native
|
||
intelligence, their sociability, their honor, their
|
||
dedication, etc).
|
||
4) Dr. Aquino disagrees with the Nazi ideology of
|
||
the supremacy of the fuhrer. There were some things that
|
||
Hitler said or wrote which are worth studying, but there
|
||
were also many, many things said, written, and done by
|
||
Hitler which are reprehensible. Setians are fond of saying
|
||
they worship none but their own higher Selves. Dr. Aquino
|
||
lives that ideal.
|
||
Those are the four ideologies of Naziism listed in
|
||
my dictionary. If there are other ideologies you wonder
|
||
about, you'll need to ask about them specifically.
|
||
Since Naziism and fascism are so closely related,
|
||
and since Dr. Aquino and the Temple of Set have been
|
||
accused of being fascist, let me explore that topic also.
|
||
.
|
||
B > Fascism -- 1: a political philosophy, movement, or
|
||
regime that exalts nation and race above the individual,
|
||
and that stands for a centralized autocratic government
|
||
headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social
|
||
regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition. 2:
|
||
a tendency toward or actual exercise of strong autocratic
|
||
or dictatorial control.
|
||
1) Dr. Aquino believes in and exalts the individual
|
||
over the nation and race. This is central to the concept
|
||
of Xeper and the Left Hand Path. This concept is even more
|
||
important than the Temple of Set -- as High Priest he as
|
||
seen many individual initiates pleasantly leave the Temple
|
||
of Set for reasons of their own, and has later welcomed
|
||
back several of those with open arms. Such is not the
|
||
behavior of a fascist.
|
||
2) Dr. Aquino does not believe in a centralized
|
||
autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader. He
|
||
believes in the American form of democracy (while admitting
|
||
that it has its problems), and he has designed the Temple's
|
||
organization and bylaws to prevent any dictatorial leader
|
||
from gaining absolute control.
|
||
3) Dr. Aquino does not believe in social
|
||
regimentation nor forcible suppression of opposition.
|
||
Instead he welcomes diversity within the Temple of Set, and
|
||
has not only tolerated but welcomed intelligent forms of
|
||
opposition within the Temple of Set.
|
||
.
|
||
So far, my one objection is to the following statement:
|
||
.
|
||
B > Instead of arguing for a socialist state, which would
|
||
be the case if he supported this Nazi ideology, Dr. Aquino
|
||
instead argues that Black Magicians should be able to
|
||
successfully make their own way in a capitalist society.
|
||
.
|
||
This is one argument I would hesitate to present to a politically-
|
||
sophisticated audience. At the very least, I certainly wouldn't
|
||
emphasize it.
|
||
.
|
||
Technically, "Nazism" was indeed an abbreviation for the phrase
|
||
"National Socialism". However, *today's American* neo-fascists,
|
||
racists, and "Nazi sympathizers" will usually present themselves as
|
||
ardent champions of capitalism. How they reconcile this
|
||
contradiction, I don't know; but it's nonetheless a fact that they
|
||
will usually oppose welfare, rather than arguing (as perhaps a
|
||
classical Nazi might) that we should keep welfare but reserve it for
|
||
people of pure Nordic descent. Today's neo-Nazi types usually
|
||
assume (like the LaVey crowd) that only "inferior" folks would ever
|
||
need welfare. Also, they will sometimes claim to be champions of
|
||
small business against the corporate establishment ("Main Street vs.
|
||
Wall Street").
|
||
.
|
||
It has also been questioned how genuinely socialist "National
|
||
Socialism" really was. I've read several places that Nazism was
|
||
promoted by German industrialists as an alternative to "real"
|
||
socialism. I don't know enough about Nazism's actual ecomonic
|
||
policies to make a judgment about this. In any case, Nazism was
|
||
fiercely anti-Communist, which it has in common with today's
|
||
American neo-Nazi's.
|
||
.
|
||
I'm *not* trying to suggest that being pro-capitalist or fiercely
|
||
anti-Communist makes one a "Nazi sympathizer". I'm simply pointing
|
||
out that, in today's political context, being pro-capitalist does
|
||
not constitute evidence *against* a perception that one is a "Nazi
|
||
sympathizer", semantically correct though that argument may be.
|
||
.
|
||
Later in your message, in your comments on Tim Maroney's article
|
||
"The Nazi Trapezoid", you made another argument I wouldn't present
|
||
to a politically-aware audience:
|
||
.
|
||
B > The Order of the Trapezoid is *not* "dedicated" to
|
||
Nazi occultism. [...] If the Order of the Trapezoid is
|
||
"dedicated" to anything, that dedication is found in the
|
||
statement,
|
||
"The O.Tr. is an Order of knighthood characterized
|
||
by strict personal honor and faithfulness to the quest for
|
||
the Grail. The Order is a *knighthood* in that its members
|
||
are pledged to the traditional chivalric virtues as
|
||
appropriate to each situation encountered. By *honor* is
|
||
meant a sense of justice, ethics, and responsibility prior
|
||
to personal comfort, convenience, or advantage. This honor
|
||
is known by one's *faithfulness* to the Quest of the Grail,
|
||
which is the self, soul, or psyche made perfect through
|
||
conscious refinement and exercise of the Will."
|
||
Let me repeat that sentence which expands on the
|
||
Order's concept of honor: "By *honor* is meant a sense of
|
||
justice, ethics, and responsibility prior to personal
|
||
comfort, convenience, or advantage."
|
||
In my opinion that statement directly and absolutely
|
||
disproves Tim's expectation of fascism.
|
||
.
