794 lines
33 KiB
Plaintext
794 lines
33 KiB
Plaintext
|
||
|
||
Computer underground Digest Sun May 22 1993 Volume 5 : Issue 38
|
||
ISSN 1004-042X
|
||
|
||
Editors: Jim Thomas and Gordon Meyer (TK0JUT2@NIU.BITNET)
|
||
Archivist: Brendan Kehoe
|
||
Shadow-Archivists: Dan Carosone / Paul Southworth
|
||
Ralph Sims / Jyrki Kuoppala
|
||
Ian Dickinson
|
||
Copy Editor: Etaoin Shrdlu, Senrio
|
||
|
||
CONTENTS, #5.38 (May 22 1993)
|
||
File 1--Here We Go Again - 2600 Magazine Threatened With Lawsuit
|
||
File 2--Obtaining Whitehouse E-Publications
|
||
File 3--UK Computer Misuse case
|
||
File 4--CPSR Position Openings
|
||
File 5--A little feedback on Bridges of Understanding
|
||
|
||
Cu-Digest is a weekly electronic journal/newsletter. Subscriptions are
|
||
available at no cost electronically from tk0jut2@mvs.cso.niu.edu. The
|
||
editors may be contacted by voice (815-753-6430), fax (815-753-6302)
|
||
or U.S. mail at: Jim Thomas, Department of Sociology, NIU, DeKalb, IL
|
||
60115.
|
||
|
||
Issues of CuD can also be found in the Usenet comp.society.cu-digest
|
||
news group; on CompuServe in DL0 and DL4 of the IBMBBS SIG, DL1 of
|
||
LAWSIG, and DL0 and DL12 of TELECOM; on GEnie in the PF*NPC RT
|
||
libraries and in the VIRUS/SECURITY library; from America Online in
|
||
the PC Telecom forum under "computing newsletters;"
|
||
On Delphi in the General Discussion database of the Internet SIG;
|
||
on the PC-EXEC BBS at (414) 789-4210; and on: Rune Stone BBS (IIRG
|
||
WHQ) 203-832-8441 NUP:Conspiracy
|
||
CuD is also available via Fidonet File Request from 1:11/70; unlisted
|
||
nodes and points welcome.
|
||
EUROPE: from the ComNet in Luxembourg BBS (++352) 466893;
|
||
|
||
ANONYMOUS FTP SITES:
|
||
UNITED STATES: ftp.eff.org (192.88.144.4) in /pub/cud
|
||
uglymouse.css.itd.umich.edu (141.211.182.53) in /pub/CuD/cud
|
||
halcyon.com( 202.135.191.2) in /pub/mirror/cud
|
||
AUSTRALIA: ftp.ee.mu.oz.au (128.250.77.2) in /pub/text/CuD.
|
||
EUROPE: nic.funet.fi in pub/doc/cud. (Finland)
|
||
ftp.warwick.ac.uk in pub/cud (United Kingdom)
|
||
|
||
Back issues also may be obtained through mailserver at:
|
||
server@blackwlf.mese.com
|
||
|
||
COMPUTER UNDERGROUND DIGEST is an open forum dedicated to sharing
|
||
information among computerists and to the presentation and debate of
|
||
diverse views. CuD material may be reprinted for non-profit as long
|
||
as the source is cited. Authors hold a presumptive copyright, and
|
||
they should be contacted for reprint permission. It is assumed that
|
||
non-personal mail to the moderators may be reprinted unless otherwise
|
||
specified. Readers are encouraged to submit reasoned articles
|
||
relating to computer culture and communication. Articles are
|
||
preferred to short responses. Please avoid quoting previous posts
|
||
unless absolutely necessary.
|
||
|
||
DISCLAIMER: The views represented herein do not necessarily represent
|
||
the views of the moderators. Digest contributors assume all
|
||
responsibility for ensuring that articles submitted do not
|
||
violate copyright protections.
|
||
|
||
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
Date: Thu, 20 May 1993 21:55:32 EDT
|
||
From: CuD Moderators <cudigest@mindvox.phantom.com>
|
||
Subject: Here We Go Again - 2600 Magazine Threatened With Lawsuit
|
||
|
||
Emmanuel Goldstein, editor of 2600, reports that the magazine is again
|
||
being threatened with litigation by a large teleco, this time AT&T.
|
||
Last year, BellCore threatened legal action (CuD #4.33). Emmanuel
|
||
recently posted the following:
|
||
|
||
+++ begin Emmanuel's message
|
||
|
||
|
||
It looks like 2600 is being threatened with yet ANOTHER lawsuit.
