220 lines
12 KiB
Plaintext
220 lines
12 KiB
Plaintext
The following was forwarded to us from the Arpanet by Dale Amon at CMU:
|
||
|
||
From: creon@ames-nas.arpa (Creon Levit)
|
||
Date: 7 Dec 1985 1642-PST (Saturday)
|
||
Subject: Review of Soviet work in quantum nonlocality and SDI super weapons?
|
||
|
||
STRATEGIC DEFENSE STUDY GROUP
|
||
POB 26548, San Francisco, CA 94126
|
||
(415)398 6690/362 7779, 12/2/85
|
||
|
||
Memorandum for the record by J. Sarfatti.
|
||
|
||
Soviet view of quantum nonlocality and the potential for SDI super weapons.
|
||
|
||
Reference: Nonlocality in quantum physics. Soviet Physics Usp. 27(4)April 1984
|
||
(Usp Fiz Nauk 142 599-617).
|
||
by B.I. Spasski & A.V. Moskovskii of M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University.
|
||
|
||
They say that we must distinguish two meanings of nonlocality. First, that of
|
||
microcausality in quantum field theory in which the commutator of second
|
||
quantized boson fields vanishes for faster than light space-like separation
|
||
between the two field points. The currents of spinor fields also obey
|
||
microcausality in conventional local quantum field theory. Violation of this
|
||
condition is the first meaning of nonlocality. They write:
|
||
|
||
"In this sense, one means by nonlocal theories...generalizations of quantum
|
||
field theory based on... a nonpoint interaction."
|
||
|
||
The second sense of nonlocality is then described:
|
||
|
||
"There are..several quantum phenomena that from a classical point of view can
|
||
be interpreted as... nonlocality inherent in quantum objects....the Aharonov-
|
||
Bohm effect, the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox, the Hanbury Brown-Twiss
|
||
effect, and other phenomena... within the Copenhagen interpretation... until a
|
||
particle interacts with some classical object it does not have definite space-
|
||
time characteristics, being, as it were, simultaneously in all the regions of
|
||
space in which the wave function... is nonvanishing... the Aharonov-Bohm
|
||
effect... the behavior of a quantum object can be influenced by the existence
|
||
of a field where the probability of finding a particle is zero... the field
|
||
acts where it is not... in quantum mechanics the potentials play a role
|
||
analogous to that of fields in classical physics ... Either one must give up
|
||
the locality principle or recognize that potentials have a physical reality no
|
||
less fundamental than the fields. But the second alternative would mean that
|
||
it is possible to find a physical difference between states differing only in
|
||
gauge... Aharonov and Bohm abandoned the second alternative ... The Aharonov-
|
||
Bohm effect could be regarded from the classical point of view as a proof of
|
||
action at a distance."
|
||
|
||
In the modern gauge theory of the unified force the field potentials are
|
||
parallel transport connections in the fiber space beyond space-time analogous
|
||
to the Christoffel symbols of general relativity within the curved space-time
|
||
base space of the bundle. Internal symmetry transformations result from
|
||
torsion in the fiber space from lifted holonomic loops in space-time.
|
||
Nonvanishing fields are a measure of curvature in the bundle. (Reference:
|
||
Classical geometric resolution of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox, Yuval
|
||
Ne'eman, Israeli Minister of Science, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., USA Vol80, 7051-
|
||
7053,Nov 1983. Ne'eman writes:
|
||
|
||
"in the geometry of a fiber bundle describing a gauge theory, curvature and
|
||
parallel transport ensure and impose nonseparability..")
|
||
|
||
The Soviet physicists continue:
|
||
|
||
"A further illustration of the nonlocality of quantum objects is provided by
|
||
the interference experiments... by Pfleeger, Mandel, and Magyar. They showed
|
||
that overlapping beams of two lasers can give an interference pattern...
