548 lines
25 KiB
Plaintext
548 lines
25 KiB
Plaintext
Newsgroups: rec.music.makers.guitar
|
|
From: templon@paramount.nikhefk.nikhef.nl (Jeffrey Templon)
|
|
Subject: Fender StratoFAQ Posting - about Stratocasters
|
|
Message-ID: <1993Jan28.161956.29636@paramount.nikhefk.nikhef.nl>
|
|
Keywords: fender stratocaster guitar faq
|
|
Organization: NIKHEFK
|
|
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 16:19:56 GMT
|
|
Lines: 542
|
|
|
|
This is the Fender Stratocaster "FAQ" posting with answers.
|
|
New sections have been added about the woods used in making
|
|
Fenders, about tremolo setups, and a BIG section about how
|
|
to date your Strat (i.e. find out its age - Fender is still
|
|
working on the Laura Dern Model so the other dating
|
|
option is still a little uncomfortable ...). Thanks to Christian
|
|
and Pasi for putting this date-a-Strat section together!!
|
|
|
|
As always, all contributions and comments and corrections
|
|
and free beer, etc. are welcome. Have fun and jam out!!
|
|
|
|
JT
|
|
for the StratoFAQ crew
|
|
|
|
[ps - I read somewhere that the US Vintage series have ASH
|
|
bodies which seems to be different than in the Frontline
|
|
(which is where we got our info). Anybody have a definitive
|
|
answer on this??]
|
|
|
|
------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
This StratoFAQ was composed by Jeff Templon
|
|
(templon@paramount.nikhefk.nikhef.nl) and Don Tillman (till@lucid.com).
|
|
We used the Fender _Frontline_ Catalog, as well as information gleaned
|
|
from magazines and our vast experience. Other net people have
|
|
contributed pieces, and their names are displayed alongside their
|
|
contributions. We welcome any corrections or additions.
|
|
|
|
Stratocasters
|
|
|
|
This FAQ explains about the different models of Fender Stratocasters, why
|
|
they exist, what the difference is between them. Last check showed forty
|
|
different models (that's forty models with the name "Strat" in them, with
|
|
separate model numbers, not counting colors), and they do not always look
|
|
very different at first glance, so be careful. Above all, let your fingers
|
|
(or maybe those of a trusted player-friend if you are a beginner) be your
|
|
guide!
|
|
|
|
We're going to be splitting them up by country of origin, not because we
|
|
really care about where they were built, but because Strats from different
|
|
countries use different materials and are of different designs.
|
|
|
|
Also we're not going to list prices; these are already available
|
|
on the internet.
|
|
|
|
Finally: if you want EVEN MORE information, there is a sort of
|
|
"definitive book" on Stratocasters. It is called "The Fender
|
|
Stratocaster" by A.R. Duchossoir, paperback, 48 pages, $9.95 (ISBN
|
|
0-88188-880-X).
|
|
|
|
Disclaimer: We come down hard on the "Hot Modern" sort of Stratocasters,
|
|
since they aren't really true to the original Stratocaster concept.
|
|
Your mileage may vary. As always, you should listen to your fingers
|
|
first (if YOU like 'em, then buy 'em!) Actually, one of us [-jt]
|
|
sort of objects to the Plus and Ultra models too.
|
|
|
|
U.S. Stratocasters
|
|
------------------
|
|
|
|
U.S. Stratocasters are intended to be the deluxe, "proper" Stratocasters.
|
|
The bodies are made of Alder just like the originals. Top quality hardware
|
|
throughout.
|
|
|
|
U.S. Vintage 1957 Stratocaster
|
|
Maple fingerboard, single layer pickguard
|
|
|
|
U.S. Vintage 1962 Stratocaster
|
|
Rosewood fingerboard, triple layer pickguard
|
|
|
|
Both models: Alder Body, Nitrocellulose lacquer finish; "medium" neck, 21
|
|
small frets, 7.25" radius; pickups have lacquer-coated windings, staggered
|
|
polepieces and cloth-wrapped wire; 3-position pickup switch (with kit for
|
|
5-position operation); nickel plated hardware, vintage tremolo unit and
|
|
tuners.
