529 lines
28 KiB
Plaintext
529 lines
28 KiB
Plaintext
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
|
|
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
|
|
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
|
|
PO BOX 1031
|
|
Mesquite, TX 75150
|
|
July 4, 1990
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Larry Spring's
|
|
Spherical Electromagnetic Quantum
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Vangard Note...
|
|
|
|
At the 1990 Borderland Conference in Santa Barbara, California
|
|
I had the pleasure of meeting and talking in depth with Mr.
|
|
Larry Spring and his charming wife, Lois. He has a fascinating
|
|
theory regarding an entirely new concept of the geometry of
|
|
electromagnetic waves and how they propagate and are modified by
|
|
various types of receivers or reflectors. We wish to thank Tom
|
|
Brown and Borderland for bringing the work of Larry to the
|
|
attention of the public. We are installing this small treatise
|
|
on the KeelyNet BBS and plan to distribute it around the various
|
|
Nets to allow a wider audience for this work.
|
|
|
|
This spherical theory adds to work already done by Keely on the
|
|
fact that oscillation occurs across the diameter of a structure.
|
|
|
|
Larry Spring, in 1985, using TV waves 150,000 to 9,600,000 times
|
|
the size of light waves, was able to determine the spherical
|
|
shape, size, alternating polarity magnetic structure, and bounce
|
|
characteristics of the electromagnetic wave.
|
|
|
|
You may contact Larry at 225 Redwood Avenue, Fort Bragg, CA
|
|
95437 or call him at Home 707 964-2116, Office 707 964-4700.
|
|
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Quantum : The smallest amount of radiant energy capable of existing
|
|
independently. This amount of energy is regarded as a
|
|
unit. (as defined in the Thorndike-Barnhart dictionary)
|
|
|
|
The electromagnetic wave front must be composed of individual
|
|
units, as these units can bounce independently to the feed horn of a
|
|
satellite dish or scatter independently from a surface rough in
|
|
relation to the size of the quanta.
|
|
|
|
I, Larry Spring, in 1985 succeeded in determining, and setting
|
|
down in writing the shape, size, magnetic structure, alternating
|
|
polarity, bounce characteristics and compressibility of the quantum
|
|
of energy which was believed to exist by many electromagnetic energy
|
|
physicists from Isaac Newton's time up to the present.
|
|
|
|
My observation of results from experimentation tend to favor
|
|
the quantum theory over the wave theory, and accomplish alternating
|
|
current in a conductor at a distance, based on transmission of
|
|
alternating polarity magnetic fields traveling through space, with
|
|
the same magnetic structure and polarity as would be found around a
|
|
resonant conductor carrying a rapidly alternating electrical current
|
|
as determined by Hans Christian Oersted and expressed by his right
|
|
hand rule.
|
|
Page 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All alternating electrical current from 1 cycle per second to
|
|
the gamma ray frequency and beyond radiate varying amounts of
|
|
electromagnetic energy, but from a practical point of view I have to
|
|
stay within the limits of my testing equipment which goes from make
|
|
and break vibrators through 60 cycle power line leakage, AM radio,
|
|
VHF television, FM radio, UHF television, C band satellite
|
|
television, red laser light, white visible light and x-ray pictures.
|
|
They all appear to be the same form of energy although they vary
|
|
considerably in their abilities due to their enormous size range
|
|
from infinitely large to infinitesimally small.
|
|
|
|
We have a great deal of knowledge assembled in the past by
|
|
Isaac Newton, Max Planck, Hans Christian Oersted, Albert Einstein,
|
|
Andre' M. Ampere and Michael Faraday, to name a few.
|
|
|
|
We know as scientific fact a great number of interrelated
|
|
actions and reactions of radiated energy upon which to build our
|
|
modern electronic world.
|
|
|
|
The facts I verified by experimentation and used in order to
|
|
arrive at my conclusions were as follows:
|
|
|
|
Electromagnetic energy travels at approximately 186,000 miles
|
|
per second through a vacuum and almost as fast through air. It
|
|
travels slower through a denser medium like glass, water, plastic or
|
|
oil. The speed I determined by measuring one wavelength which I
|
|
multiplied by the frequency.
|
|
|
|
An electric current driven by electron movement travels along a
|
|
conductor at approximately 186,000 miles per second and slower when
|
|
it is impeded by insulation, etc. This speed I also measured.
|
|
|
|
Hans Christian Oersted discovered that electron flow creates a
|
|
magnetic field around a conductor. The magnetic lines of force are
|
|
at 90 degrees to the conductor and 90 degrees to the electrical
|
|
current direction of travel along the conductor. This I tested with
|
|
a simple compass needle. A reversed current will create a magnetic
|
|
field around the conductor in an opposite direction.
