218 lines
12 KiB
Plaintext
218 lines
12 KiB
Plaintext
______________________________________________________________________________
|
|
| File Name : CYCLTIME.ASC | Online Date : 09/09/95 |
|
|
| Contributed by : InterNet | Dir Category : ENERGY |
|
|
| From : KeelyNet BBS | DataLine : (214) 324-3501 |
|
|
| KeelyNet * PO BOX 870716 * Mesquite, Texas * USA * 75187 |
|
|
| A FREE Alternative Sciences BBS sponsored by Vanguard Sciences |
|
|
| InterNet email keelynet@ix.netcom.com (Jerry Decker) |
|
|
| Files also available at Bill Beaty's http://www.eskimo.com/~billb |
|
|
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|
|
The following is a compilation of 3 files from the alt.sci.physics.new-
|
|
theories USENET. It all started with the suggestion that time might be
|
|
analog and the Niels Bohr Institute response by Viggo Simonsen followed about
|
|
one month later. They all deal with the possibility that time is a repeating
|
|
wave and possibly speeding up as it advances.
|
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
From: keelynet@ix.netcom.com (Jerry Decker)
|
|
Subject: Re: Digital universe
|
|
To: colin@colinmc.demon.co.uk
|
|
You wrote:
|
|
>
|
|
>
|
|
> Is it possible that the universe is digital? If it were analog
|
|
would we not spend forever at smaller and smaller increments of the
|
|
first second of the big bang e.g. going from one second -
|
|
milliseconds - microseconds - nanosecond - picoseconds.
|
|
>
|
|
> If you can understand what I am saying from that braintwister then
|
|
your views would be accepted.
|
|
>
|
|
>--
|
|
>col.
|
|
>
|
|
>colin@colinmc.demon.co.uk
|
|
|
|
*** To those who read this and feel the need to flame....resist.
|
|
*** It is posted in response to Colin's idea and I will not respond
|
|
*** to anyone who will not consider what is being hypothetically
|
|
*** stated. There are many points and experiments which have not been
|
|
*** included in this response. Thank you....>>> Jerry/Sysop/KeelyNet
|
|
|
|
Hi Colin!
|
|
|
|
There is a fellow named Terence McKenna who has evolved a theory that time
|
|
speeds up the closer we get to the year 2012. He has a computer program and a
|
|
book which helps to understand his theories. He bases it on the Mayan
|
|
calendar and some other items relating to sacred geometry as well as chaos
|
|
theories. Quite fascinating material overall despite the new age
|
|
connotations.
|
|
|
|
McKenna claims time is a wave that consists of 'structure-breaking' and
|
|
'symmetry-making' periods. 'Structure-breaking' is when patterns are unstable
|
|
and subject to collapse from certain stimuli.
|
|
|
|
'Symmetry-making' refers to periods where new patterns are formed and locked
|
|
into reality. We at KeelyNet have found this work to be coincidental with our
|
|
radionics researcher and friend, Peter Kelly.
|
|
|
|
Pete has come up with a theory he calls 'energy as information.' Matter is
|
|
formed according to a signature (many interrelated frequencies) which are held
|
|
in an electrical form. Magnetism is what holds the matter in a stable form.
|
|
So, to change the properties of matter, you must reduce the magnetic field,
|
|
alter the electrical signature to your will, then restore the magnetic field.
|
|
The sustained new pattern will transmute the matter.
|
|
|
|
The way this correlates with McKenna is that the Earth has a waning and waxing
|
|
magnetic field which is partially recharged by the magnetosphere of the Sun.
|
|
So, over time, the earth and all on it are subjected to this magnetic
|
|
weakening to allow 'structure-breaking' when the electrical signature is most
|
|
subject to change. This is the time when radical changes appear in our
|
|
society, wars are waged, territories change, new discoveries are made, etc....