|
|
|
|
These models are intended to be pretty close to exact replicas of the '57
|
|
and '62 models. I have played a '62 reissue and found it to be really
|
|
nice [-jt]. nathan@laplace.biology.yale.edu tells us that the above
|
|
statement about the neck (from the Fender catalogue) is misleading;
|
|
the necks are actually quite different from each other.
|
|
|
|
[USA] American Standard Stratocaster [Rosewood fingerboard]
|
|
[USA] American Standard Stratocaster [Maple fingerboard]
|
|
[USA] American Standard Stratocaster [Lefty, Rosewood fingerboard]
|
|
[USA] American Standard Stratocaster [Lefty, Maple fingerboard]
|
|
|
|
Block style saddles, satin finish neck, TBX tone control, satin finish
|
|
necks, 9.5-inch neck radius, Fender-Schaller tuners. I have one of these
|
|
and like it a lot [-dt]. I have one too, and ditto [-jt].
|
|
|
|
U.S. Strat Plus [maple fingerboard]
|
|
U.S. Strat Plus [rosewood fingerboard]
|
|
|
|
The Plus's have Lace pickups, Wilkinson nut and heads, hipshot tremsetter.
|
|
|
|
U.S. Deluxe Strat Plus [maple fingerboard]
|
|
U.S. Deluxe Strat Plus [rosewood fingerboard]
|
|
|
|
The Deluxe Plus's additionally have Ash body laminates top and back,
|
|
multicolor Lace pickups.
|
|
|
|
U.S. Strat Ultra
|
|
|
|
The Ultra additionally has an Ebony fingerboard, figured maple body
|
|
laminates top and back, bridge pickup is a pair to emulate a humbucker
|
|
sound.
|
|
|
|
[USA] Set Neck Stratocaster
|
|
[USA] Set Neck Floyd Rose Stratocaster
|
|
|
|
Mahogany body with figured maple top and back laminates, ebony fingerboard.
|
|
|
|
[USA] Floyd Rose Classic Stratocaster [maple fingerboard]
|
|
[USA] Floyd Rose Classic Stratocaster [rosewood fingerboard]
|
|
|
|
Trendy heavy metal abominations.
|
|
|
|
[USA] H.M. Strat Ultra
|
|
|
|
Basswood, trendy heavy metal abomination.
|
|
|
|
[USA] Eric Clapton Strat
|
|
[USA] Malmsteen Strat [maple fingerboard]
|
|
[USA] Malmsteen Strat [rosewood fingerboard]
|
|
[USA] Stevie Ray Vaughan Strat
|
|
[USA] Robert Cray Strat (no tremolo)
|
|
[USA] Buddy Guy Strat
|
|
|
|
Signature series. Intended to be like the ones played by the artists
|
|
who have their name written on them, but it sounds like this is usually
|
|
not the case.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Japanese/Mexican Stratocasters
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
The Japanese and Mexican Stratocasters are intended to be the best value
|
|
for the money.
|
|
|
|
It seems that the Japanese instruments are made with Basswood bodies and
|
|
the Mexican ones are made of Poplar. I don't know much about Basswood, but
|
|
it appears to be much lighter and less resonant that Ash or Alder. It's
|
|
also used by most of the other Japanese manufacturers (Ibanez, Yamaha,
|
|
Charvel, etc.) [see more wood info in the Q&A section.]
|
|
|
|
It could be argued that Basswood or Poplar are inappropriate woods for
|
|
Stratocaster bodies, making the instrument not a heck of a lot different
|
|
from, say, an Ibanez Roadstar. But certainly the use of Basswood is
|
|
completely incorrect for an instrument that claims to be a "Reissue" model.
|
|
|
|
Questions: Are the Japanese and Mexican factories actually owned by Fender
|
|
or are the instruments built by other companies? I don't know [-dt]. I
|
|
don't know either [-jt]. It probably doesn't matter too much, but do these
|
|
factories also manufacture other brands of guitars?
