595 lines
29 KiB
Plaintext
595 lines
29 KiB
Plaintext
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
|
|
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
|
|
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
|
|
PO BOX 1031
|
|
Mesquite, TX 75150
|
|
|
|
April 20, 1991
|
|
|
|
CENTER1.ASC
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Taken from Flying Saucers magazine - February 1965
|
|
Courtesy of Ron Barker Co-Sysop of KeelyNet
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Vangard notes...
|
|
|
|
This article challenges the teachings of modern science. Ron
|
|
and I were running off some disks and going through an old
|
|
batch of books which Ron had saved from the 60's. We came
|
|
across many astounding articles of which this is one.
|
|
|
|
Modern physics has come up with the term, the "Fifth Force"
|
|
(repulsion) to explain such phenomena. Yet as you will see,
|
|
it does not explain how the repelling effect can extend over
|
|
large distances as in the dual mine shaft version of the
|
|
experiment. The Eotvos experiment also relates to this
|
|
phenomenon.
|
|
|
|
To date, the repelling phenomenon's most rational explanation
|
|
is that of the Koreshan Society, that we live in a hollow
|
|
spherical chamber. As bizarre and totally insane as this
|
|
might sound, it could have merit as you will see.
|
|
|
|
We suggest you also download the file KORESH1.ZIP for a modern
|
|
day article on this belief. The wild thing in that article
|
|
(from OMNI) is that they do not GIVE DETAILS OF THE
|
|
EXPERIMENTS as this paper does.
|
|
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Earth's "Center of Gravity" - Up or Down?
|
|
|
|
Why was it that at the turn of the century, the Geodetic Survey
|
|
Department of both the French and United States governments made
|
|
certain tests which upset the Copernican theory, then DECIDED
|
|
THAT THEY SHOULD BE KEPT SECRET?
|
|
|
|
What, actually, were these tests, and should they be repeated
|
|
today, under the most severe test conditions?
|
|
|
|
If you've ever watched a bricklayer at work, you've seen him use a
|
|
plumb bob to determine the perpendicular so that his wall will be
|
|
erect and straight. A plumb bob is simply a weight suspended on the
|
|
end of a cord. It acts on the principle of the attraction of
|
|
gravity, or mass, and the weight always points toward the center of
|
|
gravity, which in the case of the spherical Earth is its exact
|
|
center.
|
|
|
|
A line formed by the cord of a plumb bob is at precisely a right
|
|
|
|
Page 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
angle from the horizontal. It is a division of a plane surface into
|
|
two 90 degree angles. By simply laying his bricks parallel to the
|
|
line of the plumb bob, the bricklayer builds a wall that is
|
|
precisely erect. If he did not use a plumb bob, there would be many
|
|
more leaning towers of Pisa in the world.
|
|
|
|
However, the plumb bob is not used only to erect buildings, but it
|
|
is used to measure the distance of the sun. Or any planet. This is
|
|
done by measuring a precise horizontal distance on the Earth (which
|
|
is naturally a curve, because the Earth is round), and since we know
|
|
the circumference of the Earth, the distance around it, thus we can
|
|
calculate an exact base for our proposed triangle to be used in
|
|
measuring the distance of the sun.
|
|
|
|
Then, by use of a sectant, we can "shoot the sun" from both ends of
|
|
this base line, and get a pair of angles which are slightly less
|
|
than 90 degree angles because they are obviously not parallel to the
|
|
perpendicular as determined by the plumb bob.
|
|
|
|
We know that, given one side of a triangle, and two of its angles,
|
|
we can calculate the length of the other two sides. Thus, we can
|
|
tell how far the sun is from the Earth.
|
|
|
|
It isn't quite this simple, because we don't know the precise size
|
|
of the Earth, (written in 1965), and thus, the difference in
|
|
parallelness of the two perpendiculars we have achieved at both ends
|
|
of our base line.
|
|
|
|
It should be obvious to the reader that since the plumb bobs point
|
|
AT THE CENTER OF THE EARTH, lines projected TO the center of the
|
|
Earth WOULD MEET AT THAT CENTER, and likewise, lines projected into
|
|
space would continually move FURTHER APART.