|
||
This time it's AT&T we've apparently annoyed. The following letter
|
||
was just received by us:
|
||
|
||
AT&T
|
||
131 Morristown Road
|
||
Basking Ridge, NJ 07920-1650
|
||
908 204-8413
|
||
FAX 908 204-8537
|
||
|
||
R.A. Ryan
|
||
Trademark and Copyright Attorney
|
||
|
||
April 13, 1993
|
||
|
||
Eric Corley
|
||
P.O. Box 99
|
||
Middle Island
|
||
New York 11953-0099
|
||
|
||
Dear Mr. Corley:
|
||
|
||
I have been informed that the Winter 1992-93 edition of
|
||
your publication 2600 Magazine includes material copied
|
||
from AT&T's Eastern Area Directory.
|
||
|
||
The material copied by you is proprietary to AT&T and
|
||
subject to the protection of state and federal law
|
||
including The Copyright Law of the United States.
|
||
|
||
AT&T will take immediate action to protect its
|
||
proprietary information and its copyrighted property in
|
||
the event you persist with its publication.
|
||
|
||
Very truly yours,
|
||
|
||
R.A. Ryan
|
||
|
||
Recycled Paper
|
||
(end letter and Emmanuel's message)
|
||
|
||
The 2600 article in question is simply 2 3/4 pages (pp 36-38) of
|
||
addresses of AT&T offices. The article's is: "IS AT&T HIDING NEAR
|
||
YOU?" It's introduced with a short blurb:
|
||
|
||
"This is a list of every AT&T office (including switching stations)
|
||
in eight states. The leftmost column is the "work location code"
|
||
which is what the office is known as to AT&T bureaucrats."
|
||
CONNECTICUT CT4630, 92 CHESTNUT ST, BRANDFORD, 06405
|
||
|
||
And so forth for nearly 3 pages. It seems about as proprietary as
|
||
telephone listings, but we're probably mistaken. We're certain that
|
||
AT&T wouldn't stoop to using it's power to harass others for frivolous
|
||
reasons.
|
||
|
||
------------------------------
|
||
|
||
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1993 22:15:15 EST
|
||
From: Dave Banisar <banisar@WASHOFC.CPSR.ORG>
|
||
Subject: Obtaining Whitehouse E-Publications
|
||
|
||
WHITE HOUSE ELECTRONIC PUBLICATIONS AND PUBLIC ACCESS EMAIL
|
||
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
|
||
|
||
Updated April 7, 1993
|
||
|
||
Table Of Contents
|
||
|
||
I. Signing up for Daily Electronic Publications.
|
||
A. Widely Available Sources.
|
||
B. Notes on Widely Available Sources.
|
||
C. Direct Email Distribution
|
||
|
||
II. Searching and Retrieving White House documents.
|
||
- WAIS
|
||
- GOPHER
|
||
- FedWorld BBS
|
||
|
||
III. Sending email to the White House.
|
||
- CompuServe
|
||
- America OnLine
|
||
- MCI
|
||
- Fidonet
|
||
- Internet
|
||
|
||
|
||
I. HOW DO I SIGN UP FOR ELECTRONIC PUBLICATIONS BY THE WHITE HOUSE?
|
||
|
||
The White House Communications office is distributing press releases
|
||
over an experimental system developed during the campaign at the MIT
|
||
Artificial Intelligence Laboratory.
|
||
|
||
You can obtain copies of all the press releases from a wide variety of
|
||
on-line services or discussion groups devoted to either national
|
||
politics in general or President Clinton in particular. These are
|
||
listed in sections I and II.
|
||
|
||
Section Ic explains how you can sign up to receive press releases
|
||
directly from the experimental MIT system by using an automated email
|
||
server. The present system was not designed to handle high levels of
|
||
message traffic. A more powerful system will become available in due
|
||
course, and in the meantime, it would be appreciated if you used this
|
||
service sparingly. One appropriate current use is secondary
|
||
redistribution and archiving. If you use it, you will be carried
|
||
forward when the more powerful system that replaces it.