|
||
although the photon interferes only with itself... the attempt to follow the
|
||
flight of the photon ...emitted by the lasers necessarily destroys the
|
||
original interference pattern... A quantum system radiates as a single entity
|
||
even when its various parts are separated by a macroscopic distance... This
|
||
property... can also be demonstrated by the Hanbury Brown-Twiss effect
|
||
interference of intensities...Suppose we have two light sources A and B at a
|
||
large distance from two photon detectors a and b. The detectors are connected
|
||
to a coincidence circuit...the number of coincidences is a periodic function
|
||
of R1 - R2, where R1 is the distance between A and a, and R2 is the distance
|
||
between B and b. The quantum feature .. is the impossibility of distinguishing
|
||
photons which arrive at a from A from photons which arrive at a from B. If the
|
||
experiment is arranged in such a way that such a distinction becomes possible,
|
||
the effect disappears... The effect appears paradoxical from the point of view
|
||
of classical notions, since it means that photons emitted by two independent
|
||
sources know the behavior of each other... "
|
||
|
||
The Soviet discussion of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paradox makes it
|
||
clear that it is the locality assumption of no quantum action at a distance
|
||
that makes the paradox in which the Heisenberg uncertainty principle is
|
||
violated. They write:
|
||
|
||
"A ... solution of the EPR paradox was proposed by V.A. Fock and A.D.
|
||
Aleksandrov (Moscow, 1956), who put forward the idea of a nonforce interaction
|
||
of quantum objects ... another example of such (nonforce) interaction is the
|
||
correlation in the behavior of microscopic objects expressed by the Pauli
|
||
principle ... another example of a nonforce interaction (is) interference from
|
||
two mirrors. The interference pattern, which is determined by the positions of
|
||
the mirrors, means that an individual photon feels an effect of the mirrors
|
||
that is not associated with transfer of energy and momentum."
|
||
|
||
The idea of the nonforce interaction is geometrically understood in the fiber
|
||
bundle geometry. The traditional force is due to energy- momentum transport in
|
||
the base space-time. The nonforce interaction is due to information transfer
|
||
in the fiber space beyond space-time. In Aspect's photon pair polarization
|
||
correlation experiment, the information transfer does not require energy-
|
||
momentum transport. The information transfer violating Bell's locality
|
||
inequality is in the fiber space. Quite apart from that, there may also be
|
||
faster than light tachyonic and Wickyonic energy-momentum transport in the
|
||
base space-time. But these two modes of superluminal interaction, i.e. (
|
||
nonforce fiber quantum information transfer, and (force) base space-time
|
||
translation energy momentum transport) must be clearly distinguished. Indeed,
|
||
the relativistic kinematics of the photon pair may allow the faster than light
|
||
collective tachyonic transport of one half the energy difference between the
|
||
two photons when moving in opposite directions in 3-space.
|
||
|
||
In my recent research on Wick rotations of solutions of the Dirac spinor
|
||
equation, I note that the slower than light bradyon has timelike world lines
|
||
inside the light cone. The bradyon (normal matter and antimatter) obeys
|
||
Einstein's 1905 equation E equals mc squared i.e. more precisely:
|
||
|
||
E = m/(1 - v2)1/2,
|
||
|
||
where c = 1, v2 means "the square of velocity", and (...)1/2 means "square
|
||
root". .
|
||
|
||
The faster than light tachyon has spacelike world lines outside the light
|
||
cone. It obeys:
|
||
|
||
E'= m/(v2 - 1)1/2 .
|
||
|
||
Both the bradyon and the tachyon feel the light cone as an impassable
|
||
classical barrier. They are classically restricted to opposite sides of the
|
||
barrier. In contrast, the Wickyon, discovered in Dirac's theory by me, can
|
||
pass right through the light cone as if it were not there. In fact, the
|
||
Wickyon loses energy as it accelerates from subluminal to superluminal speed.
|
||
The equation for the Wickyon is:
|
||
|
||
E''= m/(v2 + 1)1/2
|
||
|
||
I note that Sakharov ( the now dissident Father of the Soviet Nuclear Arsenal)
|
||
has also been thinking about the effect of Wick rotations in big bang
|
||
cosmology (private communication from Waldyr Rodrigues Jr. Institute
|
||
Mathematics, UNICAMP, S.P. Brasil).
|
||
|
||
If life can persist through a bradyon-Wickyon quantum jump then we can look
|
||
forward to a hyperdrive for time travelling Star Ships - contrary to Dr.
|
||
Forward's recent report for the U.S. Air Force (AFRPL TR-83-067).
|
||
|
||
The Soviets say:
|
||
|
||
"Some authors developed the idea that the violation of locality must be
|
||
interpreted in the framework of the Wheeler-Feynman theory of action at a
|
||
distance.. In this scheme, the correlations between the readings of the
|
||
instruments are explained by ... advanced waves (telegraph from the future)
|
||
...relativistic invariance is maintained, but one necessarily reproduces the
|
||
difficulties characteristic of a theory of action at a distance, in
|
||
particular, the breakdown in the time ordering between cause and effect."
