115 lines
5.6 KiB
Plaintext
115 lines
5.6 KiB
Plaintext
Date: Wednesday, 20 August 1986 03:42-EDT
|
|
From: Mark Crispin <MRC%PANDA@SUMEX-AIM.ARPA>
|
|
To: TOPS-20@SU-SCORE.ARPA, Boken@RED.RUTGERS.EDU
|
|
Re: DEC's PDP's
|
|
Postal-Address: 1802 Hackett Ave.; Mountain View, CA 94043-4431
|
|
Phone: +1 (415) 968-1052
|
|
|
|
A number of people have requested my list of all the DEC PDP's,
|
|
so I thought I'd bore you all with it.
|
|
|
|
The PDP-1 was an 18 bit machine. It was DEC's first computer,
|
|
and some of the first timesharing systems were designed for it. It's
|
|
also unique in being one's complement; all later DEC computers were
|
|
two's complement. Some machines, such as one of MIT's PDP-1s, were in
|
|
operation until the late '70s.
|
|
|
|
The PDP-2 was a designation reserved for a 24 bit machine, but as
|
|
far as I can tell it was never even designed and definitely none were
|
|
ever built.
|
|
|
|
The PDP-3 was a 36 bit machine that was designed but never built
|
|
by DEC. However, Scientific Engineering Institute built one in 1960.
|
|
|
|
The PDP-4 was an 18 bit machine that was intended to be a
|
|
cheaper, slower alternative to the PDP-1. It was so slow that it
|
|
didn't sell well, although it was interesting for its
|
|
auto-incrementing memory registers. It was not program-compatible
|
|
with the PDP-1, but its instruction set was the basis of DEC's future
|
|
18 bit computers.
|
|
|
|
The PDP-5 was a 12 bit machine designed to be a small laboratory
|
|
system. It used many of the ideas in the LINC (Laboratory Instruction
|
|
Computer, designed by Lincoln Labs at MIT, some of which were built by
|
|
DEC).
|
|
|
|
The PDP-6 was a 36 bit machine and the first machine to implement
|
|
the most wonderful computer architecture known to man. It was rather
|
|
expensive and difficult to maintain, and not many were sold. As a
|
|
result, DEC cancelled 36 bit computers for what was to be the first of
|
|
many times.
|
|
|
|
The PDP-7 was an 18 bit machine and the sucessor to the PDP-4.
|
|
It was a major price/performance win over the PDP-4 and the first DEC
|
|
computer to use wire-wrapping.
|
|
|
|
The PDP-8 was a 12 bit machine and the sucessor to the PDP-8. It
|
|
basically defined the term "minicomputer", and went through several
|
|
incarnations. The original PDP-8 was followed by the extremely slow
|
|
PDP-8/S (as bad as the PDP-4 was to the PDP-1, but at least the /S was
|
|
program-compatible). DEC recouped with the PDP-8/I (using MSI
|
|
integrated circuits) and the smaller PDP-8/L, and somewhat later came
|
|
out with the "Omnibus 8" machines -- the PDP-8/E, the PDP-8/F (a
|
|
half-sized version of the PDP-8/E), the PDP-8/M (an OEM version of the
|
|
PDP-8/F), and the final machine, the single board PDP-8/A. The
|
|
PDP-8/A still exists after a fashion as a current DEC product.
|
|
|
|
The PDP-9 was an 18 bit machine and the sucessor to the PDP-7.
|
|
It had a faster memory than the PDP-7 and was the first
|
|
microprogrammed DEC computer. Modulo a 300 wire(!) ECO required in
|
|
the first machines, the PDP-9 was a reliable machine and some are
|
|
still in operation today. There was a short-lived PDP-9/L.
|
|
|
|
The PDP-10 was a 36 bit machine and the sucessor to the PDP-6.
|
|
It is especially noted for its software, which represents the pinnacle
|
|
of DEC software engineering and has never been equalled. The first
|
|
KA10, largely installed in universities, created a whole generation of
|
|
timesharing hackers. The follow-on KI10, with paging and using IC's
|
|
instead of discrete components but otherwise unexciting, mostly was
|
|
sold to commercial organizations. The KL10 went through several
|
|
incarnations and is today the most representative of this marvelous
|
|
machine. The KS10 was a small, low-speed (approximately KA10
|
|
performance) processor which was DEC's last successful implementation
|
|
of this architecture.
|
|
|
|
The PDP-11 was a 16-bit machine that went through more
|
|
implementations and operating systems than can be counted. Presently
|
|
it superceded the less powerful PDP-8 as the representative
|
|
minicomputer. While the PDP-11 used octal, it was in its deep heart
|
|
of hearts a hexidecimal machine, and the first indicator of the
|
|
creeping IBMification of DEC that took full fruit in the VAX. [I can
|
|
hear the flames now...] Rather than fight it the customers loved it;
|
|
more PDP-11's have been sold than any other DEC computer (possibly
|
|
more than all the others combined).
|
|
|
|
The PDP-12 was a 12 bit machine and the sucessor to the PDP-8.
|
|
It combined a LINC and a PDP-8 type processor in the same box and
|
|
basically was a new model of the LINC-8 which was the same thing.
|
|
|
|
No PDP-13 was ever designed or built. Even DEC gets
|
|
superstitious.
|
|
|
|
The PDP-14 was a 12 bit machine with a 1 bit register. It was
|
|
used as a process control engine in applications that were felt to be
|
|
too rugged for a PDP-8, and basically replaced a set of relays. Later
|
|
DEC made PDP-8's suitable for this sort of thing, but it didn't stop
|
|
them from the ultimate silliness of building a PDP-14 that used a
|
|
PDP-8 as its console processor!
|
|
|
|
The PDP-15 was an 18 bit machine and the final one of this design
|
|
built by DEC. More PDP-15's were built and sold than any of the
|
|
others, and it went through several incarnations including some which
|
|
used a PDP-11 as a front end. Apparently the cancellation of the
|
|
PDP-15 came as a great surprise to the "Tiger Team" who worked on it,
|
|
although considering its general ungainliness compared to comparable
|
|
performance PDP-11's it wasn't surprising. In many ways the PDP-15
|
|
died for the same reason the PDP-10 did.
|
|
|
|
The PDP-16 was a "roll your own" 16 bit machine based on various
|
|
"building blocks". Every PDP-16 was essentially custom-designed by
|
|
the customer. It got a fair amount of attention when it was announced
|
|
but evidentally didn't sell very well.
|
|
|
|
There was no PDP-17 or any other designator. DEC apparently
|
|
decided that "PDP" had a perjorative ring to it.
|