930 lines
50 KiB
Plaintext
930 lines
50 KiB
Plaintext
|
||
|
||
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
|
||
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
|
||
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
|
||
PO BOX 1031
|
||
Mesquite, TX 75150
|
||
|
||
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
|
||
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
|
||
files on KeelyNet except where noted!
|
||
|
||
February 22, 1992
|
||
|
||
THEORYBE.ASC
|
||
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
The New Tesla Electromagnetics and
|
||
The Secrets of Free Electrical Energy
|
||
(Part 1) by T. E. Bearden
|
||
|
||
Retyped Without Permission, 7/13/86,
|
||
by (_>Shadow Hawk 1<_)
|
||
|
||
Comments on the New Tesla Electromagnetics
|
||
------------------------------------------
|
||
A:Discrepancies in Present EM Theory
|
||
|
||
There are at least twenty-two major discrepancies presently existing
|
||
in conventional electromagnetics theory. This paper presents a
|
||
summary of those flaws, and is a further commentary on my discussion
|
||
of scalar longitudinal waves in a previous paper, "Solutions to
|
||
Tesla's Secrets and the Soviet Tesla Weapons," Tesla Book Company,
|
||
1981 and 1982.
|
||
|
||
I particularly wish to express my deep appreciation to two of my
|
||
friends and colleagues who at this time, I believe, wish to remain
|
||
anonymous. One of the two is an experimental genius who can produce
|
||
items that do not work by orthodox theory.
|
||
|
||
The second is a master of materials science and electromagnetics
|
||
theory. I thank them both for their exceptional contributions and
|
||
stimuli regarding potential shortcoming in present electromagnetics
|
||
theory, and their forbearance with the many discussions we have held
|
||
on this and related subjects.
|
||
|
||
It goes without saying that any errors in this paper are strictly my
|
||
own, and not the fault of either of my distinguished colleagues.
|
||
|
||
(1) In present electromagnetics theory, charge and charged mass
|
||
are falsely made identical. Actually, on a charged particle,
|
||
the "charge" is the flux of virtual particles on the "bare
|
||
particle" of observable mass.
|
||
|
||
The charged particle is thus a "system" of true massless
|
||
charge coupled to a bare chargeless mass. The observable
|
||
"mass" is static, three-dimensional and totally spatial.
|
||
|
||
"Charge" is dynamic, four-dimensional or more, virtual and
|
||
spatiotemporal.
|
||
|
||
Page 1
|
||
|
||
Further, the charge and observable mass can be de-coupled,
|
||
contrary to present theory. Decoupled charge -- that is, the
|
||
absence of mass -- is simply what we presently refer to as
|
||
"Vacuum." Vacuum, spacetime, and massless charge are all
|
||
identical.
|
||
|
||
Rigorously, we should utilize any of these three as an
|
||
"ether," as suggested for vacuum by Einstein himself (see
|
||
Max Born, Einstiein's Theory of Relativity, Revised Edition,
|
||
Dover Publications, New York, 1965, p. 224). And all three
|
||
of them are identically anenergy -- not energy, but more
|
||
fundamental components of energy.
|
||
|
||
(2) Electrostatic potential is regarded as a purely 3-
|
||
dimensional spatial stress. Instead, it is the intensity of
|
||
a many-dimensional (at least four-dimensional) virtual flux
|
||
and a stress on all four dimensions of spacetime.
|
||
|
||
This is easily seen, once one recognizes that spacetime is
|
||
identically massless charged. (It is not "filled" with
|
||
charge; rather, it is charge!) Just as, in a gas under
|
||
pressure, the accumulation of additional gas further
|
||
stresses the gas, the accumulation of charge (spacetime)
|
||
stresses charge (spacetime).
|
||
|
||
Further, if freed from its attachment to mass, charge can
|
||
flow exclusively in time, exclusively in space, or in any
|
||
combination of the two. Tesla waves -- which are scalar
|
||
waves in pure massless charge flux itself -- thus can
|
||
exhibit extraordinary characteristics that ordinary vector
|
||
waves do not possess.
|
||
|
||
And Tesla waves have extra dimensional degrees of freedom in
|
||
which to move, as compared to vector waves. Indeed, one way
|
||
to visualize a tesla scalar wave is to regard it as a pure
|
||
oscillation of time itself.
|
||
|
||
(3) Voltage and potential are often confused in the
|
||
electrostatic case, or at least thought of as "composed of
|
||
the same thing." For that reason, voltage is regarded as
|
||
"potential drop." This also is not true.
|
||
|
||
Rigorously, the potential is the intensity of the virtual
|
||
particle flux at a single point -- whether or not there is
|
||
any mass at the point -- and both the pressure and the point
|
||
itself are spatiotemporal (4-dimensional) and not spatial
|
||
(3-dimensional) as presently assumed.
|
||
|
||
Voltage represents the spatial intersection of the
|
||
difference in potential between two seperated spatial
|
||
points, and always implies at least a miniscule flow of mass
|
||
current (that is what makes it spatial!).
|
||
|
||
"Voltage" is spatial and depends upon the presence of
|
||
observable mass flow, while scalar electrostatic potential
|
||
is spatiotemporal and depends upon the absence of observable
|
||
mass flow. The two are not even of the same dimensionality.
