241 lines
14 KiB
Plaintext
241 lines
14 KiB
Plaintext
SHORT TALK BULLETIN - Vol.XI April, 1933 No.4
|
||
|
||
THE RITE OF DISCALCEATION
|
||
|
||
by: Unknown
|
||
|
||
A candidate for initiation into a Masonic Lodge often finds odd those
|
||
requirements which he must fulfill in order to do as have all good
|
||
brothers and fellows who have gone this way before. Indeed, that
|
||
preparation often remains a puzzle to him, since the ritualistic
|
||
explanation is only partial. Not only does the newly made brother,
|
||
bewildered by the new world into which he is thrust, investigate
|
||
further to ascertain if all was told him which might have been; to
|
||
learn a still further meaning to the ceremony and symbol which the
|
||
passage in Ruth purports to make plain.
|
||
Those who read the fourth chapter of the immortal Book of Ruth will
|
||
note especially the seventh and eight verses:
|
||
“Now this was the manner in former times in Israel concerning
|
||
redeeming and concerning changing, for to confirm all things; a man
|
||
plucked off his shoe, and gave it to his neighbor; and this was a
|
||
testimony in Israel.
|
||
“Therefore the kinsman said unto Boaz, Buy it for Thee. So he drew
|
||
off his shoe.”
|
||
“Redeeming” here means the taking back or recovery of land or
|
||
property pledged for a debt;
|
||
“changing” refers to the transfer of ownership. As both were then,
|
||
as now, matters of importance, it is evident that the plucking off of
|
||
the shoe, as a pledge of honor and fair dealing, was of equal
|
||
importance, comparable with our swearing to our signatures to
|
||
documents before a Notary Public,
|
||
Note that “to confirm all things a man plucked off his shoe. . .” not
|
||
his “Shoes.”
|
||
Taking off one and handing it to him with whom a covenant was made
|
||
was a symbol of sincerity.Removing “both” shoes signified quite
|
||
another thought.
|
||
These are separate and distinct symbols - in Freemasonry both are
|
||
used - and it is wise to distinguish between the two, not to miss the
|
||
beautiful implications of entering that place which is holy with both
|
||
feet bare.
|
||
The Rite of Discalceation - from the Latin, “discalceatus,” meaning
|
||
“unshod” - is world wide. Freemasonry’s ritual of the entered
|
||
Apprentice Degree refers to the passage in Ruth. In the Master’s
|
||
Degree the reference is not verbal but an act which differs in
|
||
meaning from that in the first degree.
|
||
In all probability Freemasonry takes this symbol from other sources
|
||
than the Old Testament; obviously any system of teaching which is the
|
||
result of the coming together of a thousand faiths, philosophies,
|
||
rites, religions, guilds and associations, must have received so
|
||
common a symbol from more than one source, although the Great Light
|
||
does contain it. In the Old Testament are several passages which
|
||
make removal of shoes quite a different gesture than that described
|
||
in the passage from Ruth.
|
||
Exodus (III:5) states: “Draw not nigh hither; put off thy shoes off
|
||
thy feet, for the place whereon thou standest is holy ground.”
|
||
In Joshua (V:15) we find: “And the Captain of the Lord’s Host said
|
||
unto Joshua, Loose thy shoe from off thy foot; for the place whereon
|
||
thou standest is holy.”
|
||
Ecclesiastes (V:1) reads: “Keep thy foot when thou goest to the
|
||
house of God.”
|
||
The association of the removal of footwear when treading holy ground
|
||
is a fairly obvious symbol. Sandals or other footgear were used to
|
||
protect, not the ground, but the feet, both from injury and from
|
||
filth. To wear such protections in holy places, by inference stated
|
||
that the holy place was harmful to feet, or was dirty! It is similar
|
||
in thought-content to the world wide custom of men removing the hat
|
||
in church. The Knight removed his helmet in the presence of those he
|
||
did not fear. He was safe in church; the removal of his protection
|
||
against a blow was his acknowledgment that in a sanctuary not even an
|
||
enemy would assail him.
|
||
We know the custom was wide spread, not confined to Israel; from many
|
||
sources. Thus, Pythagoras instructed his disciples to “offer
|
||
sacrifices with thy shoes off.” In all the eastern religious
|
||
edifices the worshipper removes his shoes in order not to defile the
|
||
temple with that which touches the profane earth. Maimonides,
|
||
expounder of ancient Jewish law, says: “It was not lawful for a man
|
||
to come into the mountain of God’s home with his shoes on his feet,
|
||
or with his staff, or in his working garments, or with dust on his
|
||
feet.” The custom was found in Ethiopia, ancient Peru, the England
|
||
of the Druids. Adam Clark thought the custom so general in the
|
||
nations of antiquity that he quoted it as one of the thirteen proofs
|
||
that the whole human race descended from one family.
