615 lines
34 KiB
Plaintext
615 lines
34 KiB
Plaintext
______________________________________________________________________________
|
|
| File Name : SWEETNS.ASC | Online Date : 06/30/95 |
|
|
| Contributed by : Woody Montier | Dir Category : ENERGY |
|
|
| From : KeelyNet BBS | DataLine : (214) 324-3501 |
|
|
| A FREE Alternative Sciences BBS sponsored by Vanguard Sciences |
|
|
| KeelyNet * PO BOX 870716 * Mesquite, Texas * USA * 75187 |
|
|
| Voice/FAX : (214) 324-8741 InterNet - keelynet@ix.netcom.com |
|
|
| WWW Mirror - http://www.eskimo.com/~billb |
|
|
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|
|
The following file has equations that I could not place online with it due to
|
|
the limitations of ASCII text.
|
|
|
|
Words in brackets [] are inserted to fill in for equations. I plan to do
|
|
another .ASC with a .GIF containing the equations as a future file that will
|
|
replace this one.
|
|
|
|
Due to information soon to come out, I felt it necessary to reawaken the
|
|
sleeping giant by putting this online, I do not have the diagrams which this
|
|
file refers to. If you have them, please consider sending them to KeelyNet so
|
|
they can be scanned in and posted to further flesh out our combined
|
|
understanding of the VTA. Thanks!.................................>>> Jerry
|
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
NOTHING IS SOMETHING:
|
|
The Theory and Operation of a Phase-Conjugated Vacuum Triode
|
|
by Floyd A. "Sparky" Sweet June 24th, 1988
|
|
|
|
THEORETICAL OVERVIEW
|
|
|
|
Nothing, on the cosmological scale, is virtually everything. It is the home of
|
|
all the invisible fields, rippling with the activity of every real force.
|
|
|
|
Every kind of matter produces a field, the fields all mesh in complex ways,
|
|
often from interference with other fields. Fields are the "stuff" of the
|
|
virtual vacuum. A light particle is nothing more than a large interference in
|
|
the electromagnetic field. Apart from interaction with other fields a field
|
|
will not be changed in the vacuum.
|
|
|
|
It will not go away; it cannot. Fields are a fundamental part of the vacuum
|
|
structure itself. Fields in their most quiescent state form the virtual vacuum
|
|
itself. Even when everything that can be removed from a vacuum has been
|
|
removed, the Higgs field remains.
|
|
|
|
Imagine the entire universe permeated with a constant magnetic field. One need
|
|
not imagine, for it is true. It is clear from experimentation certain results
|
|
appear that are not explainable without the presence of a field.
|
|
|
|
The field consists of an infinite number of one-dimensional North and South
|
|
poles in an incoherent state - incoherent due to the presence of a multitude
|
|
of other interfering fields formed by other North and South poles, or
|
|
particles or quanta. Thus the virtual vacuum is far from empty, far from
|
|
nothing, it is rather seething with potential energy as the primordial
|
|
powerhouse of everything in the universe.
|
|
|
|
As postulated by Einstein in his famous equation E=MC 2, energy is a kind of
|
|
matter. So even the energy of distant starlight must be accounted for in any
|
|
holistic view of physical reality. The vacuum itself is literally popping with
|
|
virtual particles that appear and disappear in the field during instants too
|
|
brief to be measured.
|
|
|
|
Virtual particles with lifetimes or dwelltimes too short for the name
|
|
"particles" to be appropriate. As a result the generated fields are always in
|
|
some state of flux.
|
|
|
|
However, under the influence of a Motional Electromagnetic field parts of the
|
|
normally chaotic virtual field break off from randomness and form a more
|
|
coherent region. This region consists of a structured portion of the
|
|
spacetime continuum which by its very nature seems to attract more virtual
|
|
particles.
|
|
|
|
This higher concentration of particles develops a [scalar vortex]. This
|
|
increase in particle density has been verified by lab experiments conducted
|
|
the week of June 19, 1988.
|
|
|
|
Warping of the spacetime continuum where negative energy is produced in
|
|
abundance. The existence of this condition via direct engineering of the
|
|
virtual state allows for the safe generation of electrical energy. This
|
|
condition, in essence, forms the underlying principle of operation of the
|
|
Phase-Conjugated Vacuum Triode.