|
||
|
||
|
||
A. WIDELY AVAILABLE SOURCES
|
||
|
||
|
||
1. On USENET/NETNEWS, electronic publications are found on a variety
|
||
of groups:
|
||
|
||
Direct Distribution
|
||
|
||
alt.politics.clinton
|
||
alt.politics.org.misc
|
||
alt.politics.reform
|
||
alt.politics.usa.misc
|
||
alt.news-media
|
||
alt.activism
|
||
talk.politics.misc
|
||
|
||
Indirect Distribution
|
||
|
||
misc.activism.progressive
|
||
cmu.soc.politics
|
||
assocs.clinton-gore-92
|
||
|
||
2. On CompuServe: GO WHITEHOUSE
|
||
|
||
3. On America Online: keyword WHITEHOUSE or THE WHITEHOUSE or CLINTON
|
||
|
||
4. On The WELL: type whitehouse
|
||
|
||
5. On MCI: type VIEW WHITE HOUSE
|
||
|
||
6. On Fidonet: See Echomail WHITEHOUSE
|
||
|
||
7. On Peacenet or Econet: See pol.govinfo.usa.
|
||
|
||
|
||
B. NOTES ON WIDELY AVAILABLE SOURCES
|
||
|
||
|
||
2. CompuServe's White House Forum (GO WHITEHOUSE) is devoted to
|
||
discussion of the Clinton administration's policies and
|
||
activities. The forum's library consists of news releases and
|
||
twice daily media briefings from the White House Office of
|
||
Media Affairs. CompuServe members can exchange information and
|
||
opinions with each other in the 17 sections in the forum's
|
||
message area. The message board spans a broad range of topics,
|
||
including international and United Nations activities,
|
||
defense, health care, the economy and the deficit, housing and
|
||
urban development, the environment, and education and national
|
||
service.
|
||
|
||
3. On America Online the posts are sent to the White House Forum,
|
||
located in the News & Finance department of the service and
|
||
accessible via keywords "white house" and "clinton." The
|
||
White House Forum on America Online contains the press
|
||
releases from the White House, divided into the categories
|
||
"Press Briefings," "Meetings & Speeches," "Foreign Policy,"
|
||
"The Economy," "Technology," "Health Care," and
|
||
"Appointments." The area features a message board so you can
|
||
discuss the releases with other AOL members, and a searchable
|
||
database for easy retrieval of releases in the topic that
|
||
interests you.
|
||
|
||
4. MCI Mail users can access daily information on the administration's
|
||
|
||
programs provided by the White House through MCI Mail bulletin
|
||
boards. The available boards are: WHITE HOUSE ECONOMIC, WHITE
|
||
HOUSE FOREIGN, WHITE HOUSE SOCIAL, WHITE HOUSE SPEECHES and
|
||
WHITE HOUSE NEWS. A listing of these boards can also be
|
||
obtained by simply typing VIEW WHITE HOUSE at the COMMAND
|
||
prompt.
|
||
|
||
|
||
C. DIRECT EMAIL DISTRIBUTION
|
||
|
||
If you don't have access to the these accounts or if you would prefer
|
||
to receive the releases via email, then the next section details how
|
||
to sign up for this service. The server is not set up to answer
|
||
email letters, comments or requests for specific information. To
|
||
reach this MIT server, send email:
|
||
|
||
To: Clinton-Info@Campaign92.Org
|
||
Subject--Help
|
||
|
||
The server works by reading the subject line of the incoming message
|
||
and taking whatever action that line calls for. If you want to sign up
|
||
to automatically receive press releases, then your subject line would
|
||
begin with the word RECEIVE. You can then specify what kind of
|
||
information you are interested in receiving. The categories of
|
||
information are:
|
||
|
||
ECONOMIC POLICY
|
||
Get releases related to the economy such as budget
|
||
news, technology policy review, etc.
|
||
|
||
|
||
FOREIGN POLICY
|
||
Get releases related to foreign policy such as
|
||
statements on Bosnian airdrop, Haitian refugee status,
|
||
etc.
|
||
|
||
|
||
SOCIAL POLICY
|
||
Get releases related to social issues like National
|
||
Service (Student Loan) program, abortion, welfare
|
||
reform, etc.
|
||
|
||
SPEECHES
|
||
All speeches made by the President and important
|
||
speeches made by other Administration officials.
|
||
|
||
NEWS
|
||
Transcripts of press conferences released by the White
|
||
House Communications office, as well as the
|
||
President's remarks in photo ops and other Q&A
|
||
sessions.
