873 lines
40 KiB
Plaintext
873 lines
40 KiB
Plaintext
|
||
|
||
Computer underground Digest Wed Mar 29, 1995 Volume 7 : Issue 27
|
||
ISSN 1004-042X
|
||
|
||
Editors: Jim Thomas and Gordon Meyer (TK0JUT2@NIU.BITNET)
|
||
Archivist: Brendan Kehoe
|
||
Semi-retiring Shadow Archivist: Stanton McCandlish
|
||
Intelligent Agent: David Smith
|
||
Shadow-Archivists: Dan Carosone / Paul Southworth
|
||
Ralph Sims / Jyrki Kuoppala
|
||
Ian Dickinson
|
||
Monster Editor: Loch Nesshrdlu
|
||
|
||
CONTENTS, #7.27 (Wed, Mar 29, 1995)
|
||
|
||
File 1--Full text of the Open Meeting in Cyberspace Conference.
|
||
File 2--CLINTON ADMIN ANNOUNCES A NAT'L ELECTRONIC OPEN MEETING (fwd)
|
||
File 3--Cu Digest Header Info (unchanged since 19 Mar, 1995)
|
||
|
||
CuD ADMINISTRATIVE, EDITORIAL, AND SUBSCRIPTION INFORMATION APPEARS IN
|
||
THE CONCLUDING FILE AT THE END OF EACH ISSUE.
|
||
|
||
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 1995 00:30:42 -0500 (CDT)
|
||
From: David Smith <bladex@BGA.COM>
|
||
File 1--Full text of the Open Meeting in Cyberspace Conference.
|
||
|
||
Board of Directors, CTCLU * April 29th -- Eyore's Birthday party
|
||
|
||
---------- Forwarded message ----------
|
||
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 95 01:25:29 EDT
|
||
From: Info Open Meeting Conference <info@meeting.fedworld.gov>
|
||
|
||
PEOPLE AND THEIR GOVERNMENTS IN THE INFORMATION AGE
|
||
|
||
NATIONAL ELECTRONIC OPEN MEETING
|
||
MAY 1-14, 1995
|
||
|
||
DETAILED INFORMATION
|
||
AND PRELIMINARY AGENDA
|
||
|
||
|
||
PREFACE: The descriptions of the five topics found below
|
||
constitutes a preliminary agenda for the Electronic Open Meeting.
|
||
The substantive contents of this posting will not change
|
||
significantly prior to the open meeting, however, as the
|
||
subtopics may evolve from discussions with selected hosts, we
|
||
reserve the right to amend this posting as necessary.
|
||
|
||
SUMMARY: The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) seeks
|
||
comments from all interested parties on the topic of the
|
||
respective roles of the Federal government, State, local, and
|
||
Tribal governments, industry, the public interest and library
|
||
communities, academia, and the general public in creating an
|
||
electronic government. This notice is part of the work of the
|
||
Information Policy Committee of the Information Infrastructure
|
||
Task Force. To facilitate public input, OMB, along with the
|
||
Commerce Department's National Technical Information Service
|
||
(NTIS) and National Telecommunications and Information
|
||
Administration (NTIA), the National Performance Review (NPR), and
|
||
assistance from the US Government Printing Office, will host a
|
||
nationwide electronic open meeting to discuss a number of
|
||
questions related to this topic.
|
||
|
||
DATES: An electronic open meeting will be held from May 1 to 14,
|
||
1995. Those who wish to may submit written comments no later
|
||
than May 31, 1995.
|
||
|
||
ELECTRONIC AVAILABILITY AND ELECTRONIC OPEN MEETING: General:
|
||
This document, along with the other documents referenced herein,
|
||
are available by any HTML viewer, such as Mosaic or Netscape,
|
||
at: URL:http://meeting.fedworld.gov, or via FTP from
|
||
meeting.fedworld.gov
|
||
|
||
For those with electronic mail access who wish to find out more
|
||
about the open meeting, send a blank electronic mail message to:
|
||
info@meeting.fedworld.gov This will result in delivery of a more
|
||
detailed description of the electronic open meeting.
|
||
|
||
Public Access Sites: A primary goal of the meeting is to enable
|
||
as many Americans as possible to participate. This includes
|
||
people who do not have a computer with a modem, or access to the
|
||
Internet. In order to permit their participation, a number of
|
||
"Public Access Sites" have been established. To either locate
|
||
the nearest Public Access Site, or to order a list of all Public
|
||
Access Sites, call the GPO Access Support Team at (202) 512-1530.
|
||
|
||
|
||
In addition, through May 1, 1995 we will continue to solicit
|
||
institutions interested in serving as Public Access Sites. The
|
||
following criteria will apply to an institution interested in
|
||
serving as a Public Access Site:
|
||
|
||
* Willingness and ability to make computer facilities
|
||
available, free-of-charge, to the general public on a
|
||
full-or part-time basis throughout the two-week meeting, and
|
||
|
||
to provide logistical and technical support to the public.
|
||
|
||
* Ability to access Internet e-mail, newsgroups, or the
|
||
World Wide Web. Public Access Sites should not use Telnet
|
||
to access the FedWorld bulletin board. Because the number
|
||
of access ports at FedWorld is finite, FedWorld prefers to
|
||
reserve dial-in and Telnet capacity for individuals who seek
|
||
|
||
to use the FedWorld BBS as their primary means of
|
||
participating.
