textfiles/bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/consvort.asc
2021-04-15 13:31:59 -05:00

463 lines
20 KiB
Plaintext

(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
PO BOX 1031
Mesquite, TX 75150
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
files on KeelyNet except where noted!
July 5, 1993
CONSVORT.ASC
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This file shared with KeelyNet courtesy of John Draper.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
A NEW BEGINNING FOR THERMODYNAMICS
by
Josef Hasslberger
Rome, 8 May 1993
The reactions and questions received on my articles "Vortex - The
natural movement" and Understanding Water Power" show that there is
much interest in the subject of thermodynamics.
In fact, the "laws of thermodynamics" have long been the subject of
heated debate, especially between the promoters and the detractors
of another field, that of "perpetual motion".
Joachim Kirchhoff, who has done a thorough research on the
development and the history of thermodynamics (1) has shown that
these laws, and especially the basic assumption of conservation of
energy, can be traced back to an authoritative pronunciation of the
Royal Academy of Sciences in Paris, made in the year 1775, saying
henceforth, the Academy "will no longer accept or deal with
proposals concerning perpetual motion". Their reasoning was, that
perpetual motion is impossible to achieve and that the search for
it, is time consuming and very expensive. According to the members
of the academy, those bright minds dedicating their time and
resources to this search, could be utilized much better in other,
more reasonable endeavors.
So the fact that until that time, no one had succeeded in
constructing a workable device of "perpetual motion", was used as
the reason to forbid, de facto, any further research in that
direction. The "laws" thus established and enshrined as the laws of
thermodynamics, have entered the official screening process of all
new inventions. Patent offices all over the world have more or less
consistently refused since then, to grant recognition to anything
that was, in their opinion, infringing upon these laws.
Herbrand writes (2) that Professor Pollermann of the Julich Atomic
Research Institute in Germany, who is an "expert" pre-examiner of
patents in the energy sector, has given a negative opinion on 43% of
the patent applications referred to him! He reasons that "the
natural laws accepted by science must be followed" and says that
Page 1
many people (in his view irrationally) "wish to make use of the
eternal forces of gravitation and magnetism".
We can see from this how efficient our current patent system is in
suppressing any real renewal in the field of physics. I have
written about the subject of patents in an earlier article (3).
CONSERVATION OF ENERGY
There is such a thing as conservation of energy. However our
understanding of the concept is largely incomplete. By negating the
idea of an ether, which I called "space background" (4), we have
limited our conception of energy to that which is observable on the
purely physical plane. All electric and magnetic as well as
gravitational phenomena however, are not purely physical. They
require for their understanding, a conception of a higher-
dimensional space background, which is, to use the term of Moray, a
"sea of energy".
Conservation of energy in the current form of understanding is a
useless concept, as it negates the existence of this giant reservoir
of energy, and does not take into account the constant interchange
(through the phenomena of electricity, magnetism and gravitation),
of our world of physical existence with that reservoir. Generation
of electrical energy through magnetism for example, is not limited
to the mechanical motive power applied to a generator and the
movement of electrons through a wire, but involves a complex
exchange between space background and physical machinery.
In this context, it may be profitable to remember a statement that
Robert Myer (5) made in connection with the concept of conservation
of energy. He said: "Seeing gravity as the cause of the falling of
things, we talk about gravitation and thereby overlook, that an
essential characteristic of an 'force' (energy) is to unify within
itself, the attributes of indestructibility and mutability."
This statement should set us thinking. Meyer in fact asserts that
energy, in addition to being indestructible, is also able to change
form. This implies that we can not necessarily think in terms of
unidirectional mutability, a concept which thermodynamics has
however maintained since the inception of its famous "laws".
Now the specific form of energy which is the subject of
thermodynamics is heat.
WHAT IS HEAT?
As a first step in our approach to the understanding of
thermodynamics, we must try to understand what is this substance
that forms the basis of the theory. Heat has at first been imagined
to be a fluid and has been given the name "caloric". Soon caloric
theory, which was at the basis of our famous "laws", gave way to the
contemporary understanding, that heat is an excited state of matter,
transferred through direct contact or through the mediation of
electromagnetic waves of the infrared band. Absence of heat, or the
temperature of absolute zero, is defined as a complete absence of
molecular motion.
