856 lines
36 KiB
Plaintext
856 lines
36 KiB
Plaintext
|
||
|
||
Computer underground Digest Sun June 21, 1992 Volume 4 : Issue 27
|
||
|
||
Editors: Jim Thomas and Gordon Meyer (TK0JUT2@NIU.BITNET)
|
||
Associate Editor: Etaion Shrdlu, Jr.
|
||
Newest Authormeister: B. Kehoe
|
||
Ex-Arcmeister: Bob Kusumoto
|
||
Downundermeister: Dan Carosone
|
||
|
||
CONTENTS, #4.27 (June 21, 1992)
|
||
File 1--RFD: comp.society.cu-digest
|
||
File 2--Changing CuD to a Comp Usenet Group (Moderators' view)
|
||
File 3--CFP'93 Call for Participation
|
||
File 4--CPSR membership info
|
||
File 5--CPSR New Managing Director
|
||
File 6--Gore introduces Senate version of WINDO
|
||
File 7--NY Telephone Cuts Int'l Service At Some pay Phones (NEWSBYTES)
|
||
|
||
Back issues of CuD can be found in the Usenet alt.society.cu-digest
|
||
news group, on CompuServe in DL0 and DL4 of the IBMBBS SIG, DL1 of
|
||
LAWSIG, and DL0 and DL12 of TELECOM, on Genie in the PF*NPC RT
|
||
libraries, on the PC-EXEC BBS at (414) 789-4210, and by anonymous ftp
|
||
from ftp.eff.org (192.88.144.4) and ftp.ee.mu.oz.au
|
||
European distributor: ComNet in Luxembourg BBS (++352) 466893.
|
||
|
||
COMPUTER UNDERGROUND DIGEST is an open forum dedicated to sharing
|
||
information among computerists and to the presentation and debate of
|
||
diverse views. CuD material may be reprinted as long as the source
|
||
is cited. Some authors do copyright their material, and they should
|
||
be contacted for reprint permission. It is assumed that non-personal
|
||
mail to the moderators may be reprinted unless otherwise specified.
|
||
Readers are encouraged to submit reasoned articles relating to
|
||
computer culture and communication. Articles are preferred to short
|
||
responses. Please avoid quoting previous posts unless absolutely
|
||
necessary.
|
||
|
||
DISCLAIMER: The views represented herein do not necessarily represent
|
||
the views of the moderators. Digest contributors assume all
|
||
responsibility for ensuring that articles submitted do not
|
||
violate copyright protections.
|
||
|
||
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 1992 04:06:09 GMT
|
||
From: chip@chinacat.unicom.com (Chip Rosenthal)
|
||
Subject: File 1--RFD: comp.society.cu-digest
|
||
|
||
(Moderators' note: Chip Rosenthal has been instrumental in advocating
|
||
changing Cu Digest from an alt to a comp group in the Usenet
|
||
hierarchy. He posted the following on Usenet's news.groups list).
|
||
|
||
PROPOSAL:comp.society.cu-digest (moderated)
|
||
|
||
CHARTER:The Computer Underground Digest
|
||
|
||
SUMMARY: The proposed newsgroup will be used to distributed the
|
||
Computer Underground Digest. The CuD is an open forum for issues
|
||
relating to the phenomena of computer cracking. It has been in
|
||
publication since 1990, and is widely distributed in a number of
|
||
electronic forms.
|
||
|
||
The Computer Underground Digest began publication in early 1990 to
|
||
discuss the issues related to computer cracking -- and the crackdown
|
||
on cracking. Shortly thereafter, a gateway was instituted to
|
||
distribute CuD via alt.society.cu-digest. If this proposal passes,
|
||
the gateway destination will be changed to comp.society.cu-digest and
|
||
the alt.society.cu-digest newsgroup will be decommissioned.
|
||
|
||
Since the CuD is an edited periodical (a la RISKS Digest), it is best
|
||
handled as a moderated newsgroup. The editors of the CuD are
|
||
reachable via Internet mail at the address <tk0jut2@mvs.cso.niu.edu>.
|
||
That would be used as the %mailpaths' address for the moderated group.
|
||
|
||
If you have never seen the CuD, volume 4, issue 26 was posted to
|
||
alt.society.cu-digest recently. You might want to check it out.
|
||
|
||
I asked the editors of the CuD to contribute a brief description for
|
||
inclusion in ths RFD. This is what they provided:
|
||
|
||
| Computer underground Digest (or CuD) began in March, 1990, to continue
|
||
| discussion of so-called "hacker crackdowns," especially the
|
||
| Phrack/Craig Neidorf indictment, that Pat Townson (moderator of
|
||
| Telecom Digest) was unable to publish. CuD's editors, Jim Thomas and
|
||
| Gordon Meyer, assumed that CuD would be a temporary forum. But, as
|
||
| articles came in and the scope of the discussions expanded, CuD has
|
||
| become an established electronic journal.
