434 lines
21 KiB
Plaintext
434 lines
21 KiB
Plaintext
|
||
|
||
(word processor parameters LM=1, RM=70, TM=2, BM=2)
|
||
|
||
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
|
||
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
|
||
PO BOX 1031
|
||
Mesquite, TX 75150
|
||
|
||
April 10, 1990
|
||
|
||
This paper was written and courteously shared by
|
||
Dr. H. E. Puthoff of the
|
||
Institute for Advanced Studies,
|
||
1301 Capital Of Texas Highway S., Suite B 121
|
||
Austin, Texas 78746
|
||
(512) 328-5751
|
||
|
||
Quantum Fluctuations of Empty Space :
|
||
A New Rosetta Stone of Physics?
|
||
|
||
In a recent article in the popular press (The Economist, January
|
||
7, 1989, pp. 71-74) it was noted how many of this century's new
|
||
technologies depend on the Alice-in-Wonderland physics of quantum
|
||
mechanics, with all of its seeming absurdities.
|
||
|
||
For starters, one begins with the observation that classical
|
||
physics tells us that atoms, which can be likened to a miniature
|
||
solar system with electron planets orbiting a nuclear sun, should
|
||
not exist.
|
||
|
||
The circling electrons should radiate away their energy like
|
||
microscopic radio antennas and spiral into the nucleus. But atoms
|
||
do exist, and multitudinous other phenomena which don't obey the
|
||
rules do occur.
|
||
|
||
To resolve this cognitive dissonance physicists introduced quantum
|
||
mechanics, which is essentially a set of mathematical rules to
|
||
describe what in fact does happen. But when we re-ask the
|
||
question, "why didn't the electron radiate away its energy?" the
|
||
answer is, basically, "well, in quantum theory it doesn't."
|
||
|
||
It's at this point that not only the layman but some physicists
|
||
can begin to feel that someone's not playing fair. I say only
|
||
some physicists because the majority of working physicists are
|
||
content simply to use quantum rules that work, that describe (if
|
||
only statistically) what will happen in a given experiment under
|
||
certain conditions.
|
||
|
||
These are the so-called "logical positivists" who, in a
|
||
philosophical sense, are like the news reporter whose only
|
||
interest is the bottom line.
|
||
|
||
There are nevertheless individuals here and there who still want
|
||
to know why the electron didn't radiate, why Einstein's equations
|
||
are in this form and not another, where does the ubiquitous zero-
|
||
point energy that fills even empty space come from, why quantum
|
||
theory, and perhaps the biggest question of all, how did the
|
||
universe get started anyway?
|
||
|
||
|
||
Page 1
|
||
Surprisingly enough, there may be answers to these seemingly
|
||
unanswerable meta-level questions. Perhaps even more surprising,
|
||
they seem to be emerging, as a recent book title put it, from
|
||
"Something called Nothing" (1), or to put it more correctly, from
|
||
empty space, the vacuum, the void.
|
||
|
||
To comprehend the significance of this statement, we will have to
|
||
take a detour into the phenomenon of fluctuations with which
|
||
quantum theory abounds, including the fluctuations of empy space
|
||
itself.
|
||
|
||
Before the advent of quantum theory, physics taught that any
|
||
simple oscillator such as a pendulum, when excited, would
|
||
eventually come to rest if not continuously energized by some
|
||
outside force such as a spring. This is because of friction
|
||
losses in the system.
|
||
|
||
After it was recognized that quantum theory was a more accurate
|
||
representation of nature, one of the findings of quantum theory
|
||
was that such an oscillator would in fact not come to total rest
|
||
but rather would continue to "jiggle" randomly about its resting
|
||
point with a small amount of energy always present, the so-called
|
||
"zero-point energy."
|
||
|
||
Although it may not be observable to the eye on your grandfather
|
||
clock because it is so minute, it is nonetheless very real, and in
|
||
many physical systems has important consequences.