|
||
|
||
ALL All of the above
|
||
|
||
So, if you wanted to sign up to get releases related to the economy
|
||
your email message would look like this:
|
||
|
||
To: Clinton-Info@Campaign92.Org
|
||
Subject--RECEIVE ECONOMY
|
||
|
||
When you send a signup message to the clinton-info server, it sends
|
||
you back a status message letting you know what distribution streams
|
||
you are signed up for. If you ever want to check on what groups you
|
||
are signed up for send the following message:
|
||
|
||
To: Clinton-Info@Campaign92.Org
|
||
Subject--STATUS
|
||
|
||
You can stop receiving email releases by sending a REMOVE message to
|
||
the clinton-info server. The word REMOVE would be followed by whatever
|
||
distribution stream you wanted to drop. If you wanted to stop
|
||
receiving message about the ECONOMY then your mail would look like
|
||
this:
|
||
|
||
To: Clinton-Info@Campaign92.Org Subject--REMOVE ECONOMY
|
||
|
||
You could substitute SOCIAL, FOREIGN, SPEECHES, NEWS or ALL for
|
||
ECONOMY in the above message and you would be dropped from that
|
||
distribution list. If you send the subject line REMOVE ALL, then you
|
||
will be taken off the email distribution system all together and will
|
||
not receive further releases of any kind.
|
||
|
||
You can also ask for help from the automated server. Send an email
|
||
query as follows:
|
||
|
||
To: Clinton-Info@Campaign92.Org
|
||
Subject--HELP
|
||
|
||
The server will respond by sending you a detailed form that will guide
|
||
you through the process of signing up for the various distribution
|
||
streams. As you will quickly discover, there is a automatic form
|
||
processing interface that parallel the quick and easy subject line
|
||
commands discussed here. More detailed help is available by sending
|
||
an email query as follows:
|
||
|
||
To: Clinton-Info@Campaign92.Org
|
||
Subject--Please Help!
|
||
|
||
Finally, if you want to search and retrieve documents, but you do not
|
||
have access to the retrieval methods discussed in section II, you can
|
||
do this via email through the MIT server. You can obtain the WAIS
|
||
query form by sending an email query as follows:
|
||
|
||
To: Clinton-Info@Campaign92.Org
|
||
Subject--WAIS
|
||
|
||
Once you have identified the documents that you want, be careful not
|
||
to request them all at once, because you may be sent a message
|
||
containing all the documents and this message may be too big for some
|
||
mail delivery systems between the email server and you.
|
||
|
||
|
||
II. HOW DO I RETRIEVE WHITE HOUSE PUBLICATIONS FROM INTERNET ARCHIVES?
|
||
|
||
Various sites are archiving the press releases distributed . What follows
|
||
is an
|
||
incomplete list of some of the sites containing the documents that
|
||
have been released to date. This FAQ will be updated to reflect new
|
||
sites as they become known.
|
||
|
||
SITE DIRECTORY
|
||
|
||
1. SUNSITE.UNC.EDU /HOME3/WAIS/WHITE-HOUSE-PAPERS
|
||
2. FTP.CCO.CALTECH.EDU /PUB/BJMCCALL
|
||
3. FTP MARISTB.MARIST.EDU
|
||
4. CPSR.ORG /CPSR/CLINTON
|
||
5. FedWorld BBS 703-321-8020 8-N-1
|
||
|
||
Notes: The following are notes on how to log in and get
|
||
information from the above sites.
|
||
|
||
1. Office FOR Information Technology at University of
|
||
North Carolina Maintains the full collection of White
|
||
House electronic release available for search with WAIS and
|
||
also accessible via Gopher.
|
||
1.a WAIS
|
||
(:source
|
||
:version 3
|
||
:database-name "/home3/wais/White-House-Papers" :ip-
|
||
address "152.2.22.81"
|
||
:ip-name "sunsite.unc.edu"
|
||
:tcp-port 210
|
||
:cost 0.00
|
||
:cost-unit :free
|
||
:maintainer "pjones@sunsite.unc.edu"
|
||
|
||
:description "Server created with WAIS release 8 b5 on
|
||
Feb 27 15:16:16 1993 by pjones@sunsite.unc.edu These are the
|
||
White House Press Briefings and other postings dealing with
|
||
William Jefferson Clinton and Albert Gore as well as members
|
||
of the President's Cabinet and the first lady Hillary Rodham
|
||
Clinton, Chelsea, Socks and others in Washington DC. Dee Dee
|
||
Meyers and George Stephanopoulos. Other good words:
|
||
United States of America, Bill Al Tipper Democrats USA
|
||
US These files are also available via anonymous ftp
|
||
from sunsite.unc.edu The files of type filename used in
|
||
the index were:
|
||
/home3/ftp/pub/academic/political-science/whitehouse-
|
||
papers/1993 ")
|
||
|
||
Folks without WAIS clients or gophers that act as WAIS
|
||
clients may telnet to sunsite.unc.edu and login as swais
|
||
to access this information via WAIS.