|
||
|
|
||
| Although classified as a "hack-symp 'zine" by The Village Voice, CuD
|
||
| encourages articles that reflect a diversity of opinion, politics, and
|
||
| ideology. CuD is an open forum dedicated to sharing information among
|
||
| computerists and to the presentation and debate of diverse views.
|
||
| Readers are encouraged to submit reasoned articles relating to
|
||
| computer culture and communication. Discussions of the legal,
|
||
| ethical, social, and political implications of "cyberspace" and
|
||
| computer culture provide the core of CuD articles. The editors
|
||
| strongly encourage debate over the content and direction of computer
|
||
| technology in contemporary society.
|
||
|
||
I am not involved in the production of the CuD in any way. I merely
|
||
operate the gateway to distribute CuD via USENET. This proposal is
|
||
being made with the knowledge and support of the CuD editors. I would
|
||
be glad to answer questions regarding this RFD or the USENET gateway.
|
||
Questions regarding the content of the CuD should be directed to the
|
||
editors at <tk0jut2@mvs.cso.niu.edu>. Followups have been directed
|
||
to news.groups. Mail replies have been directed to an alias which
|
||
reaches both the moderators and myself. If there is consensus that
|
||
this proposal is reasonable, I will bring it to a vote in approximately
|
||
two weeks.
|
||
***
|
||
Chip Rosenthal 512-482-8260 | Let the wayward children play. Let the wicked
|
||
Unicom Systems Development | have their day. Let the chips fall where they
|
||
<chip@chinacat.Unicom.COM> | may. I'm going to Disneyland. -Timbuk 3
|
||
|
||
------------------------------
|
||
|
||
Date: Sat 20 Jun 92 10:21:39 CST
|
||
From: Moderators <tk0jut2@mvs.cso.niu.edu>
|
||
Subject: File 2--Changing CuD to a Comp Usenet Group (Moderators' view)
|
||
|
||
Thanks to Chip and others who have suggested and supported changing
|
||
CuD to a comp group. The advantage of changing is this:
|
||
The current readership is between 26,000-30,000 (about 16,000 on usenet
|
||
as alt.society.cu-digest) and the rest on GEnie, Compuserve, BBSes and
|
||
news-feeds and a large mailing list. The number of sites carrying alt
|
||
groups seems to be diminishing (according to usenet stats), and a
|
||
shift to comp would enable us to reduce the mailing list (and thus
|
||
bandwidth), expand the access of to CuD a significant number of
|
||
readers who lacking access to alt groups, and to improve the quality
|
||
of articles by expanding the pool or readers (and presumably
|
||
contributors).
|
||
|
||
CuD focuses on computer issues relevant to scholars, researchers, and the
|
||
media in much the same way as other comp groups (EFF, Telecom Digest,
|
||
RISKS) does. The primary difference is that we encourage articles
|
||
(rather than sort posts, although we try to include as many posts as
|
||
space allows). Our primary interest is on the legal and cultural
|
||
aspects of cyberspace, and we try to keep readers informed of relevant
|
||
computer conferences, computer-related news, book reviews, and
|
||
summaries of research on computer culture. The current mailing list
|
||
is about 50 percent computer professionals and academics, 30 percent
|
||
media, law enforcement, government/military agencies and non-computer
|
||
professionals, and 20 percent students. Although we have no hard data,
|
||
we assume that the usenet stats correspond to the mailing list
|
||
(judging from responses).
|
||
|
||
For those unsure of what CuD is: CuD stands for Computer underground
|
||
Digest, a name that was given to the first issue by a poster and the name
|
||
stuck. Recent issues have included transcripts of the PHRACK trial,
|
||
the Playboy/Event Horizons' suit, summaries, transcripts, and the text of
|
||
the FBI's proposed wire tap legislation, and attempts to make presidential
|
||
candidates aware of the power of electronic media as a "town-hall forum."
|
||
Subscriptions are available by dropping a one word "SUBSCRIBE" note
|
||
(with address included underneath):
|
||
example: SUB CuD
|
||
gayle jones gayle@jones.edu
|
||
|
||
Mail the requests to TK0JUT2@mvs.cso.niu.edu or TK0JUT2@niu.bitnet
|
||
|
||
We appreciate the support we have received for re-naming, and we
|
||
encourage readers to vote in support of the change in two weeks.
|
||
Discussions and other relevant information on voting can be found on
|
||
Usenet's news.groups
|
||
|
||
------------------------------
|
||
|
||
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 92 11:48:16 -0700
|
||
From: Bruce R Koball <bkoball@WELL.SF.CA.US>
|
||
Subject: File 3--CFP'93 Call for Participation
|
||
|
||
Call for Participation
|
||
CFP'93
|
||
The Third Conference on Computers, Freedom and Privacy
|
||
Sponsored by ACM SIGCOMM, SIGCAS & SIGSAC
|
||
9 - 12 March 1993
|
||
San Francisco Airport Marriott Hotel, Burlingame, CA
|
||
|
||
INVITATION
|
||
|
||
This is an invitation to submit session and topic proposals for
|
||
inclusion in the program of the Third Conference on Computers,
|
||
Freedom and Privacy. Proposals may be for individual talks, panel
|
||
discussions, debates or other presentations in appropriate
|
||
formats. Proposed topics should be within the general scope of the
|
||
conference, as outlined below.