|
||
|
||
(4) The charge of vacuum spacetime is assumed to be zero, when
|
||
|
||
Page 2
|
||
|
||
in fact it is a very high value. Vacuum has no mass, but it
|
||
has great massless charge and virtual particle charge flux.
|
||
For proof that a charged vacuum is the seat of something in
|
||
motion, see G. M. Graham and D. G. Lahoz, "Observation of
|
||
static electromagnetic angular momentum in vacuo," Nature,
|
||
Vol. 285, 15 May 1980, pp. 154-155. In fact, vacuum IS
|
||
charge, identically, and it is also spacetime, and at least
|
||
four-dimensional.
|
||
|
||
(5) Contrary to its present usage, zero is dimensional and
|
||
relative in its context. A three-dimensional spatial hole,
|
||
for example, exists in time. If we model time as a
|
||
dimension, then the spatial hole has one dimension in 4-
|
||
space.
|
||
|
||
So a spatial absence is a spatiotemporal presence. In the
|
||
vacuum 4-space, a spatial nothing is still a something. The
|
||
"virtual" concept and mathematical concept of a derivative
|
||
are simply two present ways of unconsciously addressing this
|
||
fundamental problem of the dimensional relativity of zero.
|
||
|
||
(6) The concepts of "space" and "time" imply that spacetime
|
||
(vacuum) has been seperated into two parts. We can only
|
||
think of a space as "continuing to exist in time." To
|
||
separate vacuum spacetime into two pieces, an operation
|
||
is continually required.
|
||
|
||
The operator that accomplishes this splitting operation is
|
||
the photon interaction, the interaction of vector
|
||
electromagnetic energy or waves with mass.
|
||
|
||
I have already strongly pointed out this effect and
|
||
presented a "raindrop model" or first-order physical change
|
||
itself in my book, The Excalibur Briefing, Strawberry Hill
|
||
Press, San Francisco, 1980, pp. 128-130.
|
||
|
||
(7) "Vector magnetic potential" is assumed to be always an
|
||
aspect of (and connected to) the magnetic field. In fact it
|
||
is a separate, fundamental field of nature and it can be
|
||
entirely disconnected from the magnetic field. See Richard
|
||
P. Feynman et al, The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Addison-
|
||
Wesley Publishing Co., New York, 1964, Vol. II, pp. 15-8 to
|
||
15-14.
|
||
|
||
Curiously, this fact has been proven for years, yet it has
|
||
been almost completely ignored in the West. The
|
||
"(triangle)x" operator, when applied to the A-field, makes
|
||
B-field.
|
||
|
||
If the (triangle)x operator is not applied, the "freed" A-
|
||
field possesses much-expanded characteristics from those
|
||
presently allowed in the "bound" theory. Specifically, it
|
||
becomes a scalar or "shadow vector" field; it is not a
|
||
normal vector field.
|
||
|
||
(8) The speed of light in vacuum is assumed to be a fundamental
|
||
constant of nature. Instead it is a function of the
|
||
intensity of the massless charge flux (that is, of the
|
||
magnitude of the electrostatic potential) of the vacuum in
|
||
|
||
Page 3
|
||
|
||
which it moves. (Indeed, since vacuum and masless charge are
|
||
one and the same, one may say that the speed of light is a
|
||
function of the intensity of the spatiotemporal vacuum!).
|
||
|
||
The higher the flux intensity (charge) of the vacuum, the
|
||
faster the speed of light in it. This is an observed fact
|
||
and already shown by hardcore measurements.
|
||
|
||
For example, distinct differences actually exist in the
|
||
speed of light in vacuo, when measured on the surface of the
|
||
earth as compared to measurements in space away from
|
||
planetary masses. In a vacuum on the surface of the earth,
|
||
light moves significantly faster. For a discussion and the
|
||
statistics, see B. N. Belyaev, "On Random Fluctuations of
|
||
the Velocity of Light in Vacuum," Soviet Physics Journal,
|
||
No. 11, Nov. 1980, pp. 37-42 (original in Russian,
|
||
translation by Plenum Publishing Corporation.)
|
||
|
||
The Russians have used this knowledge for over two decades
|
||
in their strategic psychotronics (energetics) program; yet
|
||
hardly a single U.S. scientist is aware of the measured
|
||
variation of c in vacuo. In fact, most Western scientists
|
||
simply cannot believe it when it is pointed out to them!
|
||
|
||
(9) Energy is considered fundamental and equivalent to work. In
|
||
fact, energy arises from vector processes, and it can be
|
||
disassembled into more fundamental (anenergy) scalar
|
||
components, since the vectors can.
|
||
|
||
These scalar components individually can be moved to a
|
||
distant location without expending work, since one is not
|
||
moving force vectors. There the scalar components can be
|
||
joined and reassembled into vectors to provide "free energy"
|
||
appearing at a distance, with no loss in between the initial
|
||
and distant points.
|
||
|
||
For proof that a vector field can be replaced by (and
|
||
considered to be composed of) two scalar fields, see E. T.
|
||
Whittaker, Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society,
|
||
Volume 1, 1903, p. 367. By extension, any vector wave can be
|
||
replaced by two coupled scalar waves.
|
||
|
||
(10) The classical Poynting vector predicts no longitudinal wave
|
||
of energy from a time-varying, electrically charged source.