|
|
|
|
Thus we have a great interest in exactly HOW FAR IT IS TO THE CENTER
|
|
OF THE EARTH, in order to be ABSOLUTELY SURE of our two important
|
|
angles in FIGURING PLANETARY DISTANCES.
|
|
|
|
Sometime prior to 1901, the French Government, wishing to determine
|
|
more accurately the ACTUAL SIZE OF THE EARTH, so that they could
|
|
revise and refine their calculations regarding the DISTANCE TO THE
|
|
SUN, hit on a way to measure the difference in distance apart at the
|
|
top of two lines perpendicular to the surface of the Earth and the
|
|
bottom of those same two lines.
|
|
|
|
They wanted a pair of lines long enough to give them an appreciable
|
|
measurement. Obviously they could not erect two parallel poles a
|
|
mile high, but they did feel they could SUSPEND two plumb bobs A
|
|
MILE DEEP INTO A MINE SHAFT, and thus be able to MEASURE THE
|
|
DISTANCE APART AT THE TOP AND THE DISTANCE APART AT THE BOTTOM,
|
|
which WOULD BE SLIGHTLY LESS (at the bottom). They wanted to know
|
|
exactly HOW MUCH LESS.
|
|
|
|
The result of these tests were VERY STRANGE. So strange that the
|
|
French Geodetic scientists contacted the scientists of the American
|
|
Geodetic Survey and conveyed their results to them, with the request
|
|
that similar tests be conducted in this country.
|
|
|
|
Officially, NOTHING WAS DONE FOR SOME YEARS. But in 1901, one of
|
|
the Geodetic surveyors happened to be working in the vicinity of the
|
|
|
|
Page 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tamarack mines near Calumet, Michigan. He contacted the chief
|
|
engineer at Tamarack, and informed him of the information
|
|
transmitted by the French government.
|
|
|
|
Two mine shafts were selected, and plumb lines EXACTLY 4,250 feet
|
|
long were suspended IN EACH MINE.
|
|
|
|
At the end of these lines a SIXTY POUND BOB was hung. In order to
|
|
PREVENT MOVEMENT THROUGH A HORIZONTAL DIRECTION, each bob was
|
|
suspended in a tank of oil placed at the bottom of the mine shafts.
|
|
|
|
In this way, it was reasoned, MAGNETIC FORCES COULD NOT AFFECT THEM.
|
|
|
|
The lines used to suspend the bobs were No. 24 piano wires. For
|
|
twenty-four hours the lines were allowed to hang, so that there
|
|
would be NO POSSIBILITY OF MOVEMENT from putting them in place still
|
|
remaining in the lines. The measurements were begun.
|
|
|
|
It was then that it was discovered that the French Geodetic
|
|
engineers had NOT MADE A MISTAKE. Careful re-checking proved that
|
|
the lines, CONTRARY TO EXPECTATIONS, were FARTHER APART AT THE
|
|
BOTTOM THAN AT THE TOP!!
|
|
|
|
There can be only ONE IMPLICATION to such a strange result - the
|
|
center of gravity is not, as previously believed, at the center of
|
|
the Earth, but in fact, IT MUST BE ABOVE THE SURFACE OF THE EARTH,
|
|
SOMEWHERE IN SPACE!!!
|
|
|
|
If these two lines, formed by the suspended plumb lines, were to be
|
|
EXTENDED UPWARD, they would MEET SOMEWHERE in the void AWAY FROM THE
|
|
EARTH, and that point, BY ALL THE RULES OF GRAVITATIONAL ATTRACTION,
|
|
SHOULD BE THE CENTER OF GRAVITY OF THIS PLANET!
|
|
|
|
Greatly puzzled, and not a little disturbed, the Tamarack engineer
|
|
sent for Professor McNair of the Michigan College of Mines. With
|
|
McNair there to check his results, the experiment was repeated, the
|
|
measurements gone over again, and BOTH MEN WERE CONVINCED NO ERROR
|
|
HAD BEEN MADE.
