textfiles/bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/clark2.asc
2021-04-15 13:31:59 -05:00

133 lines
5.5 KiB
Plaintext

(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
PO BOX 1031
Mesquite, TX 75150
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
files on KeelyNet except where noted!
May 28, 1993
CLARK2.ASC
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This file shared with KeelyNet courtesy of John Draper.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
OVER UNITY ELECTRICAL GENERATOR DESIGN
by
Richard L. Clark
The best form of an Over Unity Generator would have no moving parts.
Looking at the common transformer and how it works, provides the
answer. If I take a DC power supply and connect it to the primary
of the transformer, I can make a generator of sorts. I'll turn "on"
the DC to the primary for just an instant and then turn it "off".
In the secondary, there is a flux linkage, following the primary
signal, which is some 90% of the input power. Any transformer
secondary will produce about 180% of the input power in this mode,
with a gradually applied quarter sine or sawtooth wave shape DC
input.
But wait, we are throwing recoverable power away in the primary coil
winding's field collapse. Now, let us apply the DC power input and
then, when the input power is cut off, switch the primary winding's
field collapse to the output also. The primary's field collapse
contributes at least another 90% to the output for a grand total of
about 270% gain in the over unity generator design.
The DC power signal, must only take the primary winding up and then
let go (open) at the top voltage. Thus, the primary can be switched
to the output to recover it's field collapse.
Electronic switching can accomplish all of these functions at little
power usage and cost. There, the gain of a transformer Over Unity
Generator, would probably be around the 250% output power to input
power, and there is no mechanical motion.
Some old motors and generators could be adapted to the transformer
design above. The armature must be fixed permanently stationary,
and the air gap between the armature and field coils, filled with
iron filings. The air gap iron filings or iron power filling, is to
make the best use of the primary's (armature) full flux power. This
makes for the best transformer action and the highest power gain
possible with this conversion design. The electronic switching
circuitry, is the same as the common transformer design. All we
have done is convert the motor to a transformer.
In this design, for one "up" (power signal) in the primary coil, we
Page 1
get the "up" (field build) in the secondary coil and the "downs"
(field collapses) of both the secondary and primary coils as output
power.
Think of the transformer coils as coupled "springs", and it may be
clearer. This transformer/generator design has been in the nature
of electromagnetic coils all the time. If the unit is actuated 60
times a second, allowing for the counter-electromotive force filed
collapses, it makes a standard 60Hz electrical generator. This
design concept, is the natural last step after recovery of the
secondary collapses, introduced in generator designs.
The same principal and results could then be achieved in a capacitor
system. The charge (up) cycle from the secondary plate and the two
discharge cycles from both secondary and primary plates, would be
the output power. The basic external switching electronics is
basically the same as in the transformer designs.
These designs are in the basic nature of energy storage/transfer
elements....one input allows for the utility of the one input
transfer and the two storage collapses or discharges as output power
(about 300% gain).
****
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If we can be of service, you may contact
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 2