|
|
|
|
[Japan] Reissue 50's Stratocaster
|
|
v-shaped maple neck, single-layer pickguard,
|
|
|
|
[Japan] Reissue 50's Hardtail Stratocaster
|
|
as above but without wang bar.
|
|
|
|
[Japan] Reissue 60's Stratocaster
|
|
u-shaped neck with rosewood-slab fretboard, triple-layer pickguard
|
|
|
|
These "reissue" models are intended to be "good deal" reproductions of
|
|
old-model Stratocasters.
|
|
|
|
[Japan/Mexico] Standard Stratocaster [Rosewood fingerboard]
|
|
[Japan/Mexico] Standard Stratocaster [Maple fingerboard]
|
|
[Japan] Standard Stratocaster [Left handed]
|
|
|
|
These are the ones you typically see on sale. I have heard that the
|
|
Standards are no longer made at all in Japan [-jt]. The Mexican
|
|
Standards that I have played seem to be very nice guitars,
|
|
especially for the money [-jt]. I have had professional player
|
|
friends tell me the same thing.
|
|
|
|
[Japan] HRR '50's Stratocaster [maple fingerboard]
|
|
[Japan] HRR '50's Stratocaster [rosewood fingerboard]
|
|
|
|
Trendy heavy metal abominations.
|
|
|
|
[Japan] H.M. Strat [maple fingerboard, 1 humbucker, 2 single coils]
|
|
[Japan] H.M. Strat [rosewood fingerboard, 1 humbucker, 2 single coils]
|
|
[Japan] H.M. Strat [maple fingerboard, 2 humbuckers, 1 single coil]
|
|
[Japan] H.M. Strat [rosewood fingerboard, 2 humbucker, 1 single coil]
|
|
|
|
More trendy heavy metal abominations. 17" neck radius.
|
|
|
|
[Japan] Malmsteen-san Standard
|
|
|
|
|
|
Squier, Squier II Stratocasters
|
|
-------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Very inexpensive Korean instruments made with cheap plywood bodies and
|
|
cheap hardware. They can be had new for around $180. There are some
|
|
people (a "cult following"?) who prefer these guitars to the Fender models,
|
|
once the pickups have been replaced. I have no idea what the difference is
|
|
between the Squier and Squier II. [-dt, jt]
|
|
|
|
The Squier name comes from a manufacturer of strings that CBS bought in the
|
|
late 60's. Fender uses it for their cheap instruments, so as to cash in on
|
|
the low end of the market, but keeping the business somewhat separate from
|
|
their main market. (The phrase "Plausible Deniability" comes to mind.)
|
|
|
|
Questions: Is the Korean factory owned by Fender? Does this factory also
|
|
manufacture other brands of guitars? Toasters? Motorcycles?
|
|
|
|
[Korea] Squier Standard Stratocaster [maple neck]
|
|
[Korea] Squier Standard Stratocaster [rosewood neck]
|
|
[Korea] Squier II Standard Stratocaster
|
|
[Korea] Squier II Standard Stratocaster [trendy pickup option]
|
|
|
|
12-inch neck radius.
|
|
|
|
Some Commonly-Asked Questions About Stratocasters:
|
|
--------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Q: How can I tell if they are "American" Stratocasters?
|
|
|
|
A: Look on the headstock, underneath the Fender logo. It will state in
|
|
which country it was made. You can also tell by the first few
|
|
digits of the serial number. As of a few years ago, "E" meant made
|
|
in the USA [is this still true? -- jt]
|
|
|
|
Q: What is the difference between a rosewood neck and a maple neck?
|
|
|
|
A: Actually, both versions have a maple neck; the rosewood fretboard is
|
|
added on top of the maple piece. There are two important differences:
|
|
first the maple is usually smoother and harder due to the fact that there's
|
|
a finish over it while the rosewood fingerboard is bare, so there is a
|
|
different feel when you play the guitar. Secondly, the woods have
|
|
different physical properties, so the way they carry the vibrations is
|
|
different, which gives the guitar a different sound. Most people say the
|
|
maple-neck models sound "brighter" and the rosewood-models "smokier".
|
|
|
|
Q: Why the difference in the neck radii?