|
||
The Rite of discalceation becomes the more beautiful as we progress
|
||
through the degrees. At first it is only a voluntary testimony of
|
||
sincere and truthful intentions; later it is an act of humility,
|
||
signifying that he who removes his shoes knows that he enters that
|
||
which must not be defiled by anything unworthy.
|
||
The word “humility” must be strictly construed that it be not
|
||
confused with its derivative, “humiliation.”
|
||
He who is “humble” but acknowledges supremacy in another, or the
|
||
greatness of a power or principle; he who is “humiliated” is made to
|
||
feel unworthy, not in reverence to that which is greater than he, but
|
||
for the personal aggrandizement of the humiliator. A man removes his
|
||
hat upon entering a home, in the presence of women, or in a church,
|
||
not as a symbol of humility, but of reverence. The worshipper
|
||
removes his shoes on entering a holy place for the same reason.. He
|
||
who walks “neither barefoot nor shod” offers mute testimony - even
|
||
though, as yet uninstructed, he knows it not - that he is sincere.
|
||
Who walks with both feet bare, signifies that he treads upon that
|
||
which is hallowed.
|
||
Freemasonry does not stress in words this meaning of the Rite of
|
||
Discalceation for very good reasons; throughout our system the
|
||
explanation of our rites concerns always the simplest aspect. The
|
||
fathers of our ritual were far too wise in the ways of the hearts of
|
||
men to teach the abstruse first, and go then to the east. Rather did
|
||
they begin with that which is elementary; then, very often , our
|
||
ritual leaves the initiate to search further for himself, if he will.
|
||
It is Freemasonry’s recognition that man values most that for which
|
||
he has to labor.
|
||
But it is the less stressed meaning of the Rite which is of the
|
||
greater importance. He is the better Freemason and the happier who
|
||
digs for himself in the “rubbish of the Temple” to uncover that which
|
||
is gloriously buried there.
|
||
Is proof necessary, that behind the tiled door of any open Lodge is a
|
||
holy place? here it is!
|
||
Freemasons teach that the Great Light is “dedicated to God, as the
|
||
inestimable gift of God to men for the rule and guide of his faith .
|
||
. .”
|
||
In the Great Light we read (Matthew XVIII:20) “For where two or three
|
||
are gathered together in my name, there I am in the midst of them.”
|
||
Every Masonic Lodge is opened and closed in the name of God.
|
||
According to his promise, therefore, no Lodge meets without the Great
|
||
Architect being “in the midst of them.”
|
||
Consequently, the Lodge is Holy Ground.
|
||
This being so, it may well be asked why all Freemasons do to remove
|
||
their shoes when entering Lodge?
|
||
“Once a Freemason, always a Freemason.” No Lodge member is required
|
||
to repeat the obligations he once assumed, on every occasion at which
|
||
he is present when a degree is being conferred. But it is well
|
||
understood that the obligation is binding upon him for life. Every
|
||
time he follows the old, old words in his mind, he re-obligates
|
||
himself. Whenever he sees a candidate initiated, consciously or
|
||
unconsciously he himself is again initiated. Having once been taught
|
||
that a candidate is prepared in a certain way because of a certain
|
||
meaning in that preparation, it is unnecessary to inconvenience him
|
||
every time he comes to Lodge. If he is again so prepared, in his
|
||
heart, he fulfills all the outward requirements.
|
||
While the promise and the fulfillment “makes” the Lodge holy ground,
|
||
it is “kept” holy only if those who form it and conduct it, so revere
|
||
it. Stone Masons erect a Temple to God, ministers dedicate it and
|
||
worshippers consecrate it; but a desecrating hand, as in war, may
|
||
unroof it, use it as a stables, or make of it a shambles.
|
||
Mackey beautifully put the thought of the consecration holiness of a
|
||
lodge:
|
||
“The Rite of Discalceation is a symbol of reverence. It signifies,
|
||
in the language of symbolism, that the spot which is about to be
|
||
approached in this humble and reverential manner is consecrated to
|
||
some holy purpose. Of all the degrees of Freemasonry, the third
|
||
degree is the most important and sublime. The solemn lessons which
|
||
it teaches, the sacred scene which it represents, and the impressive
|
||
ceremonies with which it is conducted, are all calculated to inspire
|
||
the mind with feelings of awe and reverence.
|
||
Into the holy of holies of the Temple, when the Ark of the Covenant
|
||
had been deposited in its appropriate place, and the Shekinah was
|
||
hovering over it, the high priest alone, and on only one day in the
|
||
whole year, was permitted, after the most careful purification, to
|
||
enter with bare feet and to pronounce, with fearful veneration, the
|
||
tetragammaton or omnific word.
|
||
“And into the Master Mason’s Lodge - this holy of holies of the
|
||
Masonic Temple, where the solemn truths of death and immortality are
|
||
inculcated - the aspirant on entering should purify his heart from
|
||
every contamination, and remember, with a due sense of their symbolic
|
||
application, those words that once broke upon the astonished ears of
|
||
the old patriarch: ‘Put off thy shoes from off thy feet, for the
|
||
place whereon thou standest is holy ground.’”