|
||
In fact, an exact solution of the problem does allow this
|
||
longitudinal wave. See T. D. Keech and J. F. Corum, "A New
|
||
Derivation for the Field of a Time-Varying Charge in
|
||
Einsteins Theory," International Journal of Theoretical
|
||
Physics, Vol. 20, No. 1, 1981, pp. 63-68 for the proof.
|
||
|
||
(11) The present concepts of vector and scalar are severely
|
||
limited, and do not permit the explicit consideration of the
|
||
internal, finer-grained structures of a vector or a
|
||
scalar. That is, a fundamental problem exists with the
|
||
basic assumptions in the vector mathematics itself.
|
||
|
||
The "space" of a vector field, for example, does not have
|
||
inter-nested sublevels (subspaces) containing finer "shadow
|
||
vectors" or "virtual vectors." Yet particle physics has
|
||
|
||
Page 4
|
||
|
||
already discovered that electrical reality is built that
|
||
way. Thus one should actually use a "hypernumber" theory
|
||
after the manner of Charles Muses.
|
||
|
||
A scalar is filled with (and composed of) nested levels of
|
||
other "spaces" containing vectors, where these sum to "zero"
|
||
in the ordinary observable frame without an observable
|
||
vector resultant.
|
||
|
||
In Muses' mathematics, for example, zero has real roots.
|
||
Real physical devices can be -- and have been -- constructed
|
||
in accordance with Muses' theory. For an introduction to
|
||
Muses' profound hypernumberss approach, see Charles Muses'
|
||
forward to Jerome Rothstein, Communication, Ogranization and
|
||
Science, The Falcon's Wing Press, Indian Hills, Colorado,
|
||
1958. See also Charles Muses', "Applied Hypernumbers:
|
||
Computational Convepts," Applied Mathematics and
|
||
Computation, Vol. 3, 1976. See also Charles Muses'
|
||
"Hypernumbers II", Aoplied Mathematics and Computation,
|
||
January 1978.
|
||
|
||
(12) With the expanded Tesla electromagnetics, a new conservation
|
||
of energy law is required. Let us recapitulate for a moment.
|
||
The oldest law called for the conservation of mass.
|
||
|
||
The present law calls for the conservation of "mass and
|
||
energy", but not each separately. If mass is regarded as
|
||
simply another aspect of energy, then the present law calls
|
||
for the conservation of energy.
|
||
|
||
However, this assumes that energy is a basic, fundamental
|
||
concept. Since the energy concept is tied to work and the
|
||
movement of vector forces, it implicitly assumes "vector
|
||
movement2 to be a "most fundamental" and irreducible
|
||
concept.
|
||
|
||
But as we pointed out, Whittaker showed that vectors can
|
||
always be further broken down into more fundamental coupled
|
||
scalar components. Further, Tesla discovered that these
|
||
"coupled components" of "energy" can be individually
|
||
separated, transmitted, processed, rejoined, etc.
|
||
|
||
This directly implies that energy per se need not be
|
||
conserved. The new law therefore calls for the conservation
|
||
of anenergy, the COMPONENTS OF ENERGY.
|
||
|
||
These components may be coupled into energy, and the energy
|
||
may be further compacted into mass. It is the sum total of
|
||
the (anenergy) components -- coupled and uncoupled -- that
|
||
is conserved, NOT the matter or the energy per se.
|
||
|
||
Further, this conservation of anenergy is not spatial;
|
||
rather it is spatiotemporal in a spacetime of at least four
|
||
or more dimensions.
|
||
|
||
(13) Relativity is presently regarded as a theory or statement
|
||
about fundamental physical reality. In fact, it is only a
|
||
statement about FIRST ORDER reality -- the reality that
|
||
emerges from the vector interaction of electromagnetic
|
||
|
||
Page 5
|
||
|
||
energy with matter.
|
||
|
||
When we break down the vectors into scalars (shadow vectors
|
||
or hypervectors), we immediately enter a vastly different,
|
||
far more fundamental reality.
|
||
|
||
In this reality superluminal velocity, multiple universes,
|
||
travel back and forth in time, higher dimensions, variation
|
||
of all "fundamental constants" of nature, materialization
|
||
and dematerialization, and violation of the "conservation of
|
||
energy" are all involved.
|
||
|
||
Even our present Aristotlean logic -- fitted to the photon
|
||
interaction by vector light as the fundamental observation
|
||
mechanism -- is incapable of describing or modeling this
|
||
more fundamental reality. Using scalar waves and scalar
|
||
interactions as much subtler, far less limited
|
||
observation/detection mechanisms, we must have a new
|
||
"superrelativity" to describe the expanded electromagnetic
|
||
reality uncovered by Nikola Tesla.
|
||
|
||
(14) "Charge" is assumed to be quantized, in addition to always
|
||
occurring with -- and locked to -- mass. Indeed, charge is
|
||
not necessarily quantized, just as it is not necessarily
|
||
locked to mass. Ehrenhaft discovered and reported fractional
|
||
charges for years, in the 30's and 40's, and was ignored.
|
||
See P.A.M. Dirac, "Development of the Physicist's
|
||
Conception of Nature", Sumposium on the Development of the
|
||
Physicist's Conception of Nature, ed. Jagdish Merha, D.
