209 lines
10 KiB
Plaintext
209 lines
10 KiB
Plaintext
|
||
CALIPH HYMENAEUS BETA Xø
|
||
|
||
Introduction: Culture vs. Cult
|
||
|
||
Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law.
|
||
|
||
|
||
OUR FOUNDING EDITOR, ALEISTER CROWLEY (also known as Baphomet Xø, The
|
||
Master Therion etc., etc.) considered a balanced, wide-ranging
|
||
education a prerequisite to complete initiation. Unlike most spiritual
|
||
teachers, Crowley was worldly-wise as well as unworldly-wise,
|
||
conversant with the work of the artists, writers, scientists and
|
||
philosophers who defined his times. He accordingly used The Equinox,
|
||
which he subtitled ``The Journal of Scientific Illuminism,'' to
|
||
publish reviews and study guides, as well as individual works that
|
||
have since become standard references. A poet in his own right, he
|
||
maintained that initiation finds tangible expression in creative
|
||
genius, and so issued the finest literature and poetry possible. This
|
||
formed the editorial subtext of the original Equinox, and in that
|
||
spirit we issue this new number. Successive generations of artists,
|
||
writers, poets, filmmakers, dramatists, scientists and philosophers
|
||
have contributed much to the birth of what we call Thelemic culture.
|
||
Magick and the arts share the willingness to explore new modes of
|
||
perception and expression, to experiment with consciousness itself,
|
||
and communicate even if a new vocabulary is called for. This issue
|
||
features both contemporary poetry and cinema (the poetry of light)
|
||
that demonstrate this.
|
||
|
||
The poets have always been with us, although we (for our part) have
|
||
not always fully reciprocated--after being introduced to Allen
|
||
Ginsberg in the 1950's, my predecessor Frater Saturnus Xø reportedly
|
||
asked that ``beatniks'' not be brought around. I mean no disrespect to
|
||
Saturnus, who after all knew and (in his way) encouraged half of the
|
||
artistic contributors to this issue. But I am reminded of Robert
|
||
Kelly's
|
||
|
||
scribes & scholars of the College of the Holy Spirit, resting from
|
||
their carnival appearances or conning the sermons they will whisper, o
|
||
holy poison, in the ears of sleeping dominies. These are men who live
|
||
for nothing but truth & love. Which is true of everyone in the world,
|
||
but these men know it.
|
||
|
||
We must never forget that it is we who run the risk of becoming
|
||
``sleeping dominies''--the poets know their business and a goodly part
|
||
of ours. I should know--my poetry submission was respectfully
|
||
declined.
|
||
|
||
The work of living writers forms a counterpoise to the historical
|
||
material in this issue, all of whose authors are deceased (with the
|
||
possible exception of Frater Ad Veritatem). We have collected
|
||
virtually all of the O.T.O.'s founding documents for this number--it
|
||
was dubbed the ``ancestor worship'' issue during compilation. The
|
||
purpose of this collection is twofold: first, to provide a ready
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
compendium of the essential O.T.O. material as a guidebook during the
|
||
renaissance the Order presently enjoys, and secondly, to make plain to
|
||
the public exactly what the Order is, and is not. The O.T.O. is a
|
||
manifold organization with a complex history and philosophy, rich in
|
||
written, oral and ritual tradition. It is also the Aleister Crowley
|
||
Estate, responsible for preserving his writings and setting consistent
|
||
standards for Thelemic scholarship. These are essentially conservative
|
||
functions, yet the O.T.O.'s design preserves flexibility and
|
||
adaptability, without which ``Thelemic Order'' would be a
|
||
contradiction in terms. While it has never been necessary to join the
|
||
O.T.O. to be a Thelemite, it is central to the Order's ``experimental
|
||
design'' that being a Thelemite never becomes a bar to membership. In
|
||
this important sense, the O.T.O. is a crucible for the development of
|
||
the social models necessary to a Thelemic culture, as opposed to
|
||
Thelemic cult.
|
||
|
||
My predecessor as head of the O.T.O., Caliph Hymenaeus Alpha 777 Xø,
|
||
rescued the O.T.O. from the brink of extinction. Only a decade ago the
|
||
survival of the Order was in question, but as the leader of a handful
|
||
of survivors from the Crowley era who had tended the flame for over
|
||
forty years, Hymenaeus Alpha fanned it into life. Educated in
|
||
political science and a management analyst by profession, he also
|
||
successfully addressed the greatest long-term threat to the Order: the
|
||
``cult'' tendency in Thelema, manifesting as extreme conservativism on
|
||
the one hand, and anarchic radicalism on the other.
|
||
|
||
The ``conservative'' wing--Marcelo Motta and his Society Ordo Templi
|
||
Orientis (SOTO)--evinced a fanatical elitism that laid claim to
|
||
exclusive representation of Thelema in all its forms. After tolerating
|
||
repeated attacks from this group in their apocryphal Equinox ``Volume
|
||
Five,'' Hymenaeus Alpha filed suit in Federal Court and won a clear-
|
||
cut victory--not for the O.T.O. alone, but also indirectly for many
|
||
others who were abused in, or simply confused by, the offending works.
|
||
|
||
The ``anarchic'' wing's development was spurred by the writings of Mr.