|
||
|
||
One example is the presence of a certain amount of "noise" in a
|
||
microwave receiver that can never be gotten rid of, no matter how
|
||
perfect the technology. This is an example which shows that not
|
||
only physical devices such as pendulums have this property of
|
||
incessant fluctuation, but also fields, such as electromagnetic
|
||
fields (radio waves, microwaves, light, X-rays, etc.).
|
||
|
||
As it turns out, even though the zero-point energy in any
|
||
particular mode of an electromagnetic field is minute, there are
|
||
so many possible modes of propagation (frequencies, directions) in
|
||
open space, the zero-point energy summed up over all possible
|
||
modes is quite enormous; in fact, greater than, for example,
|
||
nuclear energy densities. And this in all of so-called "empty"
|
||
space around us. Let us concentrate on the effects of such
|
||
electromagnetic zero-point fluctuations.
|
||
|
||
With such large values, it might seem that the effects of
|
||
electromagnetic zero-point energy should be quite obvious, but
|
||
this is not the case because of its extremely uniform density.
|
||
|
||
Just as a vase standing in a room is not likely to fall over
|
||
spontaneously, so a vase bombarded uniformly on all sides by
|
||
millions of ping pong balls would not do likewise because of the
|
||
balanced conditions of the uniform bombardment.
|
||
|
||
The only evidence of such a barrage might be minute jiggling of
|
||
the vase, and similar mechanisms are thought to be involved in the
|
||
quantum jiggle of zero-point motion.
|
||
|
||
However, there are certain conditions in which the uniformity of
|
||
the background electromagnetic zero-point energy is slightly
|
||
disturbed and leads to physical effects.
|
||
|
||
Page 2
|
||
One is the slight perturbation of the lines seen from transitions
|
||
between atomic states known as the Lamb Shift (2), named after its
|
||
discoverer, Willis Lamb.
|
||
|
||
Another, also named for its discoverer, is the Casimir Effect, a
|
||
unique attractive quantum force between closely-spaced metal
|
||
plates.
|
||
|
||
An elegant analysis by Milonni et. al. at Los Angeles National
|
||
Laboratory (3) shows the Casimir force to be due to radiation
|
||
pressure from the background electromagnetic zero-point energy
|
||
which has become unbalanced due to the presence of the plates, and
|
||
which results in the plates being pushed together.
|
||
|
||
From this it would seem that it might be possible to extract
|
||
electrical energy from the vacuum, and indeed the possibility of
|
||
doing so (at least in principle) has been shown in a paper of that
|
||
same name by Robert Forward (4) at Hughes Research Laboratories in
|
||
Malibu, California.
|
||
|
||
What does this have to do with our basic questions? Let's start
|
||
with the question as top why the electron in a simple hydrogen
|
||
atom doesn't radiate as it circles the proton in its stable ground
|
||
state atomic orbit.
|
||
|
||
This issue has been re-addressed in a recent paper by the author,
|
||
this time taking into account what has been learned over the years
|
||
about the effects of zero-point energy. (5) There it is shown
|
||
that the electron can be seen as continually radiating away its
|
||
energy as predicted by classical theory, but simultaneously
|
||
absorbing a compensating amount of energy from the ever-present
|
||
sea of zero-point energy in which the atomm is immersed, and an
|
||
assumed equilibrium between these two processes leads to the
|
||
correct values for the parameters known to define the ground-state
|
||
orbit.
|
||
|
||
Thus the ground-state orbit is set by a dynamic equilibrium in
|
||
which collapse of the state is prevented by the presence of the
|
||
zero-point energy. The significance of this observation is that
|
||
the very stability of matter itself appears to depend on the
|
||
presence of the underlying sea of electromagnetic zero-point
|
||
energy.
|
||
|
||
With regard to the gravitational attraction that is described so
|
||
well by Einstein's theory, its fundamental nature is still not
|
||
well understood. Whether addressed simply in terms of Newton's
|
||
Law, or with the full rigor of general relativity, gravitational
|
||
theory is basically descriptive in nature, without revealing the
|
||
underlying dynamics for that description.
