113 lines
6.8 KiB
Plaintext
113 lines
6.8 KiB
Plaintext
SHORT TALK BULLETIN - Vol.IX January, 1931 No.1
|
||
|
||
THE PAST MASTER
|
||
|
||
by: Unknown
|
||
|
||
Fortunate the lodge which has many; poor that body of Masonry in
|
||
which Past Masters have lost the interest with which they once
|
||
presided in the East!
|
||
The honorable station of Past Master is usually honored by the
|
||
brethren; generally it is considered as second in importance only to
|
||
that of the presiding Master. And he is a wise and good Master who
|
||
sees to it that the brethren of his lodge understand that “Past
|
||
Master” is no empty title, but carries with it certain rights and
|
||
privileges, certain duties and responsibilities, all set forth in the
|
||
general body of Masonic Law, although differing in some respects in
|
||
different Jurisdictions; certain unwritten attributes which become
|
||
more or less important according to the character and abilities of
|
||
the individual Past Master.
|
||
It has been well settled in this country, as it is in England, that a
|
||
Past Master has no inherent, inviolable right of membership in the
|
||
Grand Lodge, such as is possessed by the Master of a lodge. But in
|
||
many American Jurisdictions, by action of the Grand Lodge, Past
|
||
Masters are members of the Grand Lodge (in Nevada, all Master Masons
|
||
are members of the Grand Lodge, but only the three principal officers
|
||
and one among all the Past Masters of a particular lodge are
|
||
considered voting members of Grand Lodge). In some Jurisdictions
|
||
they are full voting members; in others they have but a fraction of a
|
||
vote, all the Past Masters of a lodge having one vote between them on
|
||
any Grand Lodge question to be decided by a vote by lodges. Whether
|
||
full voting members of Grand Lodge, or members with but a fraction of
|
||
a votes, they are such by action of their own Grand Lodge, and not by
|
||
inherent right.
|
||
Before the formation of the Mother Grand Lodge in England in 1717,
|
||
when General Assemblies of Masons were held, Past Masters were as
|
||
much a part of that body as the members of the Craft. But the Old
|
||
Constitutions of the Mother Grand Lodge did not recognize Past
|
||
Masters as members of the Grand Lodge. Dermott’s “Ahiman Rezon” of
|
||
1778, quoting Anderson’s edition of the “Old and New Regulations”
|
||
says: “Past Masters of Warranted Lodges on record are allowed this
|
||
privilege (membership in Grand Lodge) while they continue to be
|
||
members of any regular lodge.” But his previous edition of this same
|
||
work does not contain this statement, and Preston refers to the Grand
|
||
Lodge, at the laying of the corner stone of Covent Garden Theater, in
|
||
London, by the Prince of Wales as Grand Master, in these words: “The
|
||
Grand Lodge was opened by Charles March, Esq., attended by the
|
||
Masters and Wardens of all the regular lodges;” he does not mention
|
||
Past Masters as a part of the Grand Lodge.
|
||
These Past Masters, or course, have long since gone the way of all
|
||
flesh; Past Masters who are now members of Grand Lodges are made so
|
||
by the action of those Grand Lodges, and not by any inherent right.
|
||
But the very fact that a Past Master “May” receive such recognition
|
||
at the hands of his Grand Lodge, which ordinarily would not be given
|
||
to brethren not Past Masters (except Wardens), must be considered as
|
||
one of the rights and privileges of a Past Master.
|
||
Past Masters are said by Mackey to possess the right to preside over
|
||
their lodges, in the absence of the Master, and on the invitation of
|
||
the Senior Warden, or in his absence, the Junior Warden.
|
||
According to the ancient laws of Masonry, which gives a Master very
|
||
large powers, any Master Mason may be called to the Chair by a
|
||
Master. Here the question is as to who may be called to the Chair by
|
||
a warden, who has congregated the lodge in the absence of the Master.
|
||
The great Masonic jurist gives unqualified endorsement to the idea
|
||
that then only a Warden, or Past Master with the consent of the
|
||
presiding Warden can preside over a lodge, and counts this as among
|
||
the rights of a Past Master. However true this may be in this
|
||
specific case, the practice and the law in many Jurisdictions gives
|
||
to the Master the right to put any brother in the Chair for the time
|
||
being, remaining, of course, responsible for the acts of his
|
||
temporary appointee, and for the acts of his lodge during such
|
||
incumbency.
|
||
It may be considered a moot question as to just when a Master becomes
|
||
a Past Master. He is installed as Master “until your successor be
|
||
regularly elected and installed.” From this point of view the Master
|
||
is Master until his successor has been made Master by installation;
|
||
in other words, the right to install his successor is inherent in the
|
||
office of Master, and not Past Master. Under the law of Masonry,
|
||
however, for this purpose Masters and Past Masters are identical; the
|
||
Master really becomes a Past Master when, after election he “passes
|
||
the Chair” in an emergent Lodge of Past Masters, or when, as a
|
||
virtual Past Master, made so in a Chapter, he is elected Master of
|
||
his lodge. In those few American Jurisdictions in which the elected
|
||
Master is not required to receive the Past Master’s Degree, prior to
|
||
installation, a Master does not become a Past Master until his
|
||
successor is installed.
|
||
The right to install his successor is inherent; the privilege of
|
||
delegating that duty to another is within the power of any Worshipful
|
||
Master (Courtesy would indicate that the desires of the Senior Warden
|
||
be considered for installing officer, as well as the date for the
|
||
installation). He should not delegate the installing power to any
|
||
brother who has not himself been installed, in order that the
|
||
succession of the Oriental Chair be unbroken, from regularly
|
||
installed Master to Master-Elect, regularly to be installed.
|
||
Therefore, in most Jurisdictions, the installation power which is the
|
||
right of the Master, may be considered also a privilege of Past
|
||
Masters.
|
||
A very important right of all Past Masters is that of being elected
|
||
to the office of Master, without again serving as Warden. Perhaps no
|
||
regulation is more jealously guarded by Grand Lodges than this, which
|
||
dates in print from 1722 (Old Charges), that no Mason may be elected,
|
||
or installed as Master who has not been regularly elected, installed
|
||
and served as Warden. There are exceptions; when a new lodge is
|
||
constituted, a brother who has not been regularly elected, installed
|
||
and served as a Warden may be elected and installed as Master (In
|
||
Nevada it is permissible for any Master Mason to be elected and
|
||
installed as Worshipful Master); when no Wardens in a lodge will
|
||
accept election to the East, a brother may be elected from the floor,
|
||
provided a dispensation is secured from the Grand Master. A Past
|
||
Master may be elected Master of a lodge (whether the lodge over which
|
||
he once presided or another is immaterial) without dispensation.
|
||
|
||
|