|
|
|
|
This device, however, produces negative energy which is the reverse of the
|
|
conventional positive energy generated by all devices in service today. The
|
|
arc generated by a short-circuit in a negative energy system is excessively
|
|
bright and cold, producing barely an audible hiss with no explosive force.
|
|
|
|
Melting of conductors does not occur and this type of negative current passes
|
|
through the human body with only the feeling of a chill. Conductors remain
|
|
cool under load while only tiny cross-sectional areas of copper are required
|
|
to convey many hundreds of watts of power.
|
|
|
|
Although all of this seems nearly unbelievable, only what has been
|
|
demonstrated in the laboratory has been described in this paper. The source of
|
|
energy is unlimited, the virtual vacuum of space itself structured by a
|
|
motional electromagnetic field is the powerhouse.
|
|
|
|
THE NATURE OF SPACE
|
|
|
|
Space itself is the ability to accommodate energy. Consider for a moment the
|
|
following illustration: A signal (energy) is transmitted from point A to point
|
|
B. A and B are separated by a finite distance. Consider three periods of
|
|
time: 1) The signal is launched from A.
|
|
2) The signal resides in the space between A and B.
|
|
3) The signal arrives at B.
|
|
|
|
If (3) occurs simultaneously with (1) we say that the signal has traveled at
|
|
infinite velocity. The signal has never resided in the intervening space and
|
|
therefore there exists no space between A and B.
|
|
|
|
A is virtually at the same point in space as B. For real space to exist
|
|
between A and B it is necessary that a signal travelling between them be
|
|
"lost" with reference to both points for a finite of time. Now we know that
|
|
for real space to exist between two points a signal travelling between them
|
|
will propagate at a finite velocity .
|
|
|
|
If a signal will not travel between two 2 points, as in the case when c = 0,
|
|
then we can also conclude that there is no link or intervening space between
|
|
them. We have no means of detecting either an infinite velocity-supporting
|
|
space or zero-velocity space, so they do not exist as usable scientific
|
|
concepts.
|
|
|
|
If space cannot accommodate a signal it has no function and no reality. We are
|
|
left then with the only real space, the home of the real and virtual vacuum.
|
|
|
|
Space supports a finite, nonzero velocity. The above discussion dealt with a
|
|
definition of space and the propagation velocity it will support.
|
|
|
|
A similar argument applies to the impedance of space. A medium can only
|
|
accommodate positive energy if the medium resists it to a reasonable degree.
|
|
|
|
Neither an infinitely strong string nor an infinitely weak one can absorb or
|
|
accommodate energy by being compressed. Neither an infinitely large mass nor
|
|
an infinitely light mass can absorb or accommodate energy imparted by
|
|
collision. The same holds true for space.
|
|
|
|
Energy cannot enter space of zero impedance (i.e; ) any more than a force can
|
|
bear on a mass of zero magnitude. Similarly, energy could not enter space of
|
|
infinite impedance.
|
|
|
|
It follows therefore, that necessary properties of real space are:
|
|
1) finite propagation velocity
|
|
2) finite impedance.
|
|
|
|
GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF ENERGY TRANSFER
|
|
|
|
Consider energy, flowing straight and level down the proximity of a
|
|
transmission line. The energy does not know the width of the channel through
|
|
which it is passing.
|
|
|
|
If the energy reaches a point where the dielectric changes (but not the
|
|
geometry), some of it will continue on and some of it will reflect. If the
|
|
energy reaches a change in the width of the transmission line some will
|
|
reflect and some will continue as well. The energy current will not know
|
|
whether: (a) the dielectric is changing, or (b) the geometry is changing
|
|
|
|
Energy current does not have directional inertia, so that (a) is equivalent to
|
|
(b). Energy current does have an aspect ratio. If the aspect ratio is forced
|
|
to change, some of the flowing energy will reflect in order to assure that its
|
|
total aspect ratio remains constant.
|
|
|
|
Crudely, the aspect ratio is similar to the ratio of E to H. The aspect ratio
|
|
of energy current is much like the aspect ratio of space. While the aspect
|
|
ratio of space can change, its fundamental velocity cannot really change. This
|
|
parameter becomes merely our way of conceptualizing time delay when energy
|
|
resides in a region of space. 4 A /B = Aspect Ratio Uniform space has only two
|
|
parameters: 1) aspect ratio 2) time delay Aspect ratio defines the shape of
|
|
energy entering a given region of space, but not its amplitude.
