331 lines
13 KiB
Plaintext
331 lines
13 KiB
Plaintext
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(word processor parameters LM=1, RM=70, TM=2, BM=2)
|
|
|
|
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
|
|
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
|
|
PO BOX 1031
|
|
Mesquite, TX 75150
|
|
|
|
DRIVE1.ASC
|
|
|
|
October 26, 1990
|
|
|
|
this document shared with KeelyNet courtesy of Joseph Misiolek
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
SELF-SUSTAINED ELECTROMAGNETIC PROPULSION
|
|
|
|
or
|
|
|
|
'How to generate mechanical momentum from enclosed
|
|
electromagnetic energy only'
|
|
(Patent Pending).
|
|
|
|
Michael J.G. Polonyi,
|
|
Consultant,
|
|
54-44 69th. St.,
|
|
Maspeth, NY 11378
|
|
|
|
|
|
According to Ref.1 and others, it is not possible to create
|
|
mechanical momentum from enclosed electromagnetic energy only :
|
|
|
|
'For it is an obvious postulate that in stationary state in
|
|
which matter is at rest and in which there are no waves
|
|
escaping, there can be no electromagnetic momentum'.
|
|
|
|
Still, this should be possible, and simpler than originally
|
|
thought of :
|
|
|
|
Suppose we use Helmholtz coils arranged as two flat coils, separated
|
|
to a distance approximately equal to the radius of the coil.
|
|
|
|
If an alternating current is applied on each coil, an
|
|
electromagnetic field will be generated by each one.
|
|
|
|
So, an attraction and repulsion effect will appear at the frequency
|
|
of the applied currents and fields, on each coil, due to the field
|
|
generated by the other coil.
|
|
|
|
Now, the question arises: is it possible that, instead of the
|
|
coils attracting and repelling each other, both will exert a force
|
|
in the same direction?
|
|
|
|
In other words: if you mount them on a cart, will the cart move in
|
|
one direction ?
|
|
|
|
Apparently it is possible after all, at least theoretically, because
|
|
it is not the current but the FIELD generated by the said current
|
|
that reacts with the other coil, and, since it takes a certain
|
|
|
|
Page 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
amount of time for the field to cross the space between the coils,
|
|
it is just a matter of finding an arrangement that will create a
|
|
unidirectional force condition.
|
|
|
|
Is there such a force condition ? Yes, and it is very simple :
|
|
|
|
If,
|
|
(a) the frequency is sufficiently high so that the distance
|
|
'D' between the coils will be a quarter of a wavelength,
|
|
|
|
(b) both fields are of the same frequency, and
|
|
|
|
(c) are in phase when they meet at one coil (they will be in
|
|
opposite phase when they reach the second coil),
|
|
|
|
then, a force will appear alternating on each coil but this
|
|
force will always point in the same direction,
|
|
|
|
since, one of the coils (the leading one) will always be
|
|
'pushed' by the field of the lagging one, which in turn will
|
|
always be 'pulled' by the leading coil field.
|
|
|
|
For clarity, see the following chart that corresponds to the
|
|
schematic further down :
|
|
|
|
|
|
| FIELD | FIELD | FIELD | FIELD | DIREC. | FORCE
|
|
Time| COIL1 | COIL1 | COIL2 | COIL2 | OF | ON
|
|
| POS.1 | POS.2 | POS.1 | POS.2 | FORCE | COIL #
|
|
-------------------------------------------------------
|
|
| | | | | |
|
|
0 | MAX | | | 0 | |
|
|
| | | | | |
|
|
D/C | 0 | MAX | 0 | MAX | + | 2
|
|
| | | | | |
|
|
2D/C | MIN | 0 | MAX | 0 | + | 1
|
|
| | | | | |
|
|
3D/C | 0 | MIN | 0 | MIN | + | 2
|
|
|
|
and so on ...
|
|
|
|
C : speed of the magnetic vector
|
|
|
|
D/C : quarter-wavelength travel time.
|
|
|
|
Now, to avoid electromagnetic radiation the assembly CAN BE
|
|
ENCLOSED.
|
|
|
|
The enclosure will also affect the wavelength and force, depending
|
|
on the particular shape and quality of the enclosure.
|
|
|
|
But this also means that the electromagnetic energy is not radiated
|
|
(other than termal losses) and CAN BE RECIRCULATED i.e. an
|
|
'electromagnetic wheeling' effect.
|
|
|
|
This arrangement is similar to a directional coupler in microwave
|
|
technology, in which the electromagnetic energy propagates in one
|
|
direction only.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the energy can propagate in one direction only in a closed
|
|
waveguide, then both ends of the waveguide can be joined in a
|
|
ring-shape, and consequently angular mechanical momentum can be
|
|
generated at will.
|
|
|
|
Obviously:
|
|
|
|
(a) ANY TWO ELECTROMAGNETIC SOURCES, OUT-OF-PHASE
|
|
IN TIME AND SPACE WILL GIVE YOU THIS EFFECT.
|
|
|
|
The force will be maximum when the sources are
|
|
a quarter of a wavelength appart, in space and
|
|
time.
|
|
|
|
(b) It can be enclosed in a metal box of any shape,
|
|
something very similar to a resonant cavity,
|
|
which in turn SHOULD BE ABLE TO MOVE.
|
|
|
|
(c) When the fields are in-phase there is no resultant
|
|
force but an increase in electromagnetic mass !