|
||
Kenneth Grant, whose excellent book The Magical Revival indeed
|
||
contributed to a genuine revival in the early 1970's. In subsequent
|
||
works, Mr. Grant (who was expelled from the O.T.O. in the mid-1950's)
|
||
claimed to be Outer Head of the O.T.O., and proceeded to organize an
|
||
``O.T.O.'' with complete disregard for the intent of Crowley and the
|
||
original founders. Grant was, for example, extremely critical of the
|
||
business aspects of the O.T.O., which are clearly a part of the
|
||
original charter. Hymenaeus Alpha met this trend by simple example--he
|
||
established a reputation as a tolerant monarch, and thereby gave the
|
||
lie to anarchy. We count some of Mr. Grant's most enthusiastic readers
|
||
among our members.
|
||
|
||
First published in England beginning in 1909 EV, The Equinox served as
|
||
the Official Organ of the A...A.... Crowley issued a new number on
|
||
each equinox, and the ten numbers of Volume I are now a standard
|
||
reference-library set. After Crowley's induction into the Ordo Templi
|
||
Orientis in 1913 EV The Equinox became an Official Organ of the O.T.O.
|
||
as well, beginning with Volume I(10). Although they shared the same
|
||
journal for several numbers, the A...A... and the O.T.O. were and are
|
||
distinct organizations. They are so often confused that Saturnus Xø
|
||
asked Crowley for an official statement on the subject:
|
||
|
||
The difference between the A...A... and the O.T.O. is very clear and
|
||
simple. The A...A... is a sempiternal institution, and entirely
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
secret. There is no communication between its members. Theoretically,
|
||
a member knows only the superior who introduced him, and any person
|
||
whom he himself has introduced. The Order is run on purely spiritual
|
||
lines.
|
||
The objective of membership is also entirely simple. The first
|
||
objective is the Knowledge and Conversation of the Holy Guardian
|
||
Angel. The next objective, omitting considerations for the present of
|
||
the 6ø=5 and 7ø=4 degrees, is the crossing of the Abyss, and the
|
||
attainment of mastership of the Temple. This is described very fully
|
||
especially in Liber 418. Much less is written about the 5ø=6 degree,
|
||
i.e. the Knowledge and Conversation, because it is too secret and
|
||
individual. It is impossible to lay down conditions, or to describe
|
||
the experiences in detail.
|
||
The O.T.O. has nothing to do with this, except that The Book of
|
||
the Law and the Word of the Aeon are essential principles of
|
||
membership. In all other respects, it stands by itself as a body
|
||
similar to Freemasonry, but involving acceptance of a social and
|
||
economic system which is intended to put the world on its feet. There
|
||
is also, of course, the secret of the IXø which is to say, the weapon
|
||
which they may use to further these purposes.
|
||
To show you the difference, Theodor Reuss was Supreme Head of
|
||
the O.T.O., but was not even a probationer of the A...A....
|
||
|
||
Crowley spent the last of his inheritance in releasing Volume I, after
|
||
which its publishing history becomes erratic--The Equinox had the
|
||
first of many interruptions in 1913 EV. Crowley termed this first
|
||
hiatus Volume II, ``a volume of silence,'' in accord with an A...A...
|
||
rule of alternating 5-year periods of speech and silence.
|
||
|
||
Volume III was issued by the O.T.O. under four administrations of the
|
||
Order over 67 years. (The ``5-year'' rule was disregarded, presumably
|
||
since it pertained to the A...A....) Volume III has a complicated
|
||
bibliography whose twists and turns are a bell-wether of the Order's
|
||
fortunes. The first number of Volume III to appear was the well-known
|
||
``blue'' Equinox, issued from Detroit in 1919 EV. Crowley outlined the
|
||
proposed contents of the remainder of Volume III in this number, but
|
||
Volume III(2) never appeared (although it reached galley-proofs and
|
||
was included in the series as if issued). In subsequent numbers of
|
||
Volume III The Equinox came to assume the character of a series of
|
||
occasional monographs. Number 3 reached galley-proofs in 1927 EV, but
|
||
was delayed until 1936 EV when it appeared in partial form as The
|
||
Equinox of the Gods (actually part one of four parts of Book Four Part
|
||
Four, to have included the Commentary to The Book of the Law). Number
|
||
4 appeared in 1938 EV as Eight Lectures on Yoga. Number 5 was
|
||
announced in 1938 EV as the Tao Teh King but actually appeared in 1944
|
||
EV as The Book of Thoth. Number 6, Liber Aleph, was close to
|
||
production at Crowley's death in 1947 EV but appeared posthumously in
|
||
1962 EV. (Its ``publication fund''--contributions from the American
|
||
O.T.O.--was found untouched under his deathbed.) This was followed by
|
||
the Shih Yi (Yi King) (Number 7) in 1971 EV, the Tao Teh King (Number
|
||
8) in 1975 EV and The Holy Books of Thelema (Number 9) in 1983 EV. The
|
||
present issue therefore completes Volume III.
|
||
|
||
The O.T.O.'s structure, history, aims and philosophy are well-
|
||
represented in this last number of Volume III--the most comprehensive
|
||
collection since Volume III(1). Caliph Hymenaeus Alpha was a
|
||
pragmatist as well as a visionary, considering these papers plans for
|
||
the future O.T.O. He observed the principles, and where practical,
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
implemented them formally, as we are doing with the forthcoming
|
||
promulgation of the Constitution. Although much of this material has
|
||
been termed outdated or ignored outright--even by self-styled
|
||
``representatives'' of the Order--these papers stand as the foundation
|
||
on which we must build if we would do honor to our predecessors'
|
||
vision, and lay claim to their inherited wisdom.
|
||
|
||
Love is the law, love under will.
|
||
|
||
|
||
`UMENAIOS B Xø
|
||
CALIPH HYMENAEUS BETA
|
||
Rex Summus Sanctissimus, U.S.A.
|
||
Acting Frater Superior, O.T.O.
|
||
|
||
|