|
||
Reidel, Boston, 1973, pp. 12-14 for a presentation of some
|
||
of Ehrenhaft's results.
|
||
|
||
Within the last few years Stanford University researchers
|
||
have also positively demonstrated the existence of
|
||
"fractional charge." For a layman's description of their
|
||
work, see "A Spector Haunting Physics," Science News, Vol.
|
||
119, January 31, 1981, pp. 68-69.
|
||
|
||
Indeed, Dirac in his referenced article points out that
|
||
Millikan himself -- in his original oildrop experiments --
|
||
reported one measurement of fractional charge, but
|
||
discounted it as probably due to error.
|
||
|
||
(15) Presently, things are always regarded as traveling through
|
||
normal space. Thus we use or model only the most elementary
|
||
type of motion -- that performed by vector electromagnetic
|
||
energy. We do not allow for things to "travel inside the
|
||
vector flow itself."
|
||
|
||
Yet, actually, there is a second, more subtle flow inside
|
||
the first, and a third, even more subtle flow inside the
|
||
second, and so on. We may operate inside, onto, into, and
|
||
out of energy itself -- and any anenergy component of
|
||
energy.
|
||
|
||
There are hypervectors and hyperscalars unlimited, within
|
||
the ordinary vectors and scalars we already know. Further,
|
||
these "interlan flows" can be engineered and utilized,
|
||
|
||
|
||
Page 6
|
||
|
||
allowing physical reality itself to be directly engineered,
|
||
almost without limits.
|
||
|
||
(16) We always assume everything exists in time. Actually,
|
||
nothing presently measured exists in time, because the
|
||
physical detection/measurement process of our present
|
||
instruments destroys time, ripping it off and tossing it
|
||
away -- and thereby "collapsing the wave function."
|
||
|
||
Present scientific methodology thus is seriously flawed. It
|
||
does not yield fundamental (spacetime) truth, but only a
|
||
partial (spatial) truth. This in turn leads to great
|
||
scientific oversights.
|
||
|
||
For example. mass does not exist in time, but mass x time
|
||
(masstime) does. A fundamental constant does not exist in
|
||
time, but "constant x time" does. Energy does not exist in
|
||
time, but energy x time (action) does. Even space itself
|
||
does not exist in time -- spacetime does.
|
||
|
||
We are almost always one dimension short in every observable
|
||
we model. Yet we persist in thinking spatially, and we have
|
||
developed instruments that detect and measure spatially
|
||
only. Such instruments can never measure and detect the
|
||
phenomenology of the nested substrata of time.
|
||
|
||
By using scalar technology, however, less limited
|
||
instruments can indeed be constructed -- and they have been.
|
||
With such new instruments, the phenomenology of the new
|
||
electromagnetics can be explored and an engineering
|
||
technology developed.
|
||
|
||
(17) We do not recognize the connection between nested levels of
|
||
virtual state (particle physics) and orthogonally rotated
|
||
frames (hyperspaces). Actually, the two are identical, as I
|
||
showed in the appendix to my book, The Excalibur Briefing,
|
||
Strawberry Hills Press, San Francisco, 1980, pp. 233-235.
|
||
|
||
A virtual particle in the laboratory frame is an observable
|
||
particle in a hyperspatial frame rotated more than one
|
||
orthogonal turn away. This of course implies that the
|
||
hyperspatial velocity of all virtual particles is greater
|
||
than the speed of light.
|
||
|
||
The particle physicist is already deeply involved in
|
||
hyperspaces and hyperspatial charge fluxes without realizing
|
||
it. In other words , he is using tachyons (particles that
|
||
move faster than light) without realizing it.
|
||
|
||
(18) Presently quantum mechanics rigorously states that time is
|
||
not an observable, and therefore it cannot be measured or
|
||
detected. According to this assumption, one must always
|
||
infer time from spatial measurements, because all detections
|
||
and measurements are spatial.
|
||
|
||
With this assumption, our scientists prejudice themselves
|
||
against looking for finer, subquantal measurement
|
||
methodologies and instrumentation. Actually this present
|
||
limitation is the result of the type of electromagnetics we
|
||
|
||
Page 7
|
||
|
||
presently know, where all instruments (the "measurers") have
|
||
been interacted with by vector electromagnetic energy
|
||
(light).
|
||
|
||
Every mass that has temperature (and all masses do!) is
|
||
continually absorbing and emitting photons, and in the
|
||
process they are continually connecting to time and
|
||
disconnecting from time. If time is continually being
|
||
carried away from the detector itself by its emitted
|
||
photons, then the detector cannot hold and "detect" that
|
||
which it has just lost.
|
||
|
||
With Tesla electromagnetics, however, the fundamental
|
||
limitation of our present instruments need not apply. With
|
||
finer instruments, we can show there are an infinite number
|
||
of levels to "time", and it is only the "quantum level time"
|
||
which is continually being lost by vector light (photon)
|
||
interaction.
|
||
|
||
By using subquantal scalar waves, instruments can move to
|
||
deeper levels of time -- in which case the upper levels of
|
||
time ARE measureable and detectable, in contradistinction to
|
||
present assumptions.