|
|
|
|
A: Leo originally designed the curved neck to be easier to chord, while
|
|
more recently a less radical curve is in demand to allow more extreme
|
|
string bending without "fretting out". The original and reissue models
|
|
have a 7.5-inch radius while the HM models have a 17-inch radius.
|
|
|
|
Q: What's a TBX tone control?
|
|
|
|
A: Fender claims that the TBX tone control is an advanced design tone
|
|
control that can not only roll off the highs, but boost them as well.
|
|
Specifically between full counter clockwise and the center detent it acts
|
|
like a normal tone control and between the center detent and full clockwise
|
|
it boosts the highs. Actually at full clockwise it's effectively out of
|
|
the circuit, as you turn it toward center it shunts the pickup with an 82K
|
|
ohm resistor, and from center down to full counterclockwise it shunts the
|
|
pickup with a capacitor like a standard tone control. So it doesn't boost
|
|
the highs at all. I don't like the TBX myself; being a double ganged
|
|
control it's more difficult to spin with your pinky, and the interesting
|
|
part of the adjustment range is all cramped between 2 and 3 or so. Next
|
|
time I open up my Strat I'll probably replace the TBX with a normal tone
|
|
control. [-dt]
|
|
|
|
Q: What's the out-of-phase position?
|
|
|
|
A: A misnomer, the pickups aren't really out of phase. The original
|
|
Stratocaster had a 3-position pickup switch that would choose only one
|
|
pickup on at a time and folks eventually discovered that they could get two
|
|
additional neat sounds by rocking the switch in between positions 1 and 2
|
|
and between positions 2 and 3. (This is because Leo correctly chose a
|
|
make-before-break switch.) Soon 5-position switches were readily available
|
|
in the parts market, and soon after that Stratocaster came equipped with
|
|
5-position switches as standard equipment.
|
|
|
|
These two addition positions soon became known as out-of-phase positions
|
|
because the nasal sound of two pickups on in phase and physically located a
|
|
couple inches from each other is superficially similiar to the sound of the
|
|
neck and bridge pickups on a two pickup instrument on out-of-phase. And
|
|
the name has stuck. [-dt]
|
|
|
|
Q: What's the deal with the middle pickup?
|
|
|
|
A: The middle pickup on current model Stratocasters (with standard pickups)
|
|
has its magnets mounted oppositely to the other two (north pole up vs.
|
|
south pole up), inverting the polarity of the signal, and is wired with its
|
|
electical connections swapped, inverting the polarity back again. Doesn't
|
|
sound too useful at first, but when the middle pickup is on at the same
|
|
time one of the other pickups is on (positions two and four on the selector
|
|
switch), hum and noise from external sources will cancel. This is the
|
|
humbucking principle. Most guitars with two single coil pickups also do
|
|
this (ie., the Telecaster, Jaguar, Jazz Bass, etc.). [-dt]
|
|
|
|
Q: What's a Lace Sensor Pickup?
|
|
|
|
A: Fender claims that the Lace Sensor pickup "is not a pickup at all, but
|
|
an Audio Emission Sensor (AES)". Pure marketing drivel. Insulting too;
|
|
AES actually stands for the Audio Engineering Society, a professional
|
|
organization. Anyway, it's a standard single coil pickup that, because of
|
|
its design, is less sensitive to hum and noise than typical single coil
|
|
pickups. It sounds similiar, but not exactly like, standard Fender single
|
|
coil pickups. They're available in four models (Gold, Silver, Blue, Red)
|
|
with different amounts of high end rolloff. The Lace Sensors only come in
|
|
one magnetic polarity, so the middle pickup hack mentioned above doesn't
|
|
apply. [-dt]
|
|
|
|
Q: What's the deal with the tone controls?
|
|
|
|
A: The original Stratocaster and current reissue model have the first tone
|
|
control connected to the neck pickup (and thus in effect only when the neck
|
|
pickup is selected), the second tone control connected to the middle
|
|
pickups (and in effect only when the middle pickup is selected), and the
|
|
bridge pickup without a tone control. Modern Stratocasters have the second
|
|
tone control in effect for both the middle and bridge pickups. [-dt]
|
|
|
|
Q: Isn't the phrase "Current Reissue Model" a triple oxymoron?