|
||
|
||
SCOPE
|
||
|
||
The advance of computer and telecommunications technologies holds
|
||
great promise for individuals and society. From convenience for
|
||
consumers and efficiency in commerce to improved public health and
|
||
safety and increased participation in democratic institutions,
|
||
these technologies can fundamentally transform our lives.
|
||
|
||
At the same time these technologies pose threats to the ideals of
|
||
a free and open society. Personal privacy is increasingly at risk
|
||
from invasion by high-tech surveillance and eavesdropping. The
|
||
myriad databases containing personal information maintained in the
|
||
public and private sectors expose private life to constant
|
||
scrutiny.
|
||
|
||
Technological advances also enable new forms of illegal activity,
|
||
posing new problems for legal and law enforcement officials and
|
||
challenging the very definitions of crime and civil liberties. But
|
||
technologies used to combat these crimes can threaten the
|
||
traditional barriers between the individual and the state.
|
||
|
||
Even such fundamental notions as speech, assembly and property are
|
||
being transformed by these technologies, throwing into question
|
||
the basic Constitutional protections that have guarded them.
|
||
Similarly, information knows no borders; as the scope of economies
|
||
becomes global and as networked communities transcend
|
||
international boundaries, ways must be found to reconcile
|
||
competing political, social and economic interests in the digital
|
||
domain.
|
||
|
||
The Third Conference on Computers, Freedom and Privacy will
|
||
assemble experts, advocates and interested people from a broad
|
||
spectrum of disciplines and backgrounds in a balanced public forum
|
||
to address the impact of computer and telecommunications
|
||
technologies on freedom and privacy in society. Participants will
|
||
include people from the fields of computer science, law, business,
|
||
research, information, library science, health, public policy,
|
||
government, law enforcement, public advocacy and many others.
|
||
|
||
Topics covered in previous CFP conferences include:
|
||
|
||
Personal Information and Privacy
|
||
International Perspectives and Impacts
|
||
Law Enforcement and Civil Liberties
|
||
Ethics, Morality and Criminality
|
||
Electronic Speech, Press and Assembly
|
||
Who Logs On (Computer & Telecom Networks)
|
||
Free Speech and the Public Telephone Network
|
||
Access to Government Information
|
||
Computer-based Surveillance of Individuals
|
||
Computers in the Workplace
|
||
Who Holds the Keys? (Cryptography)
|
||
Who's in Your Genes? (Genetic Information)
|
||
Ethics and Education
|
||
Public Policy for the 21st Century
|
||
|
||
These topics are given as examples and are not meant to exclude
|
||
other possible topics on the general subject of Computers, Freedom
|
||
and Privacy.
|
||
|
||
PROPOSAL SUBMISSION
|
||
|
||
All proposals should be accompanied by a position statement of at
|
||
least one page, describing the proposed presentation, its theme
|
||
and format. Proposals for panel discussions, debates and other
|
||
multi-person presentations should include a list of proposed
|
||
participants and session chair. Proposals should be sent to:
|
||
|
||
CFP'93 Proposals
|
||
2210 Sixth Street
|
||
Berkeley, CA 94710
|
||
|
||
or by email to: cfp93@well.sf.ca.us with the word "Proposal"
|
||
in the subject line. Proposals should be submitted as soon as
|
||
possible to allow thorough consideration for inclusion in the
|
||
formal program. The deadline for submissions is 15 August 1992.
|
||
|
||
STUDENT PAPER COMPETITION
|
||
|
||
Full time students are invited to enter the student paper
|
||
competition. Winners will receive a scholarship to attend the
|
||
conference and present their papers.
|
||
|
||
Papers should not exceed 2500 words and should address the impact
|
||
of computer and telecommunications technologies on freedom and
|
||
privacy in society. All papers should be submitted to Professor
|
||
Dorothy Denning by 15 October 1992. Authors may submit their
|
||
papers either by sending them as straight text via email to:
|
||
denning@cs.georgetown.edu or by sending 6 printed copies to:
|
||
|
||
Professor Dorothy Denning
|
||
Georgetown University
|
||
Dept. of Computer Science
|
||
225 Reiss Science Bldg.
|
||
Washington DC 20057
|
||
|
||
Submitters should include the name of their institution, degree
|
||
program, and a signed statement affirming that they are a full-
|
||
time student at their institution and that the paper is an
|
||
original, unpublished work of their own.