|
||
That statement does "directly and absolutely disprove" an
|
||
expectation of LaVey-style nihilism; but, as Tim pointed out to me
|
||
in BASE OF SET, fascist ideology is *not* incompatible with an
|
||
emphasis on the idea of honor. (The concepts of elitism and honor
|
||
don't prove that ToS and/or the Order of the Trapezoid *are*
|
||
fascist, but they certainly don't disprove it.) So, I definitely
|
||
wouldn't use this particular argument unless you're familiar with
|
||
fascist concepts of "honor" and are prepared to spell out how the
|
||
Order of the Trapezoid's concept differs from it.
|
||
.
|
||
Backtracking a bit, just after your enumeration of the central
|
||
doctrines of Nazism and fascism which Aquino disagrees with, you
|
||
made a series of arguments which I wouldn't use because they sound
|
||
too much like evasions (which seems to be a common ToS bad habit,
|
||
perhaps growing out of most Setians' understandable desire to keep
|
||
a low profile).
|
||
.
|
||
B > You quote Dr. Aquino's 11/14/90 statement, "To the
|
||
extent the Order is interested in Nazi Germany, it is
|
||
essentially with regard to the very extensive research into
|
||
occultism conducted by the Ahnenerbe and other groups &
|
||
individuals during that period." You then go on to claim,
|
||
"As the Order of the Trapezoid statement makes clear, there
|
||
is much more to its interest in Nazism than this. Aquino
|
||
does not address any of the specific issues raised in Tim's
|
||
article, which I will highlight in a later message to you."
|
||
[...]
|
||
Reading through the Order of the Trapezoid
|
||
statement, I find that the introduction concentrates on
|
||
German Romanticism, and the Order's statement doesn't even
|
||
mention the Third Reich until the eighth paragraph. The
|
||
Third Reich and the Nazi influence is then discussed and
|
||
dismissed in six paragraphs. The Third Reich and Nazi
|
||
influence occupies less than one page in the five-page
|
||
document.
|
||
Reading those six paragraphs, I find myself unable
|
||
to support your claim that "there is much more to its
|
||
interest in Nazism than this."
|
||
I do find the 1939 quote from Herman Rauschning,
|
||
which said, "This irrational element in National Socialism
|
||
is the actual source of its strength. It is the reliance on
|
||
it that accounts for its 'sleepwalker's immunity' in the
|
||
face of one practical problem after another. It explains
|
||
why it was possible for National Socialism to attain power
|
||
almost without the slightest tangible idea of what it was
|
||
going to do. ..."
|
||
Yes, the study of the social dynamics which are
|
||
mentioned are of interest, but I fail to see the connection
|
||
between those social dynamics and Naziism ... those social
|
||
dynamics apply to all fanatical movements which quickly
|
||
rise to power (or at least struggle for it). Do you
|
||
disagree?
|
||
If you can point out to me where you find this
|
||
interest in Naziism rather than German Romanticism, perhaps
|
||
I'll be better able to answer your question. Until then, I
|
||
just don't see the source of your concern.
|
||
.
|
||
The Order of the Trapezoid statement does deal with how the German
|
||
Romantic concepts of "dynamism and life-worship" got used/abused by
|
||
the Nazis. The statement says, "The uncanny attraction of the Third
|
||
Reich - Nazi Germany - lies in the fact that it endorsed and
|
||
practiced both dynamism and life-worship without restraint and to a
|
||
world-shaking degree of success."
|
||
.
|
||
Taken together, the Order of the Trapezoid statement and Aquino's
|
||
"response" to Tim show a concern with at least four different
|
||
elements pertaining to Nazi Germany: (1) The Ahnenerbe S.S.'s
|
||
occult research, (2) the German Romantic philosophical background of
|
||
"dynamism and life-worship", (3) the social dynamics of a fanatical
|
||
movement, and (4) official Nazi artwork, as in the Fenris wolf on
|
||
the masthead of the Order of the Trapezoid's newsletter: not just
|
||
any old Fenris wolf, but the specific artistic rendition of Fenris
|
||
"from the cover of the August 1941 issue of _Germanien_, official
|
||
journal of the _Ahnenerbe_, the elite section of the SS concerned
|
||
with the theory and practice of the Black Arts". All of this,
|
||
together with the above-quoted statement referring to "The uncanny
|
||
attraction of the Third Reich", does indicate a *fascination* with
|
||
Nazi Germany, though not necessarily an *agreement* with Nazism
|
||
itself. The fact that some of the above elements are not unique to
|
||
Nazism does not invalidate the thesis that Aquino's writings show a
|
||
*fascination* for Nazi Germany, a thesis whose truth is even more
|
||
evident when I review the MAGICKNET archives.
|
||
.
|
||
Of course, as I've indicated, having a fascination for Nazi Germany
|
||
isn't the same thing as agreeing with Nazism. You made a very good
|
||
case for the thesis that Aquino is not a "Nazi sympathizer". Please
|
||
don't overstate your case by trying to claim or imply that he
|
||
doesn't have a particular fascination for Nazi Germany. It probably
|
||
isn't an *all-consuming* fascination, and it's probably only one
|
||
of a number of Aquino's fascinations; but the fascination is clearly
|
||
there.
|
||
.
|
||
Regarding "the specific issues raised in Tim's article, which I will
|
||
highlight in a later message to you", I discussed most of them in my
|
||
5-part February 24 message to All in BASE OF SET, "Trapezoi.TXT".
|
||
|
||
-!- Maximus 2.00
|
||
! Origin: BaphoNet-by-the-Sea -=- 718/499-9277 (1:278/666)
|
||
|