|
||
|
||
(19) In the present physics, time is modeled as, and considered
|
||
to be, a continuous dimension such as length. This is only a
|
||
gross approximation. Indeed, time is not like a continuous
|
||
"dimension," but more like a series of "stiches," each of
|
||
which is individually made and then ripped out before the
|
||
next stitch appears.
|
||
|
||
"Vector light" photons interact one at a time, and it is
|
||
this interaction with mass that creates quantum change
|
||
itself. The absorption of a photon -- which is energy x
|
||
time -- by a spatial mass converts it to masstime: the time
|
||
was added by the photon.
|
||
|
||
The emission of a photon tears away the time, leaving behind
|
||
again a spatial mass. It is not accidental, then, that time
|
||
flows at the speed of light, for it is light which contains
|
||
and carries time. It is also not accidental that the photon
|
||
IS the individual quantum.
|
||
|
||
Since all our instruments presently are continually
|
||
absorbing and emitting photons, they are all "quantized,"
|
||
and they accordingly "quantize" their detections. This is
|
||
true because all detection is totally internal to the
|
||
detector, and the instruments only detect only their own
|
||
internal changes.
|
||
|
||
Since these detections are on a totally granular quantized
|
||
background, the detections themselves are quantized. The
|
||
Minkowski model is fundamentally erroneous in its modelling
|
||
of time, and for that reason relativity and quantum
|
||
mechanics continue to resist all attempts to successfully
|
||
combine them, quantum field theory notwithstanding.
|
||
|
||
(20) Presently, gravitational field and electrical field are
|
||
considered mutually exclusive. Actually this is also untrue.
|
||
|
||
Page 8
|
||
|
||
In 1974, for example, Santilli proved that electrical field
|
||
and gravitational fiend indeed are not mutually exclusive.
|
||
In that case one is left with two possibilities: (a) they
|
||
are totally the same thing, or (b) they are partially the
|
||
same thing. For the proof, see R. M. Santilli, "Partons and
|
||
Gravitation: Some Puzzling Questions," Annals of Physics,
|
||
Vol. 83, No. 1, March 1974.
|
||
|
||
With the new Tesla electromagnetics, pure scalar waves in
|
||
time itself can be produced electrically , and
|
||
electrostatics (when the charge has been seperated from the
|
||
mass) becomes a "magic" tool capable of directly affecting
|
||
anything that exists in time -- including the gravitational
|
||
field. Antigravity and the intertial drive are immediate and
|
||
direct consequences of the new electromagnetics.
|
||
|
||
(21) Presently, mind is considered metaphysical, not a part of
|
||
physics, and not affected by physical means. Literally, the
|
||
prevailing belief of Western scientists is that man is a
|
||
mechanical robot -- even though relativity depends entirely
|
||
upon the idea of the idea of the "observer."
|
||
|
||
Western science today thus has essentially become dogmatic,
|
||
and in this respect borders on a religion. Since this
|
||
"religion," so to speak, is now fairly well entrenched in
|
||
its power in the state, Western science is turning itself
|
||
into an oligarchy.
|
||
|
||
But mind occupies time, and when we measure and affect time,
|
||
we can directly measure and affect mind itself. In the new
|
||
electromagnetics, then, Man regains his dignity and his
|
||
humanity by restoring the reality of mind and thought to
|
||
science. In my book, The Excalibur Briefing, I have already
|
||
pointed out the reality of mind and a simplified way in
|
||
which it can be modeled to the first order.
|
||
|
||
With scalar wave instruments, the reality of mind and
|
||
thought can be measured in the laboratory, and
|
||
parapsychology becomes a working, engineering, scientific
|
||
discipline.
|
||
|
||
(22) Multiple valued basic dimensional functions are either not
|
||
permitted or severely discouraged in the present theory. For
|
||
one thing, integrals of multiple valued derivative functions
|
||
have the annoying habit of "blowing up" and yielding
|
||
erroneous answers, or none at all. And we certainly do not
|
||
allow multiple types of time!
|
||
|
||
This leads to the absurdity of the present interpretation
|
||
of relativity, which permits only a single observer (and a
|
||
single observation) at a time. So if one believes as
|
||
"absurd" a thing as the fact that more than one person can
|
||
observe an apple at the same time, the present physics
|
||
fails.
|
||
|
||
However, the acceptance of such a simple proposition as
|
||
multiple simultaneous observation leads to a physics so
|
||
bizarre and incredible that most Western physicists have
|
||
been unable to tolerate it, much less examine its
|
||
consequences.
|
||
Page 9
|
||
|
||
In the physics that emerges from multiple simultaneous
|
||
observation, all possibilities are real and physical.
|
||
|
||
There are an infinite number of worlds, orthogonal to one
|
||
another, and each world is continually splitting into
|
||
additional such "worlds" at a stupendous rate. Nonetheless,
|
||
this physics was worked out by Everett for his doctoral
|
||
thesis in 1956, and the thesis was published in 1957. (See
|
||
Hugh Everett, III, The Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum
|
||
Mechanics: A Fundamental Exposition, with papers by J. A.
|
||
Wheeler, B. S. DeWitt, L. N. Cooper and D. Van Vechten, and
|
||
N. Graham; eds. Bryce S. Dewitt and Neill Graham,
|
||
Princeton Series in Physics, Princeton University Press,
|
||
1973.)
|
||
|
||
Even though it is bizarre, Everett's physics is entirely
|
||
consistent with the present experimental basis of physics.