|
|
|
|
A conductor passed rapidly through the magnetic field of a
|
|
permanent magnet, in a position to cut the magnetic lines of force
|
|
will have an electric current driven in it moving in one direction.
|
|
When passed rapidly in the opposite direction an electrical current
|
|
will flow along the conductor in the opposite direction. Examples
|
|
of this are the electric motor and electric generator.
|
|
|
|
It makes no difference whether the conducting rod is moving or
|
|
the magnetic field is moving. The conductor could be standing still
|
|
and the magnetic field traveling at 186,000 miles per second as is
|
|
the case with a receiving TV antenna. Its the relative speed of the
|
|
magnetic field and the conductor that produces the electrical
|
|
current. A conductor lying in a position that does not cut the
|
|
magnetic lines of force receives no electron movement or electric
|
|
current driven in and or around it.
|
|
|
|
Tests show that magnetic energy does not induce current in a
|
|
conductor pointed directly at the transmitter or a conductor that is
|
|
vertical to a totally horizontal transmission. This I have tested
|
|
many times using a dipole antenna and a field strength meter. It is
|
|
|
|
Page 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
used to separate vertical and horizontal polarity of the C band
|
|
satellite signal by rotating a probe antenna horizontally or
|
|
vertically in the feed horn of a satellite parabolic dish receiving
|
|
antenna.
|
|
|
|
Based on the foregoing it is obvious that alternating polarity
|
|
magnetic fields, broadcast from a conductor carrying an alternating
|
|
electrical current, and traveling at 186,000 miles per second, are
|
|
capable of driving a similar alternating electrical current in a
|
|
conductor at a distance, providing the conductor is in a position to
|
|
cut the magnetic lines of force. The best position would be in the
|
|
same plane and parallel to the transmitting conductor.
|
|
|
|
It is unnecessary for the traveling magnetic field to contain
|
|
an electrical component. A speeding magnetic field drives electrons
|
|
in a conductor at 90 degrees to its direction of travel and 90
|
|
degrees to its magnetic lines of force.
|
|
|
|
Summary of the foregoing describes a simple magnetic quantum
|
|
traveling through space with every second quantum being in opposite
|
|
polarity. The non-traveling form is described in Oersted's right
|
|
hand rule which can be readily demonstrated by a battery, a compass
|
|
and a piece of copper wire. So much for the magnetic structure.
|
|
|
|
I may be one of the first to recognize Oersted's magnetic field
|
|
traveling through space and putting it into print.
|
|
|
|
The shape of all quanta must be the same as they all act
|
|
similarly. Only the size and density of magnetic lines of force are
|
|
different.
|
|
|
|
The best observation of its shape is the way it bounces. Being
|
|
of equal dimensions in all directions it is capable of bouncing from
|
|
all quadrants of a parabolic satellite receiving dish regardless of
|
|
polarity. This I tested by screening off sections of the dish to
|
|
see if all polarities bounce equally, and they do. It has all the
|
|
bounce characteristics of a weightless elastic ball.
|
|
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Vangard Note...
|
|
|
|
at the Borderland Conference, Larry demonstrated this theory by
|
|
using a parabolic dish lying face up on a table, suspended at the
|
|
focal point of the dish was a ping pong ball. When Larry dropped
|
|
other ping pong balls from any angle, THEY ALWAYS STRUCK THE BALL
|
|
AT THE FOCAL POINT. If the incoming energy had been lines of
|
|
force or undulating waves, they would have all had different
|
|
angles of deflection and missed the focal point, I was quite
|
|
impressed...
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
If it is quantum (a quantity) shaped like a ball, it must have
|
|
a three dimensional size. This can be readily determined by running
|
|
the energy through a chicken wire grid like screening gravel.
|
|
|
|
Wire openings just larger than 1/2 wavelength will pass most
|
|
all the signal without loss. Wire openings 1/4 wavelength will pass
|
|
approximately 1/2 of the signal. 1/8 wavelength will pass
|
|
approximately 1/4 of the signal. A solid metal sheet reflects it
|
|
|
|
Page 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
all, except for the tiniest spheres which find the texture of solid
|
|
metal is really like a screen. The size is directly related to the
|
|
1/2 wavelength and ties in correctly with 1/2 wavelength diameter
|
|
traveling magnetic spheres of alternating polarity following each
|
|
other through air and space.