|
||
|
||
As a result, attempts to unify gravity with the other forces
|
||
(electromagnetic, strong and weak nuclear forces) or to develop a
|
||
quantum theory of gravity have foundered again and again on
|
||
difficulties that can be traced back to a lack of understanding at
|
||
a fundamental level.
|
||
|
||
To rectify these difficulties, theorists by and large have
|
||
resorted to ever-increasing levels of mathematical sophistication
|
||
and abstraction, as in the recent development of supergravity and
|
||
superstring theories.
|
||
|
||
Page 3
|
||
Taking a completely different tack when addressing these
|
||
difficulties in the sixties, the well-known Russian physicist
|
||
Andrei Sakharov put forward the somewhat radical hypothesis that
|
||
gravitation might not be a fundamental interaction at all, but
|
||
rather a secondary or residual effect associated with other (non-
|
||
gravitational) fields. (6)
|
||
|
||
Specifically, Sakharov suggested that gravity might be an induced
|
||
effect brought about by changes in the zero-point energy of the
|
||
vacuum, due to the presence of matter.
|
||
|
||
If correct, gravity would then be understood as a variation on the
|
||
Casimir theme, in which background zero-point-energy pressures
|
||
were again responsible.
|
||
|
||
Although Sakharov did not develop the concept much further, he did
|
||
outline certain criteria such a theory would have to meet such as
|
||
predicting the value of the gravitational constant G in terms of
|
||
zero-point-energy parameters.
|
||
|
||
The approach to gravity outlined by Sakharov has recently been
|
||
addressed in detail, and with positive reults, again by the
|
||
author. (7)
|
||
|
||
The gravitational interaction is shown to begin with the fact that
|
||
a particle situated in the sea of electromagnetic zero-point
|
||
fluctuations develops a "jitter" motion, or ZITTERBEWEGUNG as it
|
||
is called.
|
||
|
||
When there are two or more particles they are each influenced not
|
||
only by the fluctuating background field, but also by the fields
|
||
generated by the other particles, all similarly undergoing
|
||
ZITTERBEWEGUNG motion, and the inter-particle coupling due to
|
||
these fields results in the attractive gravitational force.
|
||
|
||
Gravity can thus be understood as a kind of long-range Casimir
|
||
force. Because of its electromagnetic unerpinning, gravitational
|
||
theory in this form constitutes what is known in the literature as
|
||
an "already-unified" theory.
|
||
|
||
The major benefit of the new approach is that it provides a basis
|
||
for understanding various characteristics of the gravitational
|
||
interaction hitherto unexplained.
|
||
|
||
These include the relative weakness of the gravitational force
|
||
under ordinary circumstances (shown to be due to the fact that the
|
||
coupling constant G depends inversely on the large value of the
|
||
high-frequency cutoff of the zero-point-fluctuation spectrum); the
|
||
existence of positive but not negative mass (traceable to a
|
||
positive-only kinetic-energy basis for the mass parameter); and
|
||
the fact that gravity cannot be shielded (a consequence of the
|
||
fact that quantum zero-point-fluctuation "noise" in general cannot
|
||
be shielded, a factor which in other contexts sets a lower limit
|
||
on the detectability of electromagnetic signals).
|
||
|
||
As to where the ubiquitous electromagnetic zero-point energy comes
|
||
from, historically there have been two schools of thought:
|
||
existence by fiat as part of the boundary conditions of the
|
||
universe, or generation by the (quantum-fluctuation) motion of
|
||
charged particles that constitute matter.
|
||
|
||
Page 4
|
||
A straightforward calculation of the latter possibility has
|
||
recently been carried out by the author. (8)
|
||
|
||
It was assumed that zero-point fields drive particle motion, and
|
||
that the sum of particle motions throughout the universe in turn
|
||
generate the zero-point fields, in the form of a self-regenerating
|
||
cosmological feedback cycle not unlike a cat chasing its own tail.
|
||
|
||
This self-constistent approach yielded the known zero-point field
|
||
distribution, thus indicating a dynamic-generation process for the
|
||
zero-point fields.