|
|
|
|
Velocity or length define the time during which the properly shaped energy can
|
|
be accommodated by a region of space. Aspect ratio is really a definition of
|
|
the relative compatibility of adjacent regions of space. Does flowing energy
|
|
current largely travel unimpeded through an interface, or does it largely
|
|
reflect at the interface?
|
|
|
|
Space has quiet zones through which energy glides virtually unreflected. There
|
|
are also zones where energy current becomes incoherent, bounces about and
|
|
splits apart. Noises in space have either rapidly changing geometry or rapidly
|
|
changing impedance .
|
|
|
|
ELECTROMAGNETIC ENERGY
|
|
|
|
The rate of flow of energy through a surface can be calculated as a function
|
|
of E and H. Specifically this flow is equivalent to E H per unit area. This
|
|
energy flows at the speed of light through a medium where . E and H are in
|
|
quadrature and are normal to the direction of the energy flow.
|
|
|
|
The energy density is therefore: E H/c . If two signals of equal magnitude
|
|
(assume E/2 & H/2 ) are travelling through each other in opposite directions
|
|
the energy density is calculated as follows: If the directions of the two
|
|
signals are such that opposite H-fields cancel and E-fields add, an apparently
|
|
steady E-field will be created.
|
|
|
|
The energy density of the fields remain as calculated above, but the value of
|
|
the E-field will double from E /2 to E . It is a simple matter using the
|
|
equations for a team wave [group wave?] to get rid of H and c and so convert
|
|
the first equation into the well known equation for energy density in the so-
|
|
called electrostatic field.
|
|
|
|
Similarly, if two signals flow through each other in such a way as to give the
|
|
appearance of a steady magnetic field as a result of their E-field canceling.
|
|
It is easily shown using the above equations to cancel out H and c.
|
|
|
|
Modern physics is based upon the faulty assumption that electromagnetics
|
|
contains two kinds of energy: electric and magnetic. This assumption leads to
|
|
a Baroque view of physical reality. Under that view energy seems to be
|
|
associated with the square of the field intensity rather than a more
|
|
reasonable view that it is linearly proportional to field intensity.
|
|
|
|
It is worth remembering that neither Einstein nor most modern physicists were
|
|
or are familiar with the concept of energy currents described herein. However,
|
|
their work still survives by ignoring the energy current concept, scalar
|
|
electromagnetics, the works of T. E. Bearden, Kaluza-Klein, and others who
|
|
dispute Heaviside's interpretations of Maxwell's equations.
|
|
|
|
THE FALLACY OF DISPLACEMENT CURRENT
|
|
|
|
Conventional electromagnetic theory proposes that when an electric current
|
|
flows down a wire into a capacitor it spreads out across the plate, producing
|
|
an electric charge on the plate which in turn leads to an electric field
|
|
between the capacitor plates.
|
|
|
|
The valuable concept of continuity is then retained by postulating after
|
|
Maxwell a displacement current. This current is a manipulation of the electric
|
|
field (E) between the capacitor plates which has the dimensions of electric
|
|
current and completes the flow of electricity in the circuit. This approach
|
|
permits us to retain Kirchoff's laws and other valuable concepts even though
|
|
superficially it appears that at the capacitor there is a break in the
|
|
continuous flow of electric current.
|
|
|
|
The flaw in this model appears when we notice that the current entered the
|
|
capacitor at only one point on the capacitor plate. We then are left with the
|
|
major difficulty of explaining how the electric charge flowing down the wire
|
|
suddenly distributes itself uniformly across entire capacitor plate, at a
|
|
velocity in excess of the speed of light.
|
|
|
|
This paradoxical situation is created by a flaw in the basic model. Work in
|
|
high speed logic conducted by Ivor Catt has shown that the model of lumped
|
|
capacitance is faulty and displacement current is an artifact of the faulty
|
|
model.