|
||
|
||
1.b GOPHER is a distributed menuing system for information access on the
|
||
Internet developed at the University of Minnesota. gophers are
|
||
client-server implementations and various gopher clients are
|
||
available for nearly any computing platform. You may now use
|
||
gopher clients to assess the White House Papers and other
|
||
political information on SunSITE.unc.edu's new gopher server.
|
||
You may also add links from your local gopher server to
|
||
SunSITE for access to the White House Papers.
|
||
|
||
For gopher server keepers and adventurous clients to access
|
||
SunSITE you need only know that we use the standard gopher
|
||
port 70 and that our internet address is SunSITE.unc.edu
|
||
(152.2.22.81). Point there and you'll see the references to
|
||
the Politics areas.
|
||
|
||
For folks without gopher clients but with access to telnet:
|
||
telnet sunsite.unc.edu login: gopher The rest is very straight
|
||
forward. Browsing options end with a directory mark (/),
|
||
searching options end with an question mark (?). There's
|
||
plenty of on-line help available.
|
||
|
||
2. No special instructions.
|
||
|
||
3. The CLINTON@MARIST log files which contain all the official
|
||
administration releases distributed through the MIT servers
|
||
are available via anonymous FTP. These logs contain in
|
||
addition to the official releases, the posts that comprise the
|
||
ongoing discussion conducted by the list subscribers.
|
||
To obtain the logs:
|
||
FTP MARISTB.MARIST.EDU - the logs are in the CLINTON directory
|
||
and are named CLINTON LOG9208 thru CLINTON LOGyymm where yymm
|
||
stands for the current year and month. Problems should be
|
||
directed to my attention: URLS@MARISTC.BITNET or
|
||
URLS@VM.MARIST.EDU.
|
||
Posted by Lee Sakkas - owner, CLINTON@MARIST
|
||
|
||
4. Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility is
|
||
providing all Clinton documents on technology and privacy
|
||
at the CPSR Internet Library, available via
|
||
FTP/WAIS/Gopher at cpsr.org /cpsr/clinton (and in other
|
||
folders as relevant). For email access, send a message
|
||
with the word "help" at the 1st line of text to
|
||
listserv@cpsr.org.
|
||
|
||
5. The FedWorld Computer System, operated by the National Technical
|
||
Information Service, archives White House papers in a traditional BBS
|
||
type file library. Connect to FedWorld by calling (703) 321- 8020.
|
||
No parity, eight data bits and one stop bit (N-8-1). FedWorld
|
||
accommodates baud speeds of up to 9,600. White House papers are
|
||
located in the W-House library of files. To access this library from
|
||
the main FedWorld menu, enter <f s w-house>. Files are named with the
|
||
first four digits being the release month and day (e.g. 0323XXX.txt).
|
||
Some standard abbreviations after the date include:
|
||
|
||
rem - Remarks by the President
|
||
pc - Press Conference transcript
|
||
pr - Press Release
|
||
AM - AM Press Briefing
|
||
PM - PM Press Briefing
|
||
sch - The President's public schedule
|
||
spch- Text of major speeches.
|
||
|
||
These files are saved in ASCII format. Files can be viewed online by
|
||
requesting to download a file and then selecting (L)ist as the
|
||
download protocol. This will display the file a screen at a time.
|
||
White House papers are kept in the above format for up to two months.
|
||
Papers more than two months old are compressed using Pkzip into a
|
||
single file that contains all of the files for that month (e.g.
|
||
0193.zip contains all papers released during January 1993). In
|
||
addition to White Documents, FedWorld also provides a gateway to more
|
||
than 100 government funded BBSs and computer systems.
|
||
|
||
|
||
III. HOW DO I SEND EMAIL TO THE WHITE HOUSE?
|
||
|
||
The White House email system is under construction. This is a new
|
||
project and suffers from all of the problems common to a startup
|
||
operation. The Communications office is currently working on defining
|
||
what this system will do, as well as trying to come up with equipment
|
||
and staffing to make sure that it works. Email messages are
|
||
currently being printed out and responses are being sent out via US
|
||
Mail.