|
|
|
|
Most of the energy that does pass through the wire mesh is
|
|
reflected back as determined by constructive and destructive
|
|
interference with a test dipole antenna in front of the screen, and
|
|
a field strength meter.
|
|
|
|
The vertical magnetic lines of force around a horizontally
|
|
polarized transmission can be readily shown by passing the spherical
|
|
magnetic quantum through a grill of vertical wires. Close spacing
|
|
of the wires makes little difference and very little if any loss
|
|
of signal, as the vertical wires do not cut the vertical lines of
|
|
force around the horizontally polarized sphere of magnetic energy.
|
|
The grill can be placed any distance in front of the receiving
|
|
antenna which indicates that normally the lines of force remain
|
|
vertical from transmission to reception.
|
|
|
|
If the vertical grill of wires is rotated 90 degrees to the
|
|
wires, the slots, then the transmitting antenna and the receiving
|
|
antenna all lie in the same plane. This allows the amount of signal
|
|
passed and reflected to be determined by the wire spacing in
|
|
relation to the 1/2 wavelength as stated in my description of a
|
|
signal passing through a grid.
|
|
|
|
A grill at 45 degrees to the polarity will pass approximately
|
|
50%. Wires spaced over 1/2 wavelength will pass most all the
|
|
signal. This grill of wires acts with UHF TV and satellite signal
|
|
the same as polarizing film works on sunlight or laser light.
|
|
|
|
The size of the sphere of magnetic energy is determined by the
|
|
1/2 wavelength. In other words the diameter of the sphere is the
|
|
distance of 186,000 miles per second the energy can travel in 1/2
|
|
cycle. TV channel 3 video is transmitted at a frequency of
|
|
61,250,000 cycles per second with a total wavelength distance of 16
|
|
feet or 8 feet to a 1/2 wavelength. The C band satellite signal has
|
|
a frequency of 4 billion cycles per second and a 1/2 wavelength of
|
|
1 and 1/2 inches which is just about the size and shape of a ping
|
|
pong ball without any weight. 1/2 wavelength diameter spheres of
|
|
visible light are about 1/100,000 inch.
|
|
|
|
Size can be roughly determined by passing through openings in a
|
|
screen, but another way would be its bounce characteristics from a
|
|
rough surface. For instance a ping pong ball bounces accurately
|
|
from a sandpaper covered paddle while light spheres striking the
|
|
same paddle would be scattered. The ping pong ball spans across the
|
|
grains of sand, while the tiny spheres of light would bounce in all
|
|
directions DICTATED BY THE TINY SLOPES OF THE GRAINS OF SAND. Light
|
|
bouncing from a mirror surface would bounce accurately and in
|
|
unison, so would the ping pong balls. This thought could be carried
|
|
larger to radio spheres of 1,000 feet in diameter bouncing
|
|
accurately from a rough earth or ocean surface that would scatter
|
|
the ping pong ball size spheres. Going smaller the tiny X and gamma
|
|
rays would probably be scattered by the pores of polished metal,or
|
|
pass right through as though it was a screen or lattice.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Magnetic spheres find many materials transparent to their
|
|
particular size, like light will pass readily through glass and
|
|
water while UHF TV and C band satellite 4 GHZ signal will not pass
|
|
through water, but will pass through black plastic or tar paper,
|
|
which does not pass light. The list is long and revealing but you
|
|
get the picture.
|
|
|
|
All magnetic spheres of energy pass right through each other
|
|
without combining as witnessed by sunlight filtered into its three
|
|
primary colors passing the focal point below a magnifying glass.
|
|
Before convergence they display the three primary colors. At the
|
|
focal point their combined energies reflect white light back to our
|
|
eyes, and past the focal point they are again the three primary
|
|
colors on the opposite side of the dot.
|
|
|
|
Now lets put to the test these weightless, transparent spheres
|
|
of magnetic energy with their magnetic lines of force vertical to
|
|
their poles and their poles 90 degrees to their direction of travel
|
|
from the energy source (before the first bounce).
|
|
|
|
All magnetic spheres of radiated energy travel in a straight
|
|
line at high speed until one of the following events changes their
|
|
direction.
|
|
|
|
*** Reflection ***
|
|
|
|
Elastic spheres can reflect perfectly in any direction as
|
|
dictated by the slope of the reflecting surface. I like to
|
|
call it bounce as the spheres really contact the bounce
|
|
surface 1/4 wavelength before the customary description of
|
|
reflection, and bounce intact like a ball.
|
|
|
|
The flat bounce surface does not cut the magnetic lines of
|
|
force. It simply redirects the complete package. The
|
|
center of the sphere does not travel that last 1/4
|
|
wavelength.
