299 lines
16 KiB
Plaintext
299 lines
16 KiB
Plaintext
THE 8-CIRCUIT MODEL OF CONSCIOUSNESS- A LURKER'S GUIDE
|
|
|
|
Timothy Leary came up with this theory- or I guess model or map would
|
|
be better terms- for human consciousness. I get the impression he started
|
|
working on it early in his LSD involvement, though I haven't yet been able
|
|
to find where he first started talking about the ideas ( I suspect there may
|
|
be a reference in 'High Priest', but I haven't waded all the way through yet).
|
|
|
|
His book on the subject was called 'Exo-Psychology', and has been
|
|
republished with additional material in recent years under the title
|
|
'Info-Psychology' (New Falcon Publishing). This is a good book, and it's
|
|
especially valuable because it's original source material on the whole idea,
|
|
but it really is out there- it's hard to make sense of it unless you already
|
|
know what he's talking about.
|
|
|
|
There are, however, two excellent books that introduce, explain, and
|
|
develop these ideas. Before describing their strong & weak points, let me
|
|
give a thumbnail sketch of the big picture:
|
|
|
|
The 8-circuit model describes eight levels of function of human
|
|
consciousness. Different books call these by different names- 'circuits'
|
|
(like different circuits in a computer), 'gears' (like shifting gears on a
|
|
bicycle), 'grades' (like in elementary school)- you could call them 'burritos'
|
|
if you want- I like 'circuits'.
|
|
Anyhow, there are eight circuits. The lower four deal with normal
|
|
psychology, while the upper four deal with 'psychic', 'mystical',
|
|
'enlightened', or perhaps even 'tripped-out' consciousness. The strong point
|
|
of this system is that it integrates the two so well. Most theories deal with
|
|
one or the other, but not both- mundane psychology with no consideration of
|
|
transcendant experience, or mystical foo-fa-ra with octaves and rays and
|
|
spiritual this or that but no grounding in nitty-gritty down-to-earth
|
|
surviving in the human jungle.
|
|
|
|
The first four 'normal' circuits are influenced very much by modern
|
|
psychology, especially Adlerian developmental stuff. Part of the idea is that
|
|
as you grow up from infancy, the various circuits are activated and begin to
|
|
function, and you take an 'imprint' from the conditions at the time.
|
|
The most obvious example is when the sexual/social circuit kicks on
|
|
in adolesence, the imprint is taken when you have your first sexual experience.
|
|
Sometimes, if this happens in the back seat of a car, with the panic of
|
|
wondering whether Mom or Dad will appear, later in life the same person will
|
|
discover that nothing turns them on quite as much as doing it in the back seat
|
|
of a car, and especially if they feel a bit panicked.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here's a rundown of the first four circuits:
|
|
|
|
1st circuit: Survival/security. Things are okay or they're not, or somewhere
|
|
in between. This is connected to the first source of these things:
|
|
nursing at Mom's nipple. People who take an imprint that things aren't
|
|
safe all the time may compensate by eating, especially sweet things,
|
|
pudding, 'nursery food' that makes them feel better for a while.
|
|
This imprint is taken very early, in nursing. It's what's
|
|
known in developmental psychology as 'oral'. Putting things in your
|
|
mouth is always fun!
|
|
|
|
2nd circuit: Territorial/Emotional. This is a very particular definition of
|
|
'emotional'- are you feeling up or down? Are you on top of the
|
|
world or down in the dumps? This is related to basic primate pecking
|
|
order stuff- who's the big tough dog and who's the little submissive
|
|
dog? Later, when you get your own turf where you can be a little
|
|
king, you can defend it against others by throwing shit at each other
|
|
(in the form of words, lawsuits, horn honking, or however you prefer
|
|
to 'dump on' people).
|
|
This one is full of stereotypes- all the examples I gave were
|
|
kinda male, yet every female knows there's just as much game-playing
|
|
between women. Women traditionally have been made submissive to men,
|
|
but in many cases that's not the case, and in any case there's a lot
|
|
of passive-agressive ways the tables are turned in each direction.