|
||
|
||
Nobody wants this new venture to work more than the staff that has
|
||
devoted so many hours to getting it up and running. But much time and
|
||
effort will be required before the system is truly interactive. In
|
||
the mean time, they will need a little patience from the electronic
|
||
community. If you send a message to the White House, please include a
|
||
US Post office address for replies.
|
||
|
||
You can send email to the following accounts:
|
||
|
||
CompuServe: 75300,3115
|
||
GO: WHITE HOUSE finds White House forum
|
||
|
||
America OnLine: clinton pz
|
||
KEYWORD: WHITEHOUSE finds White House area
|
||
|
||
MCI TO: WHITE HOUSE
|
||
VIEW WHITE HOUSE views bulletin boards
|
||
|
||
Fidonet TO: WHITEHOUSE@1:2613/333
|
||
Echomail: WHITEHOUSE views echomail conference
|
||
|
||
Internet: Clinton-HQ@Campaign92.Org
|
||
75300.3115@CompuServe.Com
|
||
clintonpz@AOL.Com
|
||
|
||
Please send corrections, deletion and additions to this FAQ to:
|
||
|
||
Updates@Clinton92.Org
|
||
|
||
------------------------------
|
||
|
||
Date: Sat, 22 May 93 20:34:33 GMT
|
||
From: david@SWARB.DEMON.CO.UK(David Swarbrick)
|
||
Subject: UK Computer Misuse case
|
||
|
||
==============================================================
|
||
BBS--Just Mooting Legal BBS
|
||
Date--22-05-93 (19:49) Number--5
|
||
From--DAVID SWARBRICK Refer#--NONE
|
||
To--ALL Recvd--NO
|
||
Subj--CMA convictions Conf--(5) Comp Misus
|
||
+----------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
The two co-accused of Paul Bedworth Neil Woods and Karl Strickland,
|
||
are the first to be imprisoned in the UK for offences associated with
|
||
the Computer Misuse Act 1990.
|
||
|
||
At Southwark Crown Court on Friday 21 May 1993, both defendants were
|
||
given six month sentences. They pleaded guilty to an offence of
|
||
conspiring to commit offences under the Computer Misuse Act 1990, and
|
||
of offences under the Telecommunications Act of 1984. The actual
|
||
offences were causing criminal damage (Woods), conspiracy to obtain
|
||
telegraphic services dishonestly, and engaging in the unauthorised
|
||
publication of computer information (I confess the last one is a new
|
||
one on me - perhaps it is under the Data Protection Act?).
|
||
|
||
Woods admitted causing 15,000.00p damage to one computer system, and
|
||
otherwise it is clear that the three gained access to some 'serious'
|
||
computer systems. They also ran up very large bills for some
|
||
organisations such as the Financial Times.
|
||
|
||
The judge accepted that the accused had neither intended to cause
|
||
harm, nor had they profited in any dishonest way.
|
||
|
||
He said 'I have to mark your conduct with prison sentences both to
|
||
penalise you for what you have done and for the losses caused, and to
|
||
deter others who might be similarly tempted.'
|
||
|
||
'If your passion had been cars rather than computers we would have
|
||
called your conduct delinquent, and I don't shrink from the analogy of
|
||
describing what you were doing as intellectual joyriding ... There
|
||
may be people out there who consider hacking to be harmless, but
|
||
hacking is not harmless. Computers now form a central role in our
|
||
lives, containing personal details, financial details, confidential
|
||
matters of companies and government departments and many business
|
||
organisations.
|
||
|
||
Some, providing emergency services, depend on their computers to
|
||
deliver their services. It is essential that the integrity of those
|
||
systems should be protected, and hacking puts that integrity into
|
||
jeopardy'
|
||
|
||
He said he wanted to give a clear signal that hacking would not be
|
||
tolerated.
|
||
|
||
DS Barry Donovan formerly of the computer crimes squad said that
|
||
hacking as an activity had much decreased since the arrests.
|
||
|
||
The co-accused, Paul Bedworth was found not guilty a few weeks ago
|
||
after a three week trial. That trial ended in some confusion for the
|
||
law. Paul Bedworth had admitted all the acts he was accused of, but
|
||
claimed (and had medical evidence to suppor him) that he was addicted
|
||
to hacking and therefore not capable of committing the crime.
