408 lines
17 KiB
Plaintext
408 lines
17 KiB
Plaintext
Path: blister!jtsv16!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!samsung!news.cs.indiana.edu!purdue!spaf
|
|
From: spaf@cs.purdue.EDU (Gene Spafford)
|
|
Newsgroups: news.announce.newusers
|
|
Subject: Emily Postnews Answers Your Questions on Netiquette
|
|
Message-ID: <15400@ector.cs.purdue.edu>
|
|
Date: 25 Jul 91 23:15:57 GMT
|
|
Expires: 23 Oct 91 23:15:57 GMT
|
|
Organization: Dept. of Computer Sciences, Purdue Univ.
|
|
Lines: 395
|
|
Approved: spaf@cs.purdue.EDU
|
|
Supersedes: <14696@ector.cs.purdue.edu>
|
|
|
|
Original-from: brad@looking.on.ca (Brad Templeton)
|
|
[Most recent change: 17 Mar 1991 by brad@looking.on.ca (Brad Templeton)]
|
|
|
|
|
|
**NOTE: this is intended to be satirical. If you do not recognize
|
|
it as such, consult a doctor or professional comedian. The
|
|
recommendations in this article should recognized for what
|
|
they are -- admonitions about what NOT to do.
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Dear Emily Postnews"
|
|
|
|
Emily Postnews, foremost authority on proper net behaviour,
|
|
gives her advice on how to act on the net.
|
|
|
|
============================================================================
|
|
|
|
Dear Miss Postnews: How long should my signature be? -- verbose@noisy
|
|
|
|
A: Dear Verbose: Please try and make your signature as long as you
|
|
can. It's much more important than your article, of course, so try
|
|
and have more lines of signature than actual text.
|
|
|
|
Try and include a large graphic made of ASCII characters, plus lots of
|
|
cute quotes and slogans. People will never tire of reading these
|
|
pearls of wisdom again and again, and you will soon become personally
|
|
associated with the joy each reader feels at seeing yet another
|
|
delightful repeat of your signature.
|
|
|
|
Be sure as well to include a complete map of USENET with each
|
|
signature, to show how anybody can get mail to you from any site in
|
|
the world. Be sure to include ARPA gateways as well. Also tell
|
|
people on your own site how to mail to you. Give independent
|
|
addresses for Internet, UUCP, and BITNET, even if they're all the
|
|
same.
|
|
|
|
Aside from your reply address, include your full name, company and
|
|
organization. It's just common courtesy -- after all, in some
|
|
newsreaders people have to type an *entire* keystroke to go back to
|
|
the top of your article to see this information in the header.
|
|
|
|
By all means include your phone number and street address in every
|
|
single article. People are always responding to usenet articles with
|
|
phone calls and letters. It would be silly to go to the extra trouble
|
|
of including this information only in articles that need a response by
|
|
conventional channels!
|
|
------
|
|
|
|
Dear Emily: Today I posted an article and forgot to include my
|
|
signature. What should I do? -- forgetful@myvax
|
|
|
|
A: Dear Forgetful: Rush to your terminal right away and post an
|
|
article that says, "Oops, I forgot to post my signature with that last
|
|
article. Here it is."
|
|
|
|
Since most people will have forgotten your earlier article,
|
|
(particularly since it dared to be so boring as to not have a nice,
|
|
juicy signature) this will remind them of it. Besides, people care
|
|
much more about the signature anyway. See the previous letter for
|
|
more important details.
|
|
|
|
Also, be sure to include your signature TWICE in each article. That
|
|
way you're sure people will read it.
|
|
|
|
------
|
|
|
|
Dear Ms. Postnews: I couldn't get mail through to somebody on another
|
|
site. What should I do? -- eager@beaver.dam
|
|
|
|
A: Dear Eager: No problem, just post your message to a group that a
|
|
lot of people read. Say, "This is for John Smith. I couldn't get
|
|
mail through so I'm posting it. All others please ignore."
|
|
|
|
This way tens of thousands of people will spend a few seconds scanning
|
|
over and ignoring your article, using up over 16 man-hours their
|
|
collective time, but you will be saved the terrible trouble of
|
|
checking through Usenet maps or looking for alternate routes. Just
|
|
think, if you couldn't distribute your message to 9000 other
|
|
computers, you might actually have to (gasp) call directory assistance
|
|
for 60 cents, or even phone the person. This can cost as much as a
|
|
few DOLLARS (!) for a 5 minute call!
|
|
|
|
And certainly it's better to spend 10 to 20 dollars of other people's
|
|
money distributing the message then for you to have to waste $9 on an
|
|
overnight letter, or even 29 cents on a stamp!