|
||
|
||
* Willingness and ability to publicize your institution's
|
||
participation as a Public Access Site to the local media and
|
||
|
||
community, and answer local public and press questions about
|
||
|
||
participation.
|
||
|
||
* Willingness to be listed in a national directory of Public
|
||
|
||
Access Sites that will be made available to the public and
|
||
press, before and during the meeting.
|
||
|
||
If your institution would like to serve as a Public Access Site,
|
||
please do one of the following:
|
||
|
||
Point your World Wide Web browser to:
|
||
|
||
http://meeting.fedworld.gov
|
||
|
||
Or, send a blank e-mail message to:
|
||
|
||
pas-info@meeting.fedworld.gov
|
||
|
||
In response to your e-mail, you will receive an automated
|
||
response detailing how to register as a Public Access Site. If
|
||
you do not presently have e-mail, newsgroup, or World Wide Web
|
||
capability but plan on having such capability by the time of the
|
||
meeting, you may register as a Public Access Site or receive
|
||
general end user information by calling the GPO Access User
|
||
Support Team at (202) 512-1530.
|
||
|
||
Participation options: It is possible to participate in the
|
||
electronic open meeting in four ways depending upon desired level
|
||
of interaction -- electronic mail of comments, subscription to a
|
||
"Listserv," subscribing to a "Usenet" newsgroup, and accessing
|
||
the open meeting homepage via an HTML viewer, such as "Mosaic" or
|
||
"Netscape".
|
||
|
||
Electronic mail of comments -- This is the easiest way to
|
||
participate in the open meeting. However, interaction will be
|
||
limited. Choosing one of the options below is recommended.
|
||
|
||
Subscribing to a Mailing List -- Subscribing to a mailing
|
||
list allows more interactive participation in the meeting. When
|
||
one subscribes to a mailing list, one receives all the mail
|
||
messages which everyone posts to the mailing list. It is much
|
||
like putting a note on a bulletin board. However, instead of
|
||
having to go to the bulletin board to look for new messages, the
|
||
bulletin board comes to you in the form of electronic mail. For
|
||
help on subscribing to a mailing list please send an e-mail
|
||
message, the body of which contains the single word "help" to:
|
||
join@meeting.fedworld.gov You will receive an e-mail message
|
||
which tells you in detail how to subscribe to a mailing list.
|
||
|
||
Subscribing to a USENET newsgroup -- Subscribing to a
|
||
USENET newsgroup is similar to joining a mailing list. The
|
||
difference is that to subscribe to a USENET newsgroup, one needs
|
||
to have a newsreader configured for his or her own computer. If
|
||
you are familiar with a newsreader on your system, you will be
|
||
able to participate in the newsgroups like any other regular
|
||
newsgroup. The newsgroups have the following names:
|
||
|
||
alt.gov.meeting.services alt.gov.meeting.benefits
|
||
alt.gov.meeting.infoaccs alt.gov.meeting.partdemo
|
||
alt.gov.meeting.techgoal
|
||
|
||
Each of the newsgroups corresponds with one of the five subject
|
||
areas, described in detail below.
|
||
|
||
World Wide Web Access -- Using a World Wide Web browser
|
||
offers the greatest level of interaction for participating in the
|
||
electronic open meeting. Point the browser to:
|
||
URL:http://meeting.fedworld.gov
|
||
The participant will arrive at a user friendly interface from
|
||
where one can search the different newsgroup mailing list
|
||
responses and reply (either anonymously or not) as one deems
|
||
appropriate. The participant will also be able to view
|
||
background documents on-line, and complete a voluntary
|
||
participant survey.
|
||
|
||
Accessing Background Materials On-line -- Any user who has
|
||
access to a file transfer program, such as FTP or Fetch, may
|
||
access the document archive from: meeting.fedworld.gov or may
|
||
view the relevant documents by pointing a Web browser to the open
|
||
meeting homepage URL cited above.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION OR TO SUBMIT WRITTEN COMMENTS CONTACT:
|
||
Lew Oleinick, Information Policy and Technology Branch, Office of
|
||
Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and
|
||
Budget, Room 10236, New Executive Office Building, Washington,
|
||
D.C. 20503. Telephone: (202) 395-4638. E-mail:
|
||
OLEINICK_L@A1.EOP.GOV.
|
||
|
||
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
|
||
|
||
Background
|
||
The world has entered the age of electronic information. We
|
||
are present at the creation of a Global Information
|
||
Infrastructure that will build on what aviation and
|
||
communications have already done to shrink the world into ever
|
||
more interdependent communities. Our U.S. National Information
|
||
Infrastructure (NII) will in many ways be the paradigm upon which
|
||
the global infrastructure is modeled.
|
||
|
||
The NII is a combination of facilities, services, and people
|
||
that will allow all Americans to send and receive information
|
||
when and where they want it at an affordable cost. The NII
|
||
includes the physical facilities used to transmit, store,
|
||
process, and display voice, data, and images. It includes
|
||
software and services, including security services, that will
|
||
integrate and interconnect these physical components through the
|
||
efforts of a wide variety of private sector providers. It
|
||
includes vast quantities of information that exist today in
|
||
government agencies and the valuable information produced every
|
||
day in the private sector. Finally, it includes all Americans,
|
||
but especially the people who create information, develop
|
||
applications, information products and services, construct
|
||
facilities, and train others to tap the NII's potential.