|
||
|
||
INFORMATION
|
||
|
||
For more information on the CFP'93 program and advance
|
||
registration, as it becomes available, write to:
|
||
|
||
CFP'93 Information
|
||
2210 Sixth Street
|
||
Berkeley, CA 94710
|
||
|
||
or send email to: cfp93@well.sf.ca.us with the word
|
||
"Information" in the subject line.
|
||
|
||
THE ORGANIZERS
|
||
|
||
General Chair
|
||
-------------
|
||
Bruce R. Koball
|
||
CFP'93
|
||
2210 Sixth Street
|
||
Berkeley, CA 94710
|
||
510-845-1350 (voice)
|
||
510-845-3946 (fax)
|
||
bkoball@well.sf.ca.us
|
||
|
||
Steering Committee
|
||
------------------
|
||
John Baker Mitch Ratcliffe
|
||
Equifax MacWeek Magazine
|
||
|
||
Mary J. Culnan David D. Redell
|
||
Georgetown University DEC Systems Research
|
||
Center
|
||
Dorothy Denning
|
||
Georgetown University Marc Rotenberg
|
||
Computer Professionals
|
||
Les Earnest for Social Responsibility
|
||
GeoGroup, Inc.
|
||
C. James Schmidt
|
||
Mike Godwin San Jose State University
|
||
Electronic Frontier Foundation
|
||
Barbara Simons
|
||
Mark Graham IBM
|
||
Pandora Systems
|
||
Lee Tien
|
||
Lance J. Hoffman Attorney
|
||
George Washington University
|
||
George Trubow
|
||
Donald G. Ingraham John Marshall Law School
|
||
Office of the District Attorney,
|
||
Alameda County, CA Willis Ware
|
||
Rand Corp.
|
||
Simona Nass
|
||
Student - Cardozo Law School Jim Warren
|
||
Microtimes
|
||
Peter G. Neumann & Autodesk, Inc.
|
||
SRI International
|
||
|
||
Affiliations are listed for identification only.
|
||
|
||
Please distribute and post this notice!
|
||
|
||
|
||
------------------------------
|
||
|
||
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 1992 12:25:53 PDT
|
||
From: Nikki Draper <draper@CSLI.STANFORD.EDU>
|
||
Subject: File 4--CPSR membership info
|
||
|
||
COMPUTER PROFESSIONALS FOR SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY is a public-interest
|
||
alliance of computer scientists and others interested in the impact of
|
||
computer technology on society. We work to influence decisions
|
||
regarding the development and use of computers because those decisions
|
||
have far-reaching consequences and reflect basic values and
|
||
priorities.
|
||
|
||
As technical experts, CPSR members provide the public and policymakers
|
||
with realistic assessments of the power, promise, and limitations of
|
||
computer technology. As concerned citizens, we direct public
|
||
attention to critical choices concerning the applications of computing
|
||
and how those choices affect society.
|
||
|
||
Members of CPSR believe that computer technology should make life more
|
||
enjoyable, productive, and secure. We are working for a world in
|
||
which science and technology are used not to produce weapons of war,
|
||
but to foster a safe and just society. These concerns impel us to
|
||
many forms of action:
|
||
|
||
o We encourage public discussion of and public responsibility for
|
||
decisions involving the use of computers in systems critical to
|
||
society.
|
||
|
||
o We work to dispel popular myths about the infallibility of
|
||
technological systems.
|
||
|
||
o We challenge the assumption that technology alone can solve
|
||
political and social problems.
|
||
|
||
o We encourage critical examination of social and technical issues
|
||
within the computer profession, nationally and internationally.
|
||
|
||
o We encourage the use of computer technology to improve the quality
|
||
of life.
|
||
|
||
CPSR HISTORY
|
||
------------
|
||
Since its beginnings as a small discussion group formed over a Palo
|
||
Alto computer mail network in 1981, CPSR has grown into a national
|
||
organization with 21 chapters throughout the United States. We are also
|
||
affiliated with similar groups in Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Great
|
||
Britain, Germany, Finland, and Italy. Membership is open to all.
|
||
|
||
CPSR PROJECTS
|
||
-------------
|
||
Risk and Reliability:
|
||
|
||
Overreliance on computing technology can lead to unacceptable risks.
|
||
This project analyzes application areas in which those risks seem
|
||
particularly serious:
|
||
|
||
o SDI software problems
|
||
o dangers of autonomous weapons
|
||
o the inadequacy of simulation as a means for testing complex systems
|
||
o the potential for software failure in life-critical systems
|
||
|
||
Civil Liberties and Privacy:
|
||
|
||
The growing use of computers for record-keeping has brought with it the
|
||
danger that the vast amount of information maintained about individuals
|
||
threatens our privacy. Centered in our Washington D.C. office, the
|
||
Civil Liberties and Privacy Project is concerned with such topics as:
|
||
|
||
o the FBI National Crime Information Center
|
||
o the growing use of databases of personal information by both
|
||
government and private industry
|
||
o the right of public access to government information
|
||
o extension of First Amendment rights to electronic communication
|
||
o establishing legal protections for privacy of computerized
|
||
information
|
||
|
||
The CPSR Workplace Project:
|
||
|
||
By the mid-1990s, most U.S. workers will use a computer on the job.