|
|
|
|
Since any capacitor behaves similarly to a transmission line it is no more
|
|
necessary to postulate a displacement current for the capacitor than it is
|
|
necessary to do so for a transmission line. The excision of displacement
|
|
current from electromagnetic theory has been based on arguments which are
|
|
independent of the classic dispute over whether the electric current causes
|
|
the electromagnetic field, or vice versa.
|
|
|
|
THE MOTIONAL E-FIELD
|
|
|
|
Of all the known fields- electric, magnetic, gravitational motional E-field-
|
|
the only ones INCAPABLE of being shielded are the induced motional E-field and
|
|
the gravitational field.
|
|
|
|
The nature of the motionally induced electric field is quite unique; in order
|
|
understand it more fully we must start by parting with a few misleading
|
|
paradigms.
|
|
|
|
When magnetic flux is moved perpendicularly across a conductor an
|
|
electromotive force (e.m.f.) is electromagnetically induced within the
|
|
conductor. Within is an artifact of the commonly used analogy comparing the
|
|
flow of electric current within a wire to the flow of water within a pipe.
|
|
|
|
This is a most misleading model theoretically. The true phenomenon taking
|
|
place has little been thought of as involving the production of a spatially
|
|
distributed electric field. We can see that the model's origins likely arose
|
|
from the operation called flux cutting, a most deceiving and misleading term.
|
|
|
|
A better term, time varying flux modulation, does not imply any separation of
|
|
lines of flux. Truly, lines of flux are always in closure upon themselves and
|
|
are mathematically expressed as line integrals.
|
|
|
|
It is fallacious to use the term cutting, which implies time varying
|
|
separation which does not in fact ever occur. A motionally induced E-field is
|
|
actually created within the space occupied by the moving magnetic flux
|
|
described above. This field is present therein, whether or not a conductor is
|
|
present in space.
|
|
|
|
In terms of a definition we can say that, when magnetic flux of vector
|
|
intensity moved across a region of space with vector velocity,
|
|
electromagnetically induced electric field vector BxV appears in the space at
|
|
right angles to both.
|
|
|
|
Therefore, It is this field that is related to gravity, it is virtually
|
|
unshieldable. This field may be called (1) Motional E-field.
|
|
|
|
According to T.E. Bearden it seems that the charged particles in the atom
|
|
(electrons and protons) act like tiny magnets. Their motion in the space
|
|
surrounding the atom would create this motional E-field. The field created
|
|
both the positive and negative charges would cancel to some degree, but due to
|
|
the high orbital velocity of the negative electron relative to that of the
|
|
positive proton the induced field of the electron should dominate the
|
|
resulting field.
|
|
|
|
The field produced as a result of these charges would vary proportionally to
|
|
the inverse square of distance similar to gravity. The field produced by the
|
|
translational motion of the charges would vary inversely as the cube of
|
|
distance.
|
|
|
|
This concept totally unites the electromagnetic and gravitational field
|
|
theories and accounts for the strong and weak forces within the atom.
|
|
|
|
FIELD SUPER-POSITION AND THE VACUUM TRIODE
|
|
|
|
Electromagnetic induction with no measurable magnetic field is not new. It is
|
|
well known that in the space surrounding a properly wound toroidal coil there
|
|
is no magnetic field. This is due to the superposition of the fields.
|
|
|
|
However, when alternating current is surging through a transformer an electric
|
|
field surrounds it. When we apply the principle of superposition to the vacuum
|
|
triode it becomes more obvious how the device is in fact operating.
|
|
|
|
The principle of superposition states that In order to calculate the resultant
|
|
intensity of superimposed fields, each field must be dealt with individually
|
|
as though the other were not present. The resultant is obtained by vector
|
|
addition of each field considered singularly.
|
|
|
|
Consider for a moment the construction of the triode which includes the
|
|
bifilar coils located within the fields of the two conditioned magnets. When
|
|
the current in one half of the conductors in the coils (i.e., one of the
|
|
bifilar elements in each coil) of the device is moving up, both the current
|
|
and the magnetic field follow the right-hand rule. The resultant motional E-
|
|
field would be vertical to both and inwardly directed.
|
|
|
|
At the same time the current in the other half of the conductors in the coils
|
|
is moving down and both the current and magnetic field follow the right-hand
|
|
rule. The resulting motion E-field is again vertical to both and inwardly
|
|
directed. Thus, the resultant field intensity is double the intensity
|
|
attributable to either one of the set of coil conductors taken singularly.