|
||
|
||
While much of the infrastructure already exists, information
|
||
will be so strategic a resource for U.S. competitiveness in the
|
||
21st Century that conscious and deliberate governmental action --
|
||
in concert with industry and the public -- is needed. Of course,
|
||
government is in no position, financially, technically, or
|
||
managerially, to design or build the information highway, or even
|
||
to re-pave it. So the NII will be designed, built and operated
|
||
by the private sector. What then is the government's role?
|
||
|
||
The Federal government should be in step with the change
|
||
from paper to electronic information. The U.S. government is the
|
||
world's largest creator, collector, user, and disseminator of
|
||
information. Sound scientific research, the public health and
|
||
safety, the equitable collection and distribution of tax
|
||
receipts, and the delivery of benefits and services are a few of
|
||
the national priorities that depend on Federal information
|
||
systems. In addition, the unique nature of information in a free
|
||
society -- Jefferson called it "the currency of democracy" --give
|
||
Federal policies special importance.
|
||
|
||
|
||
The government, then, should act as a facilitator and
|
||
catalyst to the development of the NII. It should help create a
|
||
legal and policy framework that allows the information highway to
|
||
develop in a manner consistent with consumer choice, universal
|
||
service, and security and privacy protections. It should also be
|
||
a model user -- creating a government that works better and costs
|
||
less by using technology to improve information dissemination and
|
||
service delivery.
|
||
|
||
For the NII to succeed, it must be built upon a partnership
|
||
of business, labor, academia, the public, and government that is
|
||
committed to deployment of an advanced, rapid, powerful
|
||
infrastructure accessible and accountable to all Americans. The
|
||
Administration has established the Information Infrastructure
|
||
Task Force (IITF) to coordinate the Administration's efforts to
|
||
formulate forward-looking telecommunications and information
|
||
policy. Its goals are set forth in the Agenda for Action,
|
||
published on September 15, 1993.
|
||
|
||
One of the fundamental tenets of the Administration's
|
||
philosophy is that government information is a public asset and a
|
||
valuable national resource. The government should make
|
||
information available to the public on timely and equitable
|
||
terms. It is also necessary to foster the existing diversity of
|
||
information sources, in which the private sector, along with
|
||
State and local governments, libraries, and other entities, are
|
||
significant partners. On the one hand, this means that the
|
||
government should not expend public resources filling needs which
|
||
have already been met by others in the public or private sector.
|
||
On the other, it means that the government should actively
|
||
disseminate its information at the cost of dissemination and not
|
||
attempt to exert copyright-like controls or other restrictive
|
||
practices on government information. These guiding principles
|
||
are set forth in OMB Circular A-130, most recently republished in
|
||
the Federal Register on July 25, 1994. (59 FR 26906).
|
||
|
||
Toward those goals, the recent revisions to the Office of
|
||
Management and Budget Circular A-130 have increasingly focused on
|
||
the exchange of information with the public and the promotion of
|
||
agency investments in technologies that improve service delivery
|
||
to the public. On December 7, 1994, OMB Bulletin 95-01 unveiled
|
||
the Government Information Locator Service (GILS) -- the "virtual
|
||
card catalog" called for in the Agenda for Action. This first
|
||
phase of GILS is a step toward improving the infrastructure for
|
||
information and service delivery to the public.
|
||
|
||
Even before GILS, a number of Federal agencies, such as the
|
||
Department of Commerce's "NTIS FedWorld" and the Government
|
||
Printing Office's "GPO Access" systems, were using dial-up
|
||
electronic bulletin boards and connections to the Internet. The
|
||
GILS initiative then is an effort to stimulate the expanded use
|
||
of electronic access and dissemination practices in a more
|
||
coordinated manner.
|
||
|
||
Beyond GILS, questions arise as to other appropriate courses
|
||
of action for the near and far term. Generally, what are the
|
||
respective roles of the Federal government, State and local
|
||
governments, industry, the public interest and library
|
||
communities, and academia in creating an electronic government?
|
||
More specifically, how can the delivery of services to the public
|
||
be enhanced by electronic means? What services should they be,
|
||
and how can they be delivered cost effectively and within overall
|
||
budgetary constraints? What methods are best suited to further
|
||
disseminate government information to the public, collect
|
||
information from the public, and reduce burden while maximizing
|
||
efficiency? In what ways can the interaction between agencies of
|
||
the Federal government, or between agencies at the Federal, state
|
||
and local levels be improved? How can we best encourage
|
||
partnerships among governmental entities at all levels with
|
||
private sector entities to ensure a diversity of information
|
||
sources, providers and facilitators? Finally, what are the
|
||
priorities? These topics are elucidated further below for
|
||
discussion in the electronic open meeting.