|
||
The increasing use of computers in the workplace raises important
|
||
social issues, and CPSR believes that it is important for computer
|
||
professionals to be involved in this debate. CPSR's Computers in the
|
||
Workplace Project has concentrated on the following topics:
|
||
|
||
o design methodologies for workplace software
|
||
o electronic monitoring of workers on the job
|
||
o health problems associated with computer use
|
||
|
||
The 21st Century Project:
|
||
|
||
Since the Second World War, most U.S. research in science and technology
|
||
has been funded by the military and directed toward military needs.
|
||
With the end of the Cold War and the changes that have swept Eastern
|
||
Europe and the Soviet Union, it is time to refocus our scientific and
|
||
technological research toward the problems that society faces as we
|
||
enter the next century.
|
||
|
||
The 21st Century Project, led by CPSR from our Cambridge office, is a
|
||
coalition of professional organizations working to redirect national
|
||
science and technology priorities, so that they more closely match
|
||
social needs.
|
||
|
||
Grassroots Projects:
|
||
|
||
CPSR's chapter-based projects and national interest groups span a wide
|
||
range of issues, including:
|
||
|
||
o computers in education
|
||
o computers and the environment
|
||
o viruses and threats to computer security
|
||
o computerized vote-counting systems
|
||
o status of women in computer science
|
||
o implications of speculative technologies such as nanotechnology
|
||
and virtual reality
|
||
|
||
HIGHLIGHTS
|
||
----------
|
||
In the ten years since CPSR's creation, CPSR has been effective in
|
||
alerting the public and key decision-makers in the U.S. and abroad
|
||
about the impact of computers on society:
|
||
|
||
o CPSR published the first papers and held the first public debates
|
||
on the computing aspects of the Strategic Defense Initiative, or
|
||
"Star Wars."
|
||
|
||
o CPSR members testified before a U.S. Senate subcommittee on the
|
||
feasibility of SDI.
|
||
|
||
o CPSR/Boston produced an award-winning slide show and videotape
|
||
called "Reliability and Risk: Computers and Nuclear War."
|
||
|
||
o CPSR members produced the first book for general audiences on the
|
||
ways in which computers revolutionize modern weapons systems,
|
||
*Computers in Battle: Will they Work?*
|
||
|
||
o At the request of a House subcommittee, CPSR studied the FBI's
|
||
proposed National Crime Information Center upgrade (NCIC 2000).
|
||
CPSR's report was widely credited for the FBI's subsequent decision
|
||
to drop a proposal to track individuals who had not been charged
|
||
with any crime.
|
||
|
||
o CPSR co-produced a "Special Report on Computers and Elections"
|
||
for the 1988 Presidential Campaign, highlighting the potential
|
||
for errors in electronic vote-counting systems.
|
||
|
||
o CPSR filed lawsuits under the Freedom of Information Act to force
|
||
the FBI and Secret Service to reveal whether they monitor computer
|
||
bulletin boards and electronic mail.
|
||
|
||
o CPSR/Portland hosted a conference on Computers and the Environment.
|
||
|
||
o The CPSR Workplace Project organized PDC'90--the first U.S.
|
||
conference on participatory design, in which users work together
|
||
with software designers to ensure that systems meet workers' needs.
|
||
|
||
o CPSR helped lead a successful grassroots campaign to convince the
|
||
Lotus Development Corporation not to release their proposed
|
||
Marketplace: Households product, which would have included data
|
||
on 120 million Americans.
|
||
|
||
o CPSR/Berkeley organized a media campaign to register our concern
|
||
over the deadly role of computing technology in the Persian Gulf
|
||
War.
|
||
|
||
MEMBERSHIP BENEFITS
|
||
-------------------
|
||
o The CPSR Newsletter--a highly regarded magazine with reviews of
|
||
CPSR's activities and analyses of issues of concern to CPSR members.
|
||
|
||
o Invitations and discounts to CPSR events, including the annual
|
||
meeting, our biannual conference on Directions and Implications
|
||
of Advanced Computing, and various special events.
|
||
|
||
o Notice of new CPSR educational materials, including videotapes,
|
||
research papers, and books.
|
||
|
||
o Automatic membership in a local CPSR chapter (if available) and
|
||
notices of chapter meetings and activities.