|
|
A: Yes indeed, these are very rare.
|
|
|
|
Q: Does the wood used in the guitar matter? Which wood is used?
|
|
A: [courtesy Christian Sebeke <cseb@frodo.lfi.uni-hannover.de>]
|
|
Woods that have been used to make Stratocasters include ash, alder,
|
|
poplar, and basswood. The alder-bodied guitars are the "normal"
|
|
stratocasters, ash having been used in some early models and
|
|
poplar or basswood in some of the Japanese/Mexican/Korean versions.
|
|
[note - any more information from wood experts is welcome]
|
|
In the opinion of some luthiers, poplar is close to basswood.
|
|
The basic sound of a guitar made from Alder is warm with a good amount
|
|
of presence without being too extreme in the top. The Poplar is not as
|
|
popular as the name might suggest. The sound is not characteristic, but
|
|
a bit more bright than basswood. Poplar is quite soft.
|
|
|
|
Q: What is the difference between changing string gauges, tightening
|
|
the trem screws (accessible on a Strat from behind the guitar),
|
|
or adding more springs (also accessible from behind) in trying
|
|
to set up your Strat's tremolo system?
|
|
A: I'll not write up the physics details, but ... in this situation,
|
|
the difference between adjusting the number of springs vs.
|
|
adjusting the screws is that the fewer springs you have,
|
|
the "spongier" your trem action will be. That is, it will
|
|
take less force for you to change the pitch of the strings
|
|
by a given amount. This goes for both ways, either raising
|
|
or lowering the pitch! It is easy to see why this works
|
|
with lowering the pitch (then you pull against the spring),
|
|
but I was surprised about getting the same answer when
|
|
raising the pitch.
|
|
A related effect is that if you choose the few-spring option,
|
|
then your guitar will be more apt to go out of tune when
|
|
you bend notes. I don't mean "lose tune" so that you must
|
|
retune, I mean that if you play one open note and bend another
|
|
at the same time, the open note will go out of tune because
|
|
you've moved the bridge by increasing string tension with
|
|
your bend.
|
|
The effect of the string gauge is to increase the string tension;
|
|
thus if you have your trem setup and you put on heavier strings,
|
|
you'll either have to tighten the trem screws or add more springs to
|
|
keep your same trem setup position.
|
|
A final note: the number of springs may affect your guitar's
|
|
tone! You are changing the way that the string vibrations
|
|
are transmitted to the wood of the body when you add
|
|
or remove springs. A professional player told me [jt] once
|
|
that's why he doesn't use a non-tremolo strat, even though
|
|
he hardly ever touches the tremolo bar ... "you've got
|
|
this hollowed-out area in the wood with all this metal
|
|
in it ... that's why a Stratocaster sounds like it does."
|
|
|
|
Q: How do I tell when my possibly valuable Stratocaster was made?
|
|
A: The below part of the FAQ has been contributed by Christian Sebeke
|
|
and Pasi Korhonen, and answers ALOT of these questions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Version 2.3.2 , 27.01.93, 9.00
|
|
FAQ: Please date my Strat.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Introduction
|
|
|
|
Stratocasters were built since 1953 and it is quite difficult to
|
|
exactly recover the birthday of your guitar. The manufacturing dates
|
|
of the parts for the Stratocaster and the final assembly may differ
|
|
significantly. Necks are usually stamped with their manufacturing date
|
|
on the end that fits into the body and faces towards the pickups.
