textfiles/bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/powering.asc

199 lines
11 KiB
Plaintext

(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
PO BOX 1031
Mesquite, TX 75150
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
files on KeelyNet except where noted!
October 30, 1993
POWERING.ASC
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Citation-> Popular Science, Jan 1989 v234 n1 p66(3)
COPYRIGHT Times Mirror Magazines Inc. 1989
RINGS OF POWER
There's been a nuclear attack. An incoming warhead has just struck
a key U.S. defense site and knocked out the region's power grid,
leaving the country's ground-based missile-defense system without
power. In the meantime, the United States has less than 10 seconds
to fire laser weapons at the next round of incoming missiles. Where
will the power come from? An emergency electrical generator takes
15 minutes to spin up, and power is required instantly. The
solution: tap into giant energy-storage rings that can deliver an
awesome 1,000 megawatts to the lasers within 30 milliseconds.
These storage rings do not exist yet, but the Strategic Defense
Initiative Organization (SDIO) plans to build a football-field sized
prototype by the end of 1994.
The heart of the undergound ring, called a superconducting magnetic
energy-storage (SMES) ring, is a superconducting coil cooled by
liquid helium to temperatures nearing absolute zero. AT those
temperatures the coil will have no electrical resistance, and the
current can be stored almost indefinitely.
Energy storage rings could also serve an important role for
utilities. By storing excess power generated during off-peak hours
and releasing it into the grid during peak hours, the ring could
increase utility efficiency.
Experts believe that a SMES unit could be built almost anywhere, and
because it would have no moving parts, it would be easy to maintain.
And if efforts succeed in developng high-temperature superconductors
[July '87, April '88], refrigeration costs will drop substantially,
making a SMES system more practical in smaller sizes.
"I've been trying for eighteen years to get funding to build a SMES
for a large utility," says Roger Boom, director of the University of
Wisconsin's Applied Superconducting Center in Madison. A portly man
with glasses and a fringe of gray-white hair, he was not dissuaded
when the funds did not materialize. But then came SDIO with new
reasons for investing in the technology.
"We need a system that will provide about one gigawatt of power
Page 1
available immediately when the battle starts," explains Capt. Paul
Filios, technical adviser to the Defense Nuclear Agency (DNA), the
agency overseeing the SMES project for SDIO. "We can't get that
kind of power straight from the power grid. For one, the grid might
not be there after an attack. And secondly, we need the energy
equivalent of what a nuclear power plant produces in a fraction of a
second." The actual figures are classified, but a free-electron
laser weapon [Dec. 87] would require at least 1,000 megawatts of
electricity in 3/100 of a second.
The heart of a SMES is the current-carrying conductor that is coiled
around the ring 550 times. The number of coiled conductors varies
from one to four, depending on the design. Each conductor is
composed of tens of thousands of 27-millimeter-wide filaments made
from superconducting niobium-titanium alloy and embedded in copper.
In Boom's design, these filaments are embedded in unalloyed,
extremely pure aluminum, a soft material about the consistency of
toothpaste that is an extremely good conductor. If the
superconductor warms up slightly and becomes resistant, the high-
purity aluminum will carry the current.
Keeping it cool
Another conductor concept being developed by Bechtel National in San
Francisco uses a ropelike cable of superconducting strands contained
in a stainless-steel tube. The voids in the tube are filled with
liquid helium to keep the conductor at 1.8 degrees Kelvin (minus 456
degrees F).
To ward off warm-up in Boom's design, the coil will be surrounded by
a vacuum vessel that acts like a giant thermos bottle with
superfluid liquid helium inside. Moving outward from the thermos,
several heat shields are cooled to temperatures progressively higher
than 1.8 degrees K and further protect the coil.
In November 1987 SDIO (through DNA) awarded two $15-million
contracts to develop plans for a test SMES unit. One contract went
to Ebasco Services in New York and the other to Bechtel. One
company will be chosen in the spring of 1990 to build the device. It
will have a 300-foot diameter and be capable of storing about 20
megawatt-hours of electricity--enough to power 1,000 100-watt light
bulbs for 200 hours. The model must operate in two modes: fast
discharge for the ground-based laser (400 to 1,000 megawatts for 100
seconds), and slow discharge for utility applications (10 to 25
megawatts for two hours).
The design must also solve less obvious problems. When the SMES is
first cooled down to super-low operating temperatures, the entire
ring, including the coil and aluminum support structure, will shrink
several feet and tend to move inward toward the ring's center. But
if the ring needs maintenance, the liquid helium will be drained out
and the ring will warm up, causing it to expand. To accomodate
strain on the coil, the ring must have some radial leeway.
One idea championed by Boom's group is to have two conductors and an
aluminum support structure between them ripple radially around the
ring (see drawing). "The nodes of the ripple will be fastened
through struts to the rock wall," says Boom. "When the coil cools
down, those nodes stay fixed while the radius between the ripples
contracts."
Page 2
Terry Walsh, Bechtel's project manager, finds fault with this
rippled support design. "As the coil cools down it's going to be
pulling against the point where it's restrained," he says. Walsh is
concerned that these high-stress points will cause strain on the
conductor as well as dangerous hot spots from friction. He says
that Bechtel is studying an alternative approach in which a
telescoping support structure absorbs coil shrinkage and expansion.
Ring sharing
The benefits associated with SMES are wide ranging. "With SMES, the
utility can operate all plants continuously at one hundred percent
efficiency," says Boom. And in the event of a generator failure,
"the power control equipment can prevent a blackout by switching the
unit from charging to discharging in thirty milliseconds," he adds.
Boom also says that SMES could make it simpler for utilities to buy
power from intermittent alternate energy sources, such as
cogenerators and wind and solar power plants.
Where would a SMES site be located? "It depends on what the
facility is going to be used for," says Filios. Although a laser
weapon probably would not be located right next to an electric
utility, it would be more economical if the two shared a SMES. The
reason: A SMES is only economical if it's used continuously.
Otherwise, the savings from generating efficiency are lost to the
costs of refrigerating the coil. a large 5,000-megawatt-hour
facility would require a 1-1/2-mile-diameter exclusion zone, so
populated areas are out. This is because as the superconductor
cools down it generates strong magnetic forces. The aluminum ring
must also be buried in a bedrock trench to counterract these forces.
Although the free-spending military has firm plans for SMES, the
trick in persuading a frugal utility to build is to reduce operating
costs. One way of achieving this is with the new generation of
high-temperature ceramic superconductors. "Without refrigerating
cost constraints, smaller SMES units could be economical," says
Boom. So far the current-carrying capacity of these warmer
superconductors is not high enough to be useful in a SMES facility.
But the pace of developments in the field lends credence to their
possible use in the future.
Boom is optimistic that economical SMES rings could have even more
exotic applications: storing energy for space platforms or powering
rail guns or tanks.
(Refer to 4THSTATE on MHD power generation systems on KeelyNet)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If we can be of service, you may contact
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 3