|
|
|
|
Electrometer readings were always close to parabolic, thus indicating that the
|
|
source was of infinite capacity. It was further determined through experiment
|
|
that the magnetic field does change with temperature. Also, there is no reason
|
|
yet identified which would lead one to believe that electron drift velocity
|
|
changes. It has been found remarkable that the vacuum triode runs
|
|
approximately 20 F below ambient.
|
|
|
|
INDUCED ELECTROMOTIVE FORCE -POSITIVE ENERGY
|
|
|
|
When an e.m.f. is impressed on a closed metallic circuit, current results. The
|
|
e.m.f. along a closed path C in space is defined as the work per unit charge
|
|
(W/Q) done by the electromagnetic fields on a small test charge moved along
|
|
path C.
|
|
|
|
Since work is the line integral of force (F), the work per unit charge is the
|
|
line integral of force per unit charge. Letting F/Q denote the vector
|
|
electromagnetic force per unit charge (in newtons per coulomb) we have The
|
|
scalar product (F/Q) dtdl is the product of (F/Q) * cos q dl with q denoting
|
|
the angle (3) between vectors F/Q and dl.
|
|
|
|
The electric force per unit charge is the electric field intensity (E) in
|
|
volts/meter. The magnetic force per unit charge is V x B where V denotes the
|
|
velocity of the test charge in meters per second and B denotes the magnetic
|
|
flux density in webers/M 2. In terms of the smaller angle q between V and B,
|
|
the cross product of V and B is a vector having the magnitude VB sin q .
|
|
|
|
The direction of vector VxB is normal to the plane which contains vectors V
|
|
and B in accordance with the right-hand rule (i.e., VxB is in the direction of
|
|
the thumb while the fingers curl through the angle q from V toward B). Since
|
|
the total force per unit charge is E + VB the total e.m.f. in terms of the
|
|
fields is: It appears from eq. (4) that the e.m.f. depends the forward
|
|
velocity with which the test charge (4) is moved along the path C. This,
|
|
however, is not the case. If V and dl in eq. (4) have the same direction then
|
|
their associated scalar product is zero.
|
|
|
|
Thus, only the component of V which is 9 not in-line with dl (i.e. q =0) can
|
|
contribute to the e.m.f.. This component has value only if the differential
|
|
path length dl has a sideways motion. Thus, V in eq. (4) the sideways motion,
|
|
if any, of dl . The fields E and B in eq.(4) could well be represented as
|
|
functions of time as well as functions of the space coordinates. In addition,
|
|
the velocity V of each differential path length dl may vary with time.
|
|
|
|
However, eq. (4) correctly expresses the e.m.f. or voltage drop along path C
|
|
as a function of time. That component of the e.m.f. consisting of the line
|
|
integral V x B is the motional E-field since it has value ony when path C is
|
|
moving through a magnetic field, traversing lines of magnetic flux. For
|
|
stationary paths there is no motional E-field and the voltage drop is simply
|
|
the integral of the electric field E. E.m.f.s are generated by devices that
|
|
separate charge.
|
|
|
|
A familiar example is the battery which utilizes chemical forces to separate
|
|
charge. Other examples include the heating of a thermocouple, exposure of a
|
|
photovoltaic cell to incident light, or the rubbing together of different
|
|
materials (electrostatic charge separation). Electric fields are also produced
|
|
by time varying magnetic fields.
|
|
|
|
This principle is extensively exploited to produce conventional electric power
|
|
in the utility industry. The line integral of electric field intensity E
|
|
around any closed path C equals -d F /dt , with F representing the magnetic
|
|
flux over any surface S having the closed path C as its contour. The positive
|
|
side of the surface S and the direction of the line integral around contour C
|
|
are related by the right-hand rule (the curled fingers are oriented so as to
|
|
point around the loop in the direction of the integration and the extended
|
|
thumb points out the positive side of the surface S.)
|
|
|
|
The magnetic flux F is the surface integral of magnetic flux density B as
|
|
shown below: In eq. (5) the vector differential surface ds has an area of ds
|
|
and is directionally normal to the (5) plane of ds out of the positive side.
