2021-04-15 13:31:59 -05:00

199 lines
8.1 KiB
Plaintext

(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
PO BOX 1031
Mesquite, TX 75150
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
files on KeelyNet except where noted!
May 16, 1993
RELAX1.ASC
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This EXCELLENT(!) file shared with KeelyNet
courtesy of William Price.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This file is a collection of observations and conclusions that I
have made and come to after reading most of the files on the energy
directory and Beardon's last collection of free energy papers.
Beardon says that you have to charge a collector then discharge it.
The trick however is to charge the collector without letting any
current flow from the electron source, the negative terminal, to the
sink, the positive terminal.
Because of the speed of the electrons traveling in a copper wire,
this is almost an impossibility. He claims that you have to use a
conductor that has a relaxation time that is longer than the
relaxation time of copper. His suggestion is that you have to use a
xxx conductor.
Here in lies the problem and I believe at the same time the answer.
Consider for a minute the speed of electrons in a copper conductor.
Right, about 1 nanosecond per foot. So, if we run the math on this
basic number we find the following:
Length Time
1 ft 1 ns
10 ft 10 ns
100 ft 100 ns
1,000 ft 1 us
2,000 ft 2 us
5,000 ft 5 us
10,000 ft 10 us
50,000 ft 50 us
What we see here is that we can, with very long runs of copper
conductor, increase the time delay that it will take the electron
flow to reach the other end. With a spool of thin copper conductor,
say 20 or 30 gage, the type used for wire wrapping, we can fairly
easily come up with a device where we can turn on the current from a
battery and turn it off again without any current ever flowing
through the circuit.
For example, using the above numbers, one could assemble a circuit
(figure 1) that can switch the collector (the spool of wire) into
the battery circuit for about 40uS then switch it to a resistive
Page 1
load for a time period longer than 40uS. We need a longer time
period to dischare the collector than we needed to charge it. Using
Beardon's logic that you can have as many collectors as you desire
running off of the same source, we could have two or more collectors
that are alternately switched between the source and the load.
When you look at this, it seems obvious as hell. The problem Beardon
points out is a problem only because of the switching speeds
associated with relatively short conductors. A coil of copper (of
any gage thickness) that is say a hundred feet long, will allow
electrons to flow from the negative terminal to the positive
terminal in about 100 nanoseconds.
Most of us do not have the facilities or the resources to construct
a switching device that can switch a coil quite that fast. Most of
us however could, using basic Radio Shack parts, build a
multivibrator (a single chip) that uses optically coupled
transistors that could switch a 50,000 ft coil to and from a source
and load at say a 40 microsecond rate.
There may be a fatal flaw to this logic but I don't think so. Having
spent 25 years in the computer business with 13 recent years as a
consultant and now the director of engineering, I have observed that
most successful solutions are actually quite simple. When the dust
from our most recent reorganization settles, I'm going to be
completing the switch and buying a few large rolls of wire wrap
wire.
+-----\ /------+------\ /-------+
| \/ | \/ |
| ---- | ---- |
| | | | |
| a | b |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
----- ----- -----
--- | | | |
----- | C | | L |
--- | | | |
----- ----- -----
--- | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
+-----\ /------+------\ /-------+
\/ \/
---- ----
| |
a b
C = Collector (long length of copper)
L = Load
a & b are optical coupled transistors. Typically,
these are low power devices but should be able
Page 2
to support a couple of hundred milliamps of
current.
The trigger for a and b would be the outputs from a free running
unbalanced multivibrator. Unbalanced means that one side will stay
on longer than the other. Matching sets of transistors are used
because we do not want the electrons from the collector to return to
the positive side of the battery after they pass through the coil.
If the positive side of the collector remains connected to the
positive side of the battery we may run the risk of having an analoy
of a capacitor in the form of a coil.
The beauty of the multivibrator is that when one side is conducting
the other is off. The frequency that these devices run at is easily
controlled and is within the engineering skill set of hobbists.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If we can be of service, you may contact
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 3