|
||
|
||
Five relevant topic areas have been identified:
|
||
|
||
Services -- from emergency help and health care to business
|
||
licenses,
|
||
|
||
Benefits -- from social security and food stamps to small
|
||
business grants,
|
||
|
||
Information -- from declassified secrets and travel aids to
|
||
satellite weather maps,
|
||
|
||
Participatory Democracy -- ensuring everyone's chance to be
|
||
heard in a democracy,
|
||
|
||
Technology -- how the technical portion of electronic
|
||
government will work.
|
||
|
||
The following sections provide additional information and
|
||
issues for discussion. Participants will provide us with
|
||
comments, questions, and suggestions to particular issues or
|
||
problems.
|
||
|
||
SERVICES: From Emergency Help and Health Care to Business
|
||
Licenses
|
||
|
||
Governments provide a range of services from disaster relief
|
||
and public safety to public education. Already, information
|
||
technology is being used to help deliver these services. Fishing
|
||
licenses are being issued from electronic terminals and
|
||
reservations for a campground in a National Park can be made on-
|
||
line. Governments at all levels are creating electronic systems
|
||
like California's "Info/California" kiosk based service delivery
|
||
that, so far, includes twelve State agencies, two county
|
||
governments and the US Internal Revenue Service. The US Postal
|
||
Service has been a leader in kiosk-based service delivery and
|
||
continues to expand its use of kiosks.
|
||
|
||
In the public safety arena, for years the FBI's National
|
||
Crime Information Center has helped State and local police catch
|
||
fugitives from justice no matter where they attempt to hide. And
|
||
each year the American people and governments at all levels must
|
||
cope with natural disasters -- tornadoes, floods, earthquakes and
|
||
hurricanes. Property is destroyed and, most tragically, lives
|
||
are lost. In times like these how can governments best deliver
|
||
the services that are needed? How can information technology
|
||
assist governments and the public in these times of need?
|
||
|
||
Questions related to services: As electronic delivery systems
|
||
evolve what government services should they provide and where
|
||
should they be located -- in libraries, schools, shopping
|
||
centers, community centers? When are kiosks a good idea? How
|
||
should these services be paid for or funded? What types of
|
||
services would be best provided by using information technology?
|
||
|
||
BENEFITS: From Social Security and Food Stamps to Small Business
|
||
Loans
|
||
|
||
Social Security, Medicaid, Medicare, Aid to Dependent
|
||
Children, and care to disabled veterans are some of the major
|
||
Federal benefits programs. Can governments deliver these
|
||
benefits more quickly and efficiently while maintaining the
|
||
accountability and security of the programs and the dignity of
|
||
the recipients?
|
||
|
||
Each year some $500 billion in cash payments and food
|
||
assistance are provided to needy Americans. Most of these
|
||
entitlements are delivered by checks or vouchers -- paper and
|
||
postage -- while some are directly deposited electronically into
|
||
bank accounts -- no paper, no postage. But, many recipients of
|
||
this form of assistance do not have bank accounts. In these
|
||
instances, how can we take advantage of emerging technologies,
|
||
avoid paper and postage and thus save time and money? An answer
|
||
may be electronic transfer of benefits to a credit card-like
|
||
benefits card. This is actually being done in several states
|
||
right now.
|
||
|
||
Systems using bank-like automated teller machines and retail
|
||
point-of-sale terminals (scanners already installed in many
|
||
grocery stores) are undergoing testing in six states (Iowa,
|
||
Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, Ohio, and Pennsylvania) and
|
||
are planned in thirty-one more. This year Texas goes on-line
|
||
with the nation's largest electronic benefit transfer (EBT)
|
||
system. Elsewhere, eight other southern states are joining
|
||
forces to create the first regional system and every month since
|
||
1993, Maryland's "Independence Card" program has delivered some
|
||
$57 million in food stamps, welfare and child-support benefits to
|
||
170,000 households statewide. No paper, no postage, and no lost
|
||
or stolen checks.
|
||
|
||
Of course, entitlement programs are not the only types of
|
||
government benefits. Also included are small business loans and
|
||
grants for educational projects and agricultural research. For
|
||
example, notices of National Science Foundation grants are
|
||
available on-line. They may be downloaded and printed by the
|
||
applicant at his or her ease. When an application is completed,
|
||
it may be submitted to the National Science Foundation by
|
||
electronic mail. The whole process has been made more efficient
|
||
and user-friendly which ends up saving the tax payers' money.
|
||
|
||
Questions regarding benefits: What do people think about
|
||
the pilot EBT projects in Iowa, Minnesota, New Jersey, New
|
||
Mexico, Ohio, and Pennsylvania? What have people's experiences
|
||
been with the Maryland EBT program? How can governments
|
||
continue to improve the delivery of other benefits? Without
|
||
judging the merits of an individual benefits program, what do
|
||
Americans expect of their governments as technologies evolve?
|
||
Which enabling technologies should we pursue? Are added
|
||
safeguards needed to protect from fraud and abuse or will
|
||
electronic transfer make controls easier?
|
||
|
||
INFORMATION: From Declassified Secrets and Travel Aids to
|
||
Satellite Weather Maps
|
||
|
||
Government agencies at all levels collect, maintain and
|
||
disseminate an incredible array of information. It ranges from
|
||
routine data relating to consumer products to vital weather
|
||
information. It includes layers of regulations that apply to
|
||
small businesses, major corporations or even government agencies
|
||
themselves. We know the information is out there, but how do we
|
||
find it? Until recently, our only option was to write or call
|
||
the agency that had the information. Of course, first we had to
|
||
figure out which agency that was. And then we waited.