|
||
|
||
|
||
MEMBERSHIP CATEGORIES
|
||
---------------------
|
||
The attached reply form lists several categories of membership. The $40
|
||
"basic" membership covers only the costs of sending you the newsletter
|
||
and the basic administrative services we provide. If you want to help
|
||
support CPSR's program work, please consider joining at the $75
|
||
"regular" rate, or at whatever higher level you can afford. CPSR's
|
||
accomplishments during our first ten years were possible because we had
|
||
strong membership support. Such support will continue to be critical
|
||
as we try to make our second decade even more successful.
|
||
|
||
PRIVACY NOTICE
|
||
--------------
|
||
The CPSR membership database is never sold, rented, lent, exchanged, or
|
||
used for anything other than official CPSR activity. CPSR may elect
|
||
to send members mailings with information from other groups, but the
|
||
mailings will always originate with CPSR.
|
||
|
||
ORGANIZATIONAL INFORMATION
|
||
--------------------------
|
||
CPSR National Office
|
||
P.O. Box 717
|
||
Palo Alto, CA 94302
|
||
415-322-3778, 415-322-3798 (FAX)
|
||
E-mail: cpsr@csli.stanford.edu
|
||
|
||
CPSR Cambridge Office
|
||
P.O. Box 962
|
||
Cambridge, MA 02142
|
||
617-497-7440
|
||
chapman@saffron.lcs.mit.edu
|
||
|
||
CPSR Washington Office
|
||
666 Pennsylvania Ave SE, Suite 303
|
||
Washington, DC 20003
|
||
202-544-9240, 202-547-5482 (FAX)
|
||
rotenberg@washofc.cpsr.org
|
||
|
||
Staff
|
||
Gary Chapman Cambridge Director
|
||
Marc Rotenberg Washington Director
|
||
Evelyn Pine Managing Director
|
||
Nikki Draper Assistant to the Director, National
|
||
|
||
National Advisory Board
|
||
Herbert L. Abrams Richard Karp Anthony Ralston
|
||
John Backus Barbara Liskov John Shattuck
|
||
Paul Brest James Martin Herbert Simon
|
||
David Burnham Elliot Maxwell Robert E. Tarjan
|
||
Dorothy Denning Eli Noam Robert W. Taylor
|
||
Douglas Engelbart Karen Nussbaum Lawrence Tesler
|
||
Admiral Noel Gayler Severo M. Ornstein Sherry Turkle
|
||
Adele Goldberg
|
||
|
||
Board of Directors
|
||
Eric Roberts President
|
||
Jeff Johnson Chair
|
||
Todd Newman Secretary
|
||
Rodney Hoffman Treasurer
|
||
|
||
Ronni Rosenberg Director-at-Large
|
||
Dan Williams Director-at-Large
|
||
|
||
Paul Hyland Middle Atlantic Director
|
||
Lesley Kalmin Western Director
|
||
Patti Lowe Midwestern Director
|
||
Ivan Milman Southern Director
|
||
Douglas Schuler Northwestern Director
|
||
Coralee Whitcomb New England Director
|
||
|
||
Terry Winograd Special Director
|
||
Cathy Cook Special Director
|
||
|
||
|
||
============================ clip and mail ===========================
|
||
|
||
CPSR MEMBERSHIP FORM
|
||
|
||
Name ___________________________________________________________
|
||
|
||
Address ___________________________________________________________
|
||
|
||
___________________________________________________________
|
||
|
||
City/State/Zip _____________________________________________________
|
||
|
||
Home phone _____________________ Work phone ______________________
|
||
|
||
Company ___________________________________________________________
|
||
|
||
Type of work ______________________________________________________
|
||
|
||
E-mail address _____________________________________________________
|
||
|
||
CPSR Chapter
|
||
__ Acadiana __ Austin __ Berkeley
|
||
__ Boston __ Chicago __ Denver/Boulder
|
||
__ Los Angeles __ Madison __ Maine
|
||
__ Milwaukee __ Minnesota __ New Haven
|
||
__ New York __ Palo Alto __ Philadelphia
|
||
__ Pittsburgh __ Portland __ San Diego
|
||
__ Santa Cruz __ Seattle __ Washington, DC
|
||
__ No chapter in my area
|
||
|
||
CPSR Membership Categories
|
||
__ $ 20 Student/low income member
|
||
__ $ 40 Basic member
|
||
__ $ 50 Library/institutional subscriber
|
||
__ $ 75 REGULAR MEMBER
|
||
__ $ 150 Supporting member
|
||
__ $ 500 Sponsoring member
|
||
__ $1000 Lifetime member
|
||
|
||
Additional tax-deductible contribution to support CPSR projects:
|
||
__ $50 __ $75 __ $100 __ $250
|
||
__ $500 __ $1000 __ Other
|
||
|
||
Please add $10 for memberships outside the U.S.