|
|
The partial time derivative of F is defined as: This is referred to as the
|
|
magnetic current through surface S. For moving surface S the limits (6) of the
|
|
surface integral in eq. (6) are functions of time but the equation is still
|
|
applicable.
|
|
|
|
It is important to clarify at this point that when we evaluate the value of d
|
|
F/dt over a surface that is moving in the proximity of magnetic field activity
|
|
we treat the surface for the instant under consideration as though it were
|
|
stationary. The partial time derivative of F is the time rate of change of
|
|
flux through surface S due only to a changing magnetic field density B.
|
|
|
|
Any increase of F due to the motion of the surface in the B-field is not
|
|
included in that calculation. Continuing this discussion leads us to note
|
|
that an electric field must be present in any region containing a time varying
|
|
magnetic field. This is shown by eq. (7) displayed below: In this equation F
|
|
is the magnetic flux in webers out of the positive side of any surface having
|
|
(7) path C as its contour. Combining e. (7) above with e. (4) we are able
|
|
to calculate the e.m.f. about a closed path C. Thus, the e.m.f. around a
|
|
closed path consists in of two components. The component (9) d F /dt is the
|
|
variational e.m.f. and the second component is the motional E-field. In eq.(9)
|
|
(VxB) dl can be means of a vector identity be replaced with B*(Vx dl )A. V is
|
|
the sideways velocity of dl, the vector Vx dl has magnitude V dl and a
|
|
direction normal to the surface ds swept out by moving length dl in time d.
|
|
|
|
Letting Bn denote the component of B normal to this area we can see that -
|
|
B*(vx dl ) becomes -BnV dl and eq.(9) can be rewritten as: Clearly, the
|
|
integral of BnV around the closed contour C with sideways velocity of
|
|
magnitude (10) V for each length dl traversed is simply the time rate of
|
|
change of the magnetic flux through the surface bounded by C. This change is
|
|
due directly to the passage of path C through lines of magnetic flux. Hence,
|
|
the complete expression of e.m.f. above in eq.(10) is the time rate of change
|
|
of the magnetic flux over any surface S bounded by the closed path C, due to
|
|
the changing magnetic field and the movement of the path through the magnetic
|
|
field. eq.(10) may be written: NOTE:
|
|
|
|
The only difference between eq.(7) and eq.(11) is that eq.(7) contains only
|
|
the (11) variational e.m.f. while eq.(11) is the sum of the variational and
|
|
motional emf's. In eq.(7) the partial time derivative of magnetic flux F is
|
|
the rate of flux change due only to the time varying magnetic field while
|
|
eq.(11) includes the total time derivative of the rate of flux change due to
|
|
the time varying magnetic field and path C's passage through the magnetic
|
|
field.
|
|
|
|
If the closed 11 path C is not passing through lines of magnetic flux then
|
|
eq.(7) and eq.(11) are equivalent. It is also important to point out that d F
|
|
/dt in eq.(11) does not necessarily mean the total time rate of change of the
|
|
flux F over the surface S. For example, the flux over surface S is bounded by
|
|
the closed contour C of the left portion of the electric circuit shown in
|
|
Figure 1.
|
|
|
|
The flux is changing as the coil is unwound by the rotation of the cylinder as
|
|
illustrated. However, since B is static there is no variational e.m.f. and
|
|
since the conductors are not modulating lines of flux there is no motional
|
|
e.m.f. Thus, d F /dt in eq.(11) is zero even the flux is changing with time.
|
|
|
|
Note that d F /dt was defined as representing the right hand part of the
|
|
expression in e.(10) and d F /dt must not be more broadly interpreted. In the
|
|
application of the presented equations it is required that one refer all flux
|
|
densities and movements to a single specified coordinate system.
|
|
|
|
In particular, the velocities will all be with respect to this system alone
|
|
and not interpreted as relative velocities between conductors or moving lines
|
|
of flux. The coordinate system is arbitrarily selected and the magnitudes of
|
|
variational and motional fields depend upon the selection.
|
|
|
|
EXAMPLE #1
|
|
|
|
A fundamental electric generator is shown in Figure 2. The parallel
|
|
stationary conductors separated by distance l have a moving conductor
|
|
connected to across them.