|
||
|
||
All of that is changing. In December 1994, the Federal
|
||
Government Information Locator Service (GILS) was launched. As
|
||
it evolves, more and more Federal data will be at our fingertips.
|
||
This locator service is similar to the card catalog at the local
|
||
library, only it is electronic and on-line. GILS allows one to
|
||
search on-line using a specific set of key-words of interest to
|
||
locate appropriate subject matter. For example, suppose one had
|
||
an interest in a major construction project and its effect on
|
||
wildlife habitat. Using GILS, one could locate the various
|
||
environmental impact statements. In addition, one might also
|
||
locate pertinent satellite photographs.
|
||
|
||
Even declassified secrets are available electronically on
|
||
the Department of Energy's OpenNet service. More agencies will
|
||
follow. The National Archives and Records Administration is
|
||
developing a government-wide declassification database.
|
||
|
||
One information source which is quite useful when planning
|
||
to plant or harvest crops, or when planning a day at the beach,
|
||
is the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's (NOAA)
|
||
national weather forecasts. These forecasts are available for
|
||
any city in the United States which has a NOAA weather station.
|
||
At last count, there were over 150 city forecasts available from
|
||
NOAA's on-line computers.
|
||
|
||
For businesses, the Department of Commerce provides a
|
||
bulletin board which contains timely economic information. For
|
||
companies involved in export activities with Mexico and Canada,
|
||
such items as export and import levels for particular product
|
||
categories, such as paper products, from these two countries are
|
||
easily available.
|
||
|
||
For the academic community, the Department of Commerce's
|
||
Bureau of the Census provides a bulletin board containing
|
||
detailed demographic information about our country's citizens.
|
||
For the medical community, the National Institutes of Health
|
||
provide a bibliography of medical and scientific articles which
|
||
allow physicians and scientists to remain up-to-date with the
|
||
latest advances in medicine.
|
||
|
||
Questions regarding information dissemination. What level
|
||
of effort should governments devote to electronic dissemination
|
||
of government information? Are there benefits to the public at
|
||
large or only to relatively sophisticated professional
|
||
researchers, environmentalists, historians, or scientists?
|
||
Should the taxpayers foot the bill for information access or
|
||
should the direct users pay some of the cost? Where should
|
||
access be available--at libraries, schools, community centers, on
|
||
home computers? Which enabling technologies should be pursued?
|
||
|
||
PARTICIPATORY DEMOCRACY: Ensuring Everyone's Chance to be Heard
|
||
in a Democracy
|
||
|
||
What if everyone in the United States were to have instant
|
||
electronic access to their elected, appointed and career
|
||
government officials? Interested parties could participate in
|
||
the drafting of regulations and engage directly in debate on
|
||
government action. While several million Americans have
|
||
electronic mail capability, with a population of more than 250
|
||
million, such access is still relatively limited. More and more
|
||
agencies are advertising that they are now "on-line" and are
|
||
soliciting citizens to contact them at their electronic mail
|
||
address. It is also the case that more and more of our elected
|
||
officials are establishing e-mail addresses or Web sites.
|
||
|
||
There is little dispute that using information technology to
|
||
support government rulemaking can reduce costs for both agencies
|
||
and the public. And, as a practical matter, electronic
|
||
rulemaking is more efficient and can possibly reach a greater
|
||
number of interested parties than by merely publishing in the
|
||
Federal Register, corresponding by mail, talking by telephone and
|
||
traveling to hearings and meetings. This same technology also
|
||
enables interested parties to interact with other interested
|
||
parties, consider and devise new and better ways of doing things,
|
||
all prior to or without governments' involvement. For example,
|
||
the Department of Commerce's National Telecommunication and
|
||
Information Administration recently used electronic rulemaking to
|
||
gather responses to a report on reallocating the Federal radio
|
||
spectrum. The report was placed on-line and was made available
|
||
through an electronic bulletin board system and via the Internet
|
||
by Telnet. Sixty organizations responded to the report. These
|
||
sixty responses were then placed on-line for everyone to see and
|
||
discuss.
|
||
|
||
A related effort is making available to the public the rules
|
||
and regulations they are expected to follow. Also relevant are
|
||
legislative materials and supporting documents, such as
|
||
Congressional committee reports. The ultimate issue is how we
|
||
can make it possible, more practical, and more attractive for
|
||
Americans to participate in government at all levels.
|
||
|
||
Questions regarding participatory democracy. As more of us
|
||
utilize information technology to participate in governmental
|
||
processes will the volume become overwhelming? How do we balance
|
||
the level of involvement with expectations and governments'
|
||
ability to deliver? Is there a broad interest from the public to
|
||
participate, or would tax dollars be better spent elsewhere?
|
||
What are the best strategies for seeing that citizens have access
|
||
to the rules, regulations and related information needed to
|
||
comply with government requirements?
|
||
|
||
TECHNOLOGY: How the Information Infrastructure of Electronic
|
||
Government Will Work
|
||
|
||
We are in an era of technological upheaval--the information
|
||
age. The advances in information technologies of all types have
|
||
caused businesses to rethink the way they operate and governments
|
||
to reinvent the way they do business. The future look of
|
||
governments is what this electronic meeting is all about. How
|
||
will governments work, individually and together, for Americans.