|
||
The present electromagnetic theory is constructed for only
|
||
a single "rodl" or universe -- or "level."
|
||
|
||
The expanded theory, on the other hand, contains multiply
|
||
nested levels of virtual state charge -- and these levels
|
||
are identically the same as orthogonal universes, or
|
||
"hyperframes."
|
||
|
||
Multiple kinds -- and values -- of time also exist. The new
|
||
concept differs from Everett's, however, in that the
|
||
orthogonal universes intercommunicate in the virtual state.
|
||
|
||
That is, an observable in one universe is always a virtual
|
||
quantity in each of the other universes. Thus one can have
|
||
multi-level "continuities" and "discontinuities"
|
||
simultaneously, without logical conflict.
|
||
|
||
It is precisely these levels of charge -- these levels of
|
||
scalar vacuum -- that lace together the discontinuous quanta
|
||
generated by the interaction of vector light with mass.
|
||
|
||
However, to understand the new electromagnetic reality, one
|
||
requires a new, expanded logic which contains the old
|
||
Aristotlean logic as a subset. I have already pointed out
|
||
the new logic in my paper, "A Conditional Criterion for
|
||
Identity, Leading to a Fourth Law of Logic," 1979, available
|
||
from the National Technical Information Center, AD-A071032.
|
||
|
||
Even as logic is extended, quantum mechanics, quantum
|
||
electrodynamics, and relativity are drastically changed by
|
||
the Tesla electromagnetics, as I pointed out in my paper,
|
||
"Solutions to Tesla's Secrets and the Soviet Tesla Weapons,"
|
||
Tesla Book Company, 1580 Magnolia, Millbrae, CA, 94030,
|
||
1980.
|
||
|
||
The present electromagnetics is just a special case of a much more
|
||
fundamental electromagnetics discovered by Nikola Tesla, just as
|
||
Newtonian physics is a special case of the relativistic physics.
|
||
|
||
But in the new electromagnetics case, the differences between the
|
||
old and the new are far more drastic and profound.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Page 10
|
||
|
||
Additional References
|
||
---------- ----------
|
||
|
||
1. Boren, Dr. Lawence Milton, "Discovery of the Fundamental
|
||
Magnetic Charge (Arising from the new Conservation of Magnetic
|
||
Energy)," 1981/1982 (private communication). Dr. Boren has a
|
||
cogent argument that the positron is the fundamental unit of
|
||
magnetic charge. His theory thus assigns fundamentally
|
||
different natures to positive charge and negative charge.
|
||
|
||
In support of Dr. Boren, one should point out that the
|
||
"positive" end of circuits can simply be "less negative" than
|
||
the "negative" end. In other words, the circuit works simply
|
||
from higher accumulation of negative charges (the "negative"
|
||
end) to a lesser accumulation of negative charges (the
|
||
"positive" end).
|
||
|
||
Nowhere need there be positive charges (protons, positrons,
|
||
etc.) to make the circuit work. Dr. Borens theory, though
|
||
dramatic at first encounter, nonetheless bears close and
|
||
meticulous examination -- particularly since he has been able
|
||
to gather experimental data which support his theory and
|
||
disagree with present theory.
|
||
|
||
2. Eagle, Albert, "An Alternative Explanation of Relativity
|
||
Phenomena," philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, No.
|
||
191, December 1939, pp. 694 -701.
|
||
|
||
3. Ehrenaft, Felix and Wasser, Emanuel, "Determination of the Size
|
||
and Weight of Single Submicroscopic Spheres of the Order of
|
||
Magnitude r = 4 x 10(-5) cm. to 5 x 10(-6) cm., as well as the
|
||
Production of Real Images of Submicroscopic Particles by means
|
||
of Ultraviolet Light," Phil. Mag. and Jour. of Sci., Vol. II
|
||
(Seventh Series), No. 7, July 1926, pp. 30-51.
|
||
|
||
4. Ehrenhaft, Felix and Wasser, Emanuel, "New Evidence of the
|
||
Existance of Charges smaller than the Electron - (a) The
|
||
Micromagnet; (b) The Law of Resistance; (c) The computation of
|
||
errors of the Method," Phil. Mag. and Jour. of Sci., Vol. V
|
||
(Seventh Series), No. 28, February 1928, pp. 225-241.
|
||
|
||
5. See also Ehrenhaft's last paper dealing with the electronic
|
||
charge, in Philosophy of Science, Vol. 8, 1941, p. 403.
|
||
|
||
6. McGregor, Donald Rait, The Inertia of the Vacuum: A New
|
||
Foundation for Theoretical Physics, Exposition Press,
|
||
Smithtown, NY, First Edition, 1981, pp. 15-20.
|
||
|
||
7. Ignat'ev, Yu. G. and Balakin, A. B., "Nonliner Gravitational
|
||
Waves in Plasma," Soviet Physics Journal, Vol. 24, No. 7, July
|
||
1981, (U.S. Translation, Consultants Bureau, NY, JAnurary
|
||
1982), pp. 593-597.