|
||
|
||
Now as to the question of why quantum theory. Although knowledge
|
||
of zero-point fields emerged from quantum physics as that subject
|
||
matured, Professor Timothy Boyer at City College in New York took
|
||
a contrary view.
|
||
|
||
He bagan asking in the late sixties what would happen if we took
|
||
classical physics as it was<61>and inroduced a background of random,
|
||
clasical fluctuating fields of the zero-point spectral
|
||
distribution type. Could such an all-classical model reproduce
|
||
quantum theory in its entirety, and might this possibility have
|
||
been overlooked by the founders of quantum theory who were not
|
||
aware of the existence of such a fluctuating background field?
|
||
|
||
(First, it is clear from the previously-mentioned cosmological
|
||
calculation that such a field distribution would reproduce itself
|
||
on a continuing dynamic basis.)
|
||
|
||
Boyer began by tackling the problems that led to the introduction
|
||
of quantum theory in the first place, such as the blackbody
|
||
radiation curve and the photoelectric effect. One by one the
|
||
known quantum results were reproduced by this upstart neoclassical
|
||
approach, now generally referred to as Stochastic Electrodynamics
|
||
(SED) (9), as contrasted to quantum electrodynamics (QED).
|
||
|
||
Indeed, Milonni at Los Alamos noted in a review of the Boyer work
|
||
that had physicists in 1900 thought of taking this route, they
|
||
would probably have been more comfortable with this classical
|
||
approach than with Planck's hypothesis of the quantum, and one can
|
||
only speculate as to the direction that physics would have taken
|
||
then.
|
||
|
||
The list of topics successfully analyzed within the SED
|
||
formulation (i.e., yielding precise quantitative agreement with
|
||
QED treatments) has now been extended to include the harmonic
|
||
oscillator, Casimir and Van der Waals forces and the thermal
|
||
effects of acceleration through the vacuum, to name a few.
|
||
|
||
Out of this work emerged the reasons for such phenomena as the
|
||
uncertainty principle, the incessant fluctuation of particle
|
||
motion, the existence of Van der Waals forces even at zero
|
||
temperature, and so forth, all shown to be due to the influence of
|
||
the unceasing activity of the random background fields.
|
||
|
||
There are also some notable failures in SED, such as transparent
|
||
derivation of something as simple as Schrodinger's equation, which
|
||
turns out as yet to be an intractable problem.
|
||
|
||
Therefore, it is unlikely that quantum theory as we have come to
|
||
|
||
Page 5
|
||
know it and love it will be entirely replaced by a refurbished
|
||
classical theory in the near future.
|
||
|
||
Nonetheless, the successes to date of the SED approach, by its
|
||
highlighting of the role of background zero-point-fluctuations,
|
||
means that when the final chapter is written on quantum theory,
|
||
field fluctuations in empty space will be accorded an honored
|
||
position.
|
||
|
||
And now to the preeminent question of all, where did the Universe
|
||
come from? Or, in modern terminology, what started the Big Bang?
|
||
Could quantum fluctuations of empty space have something to do
|
||
with this also?
|
||
|
||
Well, Prof. Edward Tryon of Hunter College of the City University
|
||
of New York thought so when he proposed in 1973 that our Universe
|
||
may have originated as a fluctuation of the vacuum on a large
|
||
scale, as "simply one of those things which happen from time to
|
||
time." (10)
|
||
|
||
This idea was later refined and updated within the context of
|
||
inflationary cosmology by Alexander Vilenkin of Tufts University,
|
||
who proposed that the universe is created by quantum tunneling
|
||
from literally nothing into the something we call our universe.
|
||
(11)
|
||
|
||
Although highly speculative, these types of models indicate once
|
||
again that physicists find themselves turning again and again to
|
||
the Void (and the fluctuations thereof) for their answers.
|
||
|
||
Those with a practical bent of mind may be left with yet one more
|
||
unanswered question. Can this emerging Rosetta Stone of physics
|
||
be used to translate such lofty insights into mundane application?
|
||
|
||
Could the engineer of the future specialize in "vacuum
|
||
engineering?" Could the energy crisis be solved by harnessing the
|
||
energies of the zero-point sea?