|
||
|
||
The judge had in Paul's case, quite properly, told the jury that even
|
||
if established, the defence claim was not capable of being a defence
|
||
under English law, and that in effect therefore the jury could only
|
||
convict him. The jury rejected this and acquitted him. In the UK, no
|
||
one is allowed to enquire as to the inner workings of the jury room,
|
||
but I offer my own speculation. His defence was both insufficient in
|
||
law, and inherently implausible (addicted to your keyboard? No way)
|
||
Another possible explanation (gathered from the woolly realms of
|
||
speculation - and worth no more) is that the prosecution was seen to
|
||
have been bullying Paul, and the jury refused to do the bully's work
|
||
for them.
|
||
|
||
In any event, anyone reading this who hopes to rely upon his defence,
|
||
is advised that a life of innocent virtue is more to be recommended.
|
||
(Source in part Stephen Ward, Independent 22 May
|
||
1993)
|
||
|
||
------------------------------
|
||
|
||
Date: Wed, 19 May 1993 17:28:50 PDT
|
||
From: Nikki Draper <draper@CSLI.STANFORD.EDU>
|
||
Subject: CPSR Position Openings
|
||
|
||
The following jobs are available in the CPSR National Office in Palo
|
||
Alto, California. Please feel free to pass these listings along to
|
||
any interested parties.
|
||
|
||
Nikki Draper
|
||
Assistant to the Director
|
||
|
||
*********************************************************************
|
||
COMPUTER PROFESSIONALS FOR SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
|
||
|
||
MANAGING DIRECTOR
|
||
*********************************************************************
|
||
|
||
The CPSR National Managing Director is responsible for the top-level
|
||
administration and organizational development of
|
||
Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility Inc., a non-profit
|
||
public-interest organization of computer scientists and other
|
||
professionals concerned about the impact of computer technology
|
||
on society. The job is the highest level administrative position
|
||
within the organization and requires extensive autonomous decision-
|
||
making and implementation, along general guidelines of activity
|
||
established by the Board of Directors. The key areas of responsibility
|
||
are the following:
|
||
|
||
% Overall coordination of the national organization, including
|
||
management of relations among the national office staff, program
|
||
office, the Board of Directors, and the chapters.
|
||
|
||
% Oversight for financial management, including bookkeeping,
|
||
approval of expenses, interaction with accounting and payroll
|
||
services, and, in conjunction with the Finance Committee &
|
||
Board Treasurer, preparation of an annual budget and financial
|
||
status reports.
|
||
|
||
% Provide assistance to the Board in its fundraising efforts.
|
||
|
||
% Oversee production of the Annual Report.
|
||
|
||
% Close work with the Board of Directors and its committees in
|
||
the development and execution of long-range plans for
|
||
organizational development.
|
||
|
||
% In conjunction with the Communications Director, supervise
|
||
the planning and staging of the Annual Meeting.
|
||
|
||
% Responsibility for hiring, supervision, and evaluation of
|
||
national office staff.
|
||
|
||
Part-time, 20-25 hours per week $20,000-23,000 plus benefits. One
|
||
year appointment. Participation in meetings demands flexibility in
|
||
scheduling. Occasional travel to national board meetings.Women
|
||
and people of color are encouraged to apply.
|
||
|
||
Send resume plus cover letter by June 8 to CPSR, PO Box 717, Palo
|
||
Alto, CA 94301, (415) 322-3778 or CPSR@csli.stanford.edu
|
||
|
||
*********************************************************************
|
||
COMPUTER PROFESSIONALS FOR SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
|
||
|
||
Database/Office Manager
|
||
*********************************************************************
|
||
|
||
The CPSR Database/Office Manger is responsible for the the
|
||
maintenance and development of CPSR databases as well as the day
|
||
to day administrative operations of Computer Professionals for Social
|
||
Responsibility Inc., a non-profit public-interest organization of
|
||
computer scientists and other professionals concerned about the
|
||
impact of computer technology on society. The job is a critical
|
||
position within the organization. The key areas of responsibility are
|
||
the following:
|
||
|
||
includes accurate data entry, responding to membership queries
|
||
regarding the status of their membership, producing reports from
|
||
the databases as needed
|
||
|
||
% Execute organizational mailings of membership materials,
|
||
including membership renewal letters, new members development
|
||
packages, brochures, event announcements, direct mail fundraising
|
||
appeals, and the quarterly newsletter.