|
|
|
|
The circuit is completed by a moving conductor connected to the parallel
|
|
conductors by means of two sliding taps. This conductor is located at y=0 when
|
|
time t=0, and moves to the right at a constant velocity V=Vay. The applied
|
|
flux B is by dots on Figure 2 and has a magnitude that equals B=B o cosBy cos
|
|
w t ax.
|
|
|
|
The unit vectors in the directions of the respective coordinate axes are ax,
|
|
ay, and az. Solution: Let S denote the plane rectangular surface bounded by
|
|
the closed electric circuit, with a positive side selected as the side facing
|
|
the reader. The counterclockwise e.m.f. around the circuit is d F /dt with F
|
|
signifying the magnetic flux out of the positive side of S (As ds=1 dy ax).
|
|
The scalar product B*ds is B o l cos By, cos w t dy; integrating from y=0 to
|
|
y=y gives: with y1 denoting the instantaneous y position of the moving wire.
|
|
The counterclockwise e.m.f. (12) is found by replacing y with vt and
|
|
evaluating d F /dt .
|
|
|
|
The result is The variational (transformer) component is which is determined
|
|
with aid of eq.(12) to (13) 12 be where y=vt. This is the first component on
|
|
the right side of eq.(13). Note: y l was treated as a constant when evaluating
|
|
the partial time derivative of F . The motional E-field is the line integral
|
|
of V x B along the path of the moving conductor. As V x B is -B 0 , vcosBy l
|
|
cos w t ax and As dl is dz ax evaluation of the integral of -B,vcosBv l cos w
|
|
t dz from Z=0 to Z=1 results in a motional E-field of -B o lvcosBv l coswt.
|
|
|
|
This component results from modulation of the lines of flux by the moving
|
|
conductor. If the voltmeter draws no current, there can be no electromagnetic
|
|
force on the free of the wire. Therefore, the e.m.f. along the path of the
|
|
metal conductors including the moving conductor is zero.
|
|
|
|
EXAMPLE #2
|
|
|
|
Suppose the conductor with the sliding taps is stationary (V=0) and it is
|
|
located at y=y 1 . Also suppose the magnetic field B is produced by a system
|
|
of moving conductors not shown in Figure 2 which are travelling with a
|
|
constant velocity V=V ay . At time t=0 the magnetic field B is B o sinBy ax.
|
|
Determine the voltage across the voltmeter. Solution: There is no motional E-
|
|
field because the conductors in Figure 2 are at rest (stationary) with respect
|
|
to our selected coordinate system.
|
|
|
|
However, the magnetic field at points fixed with respect to the coordinate
|
|
system is changing with time and as a result there is a variational e.m.f.
|
|
Since the B-field at t=0 is B 0 sinBy ax and has a velocity of V=Vay it can be
|
|
calculated that the B-field as a function of time B o sin[B(y-vt)] ax. This is
|
|
verified by noting that an observer located at y at time t=0 who is travelling
|
|
at the constant velocity (V=Vay) of the moving current would have a y
|
|
coordinate of y=y +Vt and an accordingly different expression for B.
|
|
|
|
He would observe a constant field where the magnetic current density is: The
|
|
counterclockwise e.m.f. can be arrived at by taking the negative of an
|
|
integral of the above expression for the rectangular surface bounded by the
|
|
electric circuit with the positive side facing the reader with the limits of
|
|
zero and y. The resulting e.m.f. equals: which is the voltage across the
|
|
meter.
|
|
|
|
INDUCED MOTIONAL FIELD - NEGATIVE ENERGY
|
|
|
|
Conventional theory says that electric fields and magnetic are different
|
|
things. Consider for a moment a charge with an electric field around it. If
|
|
the charge is moved a magnetic field develops and the moving charge
|
|
constitutes a current.
|
|
|
|
If an observer were to move along with the charge, he would see no relative
|
|
motion, no current, and no magnetic field. A stationary observer would see
|
|
motion, current and a magnetic field.
|
|
|
|
It would appear that a magnetic field is an electric field observed from a
|
|
motional reference frame. Similarly, if we take a mass with a gravity field
|
|
around it and we move the mass and create a mass current, a new field is also
|
|
created. It is a different kind of gravity field with no source and no sink.