|
||
|
||
|
||
Kurt Godel showed that retroactivity, or backwards causation, poses no
|
||
logical problem for physics (Ref. INFINITY AND THE MIND, Rudy Rucker). Sir
|
||
Fred Hoyle, FRS in INTELLIGENT UNIVERSE shows that retroactivity is necessary
|
||
to understand cosmology and the origin of life. My gedankenexperiments attempt
|
||
to pin down the precise nonlocal quantum mechanisms needed to test Hoyle's
|
||
revolutionary paradigm. A paradigm anticipated by American scholars such as
|
||
Harvard's Henry Dwight Sedgwick eighty years ago. Hoyle's notion of the Loop
|
||
in Time has already been treated in literature by Borges in Coleridge's Dream
|
||
and in the works of Olaf Stapledon, to name the best. It has been popularized
|
||
in films like Escape from the Planet of the Apes and Back to the Future.
|
||
|
||
Of crucial significance for SDI command control communication is the Soviet
|
||
view on the practical use of quantum nonlocal action at a space-time distance
|
||
between transmitter and receiver.
|
||
|
||
"Is a superluminal telegraph possible?
|
||
... Stapp writes:...Quantum phenomena provide prima facie evidence that
|
||
information gets around in ways that do not conform to classical ideas...
|
||
everything we know about nature is in accord with the idea that the
|
||
fundamental processes of Nature lie outside space-time... but generate events
|
||
that can be located in space-time... none of the arguments we have considered
|
||
for the existence of superluminal signals is satisfactory."
|
||
|
||
The Soviets do not discuss my scheme for a superluminal telegraph which
|
||
depends upon extending conventional quantum mechanics to include nonlocal
|
||
observables. I have a detailed model which predicts quantum tunneling of one
|
||
photon in a pair through the classical barrier of crossed polarizers. The
|
||
tunneling probability depends on the relative orientation of a distant
|
||
polarizer that interacts with the twin photon. It is as if the distant
|
||
polarizer is placed between the crossed polarizers at exactly one half of the
|
||
actual relative orientation. One esthetically pleasing feature of this
|
||
nonlocal hidden variable model is that it has the structure of the simplest
|
||
fiber bundle - the spinor bundle of the Mobius strip. This model allows for
|
||
the experimental test of Hoyle's Loop in Time in which a Future Cause
|
||
retroactively superdetermines a Past Effect negating ordinary notions of Free
|
||
Will in accord with Godel's teleological argument.
|
||
|
||
It is important to recognize that there are now two experiments that
|
||
demonstrate the reality of nonlocality. First, Aspect's Paris experiment
|
||
showing violation of Bell's locality inequality over faster than light space-
|
||
like intervals between the two detections of the photons in a pair from a
|
||
double quantum jump. Second, the retroactive Wheeler "Delayed Choice"
|
||
experiment using a Mach Zender interferometer by Hellmuth et-al at the Max
|
||
Planck Institute for Quantum Optics in Garching reported in June 1985 at the
|
||
EPR conference in Finland. The debate now emerging is whether or not nonlocal
|
||
quantum action at a distance can be controlled for communication, space
|
||
propulsion, and SDI beam weapons.
|
||
|
||
Research in this cutting edge of New Physics will have a profound impact on
|
||
SDI. For example, untappable unjammable retroactive quantum action at a
|
||
distance command control communications and beam weapons.
|
||
|
||
One may also anticiapte application of the Salam-Weinberg-Glashow electroweak
|
||
unification to create a new type of SDI beam weapon to render nuclear weapons
|
||
"impotent and obsolete" via stimulated beta decay. The idea is to create a
|
||
lasing action in which d-quarks flip to u-quarks causing a neutron to become a
|
||
proton. The energy difference is only of the order of 3Mev. We would use the
|
||
self-interaction of the flavor-conserving weak part of the photon to induce
|
||
weak isospin flips of the d and u quarks via virtual flavor-changing charged W
|
||
pairs. This would lead to low energy transmutation of the elements allowing us
|
||
to clean up the radioactive wastes from nuclear reactors.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|