160 lines
8.3 KiB
Plaintext
160 lines
8.3 KiB
Plaintext
|
|
### ###
|
|
### ###
|
|
### #### ### ### ### ####
|
|
### ### ##### ### ###
|
|
### ### ### ### ###
|
|
### ### ##### ### ###
|
|
########## ### ### ##########
|
|
### ###
|
|
### ###
|
|
|
|
Underground eXperts United
|
|
|
|
Presents...
|
|
|
|
####### ## ## ####### # # ####### ## ## #######
|
|
## ## ## ## ##### ## ## ## ##
|
|
#### ## ## #### # # ####### ####### #######
|
|
## ## ## ## ##### ## ## ##
|
|
## ## ####### ####### # # ####### ## #######
|
|
|
|
[ No More Secrets ] [ By The GNN ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
____________________________________________________________________
|
|
____________________________________________________________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
NO MORE SECRETS
|
|
by THE GNN/DualCrew-Shining/uXu
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is a familiar fact that a phenomena can be described in several ways,
|
|
dependent upon what kind of knowledge the speaker holds. This fact turns
|
|
into a problem when one tries to apply consequential ethics to actions.
|
|
Consequential ethics regards the causal effects that follows from action as
|
|
the important part. For example; if someone killed Adolf Hitler the
|
|
consequentialist would say that it was a morally correct action since it
|
|
stopped WWII, while other ethics (deontologic for example) may claim that
|
|
the action was wrong since killing is always (intrinsically) wrong.
|
|
We live in a society were the consequences are important when it comes
|
|
to measuring what is good and evil, right or wrong. Naturally, the above
|
|
problem is far from absent. But since this kind of meta-ethics is too hard
|
|
for many people to understand, the problem is simply ignored because people
|
|
are not really aware of it.
|
|
|
|
One way of describing 'computer crime', 'hacking' and 'phreaking' is to
|
|
claim that it is wrong, wrong and, of course, wrong. Satan has offered the
|
|
new electronic apple from the tree of knowledge to some people and turned
|
|
them into 'criminals' that seeks the power of information (hence, with
|
|
'computer crimes' I do not mean computer-related theft or equal). Systems
|
|
are cracked, secrets are exposed - the state, our new God, wants to throw
|
|
these bad guys out of paradise.
|
|
Since the state owns the monopoly of violence, it will use violence to
|
|
reach this goal. If violence is not enough, the state will spread lies and
|
|
misinformation to the population instead. The state will shout that
|
|
hackers are dangerous individuals that must be stopped by all means. Since
|
|
the population is only given the point of view of the state, no real debate
|
|
will start concerning the subject. Hackers are criminals, they must be
|
|
stopped - end of discussion.
|
|
The state does not spread this twisted view of the computer underground
|
|
to protect the people. The state only protects itself. But it needs help
|
|
from ignorant people to survive. People that cannot think for themselves,
|
|
people that are so brain-washed that they seem to enjoy being fed with lies
|
|
from the state, they are the perfect mob for this project. Unfortunately,
|
|
this mob is the majority. They are the victims of our society. They are
|
|
the 'common people', the robots that work, watch television (the drug of
|
|
the nation), work, eat, sleep and die without questioning their lives.
|
|
They live as modern slaves, because someone told them that this is the only
|
|
way of living. Guess who told them this? The state, naturally.
|
|
So we have two forces; the state versus the computer underground. The
|
|
state says that hacking is wrong. The computer underground claims that it
|
|
is right.
|
|
Now we move on to the other description of the same phenomena. This
|
|
time we will study the correct version.
|
|
|
|
The main argument against hacking is - naturally - that it undermines
|
|
national security. The secrets are not secret anymore if people are able
|
|
to gain access to them. Now, what is this thing called 'secrets'? What
|
|
kind of secrets are so secret that they may cause chaos of they are
|
|
exposed?
|
|
The state answers to this question; 'The secrets are secret because if
|
|
they were public, war and terror would rule. The russians would attack us,
|
|
the arabs would attack us, Europe would attack us, United States would
|
|
attack us - if they knew our secrets. Therefor, only the men in the ruling
|
|
position ought to know about them, because they are the ones that know how
|
|
to handle it. Hackers will ruin our country, our dream and blah blah
|
|
blah.'
|
|
This is obviously wrong. It is the secrets themselves that cause war,
|
|
just because they are secret. It is the old way of looking at things, the
|
|
selfish, primitive, medieval, way that causes trouble. A few good men has
|
|
played around with each other, as if the world was nothing more than a game
|
|
of Conspiracy, far too long. Wars, espionage, cold wars, assassinations,
|
|
CIA, KGB etc etc etc. The ones who have to pay the price is the
|
|
population. If you ask yourself 'what is it good for?' you will find that
|
|
the answers will move around in small circles.
|
|
'Secrets are necessary to protect us from war (or equal)' - 'War is
|
|
necessary to protect our secrets' and so on.
|
|
What if there were no more secrets? It is time to end the government
|
|
domination, free us from our chains.
|
|
|
|
Hacking punches small holes into the balloon of secrets. Secrets gush
|
|
out of it, and soon the balloon is turned into a worthless piece of crap.
|
|
The state tries to cover the holes, since it wants to protect itself.
|
|
People realize that the contents in the balloon is not dangerous for
|
|
themselves, it is only harmful for the state itself. When we have gotten
|
|
rid of the last secret, there will not be possible for the state to spread
|
|
more lies and misinformation.
|
|
The secrets are dangerous for us only when they are secret.
|
|
The state is bad for our health.
|
|
There is nothing called 'the public good'. There are only individuals
|
|
with individual dreams and goals. To sacrifice people, entire nations,
|
|
just because a few members of the government think it is necessary for
|
|
the 'public good' - is wrong. What is good for the 'public' is only good
|
|
for the abstract and aggressive phenomena called the State. It is only
|
|
good for protecting the secrets.
|
|
Hacking is the concrete method of creating the new world order.
|
|
The fact that some slaves of the system describe the computer
|
|
underground in a certain negative way does not mean that they are beholders
|
|
of the truth. They are simply not aware of the real truth. They are
|
|
simply unable to view the situation from the correct angle.
|
|
|
|
However, one does not discuss this view without problems. This file may,
|
|
by some people, be regarded as one that does encourage people to hack,
|
|
which makes it illegal in their eyes.
|
|
Would you like to prosecute me? Be my guest. You may call it a
|
|
criminal act - I prefer to label this 'information'.
|
|
|
|
No more secrets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
If you would like to read more essays related to this subject, check out;
|
|
|
|
Declare War! (UXU-150)
|
|
The Last Frontier (UXU-138)
|
|
Fuck you, SK. (UXU-216)
|
|
|
|
...and especially the excellent file 'Hackers Against the Government's New
|
|
World Order' (UXU-151), written by FreeStyle.
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
|
|
This world rejects me. This world threw me away.
|
|
This world never gave me a chance. THE STASH +46-13-READINDEXFILE
|
|
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
|
|
|
|
Now this world gonna have to pay.
|
|
|
|
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
uXu #242 Underground eXperts United 1995 uXu #242
|
|
Call DIGITAL ANARCHY -> +1-703-758-0950
|
|
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|