|
||
|
||
After all, since the basic zero-point energy form is highly random
|
||
in nature, and tending towards self-cancellation, if a way could
|
||
be found to bring order out of chaos, the, because of the highly
|
||
energetic nature of the vacuum fluctuations, relatively large
|
||
effects could in principle be produced.
|
||
|
||
Given our relative ignorance at this point, we must fall back on a
|
||
quote given by Podolny (12) when contemplating this same issue.
|
||
|
||
"It would be just as presumptuous to deny the feasibility of
|
||
useful application as it would be irresponsible to guarantee such
|
||
application."
|
||
|
||
Only the future can reveal the ultimate use to which Mankind will
|
||
put this remaining Fire of the Gods, the quantum fluctuations of
|
||
empty space.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Page 6
|
||
|
||
|
||
REFERENCES
|
||
|
||
1. R. Podolny, "Something Called Nothing" (Mir Publ., Moscow,
|
||
1986)
|
||
|
||
2. W. E. Lamb, Jr., and R. C. Retherford, "Fine Structure of the
|
||
Hydrogen Atom by a Microwave Method," Phys. Rev.
|
||
72, 241 (1947)
|
||
|
||
3. P. W. Milonni, R. J. Cook and M. E. Goggin, "Radiation
|
||
Pressure from the Vacuum : Physical
|
||
Interpretation of the Casimir Force," Phys. Rev.
|
||
A 38, 1621 (1988)
|
||
|
||
4. R. L. Forward, "Extracting Electrical Energy from the Vacuum
|
||
by Cohesion of Charged Foliated Conductors,"
|
||
Phys. Rev. B 30, 1700 (1984)
|
||
|
||
5. H. E. Puthoff, "Ground State of Hydrogen as a Zero-Point
|
||
Fluctuation-Determined State," Phys. Rev. D 35,
|
||
3266 (1987)
|
||
See also science news article, "Why Atoms Don't Collapse," in
|
||
New Scientist, p. 26 (9 July 1987)
|
||
|
||
6. A. D. Sakharov, "Vacuum Quantum Fluctuations in Curved Space
|
||
and the Theory of Gravitation, Dokl. Akad. Nauk.
|
||
SSSR (Sov. Phys. - Dokl. 12, 1040 (1968).
|
||
See also discussion in C. W. Misner, K. S. Thorne and J. A.
|
||
Wheeler, Gravitation (Freeman, San Francisco,
|
||
1973), p. 426
|
||
|
||
7. H. E. Puthoff, "Gravity as a Zero-Point Fluctuation Force,"
|
||
Phys. Rev. A 39, 2333 (1989)
|
||
|
||
8. H. E. Puthoff, "Source of Vacuum Electromagnetic Zero-Point
|
||
Energy," subm. to Phys. Rev. A, (March 1989)
|
||
|
||
9. See review of SED by T. H. Boyer, "A Brief Survey of
|
||
Stochastic Electrodynamics," in Foundations of
|
||
Radiation Theory and Quantum Electrodynamics,
|
||
edited by A. O. Barut (Plenum, New York, 1980)
|
||
See also the very readable account "The Classical Vacuum," in
|
||
Scientific American, p. 70 (August 1985)
|
||
|
||
10. E. P. Tryon, "Is the Universe a Vacuum Fluctuation?" Nature
|
||
246, 396 (1973)
|
||
|
||
11. A. Vilenkin, "Creation of Universes from Nothing," Phys.
|
||
Lett. 117B, 25 (1982)
|
||
|
||
12. R. Podolny, Ref. 1, p. 211
|
||
|
||
We of Vangard Sciences wish to express our thanks to Dr. Puthoff
|
||
for allowing us to list his excellent paper on Zero Point Energy
|
||
on the KeelyNet. If you have questions or comments, you may
|
||
address them to KeelyNet or
|
||
directly to Dr. Puthoff at the address on the title page.
|
||
Thank you for using KeelyNet!
|
||
|
||
Page 7 |