|
|
|
|
This is a distance of 4 feet on TV channel 3 and is
|
|
important with radio and TV spheres, as well as to all
|
|
spheres regardless of their size in order to understand
|
|
their behavior.
|
|
|
|
However it may seem trivial to spheres of visible light as
|
|
the 1/4 wavelength is only 1/200,000 inch. Light is what
|
|
the old timers were observing when the laws of reflection
|
|
were established.
|
|
|
|
*** Dispersion ***
|
|
|
|
Tiny spheres can be scattered or diffused perfectly from
|
|
a surface rough in relation to the size of the sphere.
|
|
I previously mentioned light striking the sandpaper surface
|
|
of a ping pong paddle where the light is scattered and the
|
|
ping pong ball bounces accurately.
|
|
|
|
*** Refraction ***
|
|
|
|
Spheres have the proper shape to change direction when
|
|
entering the smooth surface of a denser medium at an angle
|
|
and from any direction.
|
|
Page 5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The portion of the sphere entering first experiences
|
|
retardation and compression in the denser medium which
|
|
rotates the sphere to a new direction until the sphere is
|
|
totally in the denser medium, although it is compressed and
|
|
travels slower as dictated by the density of the medium as
|
|
per the refraction index.
|
|
|
|
Upon popping out and expanding from a parallel surface like
|
|
the bottom side of a sheet of glass the reverse action takes
|
|
place.
|
|
|
|
The side of the sphere to pop out first travels faster due
|
|
to expansion and rotates the sphere back to its original
|
|
speed and direction.
|
|
|
|
The greater the angle measured from the normal the greater
|
|
the direction of change. The normal or straight-through has
|
|
equal drag on all sides and so experiences no direction
|
|
change, only a compressed and slower speed.
|
|
|
|
Light spheres refract perfectly through a magnifying glass,
|
|
approaching straight and parallel in random polarity from the sun,
|
|
and being of equal dimensions in all directions, they refract
|
|
through the glass in any direction dictated by the slope of the
|
|
surface of entry and departure, ending up at the focal point where
|
|
their energies are concentrated. If not stopped at the focal point
|
|
they just pass on through each other in a straight line and continue
|
|
on their way.
|
|
|
|
Diffraction is a condition where one side of a sphere
|
|
experiences a retardation or drag usually across an edge sharp in
|
|
relation to the size of the sphere. This rotates the sphere into a
|
|
new direction, the same as it did when entering a denser medium.
|
|
The more overlap of the sphere to the edge the greater the direction
|
|
of change. No overlap, no change. Slight overlap, slight change.
|
|
Spheres can diffract over a straight edge or through a sharp edged
|
|
hole, it makes no difference to a sphere because it is equal in all
|
|
directions.
|
|
|
|
*** Constructive Interference ***
|
|
|
|
When two spheres of alternating polarity magnetic energy
|
|
pass around the same conductor at the same instant in the
|
|
same polarity they drive electrons in the conductor with
|
|
more force than a single sphere of energy. This is called
|
|
constructive interference.
|
|
|
|
*** Destructive Interference ***
|
|
|
|
When two spheres of like frequency and opposite polarity due
|
|
to a longer path pass around a conductor at the same instant
|
|
the sphere with denser energy (more magnetic lines of force)
|
|
will prevail minus the drive of the weaker sphere.
|
|
|
|
If the two spheres were equal in energy they would both try
|
|
to drive the electrons in their own direction with equal
|
|
force and nothing would happen.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This would be read on a field strength meter as a complete
|
|
null. The above is called destructive interference.
|
|
|
|
This would happen when paths of a transmitted signal were
|
|
one 1/2 wavelength or 1 and 1/2 wavelength, etc..., longer
|
|
than the other caused by reflection, refraction or
|
|
diffraction as in Young's experiment with a double slot.
|
|
|
|
If spheres of energy due to path length pass around a conductor
|
|
somewhere in between like and unlike polarity, one sphere of energy
|
|
will start to drive the electrons one way and the next at a slightly
|
|
later time, lets say 1/4 wavelength late, and in opposite polarity
|
|
will try to drive the electrons the opposite direction a 1/4
|
|
wavelength later and the results would be somewhere between
|
|
constructive and destructive interference.
|
|
|
|
If the spheres of like polarity are in almost the same position
|
|
at the same instant they will add to some degree. If unlike
|
|
polarities arrive at the conductor at close to the same instant the
|
|
resulting electron drive and current would be almost cancelled.
|
|
|
|
Scientists today with modern instruments and modern frequencies
|
|
have a tremendous advantage over the old timers who worked with
|
|
light and their own eyes for instruments.