|
|
|
|
Don't forget. The world will end if your message doesn't get through,
|
|
so post it as many places as you can.
|
|
|
|
------
|
|
|
|
Q: What about a test message?
|
|
|
|
A: It is important, when testing, to test the entire net. Never test
|
|
merely a subnet distribution when the whole net can be done. Also put
|
|
"please ignore" on your test messages, since we all know that
|
|
everybody always skips a message with a line like that. Don't use a
|
|
subject like "My sex is female but I demand to be addressed as male."
|
|
because such articles are read in depth by all USEnauts.
|
|
|
|
------
|
|
|
|
Q: Somebody just posted that Roman Polanski directed Star Wars. What
|
|
should I do?
|
|
|
|
A: Post the correct answer at once! We can't have people go on
|
|
believing that! Very good of you to spot this. You'll probably be
|
|
the only one to make the correction, so post as soon as you can. No
|
|
time to lose, so certainly don't wait a day, or check to see if
|
|
somebody else has made the correction.
|
|
|
|
And it's not good enough to send the message by mail. Since you're
|
|
the only one who really knows that it was Francis Coppola, you have to
|
|
inform the whole net right away!
|
|
|
|
------
|
|
|
|
Q: I read an article that said, "reply by mail, I'll summarize." What
|
|
should I do?
|
|
|
|
A: Post your response to the whole net. That request applies only to
|
|
dumb people who don't have something interesting to say. Your
|
|
postings are much more worthwhile than other people's, so it would be
|
|
a waste to reply by mail.
|
|
|
|
------
|
|
|
|
Q: I collected replies to an article I wrote, and now it's time to
|
|
summarize. What should I do?
|
|
|
|
A: Simply concatenate all the articles together into a big file and
|
|
post that. On USENET, this is known as a summary. It lets people
|
|
read all the replies without annoying newsreaders getting in the way.
|
|
Do the same when summarizing a vote.
|
|
|
|
------
|
|
|
|
Q: I saw a long article that I wish to rebut carefully, what should I
|
|
do?
|
|
|
|
A: Include the entire text with your article, particularly the
|
|
signature, and include your comments closely packed between the lines.
|
|
Be sure to post, and not mail, even though your article looks like a
|
|
reply to the original. Everybody *loves* to read those long
|
|
point-by-point debates, especially when they evolve into name-calling
|
|
and lots of "Is too!" -- "Is not!" -- "Is too, twizot!" exchanges.
|
|
|
|
Be sure to follow-up everything, and never let another person get in
|
|
the last word on a net debate. Why, if people let other people have
|
|
the last word, then discussions would actually stop! Remember, other
|
|
net readers aren't nearly as clever as you, and if somebody posts
|
|
something wrong, the readers can't possibly realize that on their own
|
|
without your elucidations. If somebody gets insulting in their net
|
|
postings, the best response is to get right down to their level and
|
|
fire a return salvo. When I read one net person make an insulting
|
|
attack on another, I always immediately take it as gospel unless a
|
|
rebuttal is posted. It never makes me think less of the insulter, so
|
|
it's your duty to respond.
|
|
|
|
------
|
|
|
|
Q: How can I choose what groups to post in?
|
|
|
|
A: Pick as many as you can, so that you get the widest audience.
|
|
After all, the net exists to give you an audience. Ignore those who
|
|
suggest you should only use groups where you think the article is
|
|
highly appropriate. Pick all groups where anybody might even be
|
|
slightly interested.
|
|
|
|
Always make sure followups go to all the groups. In the rare event
|
|
that you post a followup which contains something original, make sure
|
|
you expand the list of groups. Never include a "Followup-to:" line in
|
|
the header, since some people might miss part of the valuable
|
|
discussion in the fringe groups.
|
|
|
|
------
|
|
|
|
Q: How about an example?
|
|
|
|
A: Ok. Let's say you want to report that Gretzky has been traded from
|
|
the Oilers to the Kings. Now right away you might think
|
|
rec.sport.hockey would be enough. WRONG. Many more people might be
|
|
interested. This is a big trade! Since it's a NEWS article, it
|
|
belongs in the news.* hierarchy as well. If you are a news admin, or
|
|
there is one on your machine, try news.admin. If not, use news.misc.
|
|
|
|
The Oilers are probably interested in geology, so try sci.geo.fluids.