|
||
|
||
Total Enclosed: $ ________
|
||
|
||
Make check out to CPSR and mail to:
|
||
CPSR
|
||
P.O. Box 717
|
||
Palo Alto, CA 94302-0717
|
||
|
||
------------------------------
|
||
|
||
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 1992 12:23:23 PDT
|
||
From: Nikki Draper <draper@CSLI.STANFORD.EDU>
|
||
Subject: File 5--CPSR New Managing Director
|
||
|
||
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
|
||
|
||
contact:
|
||
Nikki Draper
|
||
draper@csli.stanford.edu
|
||
(415) 322-3778
|
||
|
||
|
||
COMPUTER PROFESSIONALS FOR SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
|
||
NAMES EVELYN PINE NEW MANAGING DIRECTOR
|
||
|
||
|
||
PALO ALTO, Calif., June 5, 1992 -- Computer Professionals for Social
|
||
Responsibility (CPSR), the national alliance of professionals concerned
|
||
with the impact of technology on society based here, announced that
|
||
it has named Evelyn Pine as Managing Director. Pine, who reports to
|
||
the organization's Board of Directors, is responsible for the overall
|
||
administration of the national organization, including coordination
|
||
with its offices in Cambridge, MA and Washington, D.C. In addition,
|
||
Pine will be responsible for the design and implementation of a long-
|
||
range organizational development plan.
|
||
|
||
"Whether fighting to protect civil liberties in the information age,
|
||
or forging a non-military agenda for American research and
|
||
development, CPSR will continue to challenge both government
|
||
and industry to insure that technology serves human needs,"
|
||
Pine said.
|
||
|
||
For ten years, Pine has worked to ensure that Americans make
|
||
meaningful use of electronic technology. She comes to CPSR
|
||
from a stint as the Executive Director of The Community Memory
|
||
Project, the first participatory, public access computer network
|
||
in the country. While there, she encouraged seniors low income
|
||
families and at risk youth to use the network, located in Berkeley,
|
||
California, to share information and discuss crucial issues. As Deputy
|
||
Director of the Foundation for Community Service Cable TV, Pine
|
||
worked with local governments, schools, and community
|
||
organizations to create local cable programming.
|
||
|
||
"CPSR is extremely fortunate to have someone of Evelyn's caliber to
|
||
oversee and direct our national effort. Over the last ten years, CPSR
|
||
has established itself as a critical voice in the public debate over
|
||
technology," said Eric Roberts, president of the board of directors.
|
||
"Evelyn brings considerable talent and experience to this position.
|
||
We feel that she is the right person to lead CPSR into our second
|
||
decade."
|
||
|
||
Founded in 1981, CPSR is a public interest alliance of computer
|
||
scientists and other professionals interested in the impact of
|
||
computer technology on society. As technical experts and
|
||
informed citizens, CPSR members provide the public and policy
|
||
makers with realistic assessments of the power, promise, and
|
||
limitations of computer technology.
|
||
|
||
CPSR began as a small discussion group formed over a electronic
|
||
mail network. Today it has grown into a national organization,
|
||
with 21 chapters in the United States. The organization also has
|
||
program offices in Washington D.C. and Cambridge, MA.
|
||
|
||
The Washington D.C. office is the focal point for CPSR's Civil Liberties
|
||
and Privacy Program. This effort is concerned with equitable public
|
||
access to government information; protection of First Amendment
|
||
rights in electronic communication; and rights of privacy attached to
|
||
computerized information.
|
||
|
||
The Cambridge, MA office is the focal point for the organization's
|
||
21st Century Project. It is a coalition of professional organizations
|
||
working to redirect national science and technology priorities, so that
|
||
they more closely match social needs.
|
||
|
||
For more information on the Civil Liberties and Privacy Program,
|
||
contact Marc Rotenberg at (202) 544-9240.
|
||
|
||
For information on The 21st Century Project, contact
|
||
Gary Chapman at 617-497-7440.
|
||
|
||
------------------------------
|
||
|
||
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 1992 17:06:02 EDT
|
||
From: James P Love <LOVE@PUCC.BITNET>
|
||
Subject: File 6--Gore introduces Senate version of WINDO
|
||
|
||
- Gore, Ford, Sarbanes and Simons introduce Senate verions of GPO WINDO.
|
||
|
||
- Name of bill is changed to GPO Gateway to Government
|
||
|
||
- Fiscal note is $3 million in fy 93, $10 million in fy 94.
|
||
|
||
On June 4, 1992 Senators Gore, Ford, Sarbanes and Simons introduced S.
|
||
2813, the GPO Gateway to Government. The text of the bill was printed
|
||
on page S. 7599 of the Congressional Record. The bill, which I
|
||
haven't seen yet, is reportedly very similiar to Rose's hr 2772.
|
||
|
||
All four cosponsors are democrats. It was a pleasant surprise that
|
||
Senator Ford, who chairs the Senate Rules Committee (where the bill is
|
||
referred) was among the sponors. Unfortunately, Senator Stevens
|
||
(R-AK) was not among the originial cosponsors.