|
|
Bodies were also stamped, but the digits are usually hidden under the
|
|
pickguard and covered with paint. For a first idea we would call it
|
|
convenient to hang on to the serial numbering scheme to determine the
|
|
manufacturing year of a Strat although it is easy to exchange neck
|
|
plates. You will have to disassemble the axe to find the definitive
|
|
(neck) age. If you want to know a bit more, there is a book that deals
|
|
with nearly all details on Strats, it's called "The Fender
|
|
Stratocaster" by A.R. Duchossoir (see reference above.) One could
|
|
also recommend Tony Bacon and Paul Days book: "The Fender Book", A
|
|
complete History of Fender Electric Guitars, Balafon, London 1992 (We
|
|
don't have it yet, so no comment). If you really want to dig vintage
|
|
guitars of any kind, try George Gruhn and Walter Carter: "Gruhn's
|
|
guide to Vintage Guitars", GPI Books, SF, 1991. Not so many pictures,
|
|
but more numbering information. Also "American Guitars" by Tom
|
|
Wheeler is a good book for the guitar lover. He has several sections
|
|
and tons of pictures on all American guitar manufacturers along with
|
|
some information on dating Fenders and Gibsons. ISBN 0-06-273154-8
|
|
paperback, revised and updated edition, Harper Perennial, NY 1992
|
|
|
|
The authors [cs,pk] think that it is a pity that old Strats are getting
|
|
sold to people who don't use them to enrich the world of music, but to
|
|
enrich themselves. There may be talents that would have grown to a better
|
|
playing using an old but well crafted reasonably priced guitar. So be aware
|
|
of your instrument's value and think twice before giving it away to someone
|
|
who does not know how to play it. We don't include prices here, but if you
|
|
buy or sell a guitar be aware of the following facts: Every modification
|
|
lowers the price, also refinishing. Special models and original custom
|
|
colors may raise it significantly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note
|
|
|
|
ALWAYS USE THIS WITH A GRAIN OF SALT!!! THERE MAY BE INCONSISTENCIES.
|
|
|
|
IF YOU DATED YOUR STRAT PLEASE SEND A NOTE TO THE AUTHORS ALONG WITH AS
|
|
MUCH INFORMATION ON YOUR GUITAR AS POSSIBLE, ESPECIALLY REGARDING THE
|
|
SUBJECTS MENTIONED BELOW. WE WILL COLLECT THEM AND MERGE THEM TO THE COMING
|
|
VERSIONS OF THE FAQ.
|
|
|
|
pkor@phoenix.oulu.fi
|
|
cs@frodo.lfi.uni-hannover.de
|
|
|
|
Questionnaire (We would appreciate at least the first three items):
|
|
|
|
* Serial-Number
|
|
* Neck-Date
|
|
* Patent Number(s) like 61,62,...,76
|
|
Color (refinished?)
|
|
Neck (rosewood/maple)
|
|
Micro-Tilt (y/n)
|
|
Staggered PU's (y/n)
|
|
Scratchplate (alu/plastic/laminated)
|
|
Scratchplate Color
|
|
Headstock/Logo
|
|
|
|
|
|
Serial Numbers
|
|
|
|
To give you an idea of the age take the following table of serial numbers.
|
|
It shows the range of numbers and the respective time when they were used.
|
|
Note that the periods overlap significantly sometimes. Credits should be
|
|
given to Jim Werner, a collector from Iowa, who collected a neck
|
|
date/serial number table from more than 800 Fender instruments. His table
|
|
is reprinted in the Duchossoir. Our table is a compilation of the Werner
|
|
list and Duchossoir info, which comes from Fender for later (70s) periods.