|
||
|
||
8. Yater, Joseph C., "Relation of the second law of thermodynamics
|
||
to the power conversion of energy fluctuations," Phys. Review
|
||
A, Vol. 20, no. 4, October 1979, pp. 1614-1618.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Page 11
|
||
|
||
9. DeSantis, Romano M. et al, "On the Analysis of Feedback Systems
|
||
With a Multipower Open Loop Chain," October 1973, available
|
||
through the Defense Technical Information Center (AD 773188).
|
||
|
||
10. Graneau, Peter, "Electromagnetic Jet-Propulsion in the
|
||
Direction of current flow," Nature, Vol. 295, 28 Janurary 1982,
|
||
pp. 311-312
|
||
|
||
11. "Gravity and acceleration aren't always equivalent," New
|
||
Scientist, 17 September 1981, p. 723.
|
||
|
||
12. Gonyaev, V. V., "Experimental Determination of the Free-Fall
|
||
Acceleration of a Relativistic Charged Particle. II. A
|
||
Cylindrical Solenoid in a Time-Independent Field of Inertial
|
||
Forces," Izvestiya VUZ, Fizika, No. 7, 1979, pp. 28-32.
|
||
English Translation: Soviet Physics Journal, No. 7, 1979, pp.
|
||
829-833.
|
||
|
||
If one understands the new, expanded electromagnetics, this
|
||
Soviet paper indicates a means of generating antigravity and
|
||
pure inertial fields.
|
||
|
||
13. R. Schaffranke, "The Development of Post-Relativistic Concepts
|
||
in Physics and Advanced Technology Abroad," Energy Unlimited,
|
||
No. 12, Winter 1981, pp. 15-20.
|
||
|
||
14. F. K. Preikschat, A Critical look at the theory of Relativity,
|
||
Library of Congress Catalogue No. 77-670044. Extensive
|
||
compilation of measurements of the speed of light. Clearly
|
||
shows the speed of light is not constant but changes, sometimes
|
||
even daily.
|
||
|
||
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
B: The Secret of Electrical Free Energy
|
||
|
||
Present electromagnetic theory is only a special case of the much
|
||
more fundamental electromagnetic theory discovered by Nikola Tesla
|
||
at the turn of the century.
|
||
|
||
Pure vacuum is pure charge flux, without mass. The vacuum has a very
|
||
high electrical potential -- something on the order of 200 million
|
||
volts, with respect to a hypothetical zero charge.
|
||
|
||
Thus in an ordinary electrical circuit, each point of the "ground" -
|
||
- which has the same potential as the vacuum -- actually has a non-
|
||
zero absolute potential.
|
||
|
||
This circuit ground has a value of zero only with respect to
|
||
something else which has the same absolute electrical potential.
|
||
|
||
Voltage, which is always associated with a flow of electrical "mass"
|
||
current (even if only a miniscule flow), is, by definition, a
|
||
difference dropped in potential when a charge mass moves between two
|
||
spatially seperated points.
|
||
|
||
What we have termed "electrical current" only flows where there is a
|
||
suitable conducting medium between things which have a difference in
|
||
absolute potential.
|
||
|
||
Page 12
|
||
|
||
Furthermore, between any two points in any material, there is
|
||
considered to be a finite resistance -- if we apply a voltage ahd
|
||
have a mass current flowing between the two points!
|
||
|
||
Rigorously, to have one of the three is to have them all. To lose
|
||
one is to lose all three. Immediately we see a major error in
|
||
present theory: One can have a "difference in scalar potential"
|
||
between two points without having a "voltage drop" between them.
|
||
|
||
Specifically, if no mass current flows between them, no resistance
|
||
exists between them, and no voltage drop exists between them.
|
||
|
||
In the same fashion, one can have a "scalar wave" through the vacuum
|
||
without a voltage wave. In that case, the wave has no E-field and no
|
||
H-field.
|
||
|
||
The only reason one has an E field around a statically charged
|
||
object is because the charged electrons accumulated on the object
|
||
are actually in violent motion. It is this motion of the charged
|
||
masses that produces E-field -- as well as H-field whenever that
|
||
entire E-field ensemble moves through laborotory space.
|
||
|
||
Now let us reason together the "approximate" manner utilized in
|
||
present electromagnetic theory. For example, let us examine a bird
|
||
sitting on a high tension line.
|
||
|
||
The bird sits on the high tension line without a flow of mass
|
||
electricity, because there is no significant difference in potential
|
||
drop between the bird and the line. Specifically, between the birds
|
||
two feet -- each in contact with a different portion of the line --
|
||
there exists no potential difference.
|
||
|
||
This is true even though, with respect to the vacuum, each foot is
|
||
at a potential that would be "100,000 volts higher," were a mass
|
||
current flowing. And it is true even though the absolute potential
|
||
of each foot may be some 200.1 million "volts," were a mass current
|
||
flowing.
|
||
|
||
Now an interesting thing happens to the bird when he flies through
|
||
the air to light upon the high tension wire. As he flies towards the
|
||
wire, he is flying through the massless electrostatic potential
|
||
field of the wire, for that field extends an infinite distance away
|
||
from the wire.
|
||
|
||
The electrostatic potential field -- pure 0-field -- is actually the
|
||
spatiotemporal intensity of the massless charge at a point. In other
|
||
words, as the bird flies to the wire, he flies into an increasing
|
||
"massless charge" potential, building up to 100,000 "volts" higher
|
||
than the earth.