|
|
|
|
As the earth's magnetic field increases in strength, the sustained patterns
|
|
will become locked in and remain in control ('symmetry-making') until the
|
|
electrical signature is again allowed to change from a reduction in magnetic
|
|
force. During this time, few new ideas surface and conditions akin to those
|
|
of the 'Dark Ages' are in control. It would therefore seem desirable to
|
|
produce the best possible conditions before the increase in magnetic field
|
|
strength.
|
|
|
|
This all ties in with your idea of time possibly being an analog wave.
|
|
McKenna says the same wave is repeated OVER and OVER as we draw ever closer to
|
|
this 'strange attractor' which is pulling us all toward the year 2012 (as per
|
|
the Mayans and McKenna's calculations).
|
|
|
|
As the time waves repeat themselves, they get smaller and smaller, hence your
|
|
idea that they would reproduce in ever smaller increments. McKenna says that
|
|
by studying the WAVE itself, we can determine WHEN these points will appear to
|
|
take advantage of them in everyday life when conditions are subject to
|
|
building or destroying. Intriguing concept, eh?
|
|
|
|
Thank you for the interesting thought....if you wish, we have 3 web sites,
|
|
best of which is http://www.eskimo.com/~billb Bill runs an excellent
|
|
alternative science web page and lists many of the KeelyNet files under weird
|
|
science. You can also call the original Dallas board at (214) 324-3501 when I
|
|
get the hard drive repaired. All access and downloads are free as we exist to
|
|
exchange information and promote alternative thinking and experiments.
|
|
|
|
>>> Jerry W. Decker/Sysop/KeelyNet - Dallas - BBS (214) 324-3501
|
|
Voice (214) 324-8741
|
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
From: Viggo Simonsen <vgs>
|
|
Newsgroups: alt.sci.physics.new-theories
|
|
Subject: Cyclic Time Physics
|
|
Date: 7 Sep 1995 14:59:26 GMT
|
|
Organization: Rechenzentrum der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft in Garching
|
|
|
|
CYCLIC TIME PHYSICS
|
|
|
|
by Viggo Simonsen, Niels Bohr Institute, Copenhagen
|
|
|
|
How would physics look like if Time was cyclic, i.e. if all spacetime events
|
|
were to repeat identically an infinite number of times?
|
|
|
|
In 1949 Kurt Godel came up with a solution to Einsteins field equation with a
|
|
metric that implied existance of closed timelike curves. His as well as
|
|
others' solutions have been rejected on the basis of physical absurdities,
|
|
such as the posibility of traveling back in the past and killing your mother
|
|
before she gave birth to you. This clearly violates causality, since the very
|
|
cause for one's birth is now removed.
|
|
|
|
My feeling however from discussions and the literature that I have come
|
|
across, is that the issue and implications of cyclic time have not been
|
|
properly understood. Cyclic time as envisaged by the ancient hindus and greeks
|
|
or even by a modern philosopher as Nietzshe meant closure of Time itself and
|
|
thus a recurrence of all events in history, not local timeloops that would
|
|
allow for individual timetravels. Furthermore the period of the timecycle was
|
|
thousands of years, so no human being could possibly meet his mother before he
|
|
was born.
|
|
|
|
Closed timelike paths (CTP) in General Relativity (GR) are generally
|
|
considered to be pathalogical because they imply logical absurdities of the
|
|
kind mentioned above.
|
|
|
|
Clearly such possibilities are unacceptable, and in fact the whole debate of
|
|
CTP and causality violation is more of a philosophical than of a physical
|
|
interest. The problem doesn't become less confusing by the fact that the very
|
|
nature of time is so poorly understood and is treated ambigouisly in the
|
|
literature. On the one hand, time in GR is still the real number "t",
|
|
appearing in all the dynamic equations, and this mathematical definition of
|
|
time serves excellently on a locally flat spacetime, where time can be
|
|
considered as linear and uniform.