|
|
|
|
Professor McNair suggested that the plumb bobs be changed to a NON-
|
|
MAGNETIC metal to overcome ANY POSSIBILITY OF MAGNETIC ATTRACTION OR
|
|
REPULSION DUE TO A MAGNETIC ORE BODY NEARBY.
|
|
|
|
But when this was done, the SAME FIGURES WERE ARRIVED AT. If
|
|
magnetic influences had been at work, they would HAVE VARIED WITH
|
|
DIFFERENT METALS, BUT T H E Y D I D N O T !!
|
|
|
|
Now, suggested McNair, it would be a good idea to PREVENT AIR
|
|
CURRENTS from traveling up and down the mine shafts which might be
|
|
affecting the plumb lines. Thus, both mine shafts were SEALED AT
|
|
THE TOP. Once more THE FIGURES REMAINED THE SAME.
|
|
|
|
After trying many methods to vary the figures AND FAILING, Professor
|
|
McNair gave up in COMPLETE BEWILDERMENT.
|
|
|
|
These series of tests had not gone on in complete secrecy, and it
|
|
was inevitable that news of them leaked out. It leaked to a
|
|
reporter of the Milwaukee (Wisconsin) SENTINEL, who published the
|
|
story.
|
|
|
|
Page 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It stated the crux of the situation as follows :
|
|
|
|
"The wires were supposed to hang parallel to each other (the
|
|
reporter made an error here, THEY SHOULD HAVE HUNG CLOSER
|
|
TOGETHER AT THE BOTTOM), but were FARTHER APART BELOW THE
|
|
SURFACE than they were AT THE SURFACE and no one has suggested
|
|
anything that seems to cover the question."
|
|
|
|
Professor McNair, when questioned, stated for publication that he
|
|
had proved that magnetic attraction from the Earth or the sides of
|
|
the shaft DID NOT CAUSE THE STRANGE DIVERGENCE.
|
|
|
|
Then he went back to the Michigan College of Mines and wiped the
|
|
whole thing from his mind. Apparently this is true, for he made NO
|
|
EFFORT to contact his colleagues or scientists to call attention to
|
|
the fact that WHAT THEY WERE TEACHING about GRAVITATION and plumb
|
|
lines DID NOT ACTUALLY HOLD TRUE WHEN PUT TO A CONCLUSIVE FIELD
|
|
TEST.
|
|
|
|
However, we can forgive Professor McNair for his reluctance to
|
|
pursue the matter further, because its implications ARE TREMENDOUS
|
|
INDEED. They are totally SHATTERING TO OUR CONCEPT OF THE UNIVERSE,
|
|
and in fact, if they can be made to hold true, MAKE A SHAMBLES OF
|
|
ALL OUR PHYSICAL SCIENCES.
|
|
|
|
Obviously Professor McNair was unwilling to so upset his daily
|
|
routine. Nor were the United States and French governments - for as
|
|
the French put it,
|
|
|
|
".....the value of the franc will remains unchanged, and
|
|
bridges and buildings can still be built, SO WHY MAKE AN
|
|
ISSUE OF IT??"
|
|
|
|
However, Professor Hallock of Columbia University was of a different
|
|
mind. He heard of the experiment through a professor at the
|
|
Michigan College. He held that this actually WAS ATTRACTION UPON
|
|
THE PLUMB LINES, and in a very astute article, told how easily the
|
|
matter could be settled by USING PHOSPHOR BRONZE WIRES instead of
|
|
piano wires, and LEAD BOBS for iron bobs.
|
|
|
|
The Tamarack engineer, delighted to clear his mind of its confusion,
|
|
followed these instructions to the letter - and came up with
|
|
PRECISELY THE SAME MEASUREMENTS as before.
|
|
|
|
When Professor Hallock was informed of this result, he retired into
|
|
a dignified and stony silence. Not so the Tamarack engineer. He
|
|
had decided that something was causing this phenomena, and he was
|
|
going to find out what it was.