|
|
This corresponds to the 'anal' stage, and the first imprints
|
|
are taken during toilet training- this develops greatly when the kid
|
|
starts playing with other kids and finding out where they stand- big
|
|
kids are always telling little kids what to do.
|
|
|
|
3rd circuit: Conceptual. This kicks in even before school- kids are hungry
|
|
to learn. This circuit is the ability to make mental models of
|
|
things, which help you 'figure things out' and 'be clever'. The
|
|
imprint you take is whether you feel smart or stupid (which is
|
|
different from BEING smart or stupid!)
|
|
Sometimes people who have a bad time in other circuits
|
|
compensate in 3rd circuit- actually, that can happen with any of
|
|
them. Note also that there are different KINDS of intelligence-
|
|
verbal, mathematical, visual/spatial, musical, etc, etc... but as
|
|
Robert Anton Wilson says, "...the people with the verbal intelligence
|
|
have control of the language, so they call themselves THE
|
|
intellectuals." My father, who is a clinical psychologist, always
|
|
mentions a particular basketball player (I forget who) whom he
|
|
claims is a genius in spatial/motor intelligence, regardless of the
|
|
fact that the guy probably reads on a 7th grade level.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4th circuit: Social/Sexual. Whereas 2nd circuit deals with who bosses who,
|
|
4th deals with who is cool. What this comes down to is that depending
|
|
on whether someone is cool or not, you'd let them get close to you or
|
|
not, running a spectrum from not talking to someone at all (the snub)
|
|
to having sex with them, with many subtle shades in between.
|
|
It goes both ways- how cool are you? Are there people that
|
|
you aren't cool enough to talk to? "Oh, I could never ask HER/HIM
|
|
out..."
|
|
The imprint you take here is how cool you feel, and how hard
|
|
you have to work to feel that way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Everyone has these circuits, but some people get stuck on one or
|
|
another of them, usually because they've got some problem to work out in
|
|
that area. Often one circuit gets to be a surrogate for another (especially
|
|
if the other is underdeveloped)- the classic example is the pathetic (i.e.
|
|
poor 2nd circuit imprint) nerd who tries to out-talk his buddies to show how
|
|
smart he is (3rd circuit), in order to be an authority to them (2nd circuit
|
|
dominance).
|
|
One of the ideas that came up in LSD research was the idea that you
|
|
reach a state of flux in which new imprints can be taken. This is very much
|
|
in agreement with ideas about set and setting, but as most people who have
|
|
taken LSD agree, while everything seems to change after the experience,
|
|
after a while you slip back into the old patterns (witness all the flower
|
|
children who, unlike the few with real dedication, slipped back to become
|
|
businessmen of the 80's).
|
|
Whether this slipback is really inherent in the function of the LSD
|
|
trip is not certain, though- it may be caused by going back into one's
|
|
regular environment, which has been shaped by everything one was before.
|
|
Under the pressure of conformity to the old status quo, one slips back. That's
|
|
my theory- the way to really find out would be to try the imprint process, and
|
|
then afterwards, step into an entirely new life in another place with different
|
|
people and things, and see whether the same slipback process happened. (I
|
|
haven't tried such a radical experiment myself- I'm too attached to my current
|
|
situation to change it just to try out a theory... rationalize, rationalize...)
|
|
|
|
I think the people who have been changed for the better by their
|
|
psychedelic experiences are those who don't just get high all the time, but
|
|
who follow up their realizations with action to improve themselves and their
|
|
environment accordingly.
|
|
|
|
Leary felt that the goal was to work out the circuits so that one had
|
|
imprints that led to a happy, healthy life, but without having to always have
|
|
things one way- people who have to always be on top never learn about service,
|
|
those who always have to feel secure never learn to take risks, etc.
|
|
Ultimately, the circuits would be there to plug into and out of at
|
|
Will, while one navigated through the upper circuits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
The upper circuits deal with mystical, psychic, or paranormal
|
|
consciousness. They are built on the foundation of the lower circuits, almost
|
|
as 'overdriven' versions of them. Interestingly, they correspond well with
|
|
ideas from many spritual traditions- I was reading a description by a woman
|
|
who was initiated into a Native American sweat lodge. She described a vision
|
|
in which the Great Spirit appeared and told her of the 'four gifts to mankind'.
