199 lines
9.6 KiB
Plaintext
199 lines
9.6 KiB
Plaintext
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
|
|
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
|
|
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
|
|
PO BOX 1031
|
|
Mesquite, TX 75150
|
|
|
|
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
|
|
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
|
|
files on KeelyNet except where noted!
|
|
|
|
January 16,1994
|
|
|
|
TESBUCK.ASC
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
This file shared with KeelyNet courtesy of Joel McClain.
|
|
It is a combination of two uploads based on experiments
|
|
carried out by Joel with bucking magnetic fields.
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
TESBUCK1.ASC
|
|
Joel McClain
|
|
January 10, 1994
|
|
|
|
Description: Tesla coil output connected to matched, coaxial bucking
|
|
coils.
|
|
Output measurements taken using an analog volt meter,
|
|
with leads removed, and placed in the proximity of the
|
|
coils.
|
|
Additionally, a NE-2H lamp was used to determine the
|
|
presence of radiated energy, and a standard AM radio
|
|
was used to "listen" to output variations during
|
|
testing. (see NEONDET.ZIP, or NEONDET.ASC &
|
|
NEONDET.GIF)
|
|
|
|
Two matching coils were wound, each coil consisting of 3.5 meters of
|
|
75 Ohm coaxial cable. The core diameter of the coils is the same as
|
|
the diameter of the Tesla coil secondary windings.
|
|
|
|
The coils were wound in opposite direction relative to each other,
|
|
with one wound CW and the other wound CCW. Approximately one inch
|
|
of insulation and shield was removed from the cut ends of each coil,
|
|
and the connector ends were left intact.
|
|
|
|
The coils were placed next to each other, and the output from the
|
|
Tesla secondary was connected to each of the coils at the center
|
|
conductors, and jumpered to the shields to eliminate stray
|
|
capacitance.
|
|
|
|
When two matching coils of this type are placed along side of each
|
|
other and energized with alternating current, their fields will
|
|
"buck" each other, effectively cancelling the EM fields of both
|
|
coils. As such, the "cancelled" energy is combined to form a scalar
|
|
wave of twice the input frequency. Additionally, it was found that:
|
|
|
|
1. An energy "well" was formed in the inside diameter of the
|
|
coils, as detected by testing with a NE-2H plasma lamp,
|
|
connected on one lead to a 24" jumper cable. The "well"
|
|
appears to be in the shape of an hourglass, with energy
|
|
concentrated at the juncture between the coils. When the NE-
|
|
|
|
Page 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2H was lowered into the "well", it would illuminate. However,
|
|
if the NE-2H was connected to the Tesla output and then
|
|
lowered into the well, it would extinguish. The "well"
|
|
appears to be a vortex of energy which extinguished the lamp
|
|
by depleting the charge. As the lamp exited the "well" at
|
|
the lower end, the lamp once again illuminated.
|
|
|
|
2. The Tesla coil output is effectively doubled in terms of
|
|
radiated energy, as measured from the open ends of the
|
|
bucking coils.
|
|
|
|
3. The Tesla coil appears to operate more stably at its resonant
|
|
frequency with the matched coils connected to its output.
|
|
|
|
4. Radiated energy from the bucking coils increases considerably
|
|
with distance from the Tesla secondary.
|
|
|
|
Observations:
|
|
|
|
Applying a matched impedance device to a Tesla coil output will
|
|
improve the stability and output dynamics of the coil. The device
|
|
must be able to withstand the level of output without dielectric
|
|
breakdown.
|
|
|
|
Using bucking coils is a method for creating scalar potential, thus
|
|
there should exist a scalar potential in the gap between the coils,
|
|
extending on a horizontal plane. Therefore, the bucking coils are a
|
|
matched impedance scalar antenna/translator for the Tesla coil.
|
|
|
|
The alternate phase inversions should cancel magnetic fields. The
|
|
first set of bucking coils exhibited dual sets of polarized fields.
|
|
After rewinding the coils more carefully, the stray fields were
|
|
eliminated.
|
|
|
|
An additional set of matching bucking coils should work in a
|
|
complementary manner with the first set, permitting the scalar
|
|
energy from each set to translate back into EM energy, forming a
|
|
"Tesla Shield" in the gap between the coils. This will be attempted
|
|
next.
|
|
|
|
Having wound an additional set of matching coils for the above test,
|
|
it was found that the "Tesla Shield" could not be created. The
|
|
added load of an extra set of coils saturated the Tesla secondary,
|
|
causing output to drop below measurable emission levels. This test
|
|
will be repeated using another Tesla coil of similar constructionto
|
|
power the extra set of coils.
|
|
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
TESBUCK2.ASC
|
|
Joel McClain
|
|
January 12, 1994
|
|
|
|
Additional test data concerning the Tesla coil output to bucking
|
|
coils.
|
|
|
|
Test Set-up: Tesla secondary connected to twin, stacked coaxial
|
|
coils which are arranged in a bucking configuration,
|
|
so that the windings rotate in opposing directions.
|
|
At the center of the test stack, a scalar potential
|
|
should exist which is equal to double the amplitude
|
|
and frequency of the Tesla secondary output.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Observations: It was observed that the coils form a "negative energy
|
|
vortex", which depleted the electrons from energized
|
|
circuits which are placed in the vortex field, causing
|
|
those circuits to extinguish. It was also found that
|
|
the radiated energy of the coils, relative to the
|
|
Tesla coil, was much greater.
|
|
To fully test the theory of the vortex, one additional
|
|
test was required, that being a reversal of direction
|
|
of the energized circuit into the vortex field.
|
|
|
|
Result of Test:
|
|
|
|
A NE-2H on a 24" jumper was lowered into the field. The jumper was
|
|
connected to the Tesla secondary. Upon entering the vortex, the
|
|
lamp extinguished. Continuing to lower the lamp until it was out of
|
|
the vortex resulted in the lamp lighting.
|
|
|
|
If a vortex exixts, it must be possible to enter the lamp from the
|
|
bottom of the stack, and see it extinguish where it previously had
|
|
lit, and upon exiting the top, it should light where it previously
|
|
had extinguished.
|
|
|
|
This test was performed successfully several times. It is my
|
|
opinion that this is due to the direction of energies in the
|
|
vortical flow. Energy is "pulled" from the lamp as it enters the
|
|
vortex from either direction, and "pushed" into the lamp as it exits
|
|
the vortex. This test was performed both before and after reversing
|
|
the lamp connection between coils, to be certain that a phase
|
|
inversion was not causing the lamp to light or extinguish. Results
|
|
are identical regardless of which coil is connected to the lamp.
|
|
|
|
I would also like to note that I have been experiencing fatigue
|
|
since the beginning of this test, which may or may not be related to
|
|
the energy absorption properties of the coils. I consider the tests
|
|
to be complete at this time.
|
|
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
If you choose to experiment with this device, please note Joel's
|
|
comment regarding a fatigue. This could be tested by plants,
|
|
insects or animals to note reduced activity when in the presence of
|
|
such a field. However, please take precautions when experimenting
|
|
with these unknown qualities.
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
|
|
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
|
|
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
|
|
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
|
|
|
|
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
|
|
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
|
|
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
If we can be of service, you may contact
|
|
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 3
|
|
|
|
|