|
|
|
|
Plumb bobs suspended IN A SINGLE MINE gave TOO DELICATE A DIFFERENCE
|
|
in measurement, and after all, WERE NOT ACCURATE ENOUGH to give any
|
|
reliable figures ON THE AMOUNT OF DEVIATION, (for instance, per
|
|
mile), and whether or not the deviation had ANY RELATION TO THE SIZE
|
|
OF THE EARTH.
|
|
|
|
After all, it had originally been the purpose of the French Geodetic
|
|
Survey to REFINE THE ACTUAL SIZE OF THE EARTH AS THEN KNOWN (late
|
|
1800's) to a more accurate figure. They had something in mind
|
|
concerning artillery, as well as astronomy.
|
|
|
|
Page 4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A second series of experiments were conducted at Calumet (Michigan).
|
|
This time TWO ELEVATOR SHAFTS into the mine were used INSTEAD OF
|
|
ONE, those numbered two and five.
|
|
|
|
These two were 4,250 feet APART, and were also 4,250 feet DEEP.
|
|
They were connected at the bottom by a perfectly straight transverse
|
|
tunnel.
|
|
|
|
Now, plumb bobs were hung in each shaft, and measurements were made.
|
|
This time it was found that the plumb lines were 8.22 inches FARTHER
|
|
APART AT THE BOTTOM of the pit than at the top.
|
|
|
|
It did not take the Tamarack engineer long to discover that this
|
|
figure exactly represents the DIVERGENCE THAT WOULD BE NECESSARY TO
|
|
COMPLETE A 360 DEGREE SPHERICAL CIRCUMFERENCE. (in other words, a
|
|
SHELL OF FORCE AROUND THE EARTH)
|
|
|
|
There was only one difficulty - as expressed by the plumb lines, it
|
|
would be the CIRCUMFERENCE OF THE INSIDE OF A SPHERE AND NOT THE
|
|
OUTSIDE!!
|
|
|
|
Further, the center of gravity, as expressed by the angles formed by
|
|
the plumb lines, would be approximately 4,000 MILES OUT IN SPACE!!
|
|
|
|
Obviously THIS COULD NOT BE TRUE, because if the Chinese were to
|
|
make calculations based on a similar pair of mine shafts in their
|
|
country, on the OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE GLOBE, the center of gravity
|
|
would be found to be 4000 miles IN THE OTHER DIRECTION!!
|
|
|
|
The center of gravity, according to the plumb lines, was a SPHERE'S
|
|
SURFACE, some 16,000 MILES IN DIAMETER!!
|
|
|
|
ANY PLACE, 4,000 MILES UP, WAS THE CENTER OF GRAVITY!!
|
|
|
|
Can we blame the Tamarack engineer for going down in his mine and
|
|
maintaining a grim silence FROM THAT MOMENT ON??
|
|
|
|
A United States Geodetic Survey crew for two years conducted further
|
|
experiments, among them measuring the surface of a long lake in
|
|
Florida on the theory that WATER CONFORMS TO THE TRUE CURVATURE OF
|
|
THE EARTH'S SURFACE, REGARDLESS OF HOW THE LAND MAY BE, thus giving
|
|
A TRUE LEVEL - only to find that WATER CURVED UPHILL IN EACH
|
|
DIRECTION RATHER THAN DOWNHILL!!
|
|
|
|
Can we blame them for deciding that to give these startling figures
|
|
to the world would HAVE NO BEARING ON THE PRACTICAL PROBLEMS of
|
|
life, and was therefore BEST FORGOTTEN, since an exploration was
|
|
BEYOND THEM??
|
|
|
|
However, others were making similar experiments, among them a mystic
|
|
named Koresh (Cyrus Teed), who claimed he was the Christ, come for
|
|
the second time. In spite of his mysticism, his scientific
|
|
measurements and experiments were NOT IN THE LEAST MYSTIC.
|
|
|
|
He used the plumb bob to great advantage, for proof that the Earth's
|
|
curvature was THE REVERSE of that USUALLY ACCEPTED AS TRUE, and
|
|
thus claimed that WE LIVED ON THE INSIDE OF THE GLOBE, RATHER THAN
|
|
THE OUTSIDE!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
He accounted for the sun, the planets, the stars, the moon, gravity,
|
|
etc. in a very elaborate set of theories, but in spite of this, his
|
|
discoveries also went by the board, and are scarecely remembered
|
|
today, and NEVER MENTIONED IN SCIENTIFIC CIRCLES.