|
|
These four corresponded exactly to the upper four circuits.
|
|
It doesn't always work out so neatly, but the parallels are intersting.
|
|
|
|
5th circuit: Bliss/Healing, Neurosomatic Feedback. When 1st circuit security
|
|
gets great enough, it becomes bliss, as one becomes aware of one's
|
|
sensation of pleasure and learns to generate those sensations at
|
|
the source. This is the SF brainbox that directly stimulates one's
|
|
pleasure centers, only the box is also your brain! This feedback loop
|
|
gets going, and one may remain in the state until kicked out for
|
|
some reason (the world makes demands, or the chemical that boosted
|
|
you into the state wears off).
|
|
Ever seen a picture of a meditating yogi in bliss? In this
|
|
state, you realize you can make yourself feel bliss just as easily
|
|
as you can move your muscles or keep still.
|
|
When this awareness is applied to others, the 5th circuit
|
|
energy works to help their 1st circuit state- this is the principle
|
|
of healing. Alli believes charisma is connected to 5th circuit,
|
|
though I suspect it has to do with the others as well.
|
|
|
|
6th circuit: Psychic. This is awareness of the great information network
|
|
in which we swim.
|
|
The connection to 2nd circuit is not so obvious-
|
|
I became aware of the connection following a series of dreams, in
|
|
which certain traumatic events of my youth were replayed, but in
|
|
ways that made it obvious that the real issues were current things
|
|
that had nothing to do with the old stuff. The old stuff was stuff
|
|
I'd worked to uncover and work out, and I'm pretty certain there
|
|
wasn't much undealt trauma left. Why was I dreaming about it?
|
|
I realized that the current situation provided the flow
|
|
of anxious energy, but when that flow arose, it followed the same
|
|
channel cut by the old trauma, just like a flash flood will
|
|
follow an old dry riverbed.
|
|
Emotions seem to run in channels in the mind, metaphorically
|
|
speaking, and in the same way psychics speak of 'channeling'
|
|
material from outside. This is as far as I can put it into words-
|
|
I'm no master of any of these upper four, I just offer this in
|
|
case it will help someone else's insight.
|
|
|
|
7th circuit: Mythical Intelligence. This is the realm of the shaman, of
|
|
spirit animals, Gods and Goddesses. It is the Dreamtime.
|
|
3rd circuit draws models of specifics in the conscious
|
|
world. 7th circuits draws models of the patterns of archetype that
|
|
make up the unconscious world. It does this by telling stories
|
|
that illustrate the patterns that arise from these archetypes. When
|
|
7th circuit awareness is working, one realizes how these patterns are
|
|
being played out, and instead of just acting in the world, one is at
|
|
the same time coming into direct contact with the archetypal.
|
|
|
|
8th circuit: Out-of-Body Experiences, Factor X, and ???? This is the far
|
|
reaches, and not much is really understood about it. Since 4th
|
|
circuit has to do with letting others get close and even (especially
|
|
in the case of sexuality) merging with them, it makes sense that 8th
|
|
might have to do with overcoming the obtacle of one's physical
|
|
boundaries.
|
|
|
|
Wilson suggests how certain drugs may activate the various circuits,
|
|
something like the following:
|
|
|
|
1st circuit: Comfort foods- sugar, dairy products. Sedatives may deaden
|
|
alarm sensations and produce a sense of security- alcohol, for
|
|
example.
|
|
|
|
2nd circuit: Stimulants in general, as well as alcohol in large amounts (the
|
|
classic aggressive drunk)
|
|
|
|
3rd circuit: Stimulants, possibly, and no doubt 'Smart drugs' would fit here.
|
|
|
|
4th circuit: Ecstasy, as well as many others- generally any drug which
|
|
defeats social inadequacy programming.
|
|
|
|
5th circuit: Sex is the big one, when it goes from being mere satisfaction
|
|
of physical drives and becomes oceanlike ecstasy.