|
|
|
|
Period Series Comment
|
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
1953-1954 2 or 3 digits maybe prototypes until start in 1954
|
|
1953-1956 4 digits through 1111 mainly 1954
|
|
1955-1957 4 digits starting with 7 or 8
|
|
1954-1957 08999 ... 14514 mainly 1956
|
|
1957 15054 ... 22647
|
|
1958 28250 ... 30747
|
|
1959 30892 ... 43125
|
|
1959-1960 44606 ... 48490
|
|
1960-1962 55045 ... 71331 mainly 1961
|
|
1961-1964 76281 ... 90745 mainly 1962
|
|
1961-1963 91954 ... 98691 mainly 1963
|
|
1963-1964 L 00186 ... L 33650 few 1962
|
|
1964-1965 L 34983 ... L 99809
|
|
1965-1966 100 173 ... 124 061 mainly 1965
|
|
1964-1969 125 115 ... 195 270 mainly 1966
|
|
1966-1969 195 663 ... 215 825 mainly 1967
|
|
1966-1968 217 602 ... 240 407 mainly 1968
|
|
1966-1972 250 025 ... 293 692 exceptions through late 1970s
|
|
1968-1972 303 802 ... 375 967 mainly 1972
|
|
1979-1980 25 + 4 digits Anniversary Strat
|
|
apr 73 - sep 76 4 + 5 digits
|
|
sep 73 - sep 76 5 + 5 digits
|
|
aug 74 - aug 76 6 + 5 digits
|
|
sep 76 - dec 76 7 + 5 digits
|
|
aug 76 - apr 77 76 + 5 digits on headstock
|
|
mar 77 - aug 78 S6 + 5 digits on headstock
|
|
jan 77 - apr 78 S7 + 5 digits on headstock
|
|
dec 77 - dec 78 S8 + 5 digits on headstock
|
|
nov 78 - aug 81 S9 + 5 digits on headstock
|
|
jun 79 - jan 81 E0 + 5 digits on headstock
|
|
dec 80 - jan 82 E1 + 5 digits on headstock
|
|
dec 81 - jan 83 E2 + 5 digits on headstock
|
|
dec 82 - jan 85 E3 + 5 digits on headstock
|
|
dec 83 - early 88 E4 + 5 digits on headstock
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patent Numbers
|
|
|
|
Another source of information in the range from 1961-1976 are the patent
|
|
numbers. Those numbers are fixed numbers (i.e. the same number on EVERY
|
|
Strat made during a certain period) and written on the headstock until
|
|
1976, when the serial number moved there from the neck plate.
|
|
|
|
1961 2 numbers PAT 2,573,254 2,741,146
|
|
1962 3rd added in spring 2,960,900
|
|
1963 same 3 numbers
|
|
1964 4th added mid-'64 with transition logo 3,143,028
|
|
1965 5th added mid-'65 2,817,261
|
|
1966 after Jan '66 only 3 numbers PAT 2,741,146 3,143,028 DES 169,062
|
|
1967 same 3 numbers
|
|
1968 after mid-'68 2 numbers PAT 2,741,146 3,143,028
|
|
1969 same 2 numbers
|
|
1970 about mid-'70 one number 2,741,146
|
|
1971 same number
|
|
1972 about mid-'72 one number 3,143,028
|
|
1976 last time with PAT number, first time with serial# in the headstock
|
|
|
|
|
|
Misc.
|
|
|
|
- The 5 - digit serial numbers were preceded by a dash from late 1956 to
|
|
early 1958 and between late 1957 and late 1958 some neck plates were
|
|
double stamped, 6 digits outside and 5 digits with dash (different
|
|
number) on the underside.
|
|
|
|
- First scratchplates were anodized aluminum, then white plastic.
|
|
Laminated scratchplate from 1959 on.
|
|
|
|
- Early Strats show a "spaghetti"-logo (thin, quite simple letters). From
|
|
July '64 it changed to a more modern looking gold "transition" logo and
|
|
mid '68 until '77 they had the black "CBS"-logo. Then it got the gold
|
|
outline, and mid-1983 the smaller silver logo appeared.
|
|
|
|
- Three color sunburst was used from mid-'58.
|
|
|
|
- Large F on the plate since CBS-takeover in Jan. '65, until late '76.
|
|
|
|
- Wider headstock generally from December '65. The new small headstock
|
|
appeared in fall '81. In addition to these, a medium size headstock was
|
|
used on special models (The Strat, Walnut Strat and Gold Stratocaster)
|
|
in early 80's.
|
|
|
|
- 3 bolt Micro Tilt adjustment from fall '71 to Anniversary '79, std.
|
|
Strats till fall '81.
|
|
|
|
- Staggered Pickups appeared in 1954 and vanished in late 1974. Reappeared
|
|
late '81 along with the smaller headstock, when Dan Smith took over the
|
|
design front (Smith Strat).
|
|
|
|
Remember to send your dates to the authors.
|
|
Thanks for using this dating sceme.
|
|
|
|
[end of the Date-A-Strat section!!]
|