Page 2
We shall, for the time being, accept this concept and add some other
thoughts:
o Heat is a property of matter. Without matter, no
heat.
o The molecular motion that we call heat is a chaotic,
a random motion.
o An increase of heat is an increase of randomity in
matter. A decrease in heat denotes progressively
greater order of molecular alignment.
TWO KINDS OF MOTION
In this universe, we have two basic kind of motion:
centrifugal and centripetal,
Centrifugal motion is outward directed. It is an expanding, a
radiating, explosive motion. It has a tendency to increase the
randomity in matter and thereby cause heat.
This is the this kind of motion we are accustomed to. It has been
used in our technology since the discovery of fire, and especially
since the invention of the steam engine and the consequent
industrial revolution. Our continued and exclusive use of this
motion has given us useful but dangerous machinery, polluting
internal combustion engines, radio and microwave technology that has
definite negative effect on human, animal and plant life and last
but not least, the daughter of the atomic bomb, our atomic power
plant, which is little more than a steam turbine using a very
dangerous source of heat, radioactive uranium.
We do not have to look far to see the results of this technology: A
decrease in atmospheric oxygen from 30% to 21% since the start of
the industrial revolution, a crisis of raw materials and energy of
gigantic proportions just around the corner, and a situation where
it is almost impossible today to find some clean air to breathe or
some real fresh, healthy spring water to drink.
Centripetal motion on the other hand, is inward directed. It is a
contracting, a gravitative, an implosive kind of motion. It has a
tendency to align and de-randomize the particles of matter and
causes a decrease in temperature. Centripetal motion is associated
with the animating force we call life, which physics in its desire
to be "objective" or "scientific", has steadfastly refused to look
at. Here we have the key to resolving the riddle of thermodynamics.
We can see how nature, using both these type of motion in a balanced
way, can ever regenerate itself. It simply goes, over and over
again, through a who cycle of
chaos ---> build-up ---> decay ---> chaos,
using the centripetal or vortex motion in the build-up part of the
cycle and the radiative, heat generating motion in the decay part.
Page 3
ENTROPY
The idea of entropy, of the constant and irreversible winding down
of the universe, was introduced with the second law of
thermodynamics. This law is based on an observation of James Watt's
steam machine, which was the only technological utilization of
thermal energy available at the time.
Entropy is associated with radiation. It signifies an ever
increasing randomity of motion, an expenditure of the "innate energy
of a system". According to the current views of thermodynamics,
there is no antidote to entropy. Once expended, energy is said to
be lost forever in that giant heat sink, which we imagine the vast
reaches of the universe to be.
One of the great minds of this century, an outsider to established
science, has recognized the folly of this view and coined a term for
the antidote. He calls it syntropy.
In his book "Cosmography", R. Buckminster Fuller writes (6): "The
reader will discover that the inexorable course of the gradual
running down of the energy of the universe - that is, entropy - is
only part of the picture. Entropy has a complementary phase, which
we designated syntropy".
We can now assert that syntropy is real, and that it is closely
associated with the second kind motion discussed above, with the
centripetal, the vortex motion.
While radiation is an entropic phenomenon, gravitation is an
expression of syntropy.
GRAVITATION
We know much about radiation, but comparatively little is known
about its "negative" twin, gravitation. I am using the term
gravitation here in a much wider sense than is generally done in
physics. Gravitation in this context means an electromagnetic
phenomenon associated with a vortex in space background. It is a
twin of radiation, only with the vector inversed. Gravitation is a
pulling phenomenon, and the effect we are most familiar with, is
that gravitation keeps us firmly glued to this planet. But
gravitation is more than that. It can manifest itself in just as
wide a range of wavelengths as radiation.
Gravitation in this extended sense, explains for instance the
phenomenon found in most "free energy" devices, which often show a
marked cooling effect on their immediate environment. This is
simply radiation in reverse, caused by an independent source of
gravitation, a point of attraction, which causes energy to "inflow"
towards that point, rather than expanding outwards from it, as we
usually observe.
Anti-gravity thereby becomes accessible to engineering. If
gravitation is nothing but an inverse radiation, a pulling
phenomenon associated with a vortex, all we need to do in order to
obtain levitation or anti-gravity, is to establish an independent
source of gravitation and orient it in opposition to the gravitation
Page 4
of this planet. Applications in space propulsion would be
comparatively easy to engineer.