|
|
He is a big star, so post to sci.astro, and sci.space because they are
|
|
also interested in stars. And of course comp.dcom.telecom because he
|
|
was born in the birthplace of the telephone. And because he's
|
|
Canadian, post to soc.culture.Ontario.southwestern. But that group
|
|
doesn't exist, so cross-post to news.groups suggesting it should be
|
|
created. With this many groups of interest, your article will be
|
|
quite bizarre, so post to talk.bizarre as well. (And post to
|
|
comp.std.mumps, since they hardly get any articles there, and a "comp"
|
|
group will propagate your article further.)
|
|
|
|
You may also find it is more fun to post the article once in each
|
|
group. If you list all the newsgroups in the same article, some
|
|
newsreaders will only show the the article to the reader once! Don't
|
|
tolerate this.
|
|
|
|
------
|
|
|
|
Q: How do I create a newsgroup?
|
|
|
|
A: The easiest way goes something like "inews -C newgroup ....", and
|
|
while that will stir up lots of conversation about your new newsgroup,
|
|
it might not be enough.
|
|
|
|
First post a message in news.groups describing the group. This is a
|
|
"call for discussion." (If you see a call for discussion, immediately
|
|
post a one line message saying that you like or dislike the group.)
|
|
When proposing the group, pick a name with a TLA (three-letter
|
|
acronym) that will be understood only by "in" readers of the group.
|
|
|
|
After the call for discussion, post the call for flames, followed by a
|
|
call for arguments about the name and a call for run-on puns.
|
|
Eventually make a call for "votes." USENET is a democracy, so voters
|
|
can now all post their votes to ensure they get to all 30,000 machines
|
|
instead of just the person counting. Every few days post a long
|
|
summary of all the votes so that people can complain about bad mailers
|
|
and double votes. It means you'll be more popular and get lots of
|
|
mail. At the end of 21 days you can post the vote results so that
|
|
people can argue about all the technical violations of the guidelines
|
|
you made. Blame them on the moderator-of-the-week for
|
|
news.announce.newgroups. Then your group might be created.
|
|
|
|
To liven up discussion, choose a good cross-match for your hierarchy
|
|
and group. For example, comp.race.formula1 or soc.vlsi.design would
|
|
be good group names. If you want your group created quickly, include
|
|
an interesting word like "sex" or "activism." To avoid limiting
|
|
discussion, make the name as broad as possible, and don't forget that
|
|
TLA.
|
|
|
|
If possible, count votes from a leaf site with a once-a-week polled
|
|
connection to botswanavax. Schedule the vote during your relay site's
|
|
head crash if possible.
|
|
|
|
Under no circumstances use the trial group method, because it
|
|
eliminates the discussion, flame, pun, voting and guideline-violation
|
|
accusation phases, thus taking all the fun out of it. To create an
|
|
ALT group, simply issue the creation command. Then issue an rmgroup
|
|
and some more newgroup messages to save other netters the trouble of
|
|
doing that part.
|
|
|
|
------
|
|
|
|
Q: I cant spell worth a dam. I hope your going too tell me what to
|
|
do?
|
|
|
|
A: Don't worry about how your articles look. Remember it's the
|
|
message that counts, not the way it's presented. Ignore the fact that
|
|
sloppy spelling in a purely written forum sends out the same silent
|
|
messages that soiled clothing would when addressing an audience.
|
|
|
|
------
|
|
|
|
Q: How should I pick a subject for my articles?
|
|
|
|
A: Keep it short and meaningless. That way people will be forced to
|
|
actually read your article to find out what's in it. This means a
|
|
bigger audience for you, and we all know that's what the net is for.
|
|
If you do a followup, be sure and keep the same subject, even if it's
|
|
totally meaningless and not part of the same discussion. If you
|
|
don't, you won't catch all the people who are looking for stuff on the
|
|
original topic, and that means less audience for you.
|
|
|
|
------
|
|
|
|
Q: What sort of tone should I take in my article?
|
|
|
|
A: Be as outrageous as possible. If you don't say outlandish things,
|
|
and fill your article with libelous insults of net people, you may not
|
|
stick out enough in the flood of articles to get a response. The more
|
|
insane your posting looks, the more likely it is that you'll get lots
|
|
of followups. The net is here, after all, so that you can get lots of
|
|
attention.
|
|
|
|
If your article is polite, reasoned and to the point, you may only get
|
|
mailed replies. Yuck!
|
|
|
|
------
|
|
|
|
Q: The posting software suggested I had too long a signature and too
|
|
many lines of included text in my article. What's the best course?
|
|
|
|
A: Such restrictions were put in the software for no reason at all, so
|
|
don't even try to figure out why they might apply to your article.