|
||
|
||
% Handle information requests and orders for publications
|
||
|
||
% Collect and process the mail
|
||
|
||
% Deposit checks
|
||
|
||
% Keep inventory of office supplies and order material as needed
|
||
|
||
% Work with Director of Communication to keep inventory of
|
||
educational material and reorder as needed
|
||
|
||
% Assist with board meetings
|
||
|
||
|
||
% Manage institutional memory, including file maintenance
|
||
|
||
% Other tasks as needed
|
||
|
||
Qualifications: Experience with computers - preferably Macs, able
|
||
to prioritize, capable of working with minimal supervision, work
|
||
effectively as part of a team, self motivated, detail oriented,
|
||
experience in dealing with databases and issues surrounding
|
||
database management.
|
||
|
||
Part-time, 25 hours per week, $13,000 - $15,000, plus benefits.
|
||
Women and people of color are encouraged to apply. Send
|
||
resume plus cover letter by June 8 to CPSR, PO Box 717, Palo Alto,
|
||
CA 94301, (415) 322-3778. CPSR@csli.stanford.edu
|
||
|
||
------------------------------
|
||
|
||
Date: Mon, 17 May 93 09:43:41 CDT
|
||
From: larry@DUCKTALES.MED.GE.COM(Larry Landwehr)
|
||
Subject: A little feedback on Bridges of Understanding
|
||
|
||
In CuD 5.36, the CuD moderators wrote in re: "Building Bridges
|
||
of Understanding:"
|
||
|
||
> The obvious question, of course, is: Why should law enforcement
|
||
> personnel bother discussing these issues with an audience that
|
||
> includes "kids," law students, attorneys, professors, computer
|
||
> specialists, and other LE agents? To us, the answer is simple: If the
|
||
> goal is to minimize computer abuse rather than to simply "prosecute,"
|
||
> then open dialogue is a cost-effective and efficient way of
|
||
> educational outreach. It's in everybody's interests for law
|
||
> enforcement personnel to encourage and participate in these dialogues.
|
||
> Kim Clancy moderates the round-table forum with a gentle, but incisive
|
||
> hand. She combines her experiences as a security specialist with her
|
||
> belief in the value of dialogue and information-sharing as an
|
||
> educational tool as a means of building bridges and promoting
|
||
> understanding. We share her view that increased understanding is a
|
||
> significant means of decreasing unacceptable accesses.
|
||
|
||
"educational outreach"?
|
||
"dialogue and information-sharing"?
|
||
|
||
Come on. You have _got_ to be kidding. Or else extremely naive. Are
|
||
you seriously suggesting that someone in management (in a police
|
||
bureaucracy) would seriously back such a nebulous concept? That they
|
||
would put their professional reputations and jobs on the line for so
|
||
something so intangible that you can't even measure it? Get real!
|
||
|
||
Since at least the time of Robert Peal and his "bobbies" in London,
|
||
and probably long before that, law enforcement personnel have used
|
||
informants to manage crime. Stool pigeons, snitches, narks, whatever
|
||
you want to call them, are the most cost effective way of controlling
|
||
crime. Sometimes you get a little spinoff like actually helping
|
||
someone get their life straightened out so they quit their criminal
|
||
activities, but this is pure icing. The reason why law enforcement
|
||
personnel associate with criminals is to make more arrests. That's it
|
||
- pure and simple. Cops are pragmatic.
|
||
|
||
Now that many people in law enforcement are college educated, we start
|
||
to see police organizations with "public relations departments". My
|
||
view is that this is an experiment in social engineering, done for the
|
||
benefit of the liberal members of law enforcement (which are a
|
||
minority) and for the benefit of the media (which is very liberal).
|
||
The conservative members of law enforcement go along with these
|
||
programs because they originate in upper management and because
|
||
conservatives are pragmatic and cynical enough to subvert these
|
||
programs and use them as a cover to spread their nets for more
|
||
informants.
|
||
|
||
Anyone who engages in illegal activity had better understand the
|
||
psychology of law enforcement personnel or they will shortly be doing
|
||
time in a calaboose. A marriage between liberalism and law enforcement
|
||
is like trying to mate a donkey with a horse. It can be done, but the
|
||
result is almost certainly going to be as sterile as a mule. Elegant
|
||
social theories can be a productive seedbed for new ideas, but
|
||
pragmatism does the weeding. Those readers of CuD who cannot
|
||
distinguish the map from the territory will be in for a rude awakening
|
||
if they engage in illegal activities. CuD should at least warn them of
|
||
this.
|
||
|
||
------------------------------
|
||
|
||
End of Computer Underground Digest #5.38
|
||
************************************
|
||
|
||
|
||
|