|
||
|
||
In the other topical discussion areas, we are talking about
|
||
what electronic governments will do and generally how they will
|
||
do it. Here, it is more what they will do it with--the
|
||
technological tools to accomplish the tasks of governing.
|
||
|
||
The Information Infrastructure Task Force, a Federal
|
||
government body, along with the Information Infrastructure
|
||
Advisory Council, made up of representatives of State and local
|
||
governments, industry, and academia, are also looking at the face
|
||
of future governments. They are looking at issues such as the
|
||
need for telecommunications reform, security matters, privacy,
|
||
reliability and vulnerability, intellectual property rights,
|
||
health issues and the technologies themselves.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Interoperability, the ability to communicate with one
|
||
another, is a critical goal for future governments. Federal,
|
||
State, Tribal and local agencies must be able to interact
|
||
instantly and effectively.
|
||
|
||
Questions regarding the technology of electronic government.
|
||
What will be the role of the Internet or its progeny? What
|
||
criteria should be used for selecting one platform over another?
|
||
Or, should a portfolio of platforms be the goal? Does
|
||
interoperability of governmental systems cause concerns? What if
|
||
some government agencies systems aren't interoperable or they
|
||
can't afford a system at all? Will their citizen customers
|
||
suffer as a result? Will the information they use be as accurate
|
||
and timely as necessary? What about reliability? We know it is
|
||
essential, but won't technological vulnerabilities still exist?
|
||
Will governments become so dependent on the use of advanced
|
||
technologies that they will be unable to function if the system
|
||
fails during an emergency? Are there alternatives?
|
||
|
||
Relevant Information Sources
|
||
|
||
The following documents relevant to the topics to be
|
||
discussed in the electronic open meeting are available
|
||
electronically via anonymous FTP at: meeting.fedworld.gov The
|
||
description of each document is followed by its file designation.
|
||
"Public Information in the National Information
|
||
Infrastructure," Report to the Regulatory Information Service
|
||
Center, General Services Administration, and to the
|
||
Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory
|
||
Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Henry R. Perritt, Jr.,
|
||
Villanova University Law School, September, 1994.
|
||
PERRITT1.TXT
|
||
|
||
"The Electronic Agency and The Traditional Paradigms of
|
||
Administrative Law," Henry R. Perritt, Jr., Administrative Law
|
||
Review, Vol. 44, pp. 79-105, Winter 1992.
|
||
PERRITT2.TXT
|
||
|
||
"Agenda for Access: Public Access to Federal Information for
|
||
Sustainability through the Information Superhighway," The Bauman
|
||
Foundation, Washington, DC, January 1995.
|
||
BAUMAN.TXT
|
||
|
||
"Information Superhighway: Issues Affecting Development," US
|
||
General Accounting Office, Report to the Congress, September,
|
||
1994, Wash., DC, GAO/RCED-94-285
|
||
GAO94285.TXT
|
||
|
||
"Information Superhighway: An Overview of Technology Challenges,"
|
||
US General Accounting Office, Report to the Congress, January,
|
||
1995, Wash., DC, GAO/AIMD-95-23
|
||
|
||
GAO9523.TXT
|
||
|
||
"Executive Guide: Improving Mission Performance Through Strategic
|
||
Information Management and Technology -- Best Practices," US
|
||
General Accounting Office, Comptroller General of the United
|
||
States, May, 1994, Wash., DC, GAO/AIMD-94-115
|
||
BESTPRAC.HTM (only by HTML viewer)
|
||
|
||
"Making Government Work: Electronic Delivery of Federal
|
||
Services," US Congress, Office of Technology Assessment,
|
||
September, 1993, Wash., DC, OTA-TCT-578
|
||
GOVWORK.TXT
|
||
|
||
"Reengineering Through Information Technology: Creating a
|
||
Government That Works Better and Costs Less," National
|
||
Performance Review, Accompanying Report of the National
|
||
Performance Review, Office of Vice President, September, 1993,
|
||
Wash., DC, REENGIN.TXT
|
||
|
||
"Management of Federal Information Resources, Office of
|
||
Management and Budget Circular A-130," 59 Federal Register 37906,
|
||
25 July 1994.
|
||
OMB_A130.TXT
|
||
|
||
"National Information Infrastructure; Draft Principles for
|
||
Providing and Using Personal Information and Commentary; Notice,"
|
||
60 Federal Register 4362, 20 January 1995.
|
||
PRIVPRIN.TXT
|
||
|
||
"The National Information Infrastructure: Agenda for Action,"
|
||
Information Infrastructure Task Force, 15 September 1993.
|
||
AGENDA.TXT
|
||
|
||
"The Information Infrastructure: Reaching Society's Goals,"
|
||
Report of the Information Infrastructure Task Force Committee on
|
||
Applications and Technology, National Institute of Standards and
|
||
Technology, US Department of Commerce, Wash., DC, September,
|
||
1994.