|
||
Holiness is not a thing, but an idea. So far as we know, the beasts
|
||
of the field reverence no place as holy, for they have no
|
||
consciousness of God. The sacred words of the Great Light are holy
|
||
to us for what they teach and mean; because of whence they came. The
|
||
paper, the leather and the ink which form a Bible are no more holy
|
||
than the same materials formed into a telephone directory. The
|
||
stones of which a church is built, the wood from which the pulpit is
|
||
carved, the metal from which the cross is made are only the familiar
|
||
stones, trees and minerals used by men for a thousand purposes. The
|
||
cotton and the dye which form the Star and Stripes are but the fruit
|
||
of plants.
|
||
Book, Temple and Flag are holy to us because of our reverence for the
|
||
ideas for which they stand. They are holy to us because we make them
|
||
holy, keep them holy, think of them as holy and cherish them as holy.
|
||
So must it be with our Lodges. What is a Lodge? A certain number of
|
||
brethren; a charter or warrant; the Three Great Lights - and an
|
||
underlying idea, a faith, a belief, a Mystic Tie never seen of men
|
||
but the stronger for its intangibility. To many the Lodge is the
|
||
room in the Temple in which brethren meet; walls of stone or wood or
|
||
plaster; floor of carpet or linoleum; some seats; an Altar . . .and
|
||
yet, by common consent of all who believe in the power of the spirit
|
||
which consecrates when the Lodge is formed, holy because of what it
|
||
means.
|
||
The worshipper in eastern lands removes his shoes before he enters
|
||
his temple as a symbol that he knows his flesh needs no protection
|
||
from that which it will there touch; a symbol that he brings not
|
||
within its precincts any filth which might defile it.
|
||
The Master Mason, symbolically removing his shoes before entering his
|
||
Lodge, knows that here he will find that holiness which is in the
|
||
promise of God unto David, the holiness of the Book on the Altar, the
|
||
very presence of the Great Architect, through whom the Lodge receives
|
||
the greatest of His Blessing to man - friendship. But also does he
|
||
symbolically remove his shoes that he may carry nothing “of mineral
|
||
or metallic nature” (earth is mineral) into the Lodge to defile it,
|
||
Men can - and some do - defile their Lodges. He who brings within
|
||
evil or contentious thoughts of his brethren, defiles it. In more
|
||
than one Jurisdiction in the world the brethren are asked at every
|
||
meeting if there be any not at peace with their brethren. If such
|
||
there are, they are required to retire and return not, until their
|
||
differences are reconciled, literally carrying out the instructions:
|
||
“Therefore if thou brings thy gift to the Altar, and there
|
||
rememberest that thy brother hath ought against thee;
|
||
“Leave there thy gift before the Altar, and go thy way; first be
|
||
reconciled to thy brother, and then come offer thy gift.: (Matthew
|
||
V:23-24)
|
||
The Mason who comes to Lodge to get something from it, rather than to
|
||
give something to it, may defile it by that selfish attitude. Men
|
||
get from Freemasonry by giving.
|
||
He who brings pride of place and power to his Lodge, and serves only
|
||
for the empty honor of title or jewel, defiles that which is holy as
|
||
surely as did those money changers whom the Great Teacher drove from
|
||
the Temple.
|
||
He who assumes to work in his Lodge, but labors carelessly, in a
|
||
slovenly manner, to the desecration of ceremonies ancient when his
|
||
ancestors were not yet born, defiles his Lodge by his tacit
|
||
assumptions that his convenience is of greater importance than the
|
||
teachings of Freemasonry.
|
||
Alas, that so many symbolically wear shoes in the holy place, by the
|
||
simple process of thinking little of it, attending it seldom,
|
||
regarding it but as a club or association of men who meet together to
|
||
pass the time away! Such brethren may indeed have been entered,
|
||
passed and raised; but, uninspired, uninterested and unhelped, they
|
||
leave, seldom or never to return. To such as these the Lodge cannot
|
||
be holy; therefore charitable thought would argue that their failures
|
||
cannot defile.
|
||
Luckily for us all, the majority of Freemasons who are constant
|
||
attendants at Lodge - the brethren who do the work, carry the load,
|
||
attend to the charity, form the committees, put on the degrees, go on
|
||
foot and out of their way to help, aid and assist - the brethren, in
|
||
other words, who work for and are content with a Master’s Wages -
|
||
these “do” keep the Lodge holy; these “do” think of the Three Great
|
||
Lights upon the Altar as the Sanctum Sanctorum; these “do,” indeed,
|
||
put off their shoes from off their feet, in humble and thankful
|
||
knowledge that the place in which they stand in holy ground.
|
||
|
||
|