|
|
|
|
It is called the Protational field also known as the "Effect". This field and
|
|
its governing principles will form the basis for future anti-gravity devices.
|
|
(See illustrations 1-4). Within the confined area of the Vacuum Triode box,
|
|
the spacetime continuum is reversed by the fields that are produced in the
|
|
presence of excited coherent space flux quanta.
|
|
|
|
These quanta have been attracted from and ultimately extracted from the
|
|
virtual vacuum, the infinitely non-exhaustible Dirac Sea. For a more detailed
|
|
mathematical format see Appendix A, a paper on "The Phase Conjugate Vacuum
|
|
Triode" by T.E. Bearden, April 23, 1987. Much of the theory which likely
|
|
applies to the vacuum triode has been developed in the field of phase
|
|
conjugate optics.
|
|
|
|
With regards to over-unity phenomena it is important to note that so long as
|
|
positive energy is present in a positive/flowing time regime unity and over-
|
|
unity power gains are not possible. The summation of the losses due to
|
|
resistance, impedance, friction, magnetic hysteresis and eddy currents and
|
|
windage losses of rotating machinery will always reduce overall efficiency
|
|
below unity for a closed system.
|
|
|
|
The laws of conservation of energy always apply to all systems. However, the
|
|
induced motional E-filed changes the upon which those laws need be applied.
|
|
|
|
Since the vacuum triode operates in dimensions more than four and provides a
|
|
line between the multi-dimensional reality of the quantum state a link between
|
|
Dirac Sea we are now dealing with an open-ended system, not the closed system
|
|
within which all conservation and thermodynamic laws were developed.
|
|
|
|
To achieve unity, the summation of all magnetic and ohmic losses must equal
|
|
zero. To achieve this state negative energy and resistance moves to zero and
|
|
all energy flows along the outside of conductors in the form of a special
|
|
space field.
|
|
|
|
Negative energy is fully capable of lighting incandescent lights, running
|
|
motors, and performing all of the functions of positive energy tested to when
|
|
run in parallel with positive energy.
|
|
|
|
However, cancellation (annihilation) of opposing power types occurs. This has
|
|
been fully tested in the laboratory. Once unity has been achieved and the
|
|
gate to the Dirac Sea opened, over-unity is affected by loading the open gate
|
|
more and more which opens it further to the point where direct
|
|
communication/interaction with the nucleus of the atom itself is achieved.
|
|
|
|
Output of the vacuum triode is not proportional to the excitation input as the
|
|
output produced by the device is directly proportional to the load which is
|
|
placed upon it. That load is the only dependent variable for device output.
|
|
|
|
The triode's output voltage and frequency always remains constant due to the
|
|
conditioning of the motional E-field in the permanent magnets and the small
|
|
regulated excitation signal which is provided through a small oscillator.
|
|
Regulation remains constant, output locks into an in-phase condition (cos q =1
|
|
Kvar=1) under all load characteristics.
|
|
|
|
The vacuum triode is a solid state device consisting of conditioned permanent
|
|
magnets capable of producing a motional field. This field opens the gate to
|
|
the Dirac Sea where negative energy is able to flow from and into the triode's
|
|
receiving coils.
|
|
|
|
The coils are very small diameter copper wire but are capable of producing in
|
|
excess of 5 kilowatts of useful power; this in itself is a clear indicator
|
|
that the type of electrical energy provided by the device is not conventional.
|
|
|
|
The wire sizes employed by the device would not be capable of carrying such
|
|
large currents without excessive heat gain, however, the triode's coils
|
|
actually run cooler when loaded at 5 kW.
|
|
|
|
The fundamental magnets have been broken free of their binding forces which
|
|
constrained them to be steadystate single pole uniform magnetic flux devices.
|
|
|
|
They are now able to simply support mass, as demonstrated with the transformer
|
|
steel illustration. They can now easily be made to adopt a dynamic motional
|
|
field by applying a tiny amount of excitation.
|
|
|
|
Specifically, 10V @ 1 mA (10 mW) of excitation at 60 will enable the coils of
|
|
the triode to receive from the Dirac Sea in excess of 5000 watts of usable
|
|
negative energy; how much more can safely be removed has not yet been
|
|
determined. <END>
|
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|