|
||
GOALS.TXT
|
||
|
||
"Protecting Privacy in Computerized Medical Information," US
|
||
Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, September, 1993,
|
||
Wash., DC, OTA-TCT-576
|
||
MEDPRIV.TXT
|
||
|
||
"Putting the Information Infrastructure to Work," Report of the
|
||
Information Infrastructure Task Force Committee on Applications
|
||
and Technology, National Institute of Standards and Technology,
|
||
US Department of Commerce, Wash., DC, May, 1994.
|
||
PUT2WORK.TXT
|
||
|
||
"Breaking the Barriers to the National Information
|
||
Infrastructure," A Conference Report by the Council on
|
||
Competitiveness, Wash., DC, December, 1994.
|
||
BARRIERS.TXT
|
||
|
||
Conclusion
|
||
|
||
After the public meeting and receipt of comments, we will
|
||
analyze the results and prepare a report. The report will
|
||
summarize not only the substantive comments received, but will
|
||
evaluate the success of the meeting in terms of both the level
|
||
of participation experienced and the experience with the
|
||
technologies utilized. Notice of availability of the report will
|
||
be published on-line and in the Federal Register.
|
||
|
||
We hope that the lessons learned from this meeting will be
|
||
extremely useful to future developers of nation-wide electronic
|
||
open meetings. With the understanding that information
|
||
technology has fundamentally altered the ways by which
|
||
governments interact with the public, we acknowledge this meeting
|
||
not only as an end in itself, but also as a basis for a new
|
||
beginning to government.
|
||
|
||
------------------------------
|
||
|
||
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 1995 00:31:39 -0500 (CDT)
|
||
From: David Smith <bladex@BGA.COM>
|
||
File 2--CLINTON ADMIN ANNOUNCES A NAT'L ELECTRONIC OPEN MEETING (fwd)
|
||
|
||
Here is the press release concerning an open meeting about government in
|
||
cyberspace.
|
||
|
||
David Smith * Calendar of way cool Austin e-things:
|
||
bladex@bga.com * April 17th -- Celebrity.Net.Crisis.of.the.month
|
||
President, EFF-Austin * April 18th -- John Henry Faulk conference
|
||
Board of Directors, CTCLU * April 29th -- Eyore's Birthday party
|
||
|
||
---------- Forwarded message ----------
|
||
|
||
Department of Commerce News
|
||
|
||
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: CONTACT: Paige Darden
|
||
March 31, 1995 (202) 482-1551
|
||
|
||
CLINTON ADMINISTRATION ANNOUNCES
|
||
A NATIONAL ELECTRONIC OPEN MEETING
|
||
|
||
Organizations encouraged to serve as Public Access Sites
|
||
|
||
Washington, D.C. -- The Clinton Administration will hold a National
|
||
Electronic Open Meeting to seek public comments on how Federal,
|
||
State, Tribal and local governments should interact with citizens in
|
||
the Information Age. The meeting will begin at 9:00 a.m. (EST) on
|
||
Monday, May 1 and end at midnight on Sunday, May 14, 1995.
|
||
|
||
"Through this national open meeting, we hope to spur public
|
||
discussion and vigorous debate on how government can improve delivery
|
||
of services and benefits, and availability of information; and
|
||
increase citizen participation in our democratic process using
|
||
information technologies," said Secretary of Commerce Ronald H.
|
||
Brown.
|
||
|
||
During the two week meeting, Americans will have the opportunity to
|
||
discuss with experts and other participants five topics relevant to
|
||
"People and Their Governments in the Information Age." The topics
|
||
include: Services--from delivery of emergency help and health care
|
||
to issuing business licenses; Benefits--from delivery of Social
|
||
Security and food stamps to processing small business grants;
|
||
Information--from declassifying secrets to making Census data more
|
||
easily available; Participatory Democracy--from making access to
|
||
government easier to ensuring everyone's opportunity to participate
|
||
in government regulatory and policy-making; and Technology--from
|
||
ensuring compatible electronic systems at the various government
|
||
levels to ensuring system security and reliability. In order to
|
||
participate in the meeting, a person must use a computer with a modem
|
||
or with access to the Internet (World Wide Web, newsgroups, e-mail
|
||
listservs).
|
||
|
||
The Administration is calling on public and private organizations to
|
||
help facilitate participation by the American people who do not have
|
||
access to a computer. "We are asking public and private
|
||
organizations to make their computer facilities available, free of
|
||
charge, throughout the two week meeting," said Secretary Brown. To
|
||
participate as a "Public Access Site," institutions must have the
|
||
abilityto access Internet e-mail, newsgroups or the World Wide Web
|
||
and be willing to help encourage greater public participation by
|
||
publicizing the meeting through local press and outreach activities.
|
||
|
||
Because many organizations have not participated before in a meeting
|
||
held entirely via electronic networks, technical assistance for
|
||
Public Access Sites will be provided by the U.S. Government Printing
|
||
Office (GPO) before and during the meeting by calling (202) 512-1530.
|
||
|
||
Organizations wishing further information about serving as a Public
|
||
Access Site can point their World Wide Web (WWW) browser to
|
||
http://meeting.fedworld.gov or send a blank e-mail message to
|
||
pas-info@meeting.fedworld.gov. Organizations without WWW or e-mail
|
||
capability may call GPO for further information and to register as a
|
||
Public Access Site.
