137 lines
7.4 KiB
Plaintext
137 lines
7.4 KiB
Plaintext
______________________________________________________________________________
|
|
| File Name : LEENOTES.ASC | Online Date : 11/28/95 |
|
|
| Contributed by : Lee Trippett | Dir Category : ENERGY |
|
|
| From : KeelyNet BBS | DataLine : (214) 324-3501 |
|
|
| KeelyNet * PO BOX 870716 * Mesquite, Texas * USA * 75187 |
|
|
| A FREE Alternative Sciences BBS sponsored by Vanguard Sciences |
|
|
| InterNet email keelynet@ix.netcom.com (Jerry Decker) |
|
|
| Files also available at Bill Beaty's http://www.eskimo.com/~billb |
|
|
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|
|
The following is an interesting and informative letter uploaded by Lee
|
|
Trippett. Lee is an engineer who is very active in the areas of free energy
|
|
and associated phenomena. He is the man responsible for the TOD circuit which
|
|
showed how a digital multimeter can provide readings which are erroneous when
|
|
applied to unusual circuits which appear to be over-unity.
|
|
|
|
We all learned from this and it is to Lee's credit that he would not rest
|
|
until he proved (in this case DISPROVED) the validity OF HIS OWN CIRCUIT which
|
|
generated seeming over-unity results.
|
|
|
|
This is the kind of open-mindedness, honesty and integrity which we should all
|
|
do our best to promote and maintain in all alternative research areas. The
|
|
opinions of academia and vested science will become even more irrelevant when
|
|
circumvented by the knowledge of ONE working circuit that can be duplicated.
|
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
11/27/95
|
|
|
|
Hello Jerry!
|
|
|
|
The following paragraphs which are within quotation marks are taken directly
|
|
from a letter I recently sent to Hal Fox. Last night I downloaded some of
|
|
your KeelyNet files and found references to some work that I have done and
|
|
which relates to the following topics.
|
|
|
|
"A group in Seattle visited Yul Brown in California a few years ago. They
|
|
published notes and a mathematical argument to the effect that the Brown's
|
|
gas generator could demonstrate excess energy by igniting the gas in a
|
|
sealed chamber. This was to allow the gas to recombine to form water.
|
|
|
|
The resulting vacuum was, in theory, found to be near perfect and the
|
|
resulting mechanical energy was expected to exceed the original electrical
|
|
energy needed to break down the water into its component parts.
|
|
|
|
(By the way, there are several references to this in the literature, but
|
|
none of the references point out the fact that there is first a very violent
|
|
explosion.)
|
|
|
|
By applying a vacuum to the residual piping, pressure/vacuum gauges,
|
|
cylinder chambers and then injecting a small pressure of Brown's gas
|
|
generated by his model BN 200 into an industrial quality air cylinder, the
|
|
formation of water was observed but no vacuum exceeding the original. The
|
|
constraints placed on the piston did not reveal any energy in excess of the
|
|
electrical energy used to generate the gas needed for the experiment."
|
|
|
|
Some further comments for KeelyNet readers. I had to be extremely cautious
|
|
with this experimenting because of the potential hazards of hydrogen and
|
|
oxygen gases. Many thanks to Gary Hawkins of Seattle for his words of caution
|
|
and willingness to share his experience. There are many details of this
|
|
project which need additional explanation. But I will limit myself to one
|
|
major point.
|
|
|
|
To prevent spontaneous combustion the generation of Brown's gas must be done
|
|
with very special electrodes and chamber configuration to prevent the ratio of
|
|
hydrogen and oxygen from deviating more than 5% of the natural 2 to 1 ratio.
|
|
|
|
Another point. The Brown's gas flame shows a yellow fringe. This tells me
|
|
the gas contains some of the sodium from the electrolyte. This also might
|
|
mean the gas components are not true monoatomic. And still one more point of
|
|
importance. A flame arrestor must always be used in the gas circuit. I
|
|
discovered this the hard way as one was not supplied internally as indicated
|
|
in the instruction booklet.
|
|
|
|
"Puharich's patent 4,394,230 outlines a method and apparatus of splitting
|
|
water molecules at exceptional efficiencies. Printed comments by respected
|
|
people in the field indicate there is a resonance frequency in which water
|
|
would break down into its component gases with a resulting energy efficiency
|
|
above 100%.
|
|
|
|
I created a hydrolysis device in which one could measure the rate of gas
|
|
generation by means of a precision air flow rate meter. The required sharp
|
|
pulsed direct current waveform was applied to carbon electrodes over the
|
|
full range of frequencies found in the patent and other related literature.
|
|
Not the slightest variation was found in the rate of gas generation over a
|
|
wide range of frequencies."
|
|
|
|
Some further comments for KeelyNet readers. When I suspended a drop of water
|
|
between two gold electrodes and sufficient power is applied the water will
|
|
both turn to steam and hydrogen and oxygen gas. Puharich's patent uses a
|
|
special hardware configuration which could inject into a cylinder the results
|
|
of both steam and the two gases of water. I am wondering if the special
|
|
combination of the gases along with the steam might be the reason for his
|
|
extraordinary energy results.(?)
|
|
|
|
"The MRA or magnetic resonance amplifier is basically a tuned circuit using
|
|
very special non-linear passive components. The reactive passive components
|
|
cannot work alone. They need an input alternating signal to function and so
|
|
the computation of energy ratio must include the energy required for the
|
|
required signal source! This point has been consistently overlooked.
|
|
|
|
Therefore; I assembled a very simple and small signal generator with some
|
|
limited capacity for variable frequency energized by a single small battery.
|
|
Also, in this way, the confusion of measuring power factor or current &
|
|
voltage phase relations for a high Q circuit are omitted. The dc power gain
|
|
was found to be far less than 100%."
|
|
|
|
To add some emphasis. It is impossible for the two electrical reactive
|
|
passive components to work alone or together without a signal. The energy
|
|
which generates the signal source must be included in the equation for
|
|
calculating power conversion or gain.
|
|
|
|
On still another subject of energy. Many years ago I developed, after two
|
|
years of trial and error, two ways to inject and monitor the rate of gasoline
|
|
consumption for an 11 hp engine which was driving an electric generator.
|
|
|
|
I monitored this flow for a constant resistive electrical load of 2500 watts.
|
|
The difference in flow rate using the regular carburetor and my device for
|
|
vaporizing the fuel was 300%. That is right, three hundred percent
|
|
improvement in fuel efficiency! (The fuel was vaporized by injecting it into
|
|
a jacket surrounding the exhaust pipe which was filled with steel beads.
|
|
Additional details available upon request.)
|
|
|
|
After making this startling re-discovery of a common old idea I talked to a
|
|
number of community college instructors in the automotive field. They were not
|
|
at all surprised but when they told me of the political and economic
|
|
ramifications of getting this information adopted I dropped the whole project.
|
|
|
|
*** End of File ***
|
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|