|
|
|
|
Yet, the facts remain. Plumb lines are FARTHER APART AT THE BOTTOM
|
|
THAN AT THE TOP. What does it mean? What is wrong with our concept
|
|
of gravity, mass, electro-magnetism, the Earth's size and shape, our
|
|
position in relation to other bodies in space, the VERY NATURE OF
|
|
PHYSICAL REALITY?
|
|
|
|
From this point on, in this article, we will deviate from facts, and
|
|
merely theories. We ask no one to take what we say seriously, as
|
|
being presented as an explanation.
|
|
|
|
The statements we will make we make ONLY FOR THE PURPOSE OF
|
|
ARGUMENT, and possibly to point a way toward further experiment in
|
|
an effort to solve the mystery.
|
|
|
|
First, the Earth is a sphere (with certain very minor
|
|
irregularities). We live on the outside of it.
|
|
|
|
The Moon circles the Earth, and the Earth circles the Sun. Some
|
|
force holds them all in orbit and in their relationships to each
|
|
other. It is said that gravitation is that force.
|
|
|
|
It is said the Moon's orbit is maintained because the attraction of
|
|
mass of both bodies is exactly counterbalanced by CENTRIFUGAL FORCE.
|
|
|
|
The Earth system is maintained in its orbit about the sun by the
|
|
same delicate balance.
|
|
|
|
Could it be that THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS "ATTRACTION OR MASS?"
|
|
|
|
Would not such a quality in mass have resulted, eons ago, in the
|
|
whole Universe being GATHERED TOGETHER IN ONE CRUSHING SINGLE BODY?
|
|
|
|
Some scientists say this is what DID HAPPEN, and that there was a
|
|
resultant terrific explosion (the Big Bang theory), and that the
|
|
Universe is NOW EXPANDING (as proved, they say by the "red shift"
|
|
which shows the distant galaxies to be receding in every direction
|
|
at a CONSTANTLY INCREASING SPEED, the more distant ones just
|
|
recently discovered at something like 90,000 miles per second).
|
|
|
|
Does not this increasing speed DISPROVE THEIR OWN THEORY, because
|
|
shouldn't the speed of RETREAT FROM THE CENTRAL POINT (strangely
|
|
enough our own solar system!) DECREASE as greater distances were
|
|
reached? (the inverse square law)
|
|
|
|
If there is no such thing as attraction of mass, then we are not
|
|
bothered with any center of it.
|
|
|
|
Could it be that the presence of mass (regardless of properties)
|
|
merely causes A DISTORTION IN ITS IMMEDIATE AREA, such as the
|
|
curvature of light noted (as predicted by Albert Einstein) around
|
|
the sun during a solar eclipse?
|
|
|
|
Thus, wouldn't a plumb line be deviated IN PROXIMITY WITH MASS
|
|
simply BY REASON OF THE INTENSIFICATION of that mysterious agent of
|
|
|
|
Page 6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
creation, an ELECTRO-MAGNETIC FIELD? The best theory of creation to
|
|
date is the theory of an electro-magnetic field being placed in
|
|
rotation, and thus the DRIVING TO ITS CENTER, in a literal
|
|
CONDENSATION PROCESS, OF MATTER, to form the central body of a
|
|
planet.
|
|
|
|
Anyone who has watched a whirlpool, or a whirlwind, has noted the
|
|
POLAR "HOLES" IN BOTH ENDS. If the Earth was so formed, would it
|
|
not be MANDATORY that it have A HOLE AT BOTH POLES, AND POSSIBLY
|
|
EVEN BE HOLLOW?
|
|
|
|
Do all planets have such holes? Do we see evidence of them in the
|
|
polar caps (clouds hiding the opening, just as clouds perpetually
|
|
shroud our own poles) of Mars, and the mysterious "hole clear
|
|
through" Mercury, the mysterious "red spot" of Jupiter, the rings of
|
|
Saturn, etc.?
