185 lines
9.5 KiB
Plaintext
185 lines
9.5 KiB
Plaintext
Anatomy of a C64 user - a SysOp's guide to Commodore users.
|
||
Electrik Kool Aid - April 1990
|
||
|
||
As a SysOp, I've grown to find a special dislike for people that use
|
||
Commodore computers. This is not a prejudice against the decent
|
||
people (very rare) who through either lack of cash or ignorance (Gee
|
||
Honey, lets buy Junior a computer so he has a future. K-mart has them
|
||
on sale...) purchased this mass-marketed wonder, but a firm
|
||
disenchanment with the majority who also purchased a auto-dial modem
|
||
for it.
|
||
|
||
In the early days of home computers when everyone was limited to 16k
|
||
and cassette drives, the typical computer nut was an intelligent,
|
||
resourceful "hacker" who wasn't content to sit and play Pong - s/he
|
||
pushed the limits of his/her hardware to see what it could do. With
|
||
the advent of modems these people found an avenue to share their
|
||
knowledge and programs with one another, no matter how isolated s/he
|
||
was from other hackers.
|
||
|
||
Today's entry-level users are a breed apart. The C64 seems to attract
|
||
stupid, belligerent children who can not form complete sentences. Just
|
||
like CB radios, once the price-point was reached where everyone could
|
||
afford a modem, the trash infiltrated swiftly. As a sysop, it is in your
|
||
best interest to be able to identify these people before they become a
|
||
threat to your sanity.
|
||
|
||
EARLY WARNING SIGNALS
|
||
|
||
The first warning sign is when someone types "NEW". If this is followed
|
||
shortly by a handle containing the words "Captain", "Pirate" or "Master"
|
||
you should go to low-level alert. If the handle is the name of a TV
|
||
wrestling hero, the name of a Star Trek character, a current political
|
||
figure, or a "macho" movie character ("Rambo") you should immediatly
|
||
assume a defensive posture. If the call was made at 300 baud, prepare
|
||
for sysop-disconnect.
|
||
|
||
The third warning sign comes when your BBS requests a phone number from
|
||
the caller. One of two scenarios arise: 1> the phone number is entered
|
||
without an area code and rejected by the BBS two or three times. 2> For
|
||
some reason, people who do not know how to punctuate or type in anything
|
||
other than caps seem to know every telephone company "test" number in
|
||
existance. (Always keep a list of these numbers handy by your monitor)
|
||
If you have not already assumed low-level alert, do so now.
|
||
|
||
If your system supports 40 column displays, and the user selects this
|
||
option, you should go to high-level alert.
|
||
|
||
If your system requires new users to fill out a questionare or leave a
|
||
message to the sysop, your last early warning sign is when he A> enters
|
||
an age greater than 60, B> puts anything to do with Dungeons and Dragons
|
||
for the "occupation", C> puts a career you know pays greater than $40k/yr
|
||
for "occupation", D> has extensive trouble with the editor or E> types a
|
||
message in all caps that contains the words k00l, warez, welp, l8tr, or
|
||
"yo!". These are high-level warnings and defensive maneuvers should be
|
||
initiated.
|
||
|
||
* MAIN MENU WARNINGS
|
||
|
||
There are several tip-offs to a Commodore user who by chance may have
|
||
passed through all the previous areas unscathed.
|
||
|
||
If your new user immediatly attempts to access the files, and/or you
|
||
run a non-standard BBS (E.G. WWIV) and the user whacks the "F" or "D"
|
||
key over and over (maybe the BBS will get the idea?) be prepared for
|
||
phase two:
|
||
|
||
The user will attempt to CHAT. If this occurs in less than 2 minutes
|
||
from logon, you should avoid answering the call. If you do, you will
|
||
experience the typical "Commie-CHAT-assault".
|
||
|
||
"YO DUDE! WHERES THE FILEZ?"
|
||
"What do you mean?"
|
||
"I'VE GOT ALL THE LATEST WAREZ!!!!!!!!!!!" <-- note his sincerity
|
||
"I'm sorry, I don't have any C64 downloads, try BBS X."
|
||
|
||
At this juncture if the person doesn't drop carrier, my condolences.
|
||
|
||
"OH. WELP, PUT THE SYSOP ON. MAYBE HE COULD MAKE A C64 AREA."
|
||
"I am the SysOp."
|
||
"OH. WELP. A) COULD YOU MAKE A FILEZ AREA?"
|
||
B) WILL ZIP RUN ON THE COMMIE?"
|
||
C) GOT ANY CODEZ?"
|
||
D) WANNA BUY A C64 DISK DRIVE?"
|
||
E) COULD I HAVE ELITE ACCESS?"
|
||
F) HOW DO YOU DO ANSI?"
|
||
G) CAN I BE A CO-SYSOP?"
|
||
H) GOT ANY GIFS TO TRADE?"
|
||
I) WHATS YOUR REAL NAME / VOICE NUMBER?"
|
||
|
||
* THE OVERALL CLUES
|
||
|
||
There are several methods to detect a Commodore user, even if he isn't
|
||
as overtly annoying as the above examples:
|
||
|
||
1> A C64 user never reads messages.
|
||
2> A C64 user may post messages about the k00l BBS he runs from 10pm
|
||
till 10am. CALL NOW DUDEZ!!!!!!!!!!