|
|
Otherwise, marijuana, and most hallucinogens in moderate doses.
|
|
|
|
6th circuit: LSD
|
|
|
|
7th circuit: Psilocybin, Peyote, possibly LSD, many of the natural
|
|
psychedelics.
|
|
|
|
8th circuit: Ketamine? Excessive doses of many drugs may produce this, as
|
|
well as those which produce near-death experiences.
|
|
|
|
Note that no drug is so narrow as to only affect one circuit, and
|
|
there are probably much better techniques of activating and developing the
|
|
various parts of the Self. Some people, however, suggest that they became
|
|
aware of these capacities in themselves through use of them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since the upper circuits are built on the foundation of the lower
|
|
ones, you have to have your shit together to deal with the high stuff. If
|
|
you don't, you can have what Alli calls 'Short Circuit', in which the energy
|
|
of the higher circuit over-amps and burns out the lower circuit. This can be
|
|
either a temporary or a permanent condition, apparently, depending on how
|
|
far you overdo it.
|
|
For instance, someone who has 2nd circuit aggression/submission
|
|
problems may, if they take a large dose of LSD, may feel overwhelmed
|
|
by the influx of 6th circuit awareness- hearing voices in their head,
|
|
feeling wide open to the flow of information and unable to turn it off.
|
|
This may result in over-amping of the second circuit, in which they feel
|
|
greatly threatened or even victimized by the Universe. Too much. If this
|
|
goes too far, they may continue to feel this even after the drug has worn
|
|
off.
|
|
|
|
Okay, on to the reviews, in the order I suggest reading them:
|
|
|
|
Prometheus Rising, by Robert Anton Wilson. (New Falcon Publishing).
|
|
This is a great introduction to the lower four circuits. Wilson
|
|
uses cool literature (Joyce, Dickens) to illustrate them, and his
|
|
sections on 2nd circuit (or Human Primate Psychology) is witty and
|
|
insightful. When he gets to the upper circuits, though, he kind of
|
|
peters out, although he offers some interesting ideas.
|
|
RAW uses the 8-circuit model extensively in his novels,
|
|
especially the Illuminatus Trilogy & Schroedinger's cat. If you
|
|
liked them before, try reading them after you have this model
|
|
figured out.
|
|
|
|
Angel Tech, a modern shaman's guide to reality selection, by Antero Alli.
|
|
(New Falcon Publishing) This is by far the very best handbook on the
|
|
8-circuit model. He gives very lucid descriptions of the lower
|
|
circuits, what can go wrong with them, and what to do about it. If you
|
|
lost the owner's manual that originally came with your Human Form,
|
|
this aftermarket manual is a good maintainance guide.
|
|
The upper circuits are dealt with tolerably well- I don't
|
|
know if anyone could really do them justice. He suggests some
|
|
exercises and techniques, but hey! We're all experimenting.
|
|
|
|
Info Psychology, by Timothy Leary (New Falcon Publishing). As mentioned
|
|
above, this is the source material, but it's not the best
|
|
introduction. Leary added astrological correspondances which seem
|
|
fairly off-base, he agrees. Otherwise, there is much depth to be
|
|
dug out of this. It's not written really to be read linearly, either,
|
|
but to be connected up with at whichever points are relevant to
|
|
the user at the time. A classic for every bookcase!
|
|
|
|
|
|
The 8-circuit model is just another map, and the map is not the
|
|
territory, just as the menu is not the meal (as many Falcon authors are fond
|
|
of quipping). I've found this particular theory to be one of the more useful
|
|
ones when you are trying to figure out your head.
|
|
|
|
I asked Leary about the 8-circuit model during a lecture once, and he
|
|
picked up on it, but obviously he wasn't as interested in talking theory as he
|
|
was working the crowd like a sideshow huckster. He did a great job of that, by
|
|
the way, and I enjoyed him greatly. Too bad he gave up research for
|
|
marketing, though.
|
|
|
|
. . . . . . . . . . .
|
|
-Paul Clark a-paulc@microsoft.com
|
|
|
|
|