133 lines
6.2 KiB
Plaintext
133 lines
6.2 KiB
Plaintext
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
|
|
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
|
|
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
|
|
PO BOX 1031
|
|
Mesquite, TX 75150
|
|
|
|
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
|
|
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
|
|
files on KeelyNet!
|
|
|
|
February 24, 1991
|
|
|
|
BUMP1.ASC
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
This file courtesy of Double Helix BBS at 212 865 7043.
|
|
The author failed to include his name.
|
|
This is a short paper on my (author) own view of the universe.
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
The universe, as we know at the present time, is composed of
|
|
many units ranging in size, for as far as we can tell, from -
|
|
infinity to +infinity.
|
|
|
|
Units like galaxies and clusters of galaxies are some of the
|
|
larger units we know of. Towards the smaller end of our knowledge
|
|
are the atoms, made up of protons, neutrons, and electrons, and
|
|
interacting with countless other particles such as neutrinos,
|
|
mesons, and baryons. Most of these particles are even smaller than
|
|
any of the components of the atom.
|
|
|
|
In fact the only limitation to the size of the particles we find
|
|
seems to be in the resolving power of our instruments and the
|
|
Heisenberg uncertainty principle.
|
|
|
|
This seemingly endless range of universal units leads us to ask,
|
|
"What is the universe made of?", "Is there any really basic element
|
|
that composes all that we know as the universe?". These questions
|
|
will be extremely hard if not impossible to answer.
|
|
|
|
My idea of the universe is quite simple, particles ARE NOT
|
|
particles at all. Einstein gave us the theory of relativity and
|
|
gave us the idea that one of the basic forces of nature; gravity;
|
|
can be explained as the curvature of spacetime around an object.
|
|
|
|
Well, what if the object, be it a planet or a Quark, is not an
|
|
object at all but simply a "bump" in spacetime? Then the curvature
|
|
of spacetime is no longer around that object, it IS that object.
|
|
(from a Keely viewpoint, this "bump" is a NODE generated from
|
|
interference patterns in the AETHER.....VANGARD)
|
|
|
|
What if all the units in the universe are composed of simple
|
|
distortions in the spacetime continuum?
|
|
|
|
All universal units have charge, but the most charged in either
|
|
direction are the subatomic particles.
|
|
|
|
Well, what if these charged particles were simply vortexes in
|
|
spacetime, the size of this vortex being proportional to the mass of
|
|
|
|
Page 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the particle, spinning clockwise or counterclockwise depending on
|
|
the charge? (refer to the work of VICTOR SCHAUBERGER, Walter
|
|
Baumgartner, Walter Russell, John W. Keely)
|
|
|
|
This would allow for attraction between two vortexes spinning in
|
|
opposite directions (opposite charges attract), and repulsion
|
|
between vortexes spinning in the same direction (like charges
|
|
repel). Well, what about the fact that these particles CAN be
|
|
broken down into other particles?
|
|
|
|
Not a problem when you consider the behavior of eddys. When a
|
|
spinning eddy is disrupted by some other object or eddy in a
|
|
specific way, IT BREAKS UP into smaller swirling eddys, hence new
|
|
particles are created. (destructive interference and parametric
|
|
resonances.....VANGARD)
|
|
|
|
Magnetism can also be explained if you consider the fact that
|
|
many vortexes spinning in the same direction, will cause a general
|
|
flow of fluid or spacetime or whatever to flow around them.
|
|
|
|
Larger units like planets need not be single huge vortexes, but
|
|
may simply be MADE UP OF MANY SMALLER VORTEXES, I'd even go as far
|
|
as to say that THE NUCLEUS OF THE ATOM is made up of different
|
|
vortexes. (Keely says these vortexes occur in multiples of three
|
|
throughout all mass and energy manifestations....VANGARD)
|
|
|
|
Maybe in the atom there are vortexes spinning in different
|
|
directions, not just the positive direction (the protons), maybe
|
|
these other vortexes cancel out the power of some of the proton
|
|
vortexes thus making them "neutrons".
|
|
|
|
Very much like the proton in every aspect except size and
|
|
charge, neutrons are just a little heavier than the protons, this
|
|
difference is about the weight of two electrons.
|
|
|
|
I'm still thinking about this theory, I don't know enough to try
|
|
to prove it or even to know whether I missed something or not. I'm
|
|
still thinking about this theory and the nuclear forces but I like
|
|
this idea and there doesn't seem to be anything wrong with it so
|
|
I'll keep thinking about it.
|
|
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
|
|
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
|
|
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
|
|
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
|
|
|
|
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
|
|
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
If we can be of service, you may contact
|
|
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 2
|
|
|
|
|