|
|
Turns out most people search the net to find nice articles that
|
|
consist of the complete text of an earlier article plus a few lines.
|
|
|
|
In order to help these people, fill your article with dummy original
|
|
lines to get past the restrictions. Everybody will thank you for it.
|
|
|
|
For your signature, I know it's tough, but you will have to read it in
|
|
with the editor. Do this twice to make sure it's firmly in there. By
|
|
the way, to show your support for the free distribution of
|
|
information, be sure to include a copyright message forbidding
|
|
transmission of your article to sites whose USENET politics you don't
|
|
like.
|
|
|
|
Also, if you do have a lot of free time and want to trim down the text
|
|
in your article, be sure to delete some of the attribution lines so
|
|
that it looks like the original author of -- say -- a plea for world
|
|
peace actually wrote the followup calling for the nuking of Bermuda.
|
|
|
|
------
|
|
|
|
Q: They just announced on the radio that the United States has invaded
|
|
Iraq. Should I post?
|
|
|
|
A: Of course. The net can reach people in as few as 3 to 5 days.
|
|
It's the perfect way to inform people about such news events long
|
|
after the broadcast networks have covered them. As you are probably
|
|
the only person to have heard the news on the radio, be sure to post
|
|
as soon as you can.
|
|
|
|
------
|
|
|
|
Q: I have this great joke. You see, these three strings walk into a
|
|
bar...
|
|
|
|
A: Oh dear. Don't spoil it for me. Submit it to rec.humor, and post
|
|
it to the moderator of rec.humor.funny at the same time. I'm sure
|
|
he's never seen that joke.
|
|
|
|
------
|
|
|
|
Q: What computer should I buy? An Atari ST or an Amiga?
|
|
|
|
A: Cross post that question to the Atari and Amiga groups. It's an
|
|
interesting and novel question that I am sure they would love to
|
|
investigate in those groups. There is no need to read the groups in
|
|
advance or examine the "frequently asked question" lists to see if the
|
|
topic has already been dealt with. In fact, you don't need to read
|
|
the group at all, and you can tell people that in your query.
|
|
|
|
------
|
|
|
|
Q: What about other important questions? How should I know when to
|
|
post?
|
|
|
|
A: Always post them. It would be a big waste of your time to find a
|
|
knowledgeable user in one of the groups and ask through private mail
|
|
if the topic has already come up. Much easier to bother thousands of
|
|
people with the same question.
|
|
|
|
------
|
|
|
|
Q: What is the measure of a worthwhile group?
|
|
|
|
A: Why, it's Volume, Volume, Volume. Any group that has lots of noise
|
|
in it must be good. Remember, the higher the volume of material in a
|
|
group, the higher percentage of useful, factual and insightful
|
|
articles you will find. In fact, if a group can't demonstrate a high
|
|
enough volume, it should be deleted from the net.
|
|
|
|
------
|
|
|
|
Q: Emily, I'm having a serious disagreement with somebody on the net.
|
|
I tried complaints to his sysadmin, organizing mail campaigns, called
|
|
for his removal from the net and phoning his employer to get him
|
|
fired. Everybody laughed at me. What can I do?
|
|
|
|
A: Go to the daily papers. Most modern reporters are top-notch
|
|
computer experts who will understand the net, and your problems,
|
|
perfectly. They will print careful, reasoned stories without any
|
|
errors at all, and surely represent the situation properly to the
|
|
public. The public will also all act wisely, as they are also fully
|
|
cognizant of the subtle nature of net society.
|
|
|
|
Papers never sensationalize or distort, so be sure to point out things
|
|
like racism and sexism wherever they might exist. Be sure as well
|
|
that they understand that all things on the net, particularly insults,
|
|
are meant literally. Link what transpires on the net to the causes of
|
|
the Holocaust, if possible. If regular papers won't take the story,
|
|
go to a tabloid paper -- they are always interested in good stories.
|
|
|
|
By arranging all this free publicity for the net, you'll become very
|
|
well known. People on the net will wait in eager anticipation for
|
|
your every posting, and refer to you constantly. You'll get more mail
|
|
than you ever dreamed possible -- the ultimate in net success.
|
|
|
|
------
|
|
|
|
Q: What does foobar stand for?
|
|
|
|
A: It stands for you, dear.
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
Gene Spafford
|
|
NSF/Purdue/U of Florida Software Engineering Research Center,
|
|
Dept. of Computer Sciences, Purdue University, W. Lafayette IN 47907-1398
|
|
Internet: spaf@cs.purdue.edu phone: (317) 494-7825
|