|
||
|
||
In addition, the general public may obtain further information about
|
||
the content and format of the meeting by sending a blank e-mail
|
||
message to info@meeting.fedworld.gov or by calling GPO at (202)
|
||
512-1530. GPO also will make a complete listing of Public Access
|
||
Sites available starting April 16.
|
||
|
||
The meeting is being sponsored by several federal agencies, including
|
||
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), the National
|
||
Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), the
|
||
National Technical Information Service's FedWorld, and the National
|
||
Performance Review (NPR). The sponsoring agencies are participants
|
||
in the Information Infrastructure Task Force (IITF), an interagency
|
||
group formed to articulate and implement the Administration's vision
|
||
for the National Information Infrastructure, and which is chaired by
|
||
Secretary Brown. The GPO is also providing support for the
|
||
meeting.
|
||
|
||
Note to the editor: Members of the media who would like to be
|
||
briefed by the meeting coordinators prior to the conference
|
||
(date/time TBD) should notify Paige Darden, NTIA at (202) 482-1551.
|
||
|
||
------------------------------
|
||
|
||
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 1995 22:51:01 CDT
|
||
From: CuD Moderators <cudigest@sun.soci.niu.edu>
|
||
File 3--Cu Digest Header Info (unchanged since 19 Mar, 1995)
|
||
|
||
Cu-Digest is a weekly electronic journal/newsletter. Subscriptions are
|
||
available at no cost electronically.
|
||
|
||
CuD is available as a Usenet newsgroup: comp.society.cu-digest
|
||
|
||
Or, to subscribe, send a one-line message: SUB CUDIGEST your name
|
||
Send it to LISTSERV@VMD.CSO.UIUC.EDU
|
||
The editors may be contacted by voice (815-753-0303), fax (815-753-6302)
|
||
or U.S. mail at: Jim Thomas, Department of Sociology, NIU, DeKalb, IL
|
||
60115, USA.
|
||
|
||
To UNSUB, send a one-line message: UNSUB <your name>
|
||
Send it to LISTSERV@VMD.CSO.UIUC.EDU
|
||
(NOTE: The address you unsub must correspond to your From: line)
|
||
|
||
Issues of CuD can also be found in the Usenet comp.society.cu-digest
|
||
news group; on CompuServe in DL0 and DL4 of the IBMBBS SIG, DL1 of
|
||
LAWSIG, and DL1 of TELECOM; on GEnie in the PF*NPC RT
|
||
libraries and in the VIRUS/SECURITY library; from America Online in
|
||
the PC Telecom forum under "computing newsletters;"
|
||
On Delphi in the General Discussion database of the Internet SIG;
|
||
on RIPCO BBS (312) 528-5020 (and via Ripco on internet);
|
||
and on Rune Stone BBS (IIRGWHQ) (203) 832-8441.
|
||
CuD is also available via Fidonet File Request from
|
||
1:11/70; unlisted nodes and points welcome.
|
||
|
||
EUROPE: In BELGIUM: Virtual Access BBS: +32-69-844-019 (ringdown)
|
||
In ITALY: Bits against the Empire BBS: +39-464-435189
|
||
In LUXEMBOURG: ComNet BBS: +352-466893
|
||
|
||
UNITED STATES: etext.archive.umich.edu (192.131.22.8) in /pub/CuD/
|
||
ftp.eff.org (192.88.144.4) in /pub/Publications/CuD/
|
||
aql.gatech.edu (128.61.10.53) in /pub/eff/cud/
|
||
world.std.com in /src/wuarchive/doc/EFF/Publications/CuD/
|
||
uceng.uc.edu in /pub/wuarchive/doc/EFF/Publications/CuD/
|
||
wuarchive.wustl.edu in /doc/EFF/Publications/CuD/
|
||
EUROPE: nic.funet.fi in pub/doc/cud/ (Finland)
|
||
ftp.warwick.ac.uk in pub/cud/ (United Kingdom)
|
||
|
||
JAPAN: ftp.glocom.ac.jp /mirror/ftp.eff.org/Publications/CuD
|
||
ftp://www.rcac.tdi.co.jp/pub/mirror/CuD
|
||
|
||
The most recent issues of CuD can be obtained from the
|
||
Cu Digest WWW site at:
|
||
URL: http://www.soci.niu.edu:80/~cudigest
|
||
|
||
COMPUTER UNDERGROUND DIGEST is an open forum dedicated to sharing
|
||
information among computerists and to the presentation and debate of
|
||
diverse views. CuD material may be reprinted for non-profit as long
|
||
as the source is cited. Authors hold a presumptive copyright, and
|
||
they should be contacted for reprint permission. It is assumed that
|
||
non-personal mail to the moderators may be reprinted unless otherwise
|
||
specified. Readers are encouraged to submit reasoned articles
|
||
relating to computer culture and communication. Articles are
|
||
preferred to short responses. Please avoid quoting previous posts
|
||
unless absolutely necessary.
|
||
|
||
DISCLAIMER: The views represented herein do not necessarily represent
|
||
the views of the moderators. Digest contributors assume all
|
||
responsibility for ensuring that articles submitted do not
|
||
violate copyright protections.
|
||
|
||
------------------------------
|
||
|
||
End of Computer Underground Digest #7.27
|
||
************************************
|
||
|