How do we establish an independent source of gravitation? We
establish, by whatever mean available, magnetic, mechanic or
otherwise, a strong vortex in the background field of space. There
are numerous examples of such occurrences in the tales that surround
the field of "free energy", that have not been understood so far and
therefore were incredulously dismissed as the fantasies of a bunch
of loonies.
Maybe we should look at these phenomena again and try to understand
them with the new conception we now have of gravity.
THE THERMODYNAMIC CYCLE
The thermodynamic cycle as currently understood is a one-way street.
It leads from a source of heat (fuel) via combustion to motion, but
the heat must be constantly renewed through more fuel, as it is
"lost" to the environment in the process. In an article based on
the research of Viktor Schauberger, regarding the function of vortex
motion, Schaffer (7) writes in 1972:
"If the second law (of thermodynamics) does not hold true in the
case of vortex motion, one could postulate the following cycle:
Heat ---> Vortex ---> Motion ---> Friction ---> Heat
Vortices therefore should be able to change heat energy into motive
energy. This would necessitate an acceleration of flow and a
cooling effect. Both of these can be observed in the case of
vortices." I will not attempt to provide a mathematical description
for the circular process, but in the terms used in this article, I
want to restate what has be proposed by Schaffer, to put forth a new
and radically different thermodynamic circular process:
|---------------
\/ |
Centrifugal motion |
(expansive, explosive) |
| |
\/ |
Radiation |
|
| |
\/ |
Heat Increase |
| |
\/ |
Centripetal motion |
(contractive, implosive) |
| |
\/ |
Gravitation |
| |
\/ |
Heat Decrease |
|
\/ |
|_______________|
Page 5
This is the natural thermodynamic cycle of this universe.
Using this cycle, that is, using both the centrifugal and the
centripetal part and thus establishing a stable pulsation, it will
be possible to engineer new clean forms of motion-producing and
energy-producing machinery, that do not depend on fuel such as
petrol, coal or gas for their motion. Does that sound like a
perpetuum mobile?
WHAT IS A PERPETUUM MOBILE?
I think we have to reconsider our strict negation of the possibility
of any perpetuum mobile, which ultimately is based on nothing other
than the ideas of the honorable members of the French Academy of
Sciences of 1775. In fact, any machine which is constructed
according to the principles of nature, using the cycle as described
here, will have characteristics of what used to be called a
perpetuum mobile.
This does not mean, that the law of conservation of energy is
violated.
We have found a way, in other words, to tap into the very wheelwork
of nature an utilize its energies more efficiently.
At this point, I would like to thank all those inventors who have
encountered these phenomena in their research and who, despite a
completely inadequate scientific basis, have persisted to make their
inventions reality. I would like to acknowledge that their
inventions are real. Despite any refusal of patent examiners, and
despite the usual incredulity they have encountered everywhere.
It should also be said that this article would not have been
possible without the immense work Viktor Schauberger has done in
observing and describing the mechanics inherent in the vortex motion
of water, and without those that have collected and published what
was left of Schauberger's writing to keep the flame of this
knowledge alive for future generations.
One last word about thermodynamics: It seems that thing went wrong
when we were trying to imagine a closed system. This is something
achievable only in theory. Because every system existing within
this universe in constant and continuous exchange with the rest of
the universe. And how this universe is made, what it consists of
and how it functions, we have not even remotely begun to understand.
Josef Hasslberger
REFERENCES:
1. Kirchhoff, Joachim "Perpetuum Mobile und Klima-
Katastrophe: in raum&zeit No. 45 and 46.
2. Herbrand, Ludwig "Erinnerungen eines
Entwicklungsingenieurs", page 10, own computer printing
by Ludwid Herbrand, D-5144 Wegberg.
3. Hasslberger, Josef "The inventor and society" in
raum&zeit (American) No.4, October 1989.
Page 6
4. Hasslberger, Josef "Vortex, the Natural Movement", in
EXPLORE!
5. Quoted from a letter of Neise, Theodore Ludwig, published
in raum&zeit No. 63, 1993, page 98.
6. Fuller, R. Buckminster "Cosmography", page 51.
Macmillian Publishing Co. 1992.
7. Schaffer, Bernhard "Die Wirbelfunktion als Energiequelle"
in Implosion No. 43.
[Viktor Schauberger's book "Living Water", which details his
observations and experiments with vortex motion, may be
obtained from Tri-State Press, PO Box 150, Long Creek
Highway, Long Creek, SC 29658. Telephone (803) 647-2020.]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If we can be of service, you may contact
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 7