|
||
3> A C64 user will download a 270k IBM-only file at 300 baud.
|
||
4> A C64 user will never log off correctly. Dropping carrier is as
|
||
natural to him as using serial ports for disk I/O.
|
||
5> A C64 user will set off the chat call every time he logs on. If by
|
||
chance your BBS software limits the hours this will happen, he will
|
||
repeatadly attempt to CHAT anyway.
|
||
6> A C64 user will batch download every X-rated image file you have.
|
||
7> A C64 user will try every SysOp-only function he happens to know of.
|
||
8> A C64 user will use every slang term describing female anatomy at
|
||
least three or four times per logon.
|
||
9> A C64 user will ask if anyone has hardware for sale (I.E. 9600 baud
|
||
modem, C64 hard disk, laser printer, etc.) for "like 60 bucks?????"
|
||
10> A C64 user's vocabulary is centered around the word "sucks".
|
||
11> A C64 user will play Tradewars, attack everyone in sight, and kill
|
||
himself so he can start over with a new ship the next day.
|
||
12> A C64 user does not comprehend on-line help. Phrases like "Press a
|
||
key to continue", "Type ? for menu", and "Enter your REAL name" are
|
||
totally beyond his comprehension.
|
||
13> A C64 user does not read SysOp announcments, prefering to get the
|
||
same information via the CHAT call.
|
||
14> A C64 user has a "signature" comprised of between 7 and 30 lines.
|
||
15> A C64 user trys to maintain at least 5 active accounts on every BBS.
|
||
This allows him to send mail to himself and perform more destruction
|
||
in Tradewars.
|
||
16> A C64 user will never log on at 9600+ baud and rarely at 2400.
|
||
17> A C64 user may often log on and pretend he is female. He will then
|
||
lewdly "flirt" with other users and use the word "homo" as a verb.
|
||
18> A C64 user prefers to call 5 or 6 times in a row, logon, and hang up.
|
||
19> A C64 user will never use the words "Thank" and "You" in the same
|
||
sentance. Likewise, if your system happens to be down for any reason,
|
||
he will complain about it the next time he gets through.
|
||
|
||
* THE FINAL SOLUTION
|
||
|
||
One of the easiest ways to avoid being pestered by these people is to
|
||
configure your BBS to read the "300 baud" modem result code as meaning
|
||
"No Carrier". This way 300 baud callers can not logon. This has the
|
||
pleasant effect of removing 70% of your user problems, C64 or not. In
|
||
today's market with 1200 baud modems costing 50 bucks or less and 2400
|
||
baud modems running around the $100 mark, anyone who calls in with 300
|
||
baud is most likely going to be annoying no matter what they run.
|
||
|
||
If you can not configure your BBS to lock out 300 baud callers you should
|
||
attempt to make sure every menu on your system looks terrible when viewed
|
||
in 40 columns. A nice touch is to add a carriage return code (no line
|
||
feed) 100 or more times after each menu. 1200+ baud callers and most of
|
||
the people using other computers besides IBM-compatibles (Apple, Mac,
|
||
Amiga, etc.) will likely never notice them, but C64 users will quickly
|
||
tire of watching their screen scroll for 30 seconds every time they press
|
||
a key.
|
||
|
||
If by chance you have quality callers who would be adversley affected by
|
||
the above "enhancments", you can of course begin the never-ending game of
|
||
deleting the same person over and over. Once your C64 user determines
|
||
that you don't want him around, he and his C64 user's group will make
|
||
your life miserable. Don't worry - you'll never win, they have more years
|
||
left to live.
|
||
|
||
* CREDITS
|
||
|
||
This SysOp guide to Commodore users is the fruit of pent-up fustration at
|
||
seeing young, and probably otherwise bright minds completely abandon their
|
||
manners when they get around a modem [HERE KID, HAVE SOME DRUGS INSTEAD].
|
||
|
||
I assume the ideal C64 BBS would immediatly begin downloading video games
|
||
at logon and eliminate the trivial things like message bases and solid
|
||
conversation. It sure may be elitist of me, I think the proper use of
|
||
the English language (or even the USE of it) should be a skill mastered
|
||
long before a child makes it to Junior High School.
|
||
|
||
Though I suppose there is some solace to be taken that these brats aren't
|
||
out stealing my hubcaps or egging my house, I grieve for the future when
|
||
I pause to reflect upon the next generation's "leadership" potential. If
|
||
our current leaders have ethics problems, what will the new crop of adult
|
||
citizens be like when software and telephone piracy is fast replacing
|
||
Tonka trucks and Barbie dolls? Can someone who made super-bonus round by
|
||
wasting evil villians all his childhood ever be considered stable in the
|
||
future? These are social questions with implications greater than just
|
||
a pissed-off SysOp...
|
||
|
||
As with any attack against any given group of people, it is not meant to
|
||
brand those who have a particular brand of computer as somehow sub-human.
|
||
I'm sure there are many people who run these machines who are decent and
|
||
enjoyable callers. I doubt it though.
|
||
|
||
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
Not bad, is it? Charlie Lear found the file, and posted it on a Fidonet
|
||
Echo somewhere.... I couldn't resist it, and I'm an ex-Commodore user..! |