|
||
|
||
However, very little (if any) "mass flow" potential difference is
|
||
experienced upon his body in approaching the wire, and so
|
||
essientially no "charged mass currents" are induced in his body.
|
||
|
||
Thus the little flier safely navigates into the teeth of a very high
|
||
electrostatic potential, lights upon the wire, and is not "fried" in
|
||
the process. When he lights on the wire, his body has reached the
|
||
electrostatic potential that each foot's contact point has.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Page 13
|
||
|
||
Again, there is no mass current flow. But his body is immersed in an
|
||
increased flux of massless charge -- which is what the electrostatic
|
||
potential represents. And each "virtual particle" flow in that
|
||
charge represents a "massless (scalar)" electrical current.
|
||
|
||
The point is, one can have any amount of massless charge flow --
|
||
"scalar" current -- without any mechanical work being done in the
|
||
system.
|
||
|
||
All electrical work in a circuit is done against the physical mass
|
||
of the charged masses that flow. Rigorously, force is defined as the
|
||
time rate of charge of momentum. Even in the relativistic case
|
||
where F = ma + v(dm/dt), change of momentum requires mass movement.
|
||
No mechanical work, and hence no energy, is expended by massless
|
||
charge flow.
|
||
|
||
That is why the vacuum massless charge -- which is composed of a
|
||
very high flux of massless "particles" -- normally does no work on
|
||
our systems, and expends none of its very high "potential energy."
|
||
|
||
It is exactly the same as the bird which flew into an increasing
|
||
scalar field as it approached the high tension wire -- no work was
|
||
done upon the bird by the increasing scalar flux currents
|
||
encountered by its body.
|
||
|
||
By existing "in the vacuum," so to speak, we (the whole earth) are
|
||
as birds sitting on a high tension line! Until we create a
|
||
significant difference in potential, via our present electromagnetic
|
||
circuits, no current can flow -- anywhere.
|
||
|
||
Even if we produce potential differences, we must have a conductor
|
||
and charged masses to flow, if we wish to produce mechanical work.
|
||
Presently our electromagnetic theory allows us to create a
|
||
difference in potential within different parts of a circuit, but
|
||
only by moving and shifting charged mass.
|
||
|
||
We therefore have to do work on this electrical mass in moving it
|
||
around, and we only get back the work we have put into the circuit.
|
||
In other words, presently all we do is "pump" electrical mass.
|
||
|
||
Now notice what would happen to the bird on the line if we
|
||
substantially "pulsed" the potential on the line. Suppose we
|
||
"pulsed" it such that the bird's physical system -- considered as a
|
||
circuit containing a capicitance, a resistance, an inductance, and
|
||
many free electrons -- became resonant to the pulsing frequency.
|
||
|
||
In that case the "bird system" would resonate, and a great deal of
|
||
electrical mass would surge back and forth in the body of the bird.
|
||
In the birds body, voltage would exist, charged mass current would
|
||
flow, work would be done, and the bird would be electrocuted.
|
||
|
||
Also, note that, without mass movement, electromagnetic vector
|
||
fields are not produced (and a portion of the difficulty lies with
|
||
the actual vector mechanics itself). Scalar (nonvector) waves
|
||
continually penetrate the "space" where there is no mass movement.
|
||
|
||
This means there can exist a "delta-0" without a voltage or an E-
|
||
field. The present theory does not allow this, because it always
|
||
uses "q" (charge) to be charged mass. Briefly, without belaboring
|
||
|
||
Page 14
|
||
|
||
the point, let us just say that is the mechanical spin of the
|
||
individual charged particle -- such as the electron -- which
|
||
"entangles" or "knits together" or "couples" independent scalar
|
||
waves into vector waves.
|
||
|
||
A vector wave is simply two coupled scalar waves. The entire force
|
||
field concept -- such as the E-field and the B-field -- is
|
||
operationally defined in terms of the force exhibited on a test
|
||
particle, or test mass.
|
||
|
||
Rigorusly, an E-field does not exist as a force field in a vacuum,
|
||
but as two coupled scalar 0-fields "tumbling about each other." When
|
||
these two coupled, tumbling fields meet a spinning electron, e.g.,
|
||
the force emerges on the electron mass. In short, movement of a
|
||
rotating mass changes delta-0 to "voltage", creating the V/I/R
|
||
triad.
|
||
|
||
By "accululating charged mass particles" -- such as electrons -- one
|
||
certainly can increase the value of 0, which represents the charge
|
||
intensity or "scalar electrostatic potential." However, that is not
|
||
the only way to increase it.
|
||
|
||
Resonance and rotation of charged mass can also be appropriately
|
||
employed to vary the vacuum charge potential 0, under proper
|
||
circumstances.
|
||
|
||
By the correct application of rotary principles and Tesla
|
||
electromagnetic theory, it is possible to oscillate -- and change
|
||
the vacuum potential itself, in one part of an electrical system.
|
||
|
||
Thus by correct procedures a part of a system can be electrically
|
||
altered so that the absolute value of its "ground" (vacuum)
|
||
potential differs significantly from the normal vacuum-ground state.
|
||
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics as
|
||
this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
|
||
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
|
||
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
|
||
|
||
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
|
||
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
|
||
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
If we can be of service, you may contact
|
||
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
|
||
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Page 15 |