|
|
|
|
If gravity (as Einstein finally said when he formed his last theory,
|
|
the electro-magnetic field theory) is really NOT A THING AT ALL, but
|
|
merely manifestations (along with electro-magnetism) of SOMETHING
|
|
ELSE (the electro-magnetic FIELD IN MOTION), then can we not account
|
|
easily for the experiment of the plumb bobs and its strange result?
|
|
|
|
Is there actually NO GRAVITY OUT IN SPACE (outside the whirling
|
|
electro-magnetic field) and also, NO INERTIAL MASS, so that the
|
|
recent proposal to "sail through space" on aluminum sails which
|
|
catch the infinitesimal energy of the photon (light particles), and
|
|
thus require no engines at all, is reasonable and practical?
|
|
|
|
Is it not true that the plumb lines are not straight at all, but
|
|
FOLLOW A CURVE dictated BY THE LINES OF FORCE of a WHIRLING ELECTRO-
|
|
MAGNETIC FIELD?
|
|
|
|
Is it not true that the sun is seen NOT VIA LIGHT COMING TO US in a
|
|
straight line, but actually A GIGANTIC CURVE dictated by the master
|
|
vortex of the Solar System's whirling electro-magnetic field? Thus
|
|
it would be CONSIDERABLY NEARER than the 93,000,000 miles we believe
|
|
its distance to be?
|
|
|
|
If there is no such thing as a "straight line" (due to the
|
|
time/space/gravity curvature) in this sense of the words, then are
|
|
not all our measurements of astronomical distances BASED ON INITIAL
|
|
ERROR inherent in the incompatibility of angles and lines in a
|
|
perpetually WHIRLING "CURVED" ELECTRO-MAGNETIC FIELD?
|
|
|
|
Are gravity, magnetism and inertia ONLY ILLUSIONS induced AS
|
|
PROPERTIES OF ELECTRO-MAGNETIC FIELDS?
|
|
|
|
Is that why the plumb lines do not behave as they should; why GYRO-
|
|
COMPASSES DO NOT WORK WITHIN 150 MILES OF THE "POLE;" why it is
|
|
proposed to "sail" the seas of space merely by the propulsive force
|
|
of the "wind" of light photons; why we are developing an "ion-
|
|
thrust" engine for space travel in spite of the fact that its thrust
|
|
is COMPARABLE TO THAT OF A POCKET FLASHLIGHT?
|
|
|
|
The sun, they say, has a very weak electro-magnetic field. The Moon
|
|
none at all. Does this mean NO GRAVITY ON THE MOON? NO INERTIA?
|
|
NO MAGNETISM?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A thousand questions arise from the stimulus of these two vexing
|
|
plumb lines whose effects have been so disturbing on the minds of
|
|
those whose lips remain sealed - because "it will not affect the
|
|
value of the franc..."
|
|
|
|
Anyone with any basis in physics at all will find these questions
|
|
thronging through his mind. We present these few only to provide
|
|
that "initial thrust" to your thinking, and to challenge the owners
|
|
of francs whose value is dubious in any event.
|
|
|
|
Lastly, might we suggest to the scientists at Vandenburg Air Force
|
|
Base, where the polar satellites are launched, that here, in the
|
|
doubt cast on the scientific concept of gravity, mass and inertia,
|
|
exists perhaps an explanation for six straight failures to even
|
|
locate a PERFECTLY LAUNCHED MISSLE AFTER IT PASSES INTO THE
|
|
MYSTERIOUS POLAR REACHES.
|
|
|
|
That failure is due to the INERTIAL GUIDANCE SYSTEM (rotating
|
|
gyroscopes) that DEPENDS FOR ITS FUNCTION ON REMAINING IN AN
|
|
ELECTRO-MAGNETIC FIELD.
|
|
|
|
At the poles, might it be that there are "holes" in this field, and
|
|
that your rockets are being lost in these holes, propelled by TOO
|
|
MUCH rocket thrust (not needed if there is low or no inertia) acting
|
|
on little or no mass at all (inertia-wise)?