|
||
|
||
As readers of this list may know, the GPO WINDO (HR 2772) and the GPO
|
||
Gateway to Government (S 2813) would provide one-stop-shopping online
|
||
access to federal government databases and and information systems.
|
||
The service would be free to 1,400 federal depository libraries and
|
||
available for subscriptions in homes and offices, priced at the
|
||
incremental cost of disseminating the information. The service would
|
||
be available through the internet and over ordinary telephone lines
|
||
using a modem. For more information, contact Anne Heanue, American
|
||
Library Association 202/547-4440; Bernadine Hoduski, Joint Committee
|
||
on Printing 202/224-5953; or James Love, Taxpayer Assets Project
|
||
609/683-0534.
|
||
|
||
------------------------------
|
||
|
||
Date: Thu, Jun 18, '92 (21:45)
|
||
From: John F. McMullen (mcmullen@well.sf.ca.us)
|
||
Subject: File 7--NY Telephone Cuts Int'l Service At Some pay Phones (NEWSBYTES)
|
||
|
||
NEW YORK, NEW YORK, U.S.A., 1992 JUN 18 (NB) -- As part of its effort
|
||
to figh phone fraud with stolen calling card numbers, New York
|
||
Telephone is blocking international calls from most of its public
|
||
phones inside the Port Authority Bus Terminal and at surrounding
|
||
sidewalk locations. The company said it would also target other
|
||
high-fraud areas throughout New York City.
|
||
|
||
New York Telephone will rely on technology developed by Mars
|
||
Electronics International, based in Pennsylvania, which blocks
|
||
international calls attempted through any long distance carrier or
|
||
private business phone system. New York Telephone said it would
|
||
implement the program at selected public phones so as not to
|
||
inconvenience legitimate callers.
|
||
|
||
This is the second time that phone companies have limited service at
|
||
pay phones as an anti-crime move. A few years ago, some phones were
|
||
switched from touchtone to rotary dial service, to keep people using
|
||
them from reaching beepers allegedly used by drug dealers.
|
||
|
||
Now the problem is "sidewalk surfing," where thieves listen to callers
|
||
giving their card numbers to operators, or peer over their shoulders
|
||
when they take out calling cards. The numbers are then taken to a pay
|
||
phone, where services using them are sold to all comers. Frequently,
|
||
the services are sold to drug dealers, who can then make untraceable
|
||
calls to their overseas contacts. Some observers claim that the
|
||
numbers are also used by illegal immigrants calling their families
|
||
back home.
|
||
|
||
Telephone fraud is estimated at more than $1 billion a year
|
||
nationwide. New York Telephone operates more than 57,000 public
|
||
phones in New York City.
|
||
|
||
(Dana Blankenhorn/19920618/Press Contact: Maureen Flanagan, New York
|
||
Telephone, 212-395-0500)
|
||
|
||
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
|
||
|
||
****NY Police Responds To Blockage Of Int'l Phone Calls 06/18/92
|
||
|
||
WASHINGTON, D.C., U.S.A., 1992 JUN 18 (NB) -- New York State Police
|
||
Special Investigator Donald Delaney, in a conversation with Newsbytes,
|
||
strongly supported the move by New York Telephone Company, blocking
|
||
calls to foreign countries from pay phones in New York City's Times
|
||
Square , Port Authority Bus Terminal and other midtown locations with
|
||
a history of high credit card calling fraud, as reported elsewhere by
|
||
Newsbytes.
|
||
|
||
Delaney said: "I think that it is about time that such action was
|
||
taken. Telephone fraud in New York City is out of control and that is
|
||
why that New York Telephone took the action"
|
||
|
||
Delaney continued: "I think that this should be just the beginning. It
|
||
is not only in midtown Manhattan that we find this fraud. From one end
|
||
of Broadway t another, there is heavy incidence of fraudulent calls
|
||
through pay phones. You will also find neighborhoods that have high
|
||
incidence of the same type of crime. I would like to see the same type
|
||
of blockage on all pay phones." The Port Authority Bus Terminal has
|
||
long been identified as a major scene of telecommunications fraud
|
||
encompassing not only call selling by the collection of valid credit
|
||
card numbers from unsuspecting users so that numbers may, in turn, be
|
||
used for fraudulent calls. The numbers are generally taken through
|
||
"shoulder-surfing", a term for simply looking over the shoulder of an
|
||
unsuspecting caller and recording the keystrokes made while entering
|
||
the credit card number.
|
||
|
||
According to Delaney, shoulder-surfing in the Port Authority takes in
|
||
a whole new dimension with people using binoculars and telescopes from
|
||
positions in Port Authority's balcony to see the numbers and
|
||
voice-activated tape recorder to record them.
|
||
|
||
(Barbara E. McMullen & John F. McMullen/19920617)
|
||
|
||
------------------------------
|
||
|
||
End of Computer Underground Digest #4.27
|
||
************************************
|
||
|
||
|