|
|
|
|
GR is a local theory with no a priori constraints on the global topology, but
|
|
it is absolutely unclear how "t" should be interpreted with a global topology
|
|
that admits CTP. What does it mean that a traveller moving on a non-geodesic
|
|
path enters his own past? What does it mean to say that t has assumed its
|
|
original value? Mathematically it is clear, but physically it is a pretty
|
|
confusing situation. If I go back into the past once, I will be doomed to do
|
|
it for eternity, because by definition the past is closed, that is, no event
|
|
that has already taken place can be changed - the past is fixed once and for
|
|
all. And thus I will inevitably come back to the time when I made the
|
|
timetravel before and do it again and again, ad infinitum - simply because all
|
|
events up until and including my departure are fixed. But by the same token my
|
|
future will thus be closed, or rather my history becomes perfectly cyclic.
|
|
|
|
The ambiguity of time in physics comes about, because we use it as a kinematic
|
|
parameter as well as a label for "historical" events. If the kinematic time
|
|
along a worldline due to some odd topology happens to repeat we infer that the
|
|
travelling observer is actually coming back to a set of past events. And
|
|
because we somehow still attribute a free will and an open future to the
|
|
traveller, we allow him to alter the past. It is very tempting to apply GR on
|
|
Cosmology, but I am afraid it allows for completely nonsensical inferences. GR
|
|
is a local theory based on the pragmatic time t, that of a clock, so to say.
|
|
Of course we can always integrate the field equation with some odd metric,
|
|
but the meaning we attribute to time then, is completely ill-defined.
|
|
|
|
Despite all this, the concept of Cyclic Time in physics, as mentioned above,
|
|
is not at all meaningless or absurd, as long as it doesn't violate the
|
|
principle of a closed past. It is perfectly possible, at least from a logical
|
|
point of view, that all observers move continuously into their own past in the
|
|
course of time, in which case we could have a closed and finite history that
|
|
repeated infinitely. Such CTP's obviously have a minimum length, they will
|
|
have to exceed at least the lifespan of the observer. (How can a CTP possibly
|
|
exceed de lifespan of the observer? Think about it!) But apart from that there
|
|
are very few restrictions on them.
|
|
|
|
In principle such a CTP could coincide with the lifespan of the observer and
|
|
death could act as a wormhole to bring him back to his own birth N years
|
|
before. His eternity would then be an infinite number of identical lifes, and
|
|
he would never be able to know whether his life was a particular or an
|
|
eternal event, or rather he would always experience it as the only one.
|
|
|
|
This is just an extreme gedanken experiment, but it is mentioned as an example
|
|
of CTPs that do not conflict with causality, or they are at least free of
|
|
logical absurdities, though they do seem to challenge our notion of an open
|
|
future (notice, that here past and future refers to the same set of events).
|
|
Even the overall history of Cosmos could be cyclic, which is precisely what
|
|
was believed in archaic cultures prior to modern man.
|
|
|
|
It would be interesting to see how physics based on such a constraint on time
|
|
(periodic boundary conditions) would look like. Tacitly we take time to be
|
|
linear, and our cosmological models reflect this view (Big Bang theory) but we
|
|
really don't know if it's true. If on the other hand Time is cyclic, it is
|
|
bound to affect a whole lot of our contemporary theories, notably the 2. law
|
|
of Thermodynamics.
|
|
|
|
If there is anyone who has been thinking about these issues, I would greatly
|
|
appreciate sharing your ideas and/or objections.
|
|
|
|
Viggo Simonsen
|
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Vanguard Note...
|
|
|
|
Another file makes mention of a phenomenon which directly affects the concept
|
|
of accelerated time. It is called ALTSCI1.ASC on KeelyNet and states that
|
|
frequencies are compressed when in the presence of an excitation field.
|
|
|
|
If McKenna is correct, that time is a wave that repeats at ever smaller
|
|
wavelengths (higher frequencies), then does this mean the Earth is really
|
|
passing into some higher energy zone? As is postulated in the idea of the
|
|
Photon Belt which claims we MUST evolve or die because the Earth is moving
|
|
into an 'enriched' zone. The same principle applies to 'nuclear genesis'
|
|
where an enriched environment can literally grow new elements, see the superb
|
|
file MAGSTUFF.ASC on KeelyNet for details about this concept.
|
|
|
|
Jerry/Sysop/KeelyNet
|
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|