|
|
|
|
The whole thing is something to think about, and certainly NOT TO BE
|
|
HIDDEN beneath a pile of francs. Would it be too much for us to ask
|
|
that a body of recognized savants be assigned the task of conducting
|
|
these experiments again, in the light of present-day knowledge and
|
|
experience and implements, to correct our impressions concerning
|
|
gravity, the true nature of electro-magnetism, and such relatively
|
|
simple things as where or not a body of water's level CURVES UP OR
|
|
DOWN??
|
|
|
|
After all, it is our money that is being spent shooting at a target
|
|
that may not even be where we think it is? A record of 100% misses
|
|
for Vandenburg is subject to questioning and re-evaluation!
|
|
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Vangard note...
|
|
|
|
This most astounding paper brings to mind many correlations with
|
|
files currently or soon to be on KeelyNet. One is that of a
|
|
story from a friend which regards a dimensional (?) transport
|
|
device which uses extremely high intensity alternating magnetic
|
|
fields.
|
|
|
|
The man who did the experiment had a company which did some
|
|
government work. He had heard of bizarre effects from magnetic
|
|
fields from some of his government contacts. So, he built a
|
|
very large amperage coil in the form of a stationary bike type
|
|
frame, much like a motorcycle in that the "rider" had to
|
|
straddle the device to conduct the experiment.
|
|
|
|
The designer of the machine decided he would try it out first in
|
|
the event of problems or hidden dangers. He straddled the coil
|
|
frame and signalled to crank it up. As the magnetic field
|
|
intensity increased, the man began to fade out as if he were
|
|
|
|
Page 8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
becoming invisible. The volunteer technician operating the
|
|
controls of the unit slowly reduced the intensity and shut the
|
|
machine down.
|
|
|
|
The "designer/rider" said that when he felt a prickly sensation
|
|
over his skin, the room began to "dissolve" and he could see an
|
|
entirely different scene begin to form as if a ghost image were
|
|
materializing into reality. That was when the technician
|
|
reversed the process and the experiment ground to a halt.
|
|
|
|
One of the other volunteer techs was extremely excited about the
|
|
project and begged to be allowed to ride the device. The
|
|
designer at first refused but finally gave his permission
|
|
PROVIDING the man would sign a release that he would not be held
|
|
be responsible for anything that happened.
|
|
|
|
The agreement was that the rider would signal if he wanted the
|
|
power reduced and the machine shut down. If he DID NOT SIGNAL
|
|
then the experiment was to be allowed to continue for 1 minute
|
|
after the man became invisible which would offer a chance to see
|
|
the full materialization of whatever it was on the "other side."
|
|
|
|
The experiment proceeded as planned and the man did not signal
|
|
to stop. One minute after invisibility was achieved, the
|
|
machine was gradually shut down and the man re-appeared. He was
|
|
completely insane and in a highly manic state. The now insane
|
|
rider was committed and the machine was packed up in its
|
|
entirety and is said to be in storage in a garage.
|
|
|
|
I do not know if this is true, but my friend said the man swore
|
|
him to secrecy after allowing him to see a film of his secret
|
|
government project. The magnetic experiment WAS A TOTALLY
|
|
PRIVATE VENTURE financed by the owner of the now defunct
|
|
company.
|
|
|
|
The most interesting part is that of a high intensity magnetic
|
|
field as the article speaks of WHIRLING "CURVED" ELECTRO-
|
|
MAGNETIC FIELDS which seem to "source" gravity, mass and
|
|
inertia. Remember that the Philadelphia Experiment was of this
|
|
nature as are many others (mostly private) which have led to
|
|
bizarre and sometimes unpredictable phenomena.
|
|
|
|
We would hasten to warn those who might decide to investigate
|
|
such areas that very high intensity magnetic or electric fields
|
|
are EXTREMELY DANGEROUS to life. Mutation of cell structure can
|
|
lead to tragic ends. Please be careful and take all possible
|
|
precautions if you choose to research such areas.
|
|
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
|
|
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
|
|
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
|
|
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
|
|
|
|
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
|
|
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
If we can be of service, you may contact
|
|
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Page 9
|
|
|
|
|