|
|
|
|
|
|
As far as the calculations go, here is some preliminary:
|
|
|
|
coil1 coil2
|
|
------------|----------------------|------------------------> x
|
|
x=0 x=c/4f
|
|
|
|
c = field propagation velocity
|
|
|
|
f = field frequency
|
|
|
|
coil 1 : H1 = I1 sin wt
|
|
|
|
coil 2 : H2 = I2 cos wt
|
|
___
|
|
distance : c/4f = // /2 ; i.e. quarter-wavelength
|
|
___
|
|
Field H1 at coil 2: H12 = I1 sin (wt - // /2) = I1 (-cos wt)
|
|
2
|
|
Force at coil 2 : F2 = u H12 * H2 = - u I1 I2 cos wt
|
|
|
|
This expression says that coil2 will always feel attracted, or
|
|
pulled by coil 1.
|
|
___
|
|
Field H2 at coil 1: H21 = - I2 cos(wt - // /2) = -I2 sin wt
|
|
|
|
is negative because it travels in the opposite
|
|
direction.
|
|
2
|
|
Force at coil 1 : F1 = u H1 * H21 = - u I1 I2 sin wt
|
|
|
|
I.e.: coil1 always feels repelled, or pushed, by coil2.
|
|
|
|
Ergo, a unidirectional force !
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To concentrate the field and avoid magnetic lines dispersion, a
|
|
core or nucleus of magnetic material can be used to improve the
|
|
force effect.
|
|
|
|
The magnetic material will then slow down the propagation of the
|
|
magnetic field waves, therefore allowing a decrease, either of the
|
|
frequency or the distance between coils.
|
|
|
|
This core also behaves very much like a 'resonant cavity'.
|
|
|
|
For enclosed electromagnetic fields, the electromagnetic force
|
|
equation in integral form can be used (Ref.2).
|
|
|
|
The magnitude of the forces involved is very small, therefore it
|
|
is difficult to set up an experiment that will demonstrate the
|
|
principle, since very high frequencies and fields are necessary.
|
|
|
|
For two coils mounted on a ferrite antenna core, with a relative
|
|
permeability of 10, separated 6 cm, 28.2 ampturn at 395 MHZ and
|
|
156 ohms/turn are needed to generate 1 Newton ! This is 124 kVA !
|
|
plus losses.
|
|
|
|
But, according to the 'Principle of Equivalence' if it is possible
|
|
to create a force, in space, from enclosed electromagnetic energy
|
|
only, it should be possible to create the inverse, i.e.
|
|
electromagnetic energy from a 'force field'.
|
|
|
|
In a previous work by this author (Ref.3), it was suggested that
|
|
the 'electromagnetic momentum density' was the (missing) link
|
|
between mechanics and electrodynamics.
|
|
|
|
This would suggest in turn, that gravitation is nothing else than
|
|
'phase waves', similar to the ones that develop in microwave guides
|
|
and resonant cavities.
|
|
|
|
But for 'phase waves' to exist, there must be an electromagnetic
|
|
field of that frequency present already.
|
|
|
|
This, in turn, brings us back to the concept of 'ether', and that
|
|
all mass, even the whole universe is probably nothing else but a
|
|
gigantic 'resonant cavity'. A very powerful concept.
|
|
|
|
In (4) it is claimed, that an experiment has been set-up that can
|
|
measure absolute velocities, and explains why the Michelson-
|
|
Morley experiment fails to do so. This, in turn, would be
|
|
complementary proof of the above, the existence of an 'ether'.
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Vangard Notes
|
|
|
|
A physicist named Dr. Dan Fry once wrote a book claiming that
|
|
he had the privilege of riding in an alien ship.
|
|
|
|
His background gave him a superb chance to observe the alien
|
|
flight systems which he reported on in his book, "To Men of
|
|
Earth".
|
|
|
|
He claimed that the spaceship used two coils, one mounted in
|
|
the top center of the ship, the other in the bottom center.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When the plates were excited at their resonant frequency, the
|
|
focal point of the magnetic field created an "artificial
|
|
Neutral Centre" which could be so adjusted as to pull the ship
|
|
in the direction of the artificial center.
|
|
|
|
The natural neutral centre of the ship had no choice but to
|
|
follow, much like a child sitting in a wagon attached to a
|
|
goat, donkey or dog.
|
|
|
|
When the child holds a carrot or other food in front of the
|
|
animal, the animal follows thereby pulling the wagon wherever
|
|
the child wanted.
|
|
|
|
I suggest you study the work of John W. Keely to further
|
|
understand the properties of the Neutral Centre. That is the
|
|
main purpose of the KeelyNet, to disseminate, learn for
|
|
ourselves and help others to learn of the work of Keely.
|
|
|
|
If you have any thoughts on these matters, we would appreciate
|
|
discussing them with you.
|
|
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
References :
|
|
|
|
(1) Casimir, H.B.G., 'ON ELECTROMAGNETIC MOMENTUM AND
|
|
PONDEROMOTRIC FORCES', Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie
|
|
van Wetenschappen, Proc. B (Netherlands), Vol.75, No.1, 6-
|
|
11, 1972.
|
|
|
|
(2) Paris D.T. and Hurd F.K., 'BASIC ELECTROMAGNETIC THEORY.
|
|
McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1969, Chapter 6, p.290. eq 6-51.
|
|
|
|
(3) Polonyi, M.J.G., 'ELECTRODYNAMICS, INERTIA AND GRAVITATION :
|
|
a unfying approach', Speculations in Science and Technology,
|
|
Vol.10, No.2 page 145, 9/1987.
|
|
|
|
(4) Silvertooth, E.W., 'EXPERIMENTAL DETECTION OF THE ETHER',
|
|
Speculations in Science and Technology, Vol.10, N0.1, p.3,
|
|
1987.
|
|
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
If you have comments or other information relating to such
|
|
topics as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or
|
|
send to the Vangard Sciences address as previously listed.
|
|
|
|
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
|
|
|
|
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
|
|
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
If we can be of service, you may contact
|
|
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 5
|
|
|
|
|