|
|
|
|
I, Larry Spring, picked visible sunlight and laser light at
|
|
about 1/100,000 inch on the 1/2 wavelength, to C band satellite
|
|
signal a magnification of 150,000 times the size of light, and TV
|
|
channel 3 which is 9,600,000 times the light wavelength. I was
|
|
quite readily able to determine their size, shape, magnetic
|
|
structure and behavior in this large size, using modern instruments
|
|
unavailable to the geniuses of 100 to 200 years ago.
|
|
|
|
My observations to date have not changed any of the beginning
|
|
and end results of the electromagnetic wave theory. They simply,
|
|
logically and mechanically describe the energy's spherical shape,
|
|
size, alternating magnetic structure, bounce characteristics,
|
|
compressibility, retardability, electron driveability and
|
|
transparency to each other which they must have to accomplish what
|
|
the electromagnetic energy is known to do.
|
|
|
|
The magnetic energy is driven from the transmitting conductor
|
|
by a magnetic field that is expanding in all directions at a speed
|
|
of 186,000 miles per second, which is probably about 200,000 times
|
|
the expansion rate of exploding gunpowder. The component parts of
|
|
the expanding front must pull themselves together like raindrops and
|
|
travel in a straight line until they bounce, refract, or diffract
|
|
which changes their direction, or its energy is used up driving
|
|
electrons in a conductor, or by other means.
|
|
|
|
As far as I can visualize it starts as heat and ends up as
|
|
heat, but that is beyond the scope of this article.
|
|
|
|
Think electromagnetic waves and the best you can say is "its
|
|
difficult to describe just how, but that is the way it works".
|
|
|
|
Think spheres as described in the preceding article and most
|
|
all the actions and reactions of the magnetic energy fall logically
|
|
and mechanically into place.
|
|
|
|
Page 7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This improved vision should open new avenues of discovery.
|
|
|
|
Having been unable to find anyone throughout the United States
|
|
or any written articles exposing all my observations, I believe I am
|
|
the first to bring many of them forth in my book, copyrighted in
|
|
1985 as an unpublished work and published in June, 1986, and 2nd
|
|
edition in 1987, entitled "My Electromagnetic Spherical Theory and
|
|
My Experiments to Prove It" by Larry Spring, address 225 Redwood
|
|
Ave., Fort Bragg, California, 95437, USA.
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Vangard Note...
|
|
|
|
At the 1987 Global Sciences Congress in Denver, I had the
|
|
pleasure of attending a technical seminar by Ed Skilling and
|
|
Bob Beck. In a private discussion with Bob, we spoke of
|
|
SCALARS and the confusion many people have in understanding
|
|
their form. A form of visualization derived by Vangard for the
|
|
SCALAR field is to think of bubbles being driven from the
|
|
emitter, to which Beck said that was a perfect analogy.
|
|
|
|
Further information on this subject came from a 1988 visit to
|
|
Peter Kelly's lab in Lakemont, Georgia. There, Peter
|
|
graciously showed me his lab and some of his ongoing work.
|
|
Two things of interest which I feel apply partly to this paper
|
|
and need to be commonly known.
|
|
|
|
The first was a demonstration by Peter showing a SCALAR wave on
|
|
an oscilloscope with a special detector. On the greatest
|
|
resolution, the SCALAR took on the form of many nested
|
|
frequencies inside a primary bubble. In other words, like an
|
|
onion with multiple skins.
|
|
|
|
The second was a circuit board used as a SCALAR end amplifier
|
|
which consisted of 12 transistors all connected in parallel.
|
|
Peter said the transistors were NOT used as tuned circuits to
|
|
gain the greatest possible "nested" reception. The spooky
|
|
thing was that when he adds a 13th transistor, one of the
|
|
transistors will inevitably blow. When cut open, the inside of
|
|
the transistor is hollow as if VAPORIZED. I was astounded!
|
|
Immediately, the MAXIN light as recounted in the "Dividing of
|
|
the Way" by Phylos, came to mind, Peter said he had not thought
|
|
of that but anything was possible. The MAXIN is a vibration
|
|
visible as a white light, so high as to be akin to Aether and
|
|
which could completely vaporize, without flame, light increase,
|
|
or residue any matter.
|
|
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics as
|
|
this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the Vangard
|
|
Sciences address as listed on the first page. Thank you for your
|
|
consideration, interest and support.
|
|
|
|
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
|
|
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
|
|
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
If we can be of service, you may contact
|
|
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 484-3189
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Page 8
|
